About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Clinical and Developmental Immunology
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 186813, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/186813
Review Article

The Immune-Modulatory Role of Apolipoprotein E with Emphasis on Multiple Sclerosis and Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

1Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
2Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm 141 86, Sweden

Received 1 December 2009; Accepted 18 February 2010

Academic Editor: Kurt  Blaser

Copyright © 2010 Hong-Liang Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a 34.2 kDa glycoprotein characterized by its wide tissue distribution and multiple functions. The nonlipid-related properties of apoE include modulating inflammation and oxidation, suppressing T cell proliferation, regulating macrophage functions, and facilitating lipid antigen presentation by CD1 molecules to natural killer T (NKT) cells, and so forth. Increasing studies have revealed that APOE allele might be associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), although evidence is still not sufficient enough. In this review, we summarized the current progress of the immunomodulatory functions of apoE, with special focus on the association of APOE allele with the clinical features of MS and of its animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).

1. Introduction

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a 34.2 kDa glycosylated protein with 299 amino acid residues. The gene encoding apoE, APOE lies on the 19 chromosome. There are three isoforms of apoE in human, namely, apoE2, apoE3, and apoE4 [1] (Table 1). However, murine apoE has only one isotype, which resembles human apoE3 in terms of lipoprotein-binding preferences [2, 3]. Hepatic parenchymal cells are the principal apoE producing cells in mammalians, presumably accounting for 60% to 75% of plasma apoE [4] (Figure 1). Its synthesis and secretion have also been found in the spleen, brain, lung, kidney, and so forth. In the nervous system, apoE mRNA is present in astrocytes, nonmyelinating Schwann cells, ependymal cells, neurons, and so forth [5, 6]. ApoE has been widely studied in cholesterol transport, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases [7, 8], neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease [9, 10], and mild cognitive impairment [11, 12]. In addition, apoE functions on the immune system by suppressing T cell proliferation [13] and neutrophil activation [14], regulating macrophage functions [1518], and facilitating the presentation of lipid antigen by CD1 molecules to natural killer T (NKT) cells, [19, 20] as well as modulating inflammation and oxidation [21]. The effects of apoE on immune responses have been shown to be extensive and some of them depend upon ligands, concentrations, and lipid-binding states. By these properties, apoE functions in both physiological and pathophysiological conditions at multiple levels. In this review, we outlined the immuno-modulatory properties of apoE, with special focus on the association of APOE allele with the clinical features of multiple sclerosis (MS) and of its animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).

tab1
Table 1: The main differences among apoE isoforms in humans.
186813.fig.001
Figure 1: The synthesis and secretion of apoE are found in spleen, brain, lung, kidney, peripheral nerves, muscular tissue, adrenal, ovary and testis, and so forth. Hepatic parenchymal cells are the principal apoE-producing cells in mammalians, presumably accounting for 60% to 75% of plasma apoE, followed by astrocytes, which are the main apoE-producing cells in the brain, macrophages (M s), and nonmyelinating Schwann cells (SCs), and so forth.

2. The Role of ApoE in Innate and Adaptive Immunities

The nonlipid-related properties of apoE were originally discovered as an inhibitory effect of plasma lipoproteins on T cell proliferation in vitro [2224]. Succedent investigation ascribed this action to apoE, with a series of studies revealing that both apoE-containing lipoproteins and synthetic apoE peptides could inhibit antigen—and mitogen-stimulated T lymphocyte proliferation by downregulating DNA synthesis and by reducing phospholipid turnover in T cells [2527], as well as modifying the function of interleukin(IL-2) receptor or modifying intracellular signaling pathways [28, 29]. Furthermore, apoE can downregulate the T helper (Th 1) 1 cell-mediated immune response [30, 31]. It is noteworthy that a peptide containing the receptor-binding region (residues 133–149), COG133 other than apoE holoprotein, is enough to suppress the response [32].

ApoE can neutralize lipopolysaccharide (LPS), attenuate the inflammatory responses, and, thus, reduce LPS-induced lethality [33]. ApoE deficiency results in impaired immune responses in mice to Listeria monocytogenes [34, 35], as well as to tuberculosis [36]. Ophir et al. showed that injection of LPS led to significantly higher production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 , IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor- (TNF- ) in human APOE 4 transgenic (Tg) mice than in APOE 3 Tg ones [21].

Activation of macrophages is crucial in the initiation and effector phases of both the innate and adaptive immunities [37, 38]. Macrophages from apoE-deficient mice stimulated by exogenous antigen are more effective in upregulating the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, main histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules, and costimulatory molecules in vitro [39]. Moreover, apoE suppresses the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF- and IL-1 by macrophages in an isoform-specific manner (E2 > E3 > E4) [40]. Conversely, classical activation of macrophages by inflammatory stimuli such as LPS, interferon(IFN- ), TNF- and IL-1 was simultaneously accompanied with downregulation of apoE production [41, 42]. ApoE suppressing the inflammatory signaling in macrophages, and vice versa, indicate an intricate apoE-mediated feedback regulation of inflammatory responses. The production of nitric oxide (NO) represents one of the principle features of activated macrophages. Treatment of macrophages and microglia with apoE increases NO production [43]. After inflammatory stimulation, macrophages of APOE 4 Tg mice produce a higher level of NO than of APOE 3 Tg mice, which is coupled with an increased arginine uptake, depending on p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [40, 44]. These findings point to the immuno-regulatory dysfunction in APOE 4 carriers. Similar to apoE-deficient mice, APOE 4 Tg mice seem to bear an insufficiency to deal with inflammatory insults.

APOE-knockout mice bear abnormal humoral and cellular immune responses [45]. Although the antigen-presenting function of macrophages seems to increase in apoE-deficient mice [39], there still lacks evidence that apoE directly functions on the antigen presentation process. This increase might be due to the enhanced susceptibility to inflammatory stimulation in apoE-deficient mice, resulting in higher expression of MHC class II molecules and costimulatory molecules on macrophages, or due to the elevated tendency to the Th1 immune response [31]. However, the role of apoE in facilitating lipid antigen presentation by CD1 molecules to NKT cells has been extrapolated to be of great importance in autoimmune diseases [4649]. CD1 molecules (CD1a-d in humans and CD1d in mice), similar in structure to the MHC class I molecules, resemble MHC class II molecules in function in that they can present lipid antigens to NKT cells, in which process apoE is implicated. Upon binding to CD1 via TCR, naive NKT cells respond rapidly to secrete high amounts of IFN- and IL-4, which play a critical role in the regulation of immune responses [49] (Figure 2). More recently, B cells have been demonstrated to utilize the apoE-mediated pathways of lipid antigen presentation more efficiently than dendritic cells [50]. In terms of CD1-mediated self-lipid presentation, apoE might be involved in autoimmune diseases like MS via facilitation of self-lipid antigen presentation to NKT cells [5153].

186813.fig.002
Figure 2: ApoE facilitates the activation of CD1-restricted natural killer T (NKT) cells. Inactivated NKT cells express surface marker of NK1.1 and a semiinvariant T cell receptor (TCR). ApoE facilitates lipid antigen-presentation by CD1 positive antigen presenting cells (APCs) mainly through binding to low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). CD1 molecules present lipid antigens to NKT cells. Upon ligation to CD1 via TCR, naive NKT cells are activated, and respond rapidly to secrete high levels of IFN- and IL-4, which play a critical role in the modulation of immune and inflammatory responses.

The exact mechanisms by which apoE isoforms affect the immunity remain unclear. However apoE has been presumed to influence multiple signaling pathways. ApoE isoforms might be in part responsible for the differential modulation of the redox-sensitive transcription pathways such as nuclear factor- B (NF- B) and MAPK [21, 54, 55]. Alternatively, apoE can act by binding to different cell surface receptors [56] to exert different functions, among which LDLR-related protein (LRP) is postulated to mediate the nonlipid-related effects of apoE [57, 58].

3. The Role of ApoE in MS

MS is primarily a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disorder in the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by focal infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages, and subsequent immune-mediated damage to myelin and axons [59]. Aetiology of MS is suggested to be multifactorial and pathogenesis of it is still underclarified. A variety of studies have focused on the isoform-dependent role of apoE in MS, with an exclusive aim at finding an association of APOE allele with MS, just as the well-established one of APOE 4 with Alzheimer’s disease [60]. A general hypothesis is to assume that apoE genotypes can influence mechanisms of maintenance and repairing of the nervous system, which leads to distinct clinical courses in relation to the presence of a certain allele. A study on MS with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed lower total brain volumes in 4 allele carriers as compared with non- 4-carriers [61]. This finding provides new evidence that links APOE- 4-related impaired restoration with severe tissue destruction in MS. However, considering the relatively low gene frequency of APOE 4, especially APOE4/4 genotype in normal populations, the most probably implicated genotype affecting MS, it remains far from drawing a conclusion before more larger population-based studies are conducted.

3.1. ApoE As a Biological Marker in MS

Presently the useful biomarkers to assess the course and prognosis of MS are lacking. The ideal biomarker is one that reflects the neuropathology of MS lesions and, thus, has very high specificity and sensitivity, and that has a simple reproducible testing technique. Many studies reported the markers of inflammatory and immunological processes in MS [64]. In several studies aiming at finding specific biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of human Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), an analog of MS in the peripheral nervous system, apoE was shown to decrease in CSF in GBS patients by proteomic analysis and ELISA [65, 66]. Similarly, the levels of apoE in CSF decreased in MS [67, 68]. Furthermore, a study showed lower apoE concentrations in the serum of MS patients than in healthy subjects [69]. As there is limited permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to apoE [70, 71], this decrease in CSF might result from a reduction of local apoE synthesis and secretion by brain tissue, as a part of the suppressed systemic production of apoE in acute phage reaction, while it is difficult to explain the decreased apoE concentrations in serum [3]. However, other studies failed to show such a decrease of apoE in CSF [69, 72], or even presented completely opposite results in MS patients [73]. No correlation of apoE in serum or CSF with age, clinical course, or prognosis was found [68]. Considering the distinct status of in vivo inflammation and BBB integrity in different stages of MS, these conflicting results seem educible before larger investigations with more detailed stratification are conducted.

3.2. APOE Allele and Clinical Features of MS

The involvement of apoE in MS, although far from being elucidated, has been indicated by identification of the 19q13 chromosome as a candidate gene for autoimmune diseases from linkage analysis [74, 75], such as systemic lupus erythematosus [76]. APOE distribution in healthy populations is presented by two large-scale studies in Table 2. The gene frequencies of APOE 2, 3 and 4 are 0.077, 0.773, and 0.150, respectively, as reported by Utermann et al. [62], and 0.078, 0.783, and 0.139 by Menzel et al. [63]. Regarding the geographical distribution of APOE 4, there was a south-to-north gradient of APOE 4 frequencies in Europe, with the frequency of APOE 4 rising from only 10–15% in the south to 40%–50% in the north. And this is also the case in Japan [77]. The incidence of MS resembles APOE 4 allele frequency in terms of geographical distribution [78]. Thus a hypothesis on this involvement is that a higher gene frequency of APOE 4 is associated with MS. So far, most studies have not confirmed an alteration in APOE allele distribution in MS [79, 80]. The association between APOE 4 homozygosity and MS was not investigated in most studies, since the APOE 4/4 homozygotes are rare both in healthy subjects and in MS patients [63, 81]. Only a limited number of studies attempted to but were unable to provide a positive conclusion [82, 83]. However, one exception is Høgh et al.’s study, in which homozygosity for APOE 4 is more common in MS patients [84]. Anyhow, more large-scale studies are needed to elucidate the APOE allele distribution in MS.

tab2
Table 2: ApoE genotype frequencies.

Data from animal experiments suggested that BBB dysfunction resulting from apoE deficiency might lead to more susceptibility to EAE. Although there is no direct evidence that apoE contributes isoform dependently in maintaining BBB integrity, considering the preferences of apoE subtypes binding to lipoproteins and apoE receptors (Table 1), apoE isoforms may differ in protecting human from MS. Despite these presumptions, previous allelic association studies did not confirm the suggested relation of APOE 4 allele with liability to MS [8589]. A recent study reported that African Americans female MS patients who were APOE 4 carriers had an earlier age of onset than Caucasian female MS patients, indicating that APOE allele might not be the independent factor to determine the age of onset in MS [90]. Albeit Chapman et al. found an earlier age of onset in the APOE 4 carriers [91], most of others failed to find such positive associations [53, 68, 9294].

The classification of MS is based on the clinical observations, neuroimaging findings, and histopathological studies, as well as laboratory examinations. At least four clinical subtypes of MS have been identified, including relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), which accounts for approximately 85% of all MS cases, primary progressive MS (PPMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and progressive relapsing MS (PRMS). (The clinical course of MS subtypes is illustrated as in Figure 3.) Up to date, there has not been clear evidence for an association of apoE polymorphism with a specific clinical subtype of MS. Most studies denied the association between a particular APOE allele or genotype with MS subgroups, while the relatively small sample size limited the statistical power of the research [83, 95].

186813.fig.003
Figure 3: The four common clinical subtypes of MS are illustrated. RRMS (Relapsing-remitting MS). At least one clinical attack resulting from demyelination (relapsing phase) follows by complete or partial recovery (remitting phase), after the first recovery from an attack. SPMS (Secondary progressive MS). Symptoms are continuously and gradually worsening, after a period of RRMS. PPMS (Primary progressive MS). Symptoms keep worsening after the onset, without obvious relapsing-remitting phases. PRMS (Progressive relapsing MS). MS with characteristics of both PPMS and RRMS.

Currently, the most appropriate method to quantify severity and rate of progression is Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), which is nonlinear, providing a mean value that represents mostly motor deficits. N-acetylaspartate-creatine ratio, as an index of axonal damage, is lower in the patients with MS and an 4 allele, indicating that APOE 4 allele correlated with MS disease severity [93]. An analysis of 614 patients with MS from 379 families indicated that APOE 4 carriers were more likely to be involved in severe diseases [88]. A more recent study, on the other hand, suggested that the association of apoE polymorphisms with disease severity in MS was only in females [96]. Moreover, APOE 4 was not associated with a more severe clinical course and did not appear to influence recovery of exacerbations, as some researchers revealed [97100]. One neuroimaging study also showed a negative correlation between APOE allele and disease severity [101]. The conflicting results might be due to the heterogeneity of clinical manifestations in MS or due to the relatively small sample size in these studies. Another explanation is that the relation of APOE with clinical severity is probably not very strong [72].

Whether APOE allele influences the relapse or progression of MS is not clear. Relapse can be defined as a clinical attack resulting from demyelination, apart from the first episode of MS, characterized by three-phase clinical course, namely, onset, nadir, and recovery stages; the latter of which can either be complete or partial. It is assumed that a certain APOE allele is associated with more rapid relapse or progression. However, the results obtained from previous studies are contradictory. Most results proved the hypothesis of an association between the APOE 4 allele and rapid progression of the disease [53, 84, 88, 91, 102], whereas others did not [79, 80, 103]. Neuroimaging data demonstrated accelerated brain-tissue loss and a higher proportion of lesions evolving into “black holes” in MS patients with APOE 4. The annual reduction in brain volume in APOE 4 carriers is five-fold higher than non- 4-carriers [104]. There are also indications that the APOE 4 allele is related to more severe progression of MS, as measured by MRI markers [105]. Some studies reported that the presence of the APOE 4 allele was associated with a poorer outcome after evaluation with EDSS, progression index, and so forth [53, 88, 106], while a meta-analysis did not support this finding [80, 86, 95, 107109]. It is worth noting that most of the aforementioned studies are retrospective cross-sectional ones, but not prospective longitudinal ones. The preexisting records, in such cases, were recorded for purposes other than validating the hypothesis and, therefore, might result in incomplete followups needed for the evaluation of progression or relapse in MS patients. Although still far from clarified, the apoE 4 isoform has a higher affinity than the others to lipid molecules, and is thus postulated to associate with the poorer outcome in MS, which is related to a compromised capacity of remyelination or regeneration [95].

The recognition of the importance of cognitive impairment in MS patients is increasing. Cognitive impairment is now considered one of the earliest manifestations of the disease, which can affect up to 65% of MS cases [110, 111]. The association between APOE allele and cognitive deficits in MS has been verified by dozens of studies [112114]. However, there usually lacks robust interpretation of the cognitive impairment in MS in most studies, which can either be only a symptom on account of myelin damage and axonal loss, suggesting the severity of the disease, or be at a subclinical stage of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, irrelevant of the disease of MS per se. Hence findings, either positive or negative, must be interpreted with caution [115]. Anyway, cognitive impairment in newly diagnosed MS is intriguing, since it may be of help to evaluate the disease. Besides, the depression is common in MS and is thought to interplay with cognitive and non-cognitive activities, but efforts to explain its aetiology, from effects of drugs, to physical disability, cognitive deficits, fatigue, and disease duration have not been successful. Recent studies have shown a relation between depression and demyelination in MS [116, 117]. Interestingly, the presence of the APOE 2 allele seemed protective against depressive symptoms in MS [118], although further studies are needed to explain the mechanisms implicated.

4. The Role of ApoE in EAE

EAE, which is a CD4+ T cell-mediated experimental disorder in the CNS, has been proposed as an animal model for MS to investigate the pathogenesis and to test new therapeutic strategies. Since the first classical study by Rivers in monkeys immunized with brain homogenate, virtually all mammalian species have been revealed to be susceptible to EAE [119]. EAE has been in the last 30 years, the most frequently used animal model to study MS. Although restricted to the limited number of apoE-related EAE studies, current knowledge from literature points towards an affirmatory role of apoE in the pathogenesis of EAE. In as early as 1980s, activated macrophages and lesions in the CNS were proposed to be causally related to the increased apoE in plasma in EAE [120]. Exacerbated EAE in apoE-deficient mice was later demonstrated to be concomitant with significantly more infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages in the lesions in vivo and increased lymphocyte proliferation stimulated by myelin antigens and mitogens in vitro [121]. ApoE can bind to sulfatide, a myelin-derived glycolipid, and regulates the sulfatide level either in brain tissue or in CSF [122]. The aggravation of EAE might be a consequence of reduced priming of sulfatide-specific CD1d-restricted regulatory T cells that can inhibit EAE [123].

The aforementioned derived peptide from apoE, COG133, attenuates the severity of EAE by inhibiting production of cytokines and free radicals, as well as by reducing T cell proliferation [124]. COG133 downregulates the activation of microglia and macrophages, and reduces release of TNF- , IL-6, and NO [125]. In vivo, COG133 can also suppress LPS-induced inflammation in CNS [32].

APOE 4 allele results in early cognitive deficits in EAE mice, including deficits in spatial learning and recalling. Regional decreases in choline acetyltransferase in the hippocampus might explain these deficits [126]. This is in accordance with MS studies on human [114, 127].

As argued lately, EAE would only be useful as a model of CNS demyelination such as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, whilst the misleading role of EAE should not be neglected [128]. The isoform-specific effects of apoE on EAE must be properly interpreted now that EAE cannot mimic clinical MS to a fractional.

5. Conclusions and Prospectives

The immuno-modulatory functions of apoE have been extensively studied, while only ambiguous or even controversial results have been obtained in elucidating the isotype-dependent effects of apoE on MS and EAE. This is partly due to the difficulty of interpretation of results from animal experiments to a general conclusion. For example, the difference of serum and tissue apoE levels in APOE 2, 3, and 4 Tg mice might be a confounding factor when isoform-dependent effects are studied. Domain interaction (Table 1) distinguishes apoE4 from apoE2 and apoE3 in biological functions, and contributes to the detrimental effects of apoE4 [129, 130]. Because of domain interaction, apoE4 binds preferentially to very low-density lipoproteins, which are more rapidly removed from plasma than other lipoproteins such as HDL, to which apoE3 and apoE2 bind preferentially, resulting a lower level of apoE in serum [130, 131]. The lower level of apoE4 causally depresses the protective role of apoE in both inflammatory and immune responses. Additionally, lipid-free apoE only binds to LRP [132, 133]. Therefore, in interpreting the effects of apoE on immune responses, its lipidation state, concentration, and location of action must be taken into account. The comparison of APOE 4 carriers, especially APOE 4 heterozygotes in MS, with healthy subjects might not be efficient enough to exclude the influence of other APOE alleles, for no evidence as yet has confirmed a similar or contrary effect among apoE isoforms on susceptibility to or clinical severity of MS. Moreover, interaction between APOE and other genes should be taken into account in studying the pathogenesis of MS, as in other apoE related diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease [134]. Anyway, the elucidation of the exact mechanisms by which apoE functions on the immune responses is appealing in that it may provide new insights to the preventive or therapeutic strategies in coping with autoimmune diseases and even other diseases.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by grants from China Scholarship Council, Swedish Medicine Association, Gun och Bertil Stohnes Foundation, and Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, as well as Wallenberg’s Foundation.

References

  1. K. H. Weisgraber, “Apolipoprotein E: structure-function relationships,” Advances in Protein Chemistry, vol. 45, pp. 249–302, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. L. Raffaï, L.-M. Dong, R. V. Farese Jr., and K. H. Weisgraber, “Introduction of human apolipoprotein E4 “domain interaction” into mouse apolipoprotein E,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 20, pp. 11587–11591, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Li, P. A. Thompson, and R. L. Kitchens, “Infection induces a positive acute phase apolipoprotein E response from a negative acute phase gene: role of hepatic LDL receptors,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1782–1793, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. W. Mahley, “Apolipoprotein E: cholesterol transport protein with expanding role in cell biology,” Science, vol. 240, no. 4852, pp. 622–630, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. K. Boyles, R. E. Pitas, E. Wilson, R. W. Mahley, and J. M. Taylor, “Apolipoprotein E associated with astrocytic glia of the central nervous system and with nonmyelinating glia of the peripheral nervous system,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1501–1513, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. M. Refolo and H. M. Fillit, “Apolipoprotein E4 as a target for developing new therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 151–155, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. G. Yancey, H. Yu, M. F. Linton, and S. Fazio, “A pathway-dependent on ApoE, ApoAI, and ABCA1 determines formation of buoyant high-density lipoprotein by macrophage foam cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1123–1131, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. S. Knopman, R. O. Roberts, Y. E. Geda, et al., “Association of prior stroke with cognitive function and cognitive impairment: a population-based study,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 614–619, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Kim, J. M. Basak, and D. M. Holtzman, “The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease,” Neuron, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 287–303, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Guo, L. Fratiglioni, M. Viitanen, et al., “Apolipoprotein E genotypes and the incidence of Alzheimer's disease among persons aged 75 years and older: variation by use of antihypertensive medication?” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 225–231, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Ewers, Z. Zhong, K. Bürger, et al., “Increased CSF-BACE 1 activity is associated with ApoE-ε4 genotype in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 1252–1258, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Heun, U. Gühne, T. Luck, et al., “Apolipoprotein E allele 4 is not a sufficient or a necessary predictor of the development of Mild Cognitive Impairment,” European Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. M. Avila, G. Holdsworth, N. Sasaki, R. L. Jackson, and J. A. Harmony, “Apoprotein E suppresses phytohemagglutinin-activated phospholipid turnover in peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 257, no. 10, pp. 5900–5909, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. A. Terkeltaub, C. A. Dyer, J. Martin, and L. K. Curtiss, “Apolipoprotein (Apo) E inhibits the capacity of monosodium urate crystals to stimulate neutrophils. Characterization of intraarticular Apo E and demonstration of Apo E binding to urate crystals in vivo,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. P. Vitek, C. M. Brown, and C. A. Colton, “APOE genotype-specific differences in the innate immune response,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1350–1360, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. W. Barger and A. D. Harmon, “Microglial activation by alzhelmer amyloid precursor protein and modulation by apolipoprotein E,” Nature, vol. 388, no. 6645, pp. 878–881, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. A. Colton, C. M. Brown, M. Czapiga, and M. P. Vitek, “Apolipoprotein-E allele-specific regulation of nitric oxide production,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 962, pp. 212–225, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  18. C. A. Colton, C. M. Brown, D. Cook, et al., “APOE and the regulation of microglial nitric oxide production: a link between genetic risk and oxidative stress,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 777–785, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. van den Elzen, S. Garg, L. León, et al., “Apolipoprotein-mediated pathways of lipid antigen presentation,” Nature, vol. 437, no. 7060, pp. 906–910, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. A. Borg, K. S. Wun, L. Kjer-Nielsen, et al., “CD1d-lipid-antigen recognition by the semi-invariant NKT T-cell receptor,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7149, pp. 44–49, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Ophir, N. Amariglio, J. Jacob-Hirsch, R. Elkon, G. Rechavi, and D. M. Michaelson, “Apolipoprotein E4 enhances brain inflammation by modulation of the NF-κB signaling cascade,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709–718, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Schumacher, G. Maerker-Alzer, and U. Wehmer, “A lymphocyte inhibiting factor isolated from normal human liver,” Nature, vol. 251, no. 5476, pp. 655–656, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. K. Fujii and T. S. Edgington, “Direct suppression of lymphocyte induction by the immunoregulatory human serum low density lipoprotein, LDL-In,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 156–160, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Y. Hui and J. A. K. Harmony, “Phosphatidylinositol turnover in mitogen-activated lymphocytes. Suppression by low-density lipoproteins,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Y. Hui, J. A. K. Harmony, T. L. Innerarity, and R. W. Mahley, “Immunoregulatory plasma lipoproteins. Role of apoprotein E and apoprotein B,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 255, no. 24, pp. 11775–11781, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. G. Pepe and L. K. Curtiss, “Apolipoprotein E is a biologically active constituent of the normal immunoregulatory lipoprotein, LDL-In,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 136, no. 10, pp. 3716–3723, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. J. Mistry, M. A. Clay, M. E. Kelly, M. A. Steiner, and J. A. K. Harmony, “Apolipoprotein E restricts interleukin-dependent T lymphocyte proliferation at the G1A/G1B boundary,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Bocksch, T. Stephens, A. Lucas, and B. Singh, “Apolipoprotein E: possible therapeutic target for atherosclerosis,” Current Drug Targets—Cardiovascular & Haematological Disorders, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 93–106, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. S. Getz and C. A. Reardon, “Apoprotein E as a lipid transport and signaling protein in the blood, liver, and artery wall,” Journal of lipid research, vol. 50, supplement, pp. S156–S161, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. Laurat, B. Poirier, E. Tupin, et al., “In vivo downregulation of T helper cell 1 immune responses reduces atherogenesis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice,” Circulation, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Ali, M. Middleton, E. Puré, and D. J. Rader, “Apolipoprotein E suppresses the type I inflammatory response in vivo,” Circulation Research, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 922–927, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. R. Lynch, W. Tang, H. Wang, et al., “APOE genotype and an ApoE-mimetic peptide modify the systemic and central nervous system inflammatory response,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 49, pp. 48529–48533, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Van Oosten, P. C. N. Rensen, E. S. Van Amersfoort, et al., “Apolipoprotein E protects against bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced lethality: a new therapeutic approach to treat gram-negative sepsis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 12, pp. 8820–8824, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. N. de Bont, M. G. Netea, P. N. M. Demacker, et al., “Apolipoprotein E knock-out mice are highly susceptible to endotoxemia and Klebsiella pneumoniae infection,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 680–685, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. E. Roselaar and A. Daugherty, “Apolipoprotein E-deficient mice have impaired innate immune responses to Listeria monocytogenes in vivo,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1740–1743, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. W. Martens, M. C. Arikan, J. Lee, F. Ren, T. Vallerskog, and H. Kornfeld, “Hypercholesterolemia impairs immunity to tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 3464–3472, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Gordon, “Alternative activation of macrophages,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Lehnardt, L. Massillon, P. Follett, et al., “Activation of innate immunity in the CNS triggers neurodegeneration through a Toll-like receptor 4-dependent pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 14, pp. 8514–8519, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Tenger and X. Zhou, “Apolipoprotein E modulates immune activation by acting on the antigen-presenting cell,” Immunology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 392–397, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. I. Maezawa, M. Nivison, K. S. Montine, N. Maeda, and T. J. Montine, “Neurotoxicity from innate immune response is greatest with targeted replacement of E4 allele of apolipoprotein E gene and is mediated by microglial p38MAPK,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 797–799, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Saura, V. Petegnief, X. Wu, Y. Liang, and S. M. Paul, “Microglial apolipoprotein E and astroglial apolipoprotein J expression in vitro: opposite effects of lipopolysaccharide,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1455–1467, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Z. Werb and J. R. Chin, “Apoprotein E is synthesized and secreted by resident and thioglycollate-elicited macrophages but not by pyran copolymer- or bacillus Calmette-Guerin-activated macrophages,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 1272–1293, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. P. Vitek, J. Snell, H. Dawson, and C. A. Colton, “Modulation of nitric oxide production in human macrophages by apolipoprotein-E and amyloid-beta peptide,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 240, no. 2, pp. 391–394, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Czapiga and C. A. Colton, “Microglial function in human APOE3 and APOE4 transgenic mice: altered arginine transport,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 134, no. 1-2, pp. 44–51, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. T. Laskowitz, D. M. Lee, D. Schmechel, and H. F. Staats, “Altered immune responses in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 613–620, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. Chaussabel, R. T. Semnani, M. A. McDowell, D. Sacks, A. Sher, and T. B. Nutman, “Unique gene expression profiles of human macrophages and dendritic cells to phylogenetically distinct parasites,” Blood, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 672–681, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. F. Le Naour, L. Hohenkirk, A. Grolleau, et al., “Profiling changes in gene expression during differentiation and maturation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells using both oligonucleotide microarrays and proteomics,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 21, pp. 17920–17931, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. Yoshimoto, A. Bendelac, C. Watson, J. Hu-Li, and W. E. Paul, “Role of NK1.1+ T cells in a TH2 response and in immunoglobulin E production,” Science, vol. 270, no. 5243, pp. 1845–1847, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. K. Singh, M. T. Wilson, S. Hong, et al., “Natural killer T cell activation protects mice against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 194, no. 12, pp. 1801–1811, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. L. L. Allan, K. Hoefl, D.-J. Zheng, et al., “Apolipoprotein-mediated lipid antigen presentation in B cells provides a pathway for innate help by NKT cells,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 2411–2416, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. E. Tupin, A. Nicoletti, R. Elhage, et al., “CD1d-dependent activation of NKT cells aggravates atherosclerosis,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 199, no. 3, pp. 417–422, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. R. W. Mahley and S. C. Rall Jr., “Apolipoprotein E: far more than a lipid transport protein,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, vol. 1, no. 2000, pp. 507–537, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. Fazekas, S. Strasser-Fuchs, H. Kollegger, et al., “Apolipoprotein E ε4 is associated with rapid progression of multiple sclerosis,” Neurology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 853–857, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. C. M. Brown, E. Choi, Q. Xu, M. P. Vitek, and C. A. Colton, “The APOE4 genotype alters the response of microglia and macrophages to 17β-estradiol,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1783–1794, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. I. Maezawa, N. Maeda, T. J. Montine, and K. S. Montine, “Apolipoprotein E-specific innate immune response in astrocytes from targeted replacement mice,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 10, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. L. Jofre-Monseny, A.-M. Minihane, and G. Rimbach, “Impact of apoE genotype on oxidative stress, inflammation and disease risk,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 131–145, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. U. K. Misra, C. L. Adlakha, G. Gawdi, M. K. McMillian, S. V. Pizzo, and D. T. Laskowitz, “Apolipoprotein E and mimetic peptide initiate a calcium-dependent signaling response in macrophages,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 677–683, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. Ruiz, D. Kouiavskaia, M. Migliorini, et al., “The apoE isoform binding properties of the VLDL receptor reveal marked differences from LRP and the LDL receptor,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1721–1731, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. Compston and A. Coles, “Multiple sclerosis,” The Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9648, pp. 1502–1517, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. D. E. Schmechel, A. M. Saunders, W. J. Strittmatter, et al., “Increased amyloid β-peptide deposition in cerebral cortex as a consequence of apolipoprotein E genotype in late-onset Alzheimer disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 20, pp. 9649–9653, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. N. De Stefano, M. L. Bartolozzi, B. Nacmias, et al., “Influence of apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype on brain tissue integrity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 536–540, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. G. Utermann, A. Steinmetz, and W. Weber, “Genetic control of human apolipoprotein E polymorphismml: comparison of one- and two-dimensional techniques of isoprotein analysis,” Human Genetics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 344–351, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. H. J. Menzel, R. G. Kladetzky, and G. Assmann, “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and coronary artery disease,” Arteriosclerosis, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 310–315, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. B. Bielekova and R. Martin, “Development of biomarkers in multiple sclerosis,” Brain, vol. 127, no. 7, pp. 1463–1478, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. T. Jin, L.-S. Hu, M. Chang, J. Wu, B. Winblad, and J. Zhu, “Proteomic identification of potential protein markers in cerebrospinal fluid of GBS patients,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 563–568, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. Y.-R. Yang, S.-L. Liu, Z.-Y. Qin, et al., “Comparative proteomics analysis of cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 737–744, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. O. Gaillard, A. Gervais, D. Meillet, J. Delattre, O. Lyon-Caeń, and E. Schuller, “Apolipoprotein E intrathecal synthesis is decreased in multiple sclerosis patients,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 148–150, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. O. Gaillard, A. Gervais, D. Meillet, et al., “Apolipoprotein E and multiple sclerosis: a biochemical and genetic investigation,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 180–186, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. B. B. Gelman, N. Rifai, R. H. Christenson, and L. M. Silverman, “Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma apolipoproteins in patients with multiple sclerosis,” Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. F. Linton, R. Gish, S. T. Hubl, et al., “Phenotypes of apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein E after liver transplantation,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 270–281, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. R. W. Mahley, K. H. Weisgraber, and Y. Huang, “Apolipoprotein E: structure determines function, from atherosclerosis to Alzheimer's disease to AIDS,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 50, supplement, pp. S183–S188, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. E. Teunissen, P. C. Dijkstra, and C. Polman, “Biological markers in CSF and blood for axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. D. Chiasserini, M. Di Filippo, A. Candeliere, et al., “CSF proteome analysis in multiple sclerosis patients by two-dimensional electrophoresis,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 998–1001, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. J. L. Haines, M. Ter-Minassian, A. Bazyk, et al., “A complete genomic screen for multiple sclerosis underscores a role for the major histocompatibility complex,” Nature Genetics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 469–471, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. K. G. Becker, R. M. Simon, J. E. Bailey-Wilson, et al., “Clustering of non-major histocompatibility complex susceptibility candidate loci in human autoimmune diseases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 17, pp. 9979–9984, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. C. Xing, A. L. Sestak, J. A. Kelly, et al., “Localization and replication of the systemic lupus erythematosus linkage signal at 4p16: interaction with 2p11, 12q24 and 19q13 in European Americans,” Human Genetics, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 623–631, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. L. U. Gerdes, “The common polymorphism of apolipoprotein E: geographical aspects and new pathophysiological relations,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 628–631, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. D. E. Bulman and G. C. Ebers, “The geography of MS reflects genetic susceptibility,” Journal of Tropical and Geographical Neurology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  79. C. Ferri, F. L. Sciacca, F. Veglia, et al., “APOE ε2–4 and -491 polymorphisms are not associated with MS,” Neurology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 888–889, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. T. Masterman, Z. Zhang, D. Hellgren, et al., “APOE genotypes and disease severity in multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 98–103, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. L. U. Gerdes, I. C. Klausen, I. Sihm, and O. Færgeman, “Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in a Danish population compared to findings in 45 other study populations around the world,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 155–167, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. S. Al-Shammri, H. Fatania, R. Al-Radwan, and A. O. Akanji, “The relationship of APOE genetic polymorphism with susceptibility to multiple sclerosis and its clinical phenotypes in Kuwaiti Arab subjects,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 351, no. 1-2, pp. 203–207, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. M. Pinholt, J. L. Frederiksen, P. S. Andersen, and M. Christiansen, “Apo E in multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis: the Apo E-ε4 allele is associated with progression of multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 511–515, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. P. Høgh, A. Oturai, K. Schreiber, et al., “Apoliprotein E and multiple sclerosis: impact of the epsilon-4 allele on susceptibility, clinical type and progression rate,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 226–230, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. D. A. Hafler, A. Compston, S. Sawcer, et al., “Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 9, pp. 851–862, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. R. M. Burwick, P. P. Ramsay, J. L. Haines, et al., “APOE epsilon variation in multiple sclerosis susceptibility and disease severity: some answers,” Neurology, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1373–1383, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. A. Bonetti, K. Koivisto, T. Pirttilä, et al., “A follow-up study of chromosome 19q13 in multiple sclerosis susceptibility,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 208, no. 1-2, pp. 119–124, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. S. Schmidt, L. F. Barcellos, K. DeSombre, et al., “Association of polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein E region with susceptibility to and progression of multiple sclerosis,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 708–717, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. O. E. Mustafina, K. Z. Bakhtiiarova, A. M. Mikhĭlova, et al., “Analysis of the association of allelic variants of apolypoprotein E and interleukin 1 beta genes with multiple sclerosis in ethnic Tatars,” Genetika, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 407–413, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  90. R. Huang, M. Hughes, S. Mobley, I. Lanham, and S. E. Poduslo, “APOE genotypes in African American female multiple sclerosis patients,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 414, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. J. Chapman, S. Vinokurov, A. Achiron, et al., “APOE genotype is a major predictor of long-term progression of disability in MS,” Neurology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 312–316, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. C. Ballerini, D. Campani, G. Rombolà, et al., “Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism to clinical heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 296, no. 2-3, pp. 174–176, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. C. Enzinger, S. Ropele, S. Strasser-Fuchs, et al., “Lower levels of N-acetylaspartate in multiple sclerosis patients with the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. N. Evangelou, M. Jackson, D. Beeson, and J. Palace, “Association of the APOE ε4 allele with disease activity in multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 203–205, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. M. Santos, M. do Carmo Costa, M. Edite Rio, et al., “Genotypes at the APOE and SCA2 loci do not predict the course of multiple sclerosis in patients of Portuguese origin,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 153–157, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. O. H. Kantarci, D. D. Hebrink, S. J. Achenbach, et al., “Association of APOE polymorphisms with disease severity in MS is limited to women,” Neurology, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 811–814, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. Ma. J. Sedano, P. Calmarza, L. Perez, and J. M. Trejo, “No association of apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype with faster progression or less recovery of relapses in a Spanish cohort of multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. M. Niino, S. Kikuchi, T. Fukazawa, I. Yabe, and K. Tashiro, “Polymorphisms of apolipoprotein E and Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 382–386, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. G. Koutsis, M. Panas, G. Karadima, et al., “APOE genotypes in Greek multiple sclerosis patients: No effect on the MS Severity Score,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 254, no. 3, pp. 394–395, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. A. van der Walt, J. Stankovich, M. Bahlo, et al., “Apolipoprotein genotype does not influence MS severity, cognition, or brain atrophy,” Neurology, vol. 73, no. 13, pp. 1018–1025, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. J. N.P. Zwemmer, T. van Veen, L. van Winsen, et al., “No major association of ApoE genotype with disease characteristics and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 272–277, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. M. Pinholt, J. L. Frederiksen, and M. Christiansen, “The association between apolipoprotein E and multiple sclerosis,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 573–580, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. K. Schreiber, A. B. Oturai, L. P. Ryder, et al., “Disease severity in Danish multiple sclerosis patients evaluated by MRI and three genetic markers (HLA-DRBI1501, CCR5 deletion mutation, apolipoprotein E),” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 295–298, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. C. Enzinger, S. Ropele, S. Smith, et al., “Accelerated evolution of brain atrophy and “black holes” in MS patients with APOE-ε4,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 563–569, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  105. F. Fazekas, S. Strasser-Fuchs, H. Schmidt, et al., “Apolipoprotein E genotype related differences in brain lesions of multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 25–28, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. E. Cocco, A. Sotgiu, G. Costa, et al., “HLA-DR,DQ and APOE genotypes and gender influence in Sardinian primary progressive MS,” Neurology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 564–566, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. G. Savettieri, V. Andreoli, S. Bonavita, et al., “Apolipoprotein E genotype does not influence the progression of multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 250, no. 9, pp. 1094–1098, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. M. Pinholt, J. L. Frederiksen, P. S. Andersen, and M. Christiansen, “Apo E in multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis: the Apo E-ε4 allele is associated with progression of multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 511–515, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. S. V. Ramagopalan, G. C. DeLuca, K. M. Morrison, et al., “No effect of APOE and PVRL2 on the clinical outcome of multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 186, no. 1-2, pp. 156–160, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. S. M. Rao, G. J. Leo, L. Ellington, T. Nauertz, L. Bernardin, and F. Unverzagt, “Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning,” Neurology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 692–696, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. S. M. Rao, G. J. Leo, L. Bernardin, and F. Unverzagt, “Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction,” Neurology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 685–691, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. J. Shi, C. B. Zhao, T. L. Vollmer, T. M. Tyry, and S. M. Kuniyoshi, “APOE 4 allele is associated with cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis,” Neurology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 185–190, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. G. Savettieri, D. Messina, V. Andreoli, et al., “Gender-related effect of clinical and genetic variables on the cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 251, no. 10, pp. 1208–1214, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. G. Koutsis, M. Panas, E. Giogkaraki, et al., “APOE ε4 is associated with impaired verbal learning in patients with MS,” Neurology, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 546–549, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. A. D. Sadovnick and D. H. Jacobs, “MS and cognition and APOE: the ongoing conundrum about biomarkers,” Neurology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 164–165, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. R. Bakshi, D. Czarnecki, Z. A. Shaikh, et al., “Brain MRI lesions and atrophy are related to depression in multiple sclerosis,” NeuroReport, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1153–1158, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. D. Berg, T. Supprian, J. Thomae, et al., “Lesion pattern in patients with multiple sclerosis and depression,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 156–162, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. L. J. Julian, L. Vella, D. Frankel, S. L. Minden, J. R. Oksenberg, and D. C. Mohr, “ApoE alleles, depression and positive affect in multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 311–315, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. R. Furlan, C. Cuomo, and G. Martino, “Animal models of multiple sclerosis,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 549, pp. 157–173, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. V. G. Shore, M. E. Smith, V. Perret, and M. A. Laskaris, “Alterations in plasma lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 119–129, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. D. Karussis, D. M. Michaelson, N. Grigoriadis, et al., “Lack of apolipoprotein-E exacerbates experimental allergic encephalomyelitis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 476–480, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. X. Han, H. Cheng, J. D. Fryer, A. M. Fagan, and D. M. Holtzman, “Novel role for apolipoprotein E in the central nervous systemml: modulation of sulfatide content,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 10, pp. 8043–8051, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. J. Schümann and G. De Libero, “Serum lipoproteins: trojan horses of the immune response?” Trends in Immunology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 57–59, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. F.-Q. Li, G. D. Sempowski, S. E. McKenna, D. T. Laskowitz, C. A. Colton, and M. P. Vitek, “Apolipoprotein E-derived peptides ameliorate clinical disability and inflammatory infiltrates into the spinal cord in a murine model of multiple sclerosis,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 318, no. 3, pp. 956–965, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. D. T. Laskowitz, A. D. Thekdi, S. D. Thekdi, et al., “Downregulation of microglial activation by apolipoprotein E and apoE-mimetic peptides,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 74–85, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. J.-l. Tu, C.-B. Zhao, T. Vollmer, et al., “APOE 4 polymorphism results in early cognitive deficits in an EAE model,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 384, no. 4, pp. 466–470, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. J. Shi, C. B. Zhao, T. L. Vollmer, T. M. Tyry, and S. M. Kuniyoshi, “APOE ε4 allele is associated with cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis,” Neurology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 185–190, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. S. Sriram and I. Steiner, “Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: a misleading model of multiple sclerosis,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 939–945, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. K. H. Weisgraber and R. W. Mahley, “Human apolipoprotein E: the Alzheimer's disease connection,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 1485–1494, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. R. E. Gregg, L. A. Zech, E. J. Schaefer, et al., “Abnormal in vivo metabolism of apolipoprotein E4 in humans,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 815–821, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. K. H. Weisgraber, “Apolipoprotein E distribution among human plasma lipoproteins: role of the cysteine-arginine interchange at residue 112,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1503–1511, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. T. L. Innerarity, R. E. Pitas, and R. W. Mahley, “Binding of arginine-rich (E) apoprotein after recombination with phospholipid vesicles to the low density lipoprotein receptors of fibroblasts,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 254, no. 10, pp. 4186–4190, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. M. Narita, D. M. Holtzman, A. M. Fagan, et al., “Cellular catabolism of lipid poor apolipoprotein E via cell surface LDL receptor-related protein,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 743–749, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. B. Wang, F. Jin, Z. Yang, et al., “The insertion polymorphism in angiotensin-converting enzyme gene associated with the APOE ε4 allele increases the risk of late-onset alzheimer disease,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 267–271, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus