About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Power Management Electronics

Volume 2008 (2008), Article ID 675173, 9 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/675173
Research Article

Improved Switching Characteristics of Fast Power MOSFETs Applying Solder Bump Technology

1Research Center for Microperipheric Technologies, Faculty IV — Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Berlin Institute of Technology, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany

2Fraunhofer Institute for Reliability and Microintegration, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany

Received 30 November 2007; Accepted 18 March 2008

Academic Editor: Peter Friedrichs

Copyright © 2008 Sibylle Dieckerhoff et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The impact of a reduced package stray inductance on the switching performance of fast power MOSFETs is discussed applying advanced 3D packaging technologies. Starting from an overview over new packaging approaches, a solder bump technology using a flexible PI substrate is exemplarily chosen for the evaluation. Measurement techniques to determine the stray inductance are discussed and compared with a numerical solution based on the PEEC method. Experimental results show the improvement of the voltage utilization while there is only a slight impact on total switching losses.

1. Introduction

Fast power MOSFETs in the voltage class up to 100 V realize very high current and power densities while at the same time switching transients achieve times below 50 nanoseconds. Due to the fast switching, parasitic inductances in the circuit have significant impact on converter power since overvoltages and oscillations reduce the voltage margin and hence, the maximum power rating. Optimizing the packaging of the devices is an important step to improve the utilization of the semiconductors and make use of their full current and voltage ratings.

Usually, state-of-the-art devices are assembled in discrete housing, or in power modules. The semiconductor dice are soldered to a leadframe or DBC, and thick wire bond technology is applied to contact the top source and gate pads of the dice as well as the external terminals. The wire bonds are a bottleneck with regard to stray inductance and the ohmic losses, that is, the current utilization of the chips. Further drawbacks include reliability issues and limitations with regard to 3D integration.

Several new packaging technologies have been proposed to overcome the structural limits of the wire bond technology and the related reliability problems (e.g., [18]) as well as the reliability and thermal constraints associated with the die solder contact [9]. Only a few ideas have made the transition to market yet, for example, the discrete International Rectifier “DirectFET” [10]. The (“low-temperature joining technique”) LTJT, which is a promising alternative for the die solder bond, is close to realization for automotive applications [11].

Apart from the LTJT, most of the proposed packaging solutions concentrate on a substitution of the wire bonds including alternatives like ribbon bonding [12] or spring contacts as well as planar interconnect technologies in 3-dimensional stacked assemblies. The latter include solutions with a prestructured circuit board, for example, a copper frame, a flexible substrate, or a second DBC that is usually soldered to the top side of the dice by solder bumping. Examples are the “flip-chip-on-flex” technology [3, 4] and the “power ball grid array” technology applying two DBCs [5]. In derivatives of these solutions, copper posts or cylinders are soldered between the two substrates [6, 7], which might be necessary for high-voltage applications. Other feasible alternatives cover solutions where the electrical circuit layout is structured during a planar integration process with metallurgically-formed interconnects leading to a multilayer assembly. Typical examples are the planar integration with an “embedded power stage” [1] or the “Planar Power Polymer Packaging Technology” [2]. Table 1 summarizes the basic material and geometrical data of the described 3D approaches.

tab1
Table 1: Typical examples of alternative packaging technologies substituting wire bonding technology.

There are several advantages anticipated from 3D sandwich assemblies including higher power density due to a compact layout, reduced interconnect resistances, and higher current rating compared to wire bonds as well as less parasitic stray inductance giving improved switching behavior and reduced overvoltage. Furthermore, improved heat paths and the possibility to apply double-side cooling concepts due to a second planar surface are expected. The compact integration of control electronic components into the power assembly might be a further benefit. The reliability of 3D assemblies, on the other hand, has to be investigated thoroughly. Difficulties are to be expected, since several materials with different CTEs (coefficient of thermal expansion) are joined with large contact areas.

The focus of this paper is the evaluation of the switching behavior of fast MOSFETs applying sandwich-type packaging. Exemplarily, a solder bump technology is used with the top contacts of the dice soldered to a flexible PI substrate. The analysis is based on experimental results of a half-bridge topology in buck converter configuration. The prototypes are built with 100 V-MOSFETs (Infineon OptiMOS, chip area ) with high current rating and low on-state resistance in the range below 5 mΩ, and Schottky diodes (IXYS DWS 36-80 A). The wire bonds are limiting the chip utilization for this kind of MOSFET due to their current rating given by the maximum wire temperature.

2. Prototype development

2.1. Flip chip-technology using a flexible PI substrate

Figure 1 depicts the principle process flow of the flip chip technology. As a prototype, a complete half-bridge circuit is built applying two MOSFETs and two Schottky diodes.

fig1
Figure 1: Process flow of the flip chip technology. (Right figures: photographs showing the prototype during the assembly process: (a) bumped MOSFET, (b) chips soldered to the flex, (c) complete assembly).

The bumping layout for the chips is designed in order to maximize the number of solder joints within the design rules for flip chip assembly. 100  m pad size at 200  m pitch are chosen as this design still allows assembly using conventional equipment. As a basic design rule, the pad size should be between 30–50% of the chosen pitch. The bump array is chosen over a larger solder joint on the whole source pad area in order to reduce stress. Chip layouts optimized for wire bonding are limiting the area which can be used, since only a part of the chip is covered with Al-pads and the rest of the surface is coated with a passivation.

The wafers are bumped with electroless Ni/Au using a spin on resist and photolithography due to the unpassivated metallization (resist: 6  m, Ni/Au bumps: 6  m). The Ni bumps grow in the resist openings. Then SAC solder paste is printed on the Ni/Au UBM and reflowed to form solder bumps of 60 m height. The chips are placed on the flexible substrate (50  m polyimide with Cu/Ni/Au metallization of 50, 100, or 150  m Cu-thickness depending on the rated current) and soldered in a conventional reflow step with a maximum temperature of 250 .

In order to compensate the height difference of the chips and contact the interconnects to external leads, it is aimed for deformation of the flexible substrate during the assembly on the DBC (Figure 2). It turns out that for the thicker metallization layers plastic deformation is not achieved during the bonding process at 200 with 5 kg pressure. But for these substrates, a forming step before the assembly is possible comparable to the forming of leadframes without altering the rest of the process flow.

675173.fig.002
Figure 2: FC technology: Cross-section through MOSFET (left) and diode (right), showing the principle of height compensation by flex deformation.
2.2. Geometric and electric characteristics

Table 2 summarizes the basic geometric data for the solder bump technology. Different from the comparable solutions [3, 4] given in Table 1, bump diameter and pitch are chosen relatively small in the 100–200  m range. For the FC technology, the small diameters are advantageous with regard to stress in the solder joints. On the other hand, the height of the interconnects is limited according to the approximation of the solder bumps as balls, giving restrictions to insulation clearances.

tab2
Table 2: Summary of interconnect data

The cross section of the solder bumps and the total contact area on the chip should be as large as possible to reduce current densities and losses. The available contact area is restricted by the pad layout of the chip. From existing data for active chips, a maximum of 80% of the total chip area can be estimated for the pads (for the chip in Figure 1, is only 18%.) Assuming an average diameter for a single contact, the total contact area related to is

The ratio is introduced for comparability reasons. It defines an average electrical conductivity and an average thermal conductivity of the top chip contact, see Table 2. Since the solder bumps are very short, their contribution to the power losses is negligible if the maximum is used .

Considering the top metallization, with a maximum Cu- thickness of 100–150  m, the FC technology is comparable to solutions [14]. The current rating of the metallization is basically defined by the ohmic losses and the heat paths in the package. This aspect is further discussed in [13].

With regard to parasitics and switching characteristics, the chosen FC demonstrator is exemplary for a variety of 3D packages.

3. Measurement of the Stray Inductance

The switching characteristics of the power MOSFETs show the interaction of the semiconductor device properties with the stray inductance of the assembly. Parasitic capacitances further contribute to the switching behavior, but since the internal MOSFET capacitances are dominant, the impact of the package can be neglected. In order to determine the stray inductance of a commutation circuit, apart from double-pulse measurements in buck converter configuration (see Figure 3), further techniques exist including voltage measurements based on an externally switched current and measurements applying an impedance analyzer.

675173.fig.003
Figure 3: Test circuit.
3.1. Double-pulse measurements

A test system has been built which consists of a DC-link capacitor bank with up to 15 mF and a tapped air-core load coil with up to 150  H supplemented by a gate drive and a liquid cooling system to mount the flip chip assembly. The test setup has a maximum voltage rating of 200 V and is capable of continuous load currents up to 250 A. The gate drive is capable of 9 A peak currents with 20 nanoseconds rise/fall time into 10 nF capacitive loads. As some components like the dc-link capacitor bank and the load inductance are easily changed, the voltage and current rating is adaptable over a wide range. Figure 3 depicts the basic double-pulse test circuit and switching principle. The current is measured with a high performance Rogowski current transducer of high bandwidth allowing to correctly acquiring steep current transients. The delay of 40 nanoseconds is corrected in the figures. The voltage is captured with the full bandwidth of 500 MHz. Basically, from the double-pulse measurements, switching times, switching energies, and the voltage and current overshoots may be derived, all of which depend on the chosen semiconductors, on the design of the test circuit, and on the gate driver.

Double-pulse measurements varying the load current and the gate resistance have been performed. Figure 4 exemplarily depicts the turn-on and turnoff characteristics of the flip chip demonstrator switching 40 A at 40 V using a gate resistance of either 5.6 Ω or 22 Ω. Typically, since the turn-on is governed by the Schottky diode, the impact of the gate resistance is more evident in the turnoff. For the chosen MOSFET type, switching times below 100 nanoseconds are typical.

fig4
Figure 4: Switching characteristics of the 100 V MOSFET assembly with different gate resistances; blue: RG = 5.6  red: RG = 22  (a) turn-on, (b) turnoff.

Measuring the oscillation frequency in conjunction with the output capacitance of the MOSFET gives the total stray inductance of the circuit including dc link and external leads. Due to the oscillations, deducing the stray inductance only from the voltage overshot at turnoff is not feasible. With a measured oscillation frequency of 27 MHz and a specified typical MOSFET capacitance (maximum 1.82 nF), the stray inductance of the commutation circuit is calculated to .

A more accurate result is achieved by introducing a defined additional inductance into the circuit and analyzing the change in the oscillation frequency. Neglecting changes in the mutual inductances, the original inductance is then achieved according to

From the results in the following section, for the frequency changes to and hence, the stray inductance of the commutation circuit is calculated to 26.5 nH.

Since these results include the dc link (interconnects and capacitors) and external leads, other measurement techniques are required to determine the contribution of the sandwich package to the overall stray inductance.

3.2. Externally switched current

Eliminating the impact of the device's switching characteristics is achieved, if the load current is switched externally while the devices of the DUT are continuously in the on-state. With an appropriate voltage measurement, the stray inductance of the package itself can be measured. Figure 5 depicts the operation principle of this technique. The test circuit is designed to produce a current rise of 200 A/ s at 42 V and 0.2  H. Since currents up to 50 A arise, the on-state voltage drop of the semiconductors needs to be considered.

fig5
Figure 5: Measurement of the voltage drop across the package with an externally switched current.

Hence, the total stray inductance of the package is derived according to

Table 3 summarizes the results for the flip chip on flex demonstrator. Since the MOSFET on-state losses may be calculated more exactly than the on-state losses of the body diode in parallel to the external Schottky diode, the results are given for the forward direction. From dc measurements, the on-state resistance is determined to 3.7 mΩ at 25 chip temperature with 20 A test current. Although only 100 solder bumps could be placed due to the limited source pad area of the chip, the Rdson is reduced compared to the TO220 device. The corresponding datasheet (Infineon IPP05CN10N) specifies  mΩ for the TO220 and  mΩ for the TO263 housing.

tab3
Table 3: Stray inductance measurement at 200 A/ s.

For comparison, the same setup is used characterizing a standard assembly with two MOSFETs each in TO 220 housing. In this case, the MOSEFTs are soldered onto a dummy substrate with a geometry comparable to the flip chip assembly. The voltage is measured across equivalent connection points on the dummy package. With the determined to be 7 mΩ, the resulting stray inductance of this assembly is calculated to 26.5 nH and hence, considerably higher than the flip chip inductance.

In Table 3, the sum of the two partial inductances is slightly higher than the total inductance due the mutual inductance between the two circuit paths.

3.3. Impedance analyzer

A different alternative is the use of an impedance analyzer, for example, HP4294A. In this case, precautions including correctly biased devices and a preceding calibration need to be taken: The measurement requires the switches to be in the off-state and derives the circuit inductance and capacitance from an LRC resonant circuit. Therefore, the gate-source contacts of the MOSFETs are shorted and the antiparallel diodes are biased with a negative voltage; see Figures 6 and 7.

675173.fig.006
Figure 6: Impedance measurement plot DC+ to DC−.
675173.fig.007
Figure 7: Test circuit and equivalent circuit of the assembly.

Table 4 contains the results for the flip chip demonstrator. Compared to the technique described in Section 3.2, the error introduced is higher since the capacitances of the chips and the stray inductance are spatially distributed. The measured capacitance includes the MOSFET and diode capacitances as well as the package capacitance. All concurrent paths are measured, resulting in a lower measured inductance that is composed of the parallel inductances of the diode and MOSFET current paths. Therefore, this technique is not suitable for multichip modules, as it does not reflect the relevant current path. Figure 7 shows a model for the distribution of parasitic passive components.

tab4
Table 4: Inductance measurement using impedance analyzer HP4294A.

4. Numerical Calculation of the Stray Inductance

Commonly, “partial element equivalent circuit” (PEEC) as well as combined PEEC- and FEM-methods (Maxwell Q3D Extractor) are applied for the calculation of partial self and mutual inductances of electrical geometries, for example [14]. Here, the FC demonstrator is modeled with the software “FastHenry” [15]; see Figure 8. Planar conducting structures are used to account for the 2-dimensional current flow. The total package inductance DC+ to DC− is calculated to 8.64 nH at low frequencies and shows good agreement with the measured results. Skin and proximity effects are not considered in the result for comparability with the measurements but can be taken into account for a more detailed circuit simulation.

675173.fig.008
Figure 8: PEEC model of the FC half-bridge assembly.

From the simulation, the DC resistance is calculated to 3.8 mΩ, which is also in good agreement with the measurements.

5. Impact of the stray inductance on the switching characteristics

In order to analyze the impact of the stray inductance, the switching characteristics of the flip chip demonstrator is first measured in the optimized low-inductive test circuit. Even in this case, the inductance of the flip chip assembly (8-9 nH) is quite low compared to the inductance of the total circuit (26 nH). In a second step, an additional inductance of 10 nH is introduced into the circuit to simulate a chip and wire assembly. Exemplarily Figure 9 depicts two measurements switching 40 V and 40 A with a gate resistance of in the buck converter test circuit given in Figure 3.

fig9
Figure 9: Impact of the stray inductance on the measurements, blue: FC assembly, red: Add. stray inductance; (a) turn-on (b) turnoff.

In the following, the impact of the increased stray inductance on the voltage overshot and on the switching losses will be discussed.

5.1. Voltage overshoot during switching

Figure 10 shows the voltage overshoot as a function of the load current with the gate resistance as parameter. The dashed lines represent the measurements with the increased stray inductance. The voltage limit is set to the rated voltage of 100 V, avalanche operation is not tested here. The increase in voltage overshoot is basically in the range of 25–30% for the increase of the total stray inductance of approximately 40%. This clearly shows the benefit of higher chip utilization due to a better voltage rating achievable with a planar package with reduced stray inductance. As the voltage overshoot is superimposed by a damped oscillation and switching speed varies with load current, there is no linear relationship between current or stray inductance and overvoltage.

675173.fig.010
Figure 10: Voltage overshoot as a function of the stray inductance. Dashed lines: additional stray inductance of 10 nH in the circuit.
5.2. Switching energies

Apart from the on-state resistance, for high-frequency applications also switching losses of MOSFETs are relevant for the power losses. In the datasheets, basically turn-on and turnoff switching times for resistive loads are given. Usually, from these datasheet values, the switching energies are derived according to .

Alternatively, the switching energies can be extracted more exactly from the double-pulse measurements allowing to analyze the impact of the stray inductance on the switching losses. The switching losses are determined varying gate resistance and load current. The load current is increased until a voltage limit of approximately 100 V is reached. Figure 11 shows the typical increase of switching losses with increasing gate resistance as switching speed is lowered. Turnoff losses are approximately 15% higher with higher stray inductance due to the voltage overshoot. Turn-on losses are lowered up to 25% as current rise time is limited by the stray inductance. In summary the switching losses are slightly affected by the stray inductance leading to around 5% lower losses with lower stray inductance, since turnoff losses are dominant. As switching speed decreases with higher current due to the miller effect, there is also a nonlinear increase in switching losses at higher current levels, especially with higher gate resistances.

fig11
Figure 11: Switching losses for different gate resistances at (a) turn-on and (b) turnoff. Dashed lines: additional stray inductance of 10 nH in the circuit.

Figure 12 depicts a comparison of switching and on-state losses in a DC/DC converter with 50% duty cycle at different switching frequencies. The calculation is based on the switching losses measured with a gate resistance of 5.6 Ω. A linear extrapolation is done for the switching losses at higher current levels. This leads to underestimated switching losses at high current levels, as discussed before.

675173.fig.012
Figure 12: Conduction losses and switching losses at 50% duty-cycle, .

At lower frequencies in the 10 kHz range, the losses are dominated by the on-state losses due to the MOSFETs and package . With higher switching frequencies up to 100 kHz, the switching losses increase and dominate the power losses of the system. For the given devices, the impact of the stray inductance is not relevant for the loss calculation.

6. Summary

In this paper, the impact of a reduced package stray inductance on the switching performance of fast power MOSFETs is discussed applying advanced 3D packaging technologies. Starting from an overview over new packaging technologies, a solder bump technology using a flexible PI substrate is exemplarily chosen for the evaluation.

Measurement techniques to determine the stray inductance of the package are discussed, showing that accurate results may be achieved applying an externally switched current approach while double-pulse measurements and the use of an impedance analyzer are not feasible for the package characterization. Good agreement with a numerical solution based on the PEEC method is found.

The relevance of a low stray inductance for fast switching MOSFETs is obvious from the measurement of the voltage overshoot allowing operating the new device at significantly higher DC voltages—up to 25%—than standard packages. The impact on the switching losses, however, was found to be less pronounced due to the reduced losses at turn-on.

As an additional benefit, also the package resistance is reduced compared to standard housing while at the same time larger copper areas substituting the wire bonds are able to carry higher amounts of current. This thermal aspect is discussed further in [13].

Acknowledgment

Part of the work has originally been presented at the IEEE PESC Conference 2007 [13] and the EPE Conference 2007 [16]. This article gives a comprehensive summary of the results.

References

  1. Z. Liang, J. D. van Wyk, F. C. Lee, et al., “Integrated packaging of a 1 kW switching module using a novel planar integration technology,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 242–250, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Fillion, E. Delgado, R. Beaupre, and P. McConnelee, “High power planar interconnect for high frequency converters,” in Proceedings of the 6th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC '04), pp. 18–24, Singapore, December 2004.
  3. J. G. Bai, G.-Q. Lu, and X. Liu, “Flip-chip on flex integrated power electronics modules for high-density power integration,” IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. Y. Xiao, H. N. Shah, R. Natarajan, E. J. Rymaszewski, T. P. Chow, and R. J. Gutmann, “Integrated flip-chip flex-circuit packaging for power electronics applications,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 515–522, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. K. Häse, G. Lefranc, M. Zellner, and T. Licht, “A solder bumping interconnect technology for high-power devices,” in Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC '04), vol. 6, pp. 4183–4187, Aachen, Germany, June 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Mermet-Guyennet, “New structure of power integrated module,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Integrated Power Electronics Systems (CIPS '06), Naples, Italy, June 2006.
  7. S. Haque, K. Xing, R.-L. Lin, et al., “An innovative technique for packaging power electronic building blocks using metal posts interconnected parallel plate structures,” IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 136–144, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. S. S. Wen, D. Huff, and G.-Q. Lu, “Dimple-array interconnect technique for packaging power semiconductor devices and modules,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD '01), pp. 69–74, Osaka, Japan, June 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. R. Amro, J. Lutz, J. Rudzki, M. Thoben, and A. Lindemann, “Double-sided low-temperature joining technique for power cycling capability at high temperature,” in Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE '05), Dresden, Germany, September 2005.
  10. A. Sawle, M. Standing, T. Sammon, and A. Woodworth, “DirectFET: a proprietary new source mounted power package for board mounted power,” in Proceedings of the 43rd Power Conversion and Intelligent Motion Conference (PCIM '01), Nuremberg, Germany, June 2001.
  11. C. Göbl, P. Beckedahl, and H. Braml, “Low temperature sinter technology die attachment for automotive power electronic applications,” in Proceedings of the Internalional Conference on Automotive Power Electronics, Paris, France, June 2006.
  12. C. Luechinger, “Large aluminum ribbon bonding: an alternative interconnect solution for power module applications,” in Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Microelectronics (IMAPS '04), Long Beach, Calif, USA, November 2004.
  13. S. Dieckerhoff, T. Wernicke, T. Kirfe, et al., “Electric characteristics of planar interconnect technologies for power MOSFETs,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC '07), pp. 1036–1042, Orlando, Fla, USA, June 2007.
  14. D. Cottet and A. Hamidi, “Numerical comparison of packaging technologies for power electronics modules,” in Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC '05), pp. 2187–2193, Recife, Brazil, June 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. Fast Field Solvers, 2007, http://www.fastfieldsolvers.com/.
  16. T. Wernicke, S. Dieckerhoff, T. Kirfe, G. Feix, S. Guttowski, and H. Reichl, “Experimental characterization methods for power MOSFET assemblies,” in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE '07), pp. 1–9, Aalborg, Denmark, September 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar