Table of Contents
Urban Studies Research
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 321815, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/321815
Research Article

Consequences of Economic Deconcentration in Italy and Rome: Unplanned Processes in a Highly Regulated Country

Dipartimento di Studi Europei, Americani e Interculturali, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy

Received 10 January 2012; Revised 6 March 2012; Accepted 18 April 2012

Academic Editor: Robert C. Kloosterman

Copyright © 2012 Armando Montanari and Barbara Staniscia. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. S. Nivola, Laws of the Landscape, How Policies Shape Cities in Europe and America, Brooking Institution Press, Washigton, DC, USA, 1999.
  2. A. Borsdorf and H. Wimmer, “The European city: a phase-out model; challenges for European urban policy and research in the 21st century,” in Proceedings of the Conference on the Role of Urban Research in the 7th Framework Programme, January 2005, http://www.mep.tno.nl/super/.
  3. A. Montanari and B. Staniscia, “Types of economic deconcentration in European urban space. Magnitude, physical form, sectoral composition and governance context,” Die Erde, vol. 137, no. 1-2, pp. 135–153, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Montanari and B. Staniscia, “La deconcentration economica nello spazio urbano europeo. Il caso dell'area metropolitana Chieti-Pescara,” Rivista Geografica Italiana, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 207–234, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Montanari, B. Staniscia, and S. Di Zio, “The Italian way to deconcentration. Rome: the appeal of the historic centre, Chieti-Pescara: the strength of the periphery,” in Employment Deconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas. Market Forces Versus Planning Regulations, E. Razin, M. Dijst, and C. Vazquez, Eds., pp. 145–178, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  6. E. Razin, “Introduction: deconcentration of economic activities within metropolitan regions: a qualitative framework for cross-national comparison,” in Employment Deconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas. Market Forces Versus Planning Regulations, E. Razin, M. Dijst, and C. Vazquez, Eds., pp. 1–27, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. N. Larsen, Governance, Policy and Determinants of Economic Land Use Deconcentration, Danish Building Research Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005.
  8. M. Dijst and C. Vazquez, “Employment deconcentration in European metropolitan areas: a comprehensive comparison and policy implications,” in Employment Deconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas. Market Forces Versus Planning Regulations, E. Razin, M. Dijst, and C. Vazquez, Eds., pp. 265–291, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Nuvolati, “Urban development programmes in Italy. The UGIS project for analyse the effects of the URBAN community initiative,” in Proceedings of the Eura Conference Urban and Spatial European Policies: Levels of Territorial Government, pp. 18–20, Turin, Italy, April 2002.
  10. A. Faludi and B. Waterhout, The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective. No Masterplan, Routledge, London, UK, 2002.
  11. Commission of the European Communities, The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies: Italy, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
  12. B. Staniscia, L'Europa dello sviluppo locale. I Patti Territoriali per l'Occupazione in una prospettiva comparata, Donzelli, Roma, Italy, 2003.
  13. G. Cinà (a cura di), Pianificazione e sviluppo locale. Un profilo della esperienza italiana, L'Harmattan Italia, Torino, Italy, 1997.
  14. F. Governa and C. Salone, “Territories in action, territories for action: the territorial dimension of Italian local development policies,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 796–818, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Governa and C. Salone, “Italy and European spatial policies: polycentrism, urban networks and local innovation practices,” European Planning Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 265–283, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. C. Palermo, “Urban Italia: programma compiuto, progetto generativo,” in Il programma Urban e l'innovazione delle politiche urbane. Il senso dell'esperienza: interpretazioni e proposte, P. C. Palermo (a cura di), Ed., pp. 13–18, Franco Angeli/Diap, Milano, Italy, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  17. U. J. Rivolin, “Shaping European spatial planning: how Italy's experience can contribute,” Town Planning Review, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 51–76, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Governa and C. Salone, “Descrivere la governance. Conoscenza geografica e modelli di azione collettiva nelle politiche urbane e territoriali,” Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 29–50, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Marcelloni, Pensare la città contemporanea. Il nuovo piano regolatore di Roma, Laterza, Roma, Italy, 2003.