- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 961059, 8 pages
A Sphingosine Kinase Form 2 Knockout Sensitizes Mouse Myocardium to Ischemia/Reoxygenation Injury and Diminishes Responsiveness to Ischemic Preconditioning
1Liver Study Unit, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA
2Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
3Department of Pharmaceutical Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
4Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA
5Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
Received 9 December 2010; Accepted 10 January 2011
Academic Editor: Kenneth Maiese
Copyright © 2011 Donald A. Vessey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Sphingosine kinase (SphK) exhibits two isoforms, SphK1 and SphK2. Both forms catalyze the synthesis of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a sphingolipid involved in ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Since the ratio of SphK1 : SphK2 changes dramatically with aging, it is important to assess the role of SphK2 in IR injury and IPC. Langendorff mouse hearts were subjected to IR (30 min equilibration, 50 min global ischemia, and 40 min reperfusion). IPC consisted of 2 min of ischemia and 2 min of reperfusion for two cycles. At baseline, there were no differences in left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), ± dP/dtmax, and heart rate between SphK2 null (KO) and wild-type (WT) hearts. In KO hearts, SphK2 activity was undetectable, and SphK1 activity was unchanged compared to WT. Total SphK activity was reduced by 53%. SphK2 KO hearts subjected to IR exhibited significantly more cardiac damage (% infarct size) compared with WT (% infarct size); postischemic recovery of LVDP was lower in KO hearts. IPC exerted cardioprotection in WT hearts. The protective effect of IPC against IR was diminished in KO hearts which had much higher infarction sizes (%) compared to the IPC/IR group in control hearts (%). Western analysis revealed that KO hearts had substantial levels of phosphorylated p38 which could predispose the heart to IR injury. Thus, deletion of the SphK2 gene sensitizes the myocardium to IR injury and diminishes the protective effect of IPC.
Exposure of the myocardium to extended periods of ischemia results in cell injury. Much of this damage occurs upon reperfusion, and thus it is referred to as ischemia/reoxygenation (I/R) injury. Reactive oxygen species are formed upon reperfusion, and they have been implicated as contributing factors to this injury . I/R injury is characterized by poor recovery of hemodynamic function upon reperfusion and the development of extensive areas of infarction . Protection against I/R injury can be provided by ischemic preconditioning (IPC). IPC consists of short periods of I/R that precede long term (index) ischemia and reperfusion. The triggers for IPC are cellular agonists that are released from myocytes via pannexin-1/P2X7 channels  in response to brief ischemia. These agonists bind to G-protein coupled receptors initiating a protective response [4–6]. These include adenosine, bradykinin, and opioids [4, 5] and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) .
S1P is an important intracellular signaling molecule that regulates diverse cellular events and has both cell growth and prosurvival effects [7–9]. These cell signaling effects are in part mediated by S1P binding to specific cell surface G-protein-coupled receptors [7–10]. In the heart, S1P is cardioprotective as revealed by studies of cultured cardiac myocytes [11, 12] as well as ex vivo isolated hearts [3, 6, 13]. The increased myocyte viability induced by S1P may relate to activation of a prosurvival pathway that includes PI-3K/Akt and increased bcl-2 expression followed by reduced cytochrome C release and prevention of caspase activation [9, 12].
Sphingosine kinase (SphK) is the enzyme responsible for the formation of S1P. It exhibits two isoforms (SphK1 and SphK2) in heart [14–16]. SphK1 appears to be a protective kinase, as its overexpression increases intracellular S1P content and promotes cell growth and survival [17–19]. Indeed, study of an SphK1 null mouse demonstrated that loss of SphK1 sensitizes the myocardium to I/R injury and results in the loss of both ischemic preconditioning and ischemic postconditioning [20, 21].
The role of SphK2 in cell survival is less clear. Studies of SphK2 in cell systems have suggested that SphK2 is antiproliferative and proapoptotic [22–24]. In contrast, it has recently been shown that SphK2-directed S1P synthesis in mitochondria is important for proper assembly of the respiratory chain , and thus SphK2 activity might serve to limit free radical production by the respiratory chain. In this scenario, SphK2 would actually be protective. Discerning the role of SphK2 is important particularly with respect to aging as we have found that SphK2 activity, but not SphK1, decreases with aging . However, to date, no studies of the role of Sphk2 in cellular injury to heart have been reported. Thus, the primary objective of the present study was to utilize mouse hearts that possess an inactivated SphK2 gene to determine if SphK2 affects sensitivity to myocardial IR injury or cardioprotection conferred by IPC.
2.1. Baseline Characteristics
The baseline parameters for WT and SphK2 KO mouse hearts are not different. For WT and KO, respectively, there were no differences in body weight ( g versus g), heart weight ( versus mg), heart rate ( versus bpm), or left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) at baseline ( versus mmHg). The KO mice exhibit no evident phenotype, breed normally, have normal vascular development, and live a normal lifespan.
2.2. Verification of Deletion of SphK2 and Loss of SphK2 Activity
PCR analysis of DNA from tail snips (Figure 1) revealed that the SphK2 null hearts are indeed lacking a full length SphK2 gene. Hearts from SphK2 null mice and WT mice were subfractionated into cytosolic and particulate fractions and assayed for total sphingosine kinase activity (Figure 2). WT mice had a cytosolic specific activity of pmol/min/mg protein and a particulate fraction activity of pmol/min/mg. In contrast, KO hearts had a cytosolic specific activity of pmol/min/mg protein and a particulate fraction activity of pmol/min/mg. Total activity was reduced by approximately 53% in KO hearts relative to the wild-type hearts (53% reduction in the cytosolic fraction and 50% reduction in the particulate fractions). There was no change in the distribution of activity between cytosolic and particulate fractions with ca. 85% of total activity being present in the cytosolic fraction of both KO and WT hearts. The finding of SphK activity in the particulate fraction of KO hearts is consistent with the report of SphK activity in the mitochondria from SphK2 KO hearts .
To verify that SphK2 activity was absent in KO hearts, we took advantage of our previous finding that cytosolic SphK1 and SphK2 activity in heart can be cleanly separated by gel filtration chromatography . Analysis of the cytosolic fractions from WT and SphK2 KO hearts by gel filtration analysis is shown in Figure 3. As expected, SphK2 KO hearts are completely devoid of cytosolic SphK2 activity, but SphK1 activity is not significantly altered.
2.3. Deletion of SphK2 Impairs Cardiac Function during Ischemia/Reoxygenation (IR) Injury
Both WT and KO hearts were subjected to 50 min global ischemia and 40 minutes of reperfusion (reoxygenation). The recovery of LVDP at the end of IR is shown in Figure 4. While there was wide variation in recoveries of LVDP due to stunning, based on one way ANOVA there still was significantly lower recovery of LVDP in KO mouse hearts () than in WT hearts (). Thus, IR caused more serious impairment of both cardiac hemodynamic function in KO hearts compared to the dysfunction observed in hearts from WT mice. Moreover, infarct size was significantly higher in KO hearts than in WT hearts ( for KO versus , in WT, ).
2.4. Deletion of SphK2 Prevents Cardioprotection during Ischemia/Reoxygenation Injury and Ischemic Preconditioning
As shown in Figure 4, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) increased cardiac performance in WT hearts. At the end of IR, WT-IPC hearts exhibited improved LVDP ( recovery) compared with the WT control group (). In WT hearts infarct size was far less after () compared with IR alone (). However, with KO hearts IPC did not provide protection. Infarct size was not diminished ( after IPC compared to for untreated) and was much greater than that seen with IPC-treated WT hearts (). Further, recovery of LVDP was not significantly for KO hearts ( no IPC versus plus IPC) and was significantly less than LVDP obtained with IPC-treated WT hearts (, ).
2.5. Exogenous Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Exerts Cardioprotection in SphK2 KO Hearts
Previous results from our laboratory in [13, 20, 27] revealed that WT mouse hearts can be pharmacologically preconditioned with S1P. The data in Figure 4 indicate that pharmacological preconditioning with 0.4 μM S1P protected SphK2 null mouse hearts against IR injury. S1P improved LVDP recovery ( versus untreated) and significantly reduced infarction size ( versus untreated). This indicates that the signaling pathway for preconditioning is still intact in KO hearts.
2.6. Phosphorylation Levels of Akt, Erk, and p38 and in Wild-Type and SphK2 KO Hearts
Phosphorylated forms of the signaling molecules Akt (P-Akt) and Erk (P-Erk) enhance survival in mouse heart. Therefore, their levels were measured by Western blotting in untreated flushed hearts from WT and KO mice. P-Akt was readily detectable in the cytosolic fraction of KO and WT hearts (Figure 5). No difference in P-Akt level was observed between WT and KO hearts (Figure 5). P-Akt was present in very low amounts in the particulate fraction from both WT and KO hearts (data not shown). P-Erk levels exhibited wide scatter, and mean values did not seem to differ between WT and KO hearts (data not shown). The detrimental signaling molecule phospho-p38 (P-p38) is present in WT mouse heart in low amount under normal conditions (Figure 5). By contrast, in KO hearts much higher levels of P-p38 were found in the cytosolic fraction (Figure 5). P-p38 protein was not readily detectable in the particulate fraction of WT or KO hearts.
Based on studies in noncardiac cells, it has been hypothesized that SphK1 and SphK2 have opposite effects on cell survival with SphK1 being prosurvival while SphK2 is purported to be antisurvival [22–24]. We have previously shown in SphK1 KO mouse hearts that an active SphK1 is essential to cardioprotection by both ischemic preconditioning  and ischemic postconditioning . In the current study, we have for the first time examined the role of SphK2 in cardioprotection by testing the hypothesis that elimination of SphK2 by genetic means would enhance the cardiac response to IR injury and IPC. For these studies we used a mouse model in which deletion of exons 2–5 of the SphK2 gene leads to a complete loss of SphK2 activity and thereby a >50% reduction of SphK activity in both the cytosolic and particulate fractions. A significant compensatory increase in SphK1 activity was not found. We found no significant difference in baseline cardiac function between wild-type and SphK2 null mouse hearts. However, after 40 minutes of global ischemia and 40 minutes of reperfusion, recovery of LVDP was significantly decreased in KO hearts, and infarct sizes were significantly increased. This indicates an increased sensitivity to IR injury in KO hearts. Consistent with this increased sensitivity, the capacity for IPC-induced cardiac protection was abolished in the KO hearts. In contrast to studies is isolated cells [22–24], these results provide the first evidence in a genetically modified animal that SphK2 is an important lipid kinase mediating cardiac cell survival, and further that SphK1 and SphK2 are both required for ischemic preconditioning in the heart. A protective role for SphK2 was also reported in renal IR injury . However, ischemic preconditioning was not studied, and exogenous S1P receptor agonism failed to produce renal protection .
IPC results in release of S1P from myocytes which then binds to cell surface G-protein-coupled receptors and triggers the cardioprotective response [3, 6, 29]. It follows that deletion of SphK2 might make less S1P available for release during brief episodes of IPC. We have shown that a decrease in S1P response makes a significant contribution to overall potency of the preconditioning response . Further, our previous work revealed that during ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated hearts, SphK activity declines markedly during ischemia and remains depressed during recovery, while in hearts that have been preconditioned, recovery of enzyme activity is much more robust . S1P levels are altered in parallel , and there may be a threshold concentration at the cellular level below which prosurvival pathways are either not activated or are suppressed. Thus, the simplest explanation for the failure of SphK2 KO mice to precondition is that there is insufficient intracellular S1P to achieve threshold levels of S1P release for triggering IPC (see Figure 6).
In addition, interactions of SphK2 and/or S1P with other signaling molecules may also contribute to the loss of cardioprotection. In particular, Strub et al. have shown that mitochondrial SphK2 activity is critical for the proper assembly of cytochrome oxidase . SphK2 KO mice contain a defective cytochrome oxidase that limits respiration. Decreased cytochrome oxidase activity can cause accumulation of electrons upstream, and this can lead to increased ROS generation . Opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) is thought to be the key to reperfusion injury, and ROS generation encourages mPTP opening . Therefore, increased ROS generation upon reoxygenation by SphK2 KO hearts could promote mPTP opening and increase subsequent injury. This would provide a link between loss of SphK2 and IR injury (see Figure 6).
These findings have important implications with regard to the aging heart. As shown in Figure 3 and demonstrated previously [16, 20, 26], in young rodent hearts, SphK2 activity exceeds that of SphK1, but as animals age this ratio changes so that senescent rat hearts contain significantly more SphK1 than SphK2 activity . The data in the present paper indicate that this shift from SphK2 to SphK1 is unlikely to affect cardioprotection per se. However, this shift does appear to lead to somewhat reduced S1P levels with aging , and this may contribute to the impaired response to certain cardioprotective interventions such as IPC that have been noted in aged hearts [26, 33, 34].
Activation of Akt by phosphorylation plays an important role in promoting cardiomyocyte survival. Akt phosphorylation is cardioprotective both in vitro and in vivo [35, 36]. In this study, we found that the phosphorylation levels of Akt (and also Erk) were the same in SphK2-KO mouse hearts at baseline as in WT. However, the detrimental signaling molecule phospho-p38 was readily detectable in KO hearts at baseline, but low in WT hearts. This finding implies that chronic activation of p38 is present in the KO mouse. This observation is novel as it has been shown that preventing p38 phosphorylation is an important component of cardioprotection . Chronic activation of p38 represents a negative predisposition of the KO hearts to injury. This could contribute to the adverse response of SphK2 KO hearts to IR and IPC.
In summary, our data demonstrate for the first time that myocardial damage is enhanced after ischemia/reperfusion in mice null for SphK2 and that the cardioprotective intervention of preconditioning is abolished by deletion in the SphK2 gene. These observations are contrary to prior suggestions derived from in vitro models that SphK1 and SphK2 drive opposing functions that regulate cell fate.
4. Materials and Methods
This study was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academic Press, Washington DC, 1996), and all procedures were approved by the Animal Care Subcommittee of the San Francisco Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin A, and triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) were obtained from Sigma. D-Erythro-sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) was obtained from Biomol Research Laboratories. D-Erythro-sphingosine-[3H] was obtained from American Radiolabeled Chemicals.
4.1. SphK2 Null Mice
SphK2 null (KO) mice in which exons 2–5 of the SphK2 gene had been deleted  were obtained from Drs. Shaun Coughlin and Rajita Pappu (Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco). These mice along with their wild-type littermates were used for all studies reported herein and were all 3 to 4 months of age at the time of study. Male homozygous null (SphK2) and wild-type (WT) mice were generated by breeding heterozygous (SphK2) mice. Genotyping using PCR to confirm the absence of exons 2–5 of SphK2 DNA was routinely performed on tail biopsies of 3-4-week-old mice. Figure 1 shows PCR primers used for analysis of SphK2, SphK2, Sphk2 mice. To identify WT and KO mice, PCR was employed using the following primer sets. For the WT, the set was 5′ATTTTCTGGAGGGCGGGATAGG3′ and 5′AAGAGGAACGGGGAGTGAGACAAG3′, which amplifies a 572-bp fragment. The homozygous null (SphK2) mice were identified with the primer set as follows: 5′GCCACCACTTATGAGGAGAATCG3′ and 5′GACACAGAACATCCCATCCCTAAC3′. This set amplifies a fragment of approximately 378 bp.
4.2. Langendorff Isolated Perfused Heart Preparation
Male mice (3-4 months of age, weighing 25–28 g) were heparinized (500 U/kg, IP) and anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, IP). Hearts were rapidly excised, washed in ice-cold arresting solution (NaCl 120 mmol/L, KCl 30 mmol/L), and cannulated via the aorta on a 20-gauge stainless steel blunt needle. Hearts were perfused at 70 mmHg on a modified Langendorff apparatus using Krebs-Henseleit solution containing (mmol/L) NaCl 118, KCl 4.7, CaCl2 2.5, MgSO4 1.2, KH2PO4 1.2, NaHCO3 24, glucose 5.5, and Na pyruvate 5.0. The perfusion solution was bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2 and maintained at 37°C. During periods of global ischemia the hearts were lowered into a thermostated chamber to maintain a heart temperature of 37°C.
4.3. Ischemia-Reoxygenation (IR) and Ischemic Preconditioning (IPC) Protocols
The protocol for IR experiments consisted of a 20-minute equilibration period, followed by 40 minutes of global ischemia and 40 minutes of reperfusion (reoxygenation). For IPC, hearts were equilibrated for 16 minutes and then subjected to two short cycles of preconditioning, each consisting of 2 minutes of global ischemia and 2 minutes of reperfusion. This was followed immediately by 50 min of global ischemia and 40 min of reperfusion. Hemodynamics (left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and ±dP/dt) were recorded using a balloon inserted into the LV as previously described . LVEDP was initially set at 5 mmHg during equilibration and subsequent changes measured. Infarct size was measured by TTC staining as previously described .
4.4. Sphingosine Kinase Activity
Hearts were rapidly excised from anesthetized mice (pentobarbital sodium 60 mg/mL ip), mounted on the Langendorff apparatus, and flushed for 1 min with perfusion buffer. They were then homogenized in ice-cold isolation buffer (0.13 M KCl, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 μg/L leupeptin, 0.25 μg/L each of chymostatin and pepstatin A). The homogenate was centrifuged for 6 min at 350 g in a TOMY microcentrifuge to remove cell debris and nuclei. The supernatant was centrifuged for 50 min at 100,000 g. The supernatant was decanted and designated as the cytosolic fraction. The particulate fraction was washed once with buffer A and then repelleted by centrifugation. The wash was added back to the cytosolic fraction. Both cytosolic and membrane fractions were used separately for assay of SphK activity. The radioassay uses a chloroform (fresh)/methanol/aqueous trisodium EDTA extraction system to separate reactant ([3H]sphingosine) from product ([3H]S1P) essentially as previously described [30, 39]. A standard assay contains Triton X-100 (0.05%), 250 mM KCl, 1 μM [3H]sphingosine (300–400 cpm/pmol), 5 mM ATP, 10 mM Mg2+, 100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM ascorbate, and enzyme protein in a volume of 0.5 mL. Separation and identification of enzymatically active forms of SphK1 and SphK2 were done as described previously .
4.5. Western Analysis
Mouse hearts were mounted on the Langendorff apparatus and perfused under the indicated conditions. They were then homogenized in 0.13 M KCl, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 μg/L leupeptin, 0.25 μg/L each of aprotinin and pepstatin A and centrifuged at g to generate a particulate and a cytosolic fraction. The particulate fraction was washed once with the isolation buffer. Western analysis was conducted as described previously  using the following antibodies from Cell Signaling Technology: phospho-Akt (Ser 473, no. 9271), phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182, no. 9211), p38 (no. 9218), phospho-Erk1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204. no. 4376). Protein concentration was determined using the detergent compatible DC Protein Assay kit from Bio-Rad and used to equalize the protein concentration in all samples. Each lane was then loaded with exactly 10 μg of protein.
4.6. Statistical Analysis
The data are presented as . The significance of the differences in mean values for hemodynamics, infarction size, between groups was evaluated by one-way ANOVA, followed by posthoc testing (Newman-Keuls). Differences in SphK activity between WT and SphK2 KO tissues were evaluated by Student’s t-test. was considered statistically significant.
This work was supported by a grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development (DAV) and NIH Grants 1P01 HL068738-01A1 and 1RO1 HL090606 (JSK). The authors thank Drs. Shaun Coughlin and Rajita Pappu for supplying the SphK2 null mice.
- K. M. Venardos, A. Perkins, J. Headrick, and D. M. Kaye, “Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, antioxidant enzyme systems, and selenium: a review,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 1539–1549, 2007.
- L. M. Buja and M. L. Entman, “Modes of myocardial cell injury and cell death in ischemic heart disease,” Circulation, vol. 98, no. 14, pp. 1355–1357, 1998.
- D. A. Vessey, L. Li, and M. Kelley, “Pannexin-I/P2X 7 purinergic receptor channels mediate the release of cardioprotectants induced by ischemic pre- and postconditioning,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 190–195, 2010.
- R. Schulz, M. V. Cohen, M. Behrends, J. M. Downey, and G. Heusch, “Signal transduction of ischemic preconditioning,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 181–198, 2001.
- E. R. Gross and G. J. Gross, “Ligand triggers of classical preconditioning and postconditioning,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 212–221, 2006.
- D. A. Vessey, L. Li, N. Honbo, and J. S. Karliner, “Sphingosine 1-phosphate is an important endogenous cardioprotectant released by ischemic pre- and postconditioning,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 297, no. 4, pp. H1429–H1435, 2009.
- S. Spiegel and S. Milstien, “Sphingosine-1-phosphate: an enigmatic signalling lipid,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 397–407, 2003.
- S. Kennedy, K. A. Kane, N. J. Pyne, and S. Pyne, “Targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate signalling for cardioprotection,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 194–201, 2009.
- J. S. Karliner and J. H. Brown, “Lipid signalling in cardiovascular pathophysiology,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 171–174, 2009.
- D. Verzijl, S. L. M. Peters, and A. E. Alewijnse, “Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors: zooming in on ligand-induced intracellular trafficking and its functional implications,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 99–104, 2010.
- J. S. Karliner, N. Honbo, K. Summers, M. O. Gray, and E. J. Goetzl, “The lysophospholipids sphingosine-1-phosphate and lysophosphatidic acid enhance survival during hypoxia in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1713–1717, 2001.
- J. Zhang, N. Honbo, E. J. Goetzl, K. Chatterjee, J. S. Karliner, and M. O. Gray, “Signals from type 1 sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors enhance adult mouse cardiac myocyte survival during hypoxia,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 293, no. 5, pp. H3150–H3158, 2007.
- Z. Q. Jin, H. Z. Zhou, P. Zhu et al., “Cardioprotection mediated by sphingosine-1-phosphate and ganglioside GM-1 in wild-type and PKCε knockout mouse hearts,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 282, no. 6, pp. H1970–H1977, 2002.
- T. Kohama, A. Olivera, L. Edsall, M. M. Nagiec, R. Dickson, and S. Spiegel, “Molecular cloning and functional characterization of murine sphingosine kinase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 37, pp. 23722–23728, 1998.
- H. Liu, M. Sugiura, V. E. Nava et al., “Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a novel mammalian sphingosine kinase type 2 isoform,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 26, pp. 19513–19520, 2000.
- D. A. Vessey, M. Kelley, J. Zhang, L. Li, R. Tao, and J. S. Karliner, “Dimethylsphingosine and FTY720 inhibit the SK1 form but activate the SK2 form of sphingosine kinase from rat heart,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 273–279, 2007.
- V. Limaye, X. Li, C. Hahn et al., “Sphingosine kinase-1 enhances endothelial cell survival through a PECAM-1-dependent activation of PI-3K/Akt and regulation of Bcl-2 family members,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 3169–3177, 2005.
- A. Olivera, T. Kohama, L. Edsall et al., “Sphingosine kinase expression increases intracellular sphingosine-1- phosphate and promotes cell growth and survival,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 545–558, 1999.
- L. C. Edsall, O. Cuvillier, S. Twitty, S. Spiegel, and S. Milstien, “Sphingosine kinase expression regulates apoptosis and caspase activation in PC12 cells,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1573–1584, 2001.
- Z. Q. Jin, J. Zhang, Y. Huang, H. E. Hoover, D. A. Vessey, and J. S. Karliner, “A sphingosine kinase 1 mutation sensitizes the myocardium to ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2007.
- Z. Q. Jin, J. S. Karliner, and D. A. Vessey, “Ischaemic postconditioning protects isolated mouse hearts against ischaemia/reperfusion injury via sphingosine kinase isoform-1 activation,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 134–140, 2008.
- H. Liu, R. E. Toman, S. K. Goparaju et al., “Sphingosine kinase type 2 is a putative BH3-only protein that induces apoptosis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 41, pp. 40330–40336, 2003.
- N. Igarashi, T. Okada, S. Hayashi, T. Fujita, S. Jahangeer, and S. I. Nakamura, “Sphingosine kinase 2 is a nuclear protein and inhibits DNA synthesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 47, pp. 46832–46839, 2003.
- M. Maceyka, H. Sankala, N. C. Hait et al., “SphK1 and SphK2, sphingosine kinase isoenzymes with opposing functions in sphingolipid metabolism,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 44, pp. 37118–37129, 2005.
- G. M. Strub, M. Paillard, J. Liang, et al., “Sphingosine 1-phosphate produced by sphingosine kinase 2 in mitochondria interacts with prohibitin 2 to regulate complex IV assembly and respiration,” FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 600–612, 2011.
- D. A. Vessey, M. Kelley, L. Li, and Y. Huang, “Sphingosine protects aging hearts from ischemia/reperfusion injury: superiority to sphingosine 1-phosphate and ischemic pre- and post-conditioning,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 146–151, 2009.
- D. A. Vessey, L. Li, M. Kelley, and J. S. Karliner, “Combined sphingosine, S1P and ischemic postconditioning rescue the heart after protracted ischemia,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 375, no. 3, pp. 425–429, 2008.
- S. K. Jo, A. Bajwa, H. Ye et al., “Divergent roles of sphingosine kinases in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Kidney International, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2009.
- R. Tao, J. Zhang, D. A. Vessey, N. Honbo, and J. S. Karliner, “Deletion of the Sphingosine Kinase-1 gene influences cell fate during hypoxia and glucose deprivation in adult mouse cardiomyocytes,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 56–63, 2007.
- D. A. Vessey, M. Kelley, L. Li et al., “Role of sphingosine kinase activity in protection of heart against ischemia reperfusion injury,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. BR318–BR324, 2006.
- Q. Chen and E. J. Lesnefsky, “Depletion of cardiolipin and cytochrome c during ischemia increases hydrogen peroxide production from the electron transport chain,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 976–982, 2006.
- A. P. Halestrap, S. J. Clarke, and I. Khaliulin, “The role of mitochondria in protection of the heart by preconditioning,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1767, no. 8, pp. 1007–1031, 2007.
- M. Juhaszova, C. Rabuel, D. B. Zorov, E. G. Lakatta, and S. J. Sollott, “Protection in the aged heart: preventing the heart-break of old age?” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 233–244, 2005.
- K. Boengler, R. Schulz, and G. Heusch, “Loss of cardioprotection with ageing,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 247–261, 2009.
- Y. Fujio, T. Nguyen, D. Wencker, R. N. Kitsis, and K. Walsh, “Akt promotes survival of cardiomyocytes in vitro and protects against lschemia-reperfusion injury in mouse heart,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 660–667, 2000.
- T. Matsui, J. Tao, F. del Monte et al., “Akt activation preserves cardiac function and prevents injury after transient cardiac ischemia in vivo,” Circulation, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 330–335, 2001.
- S. Kumphune, R. Bassi, S. Jacquet et al., “A chemical genetic approach reveals that p38α MAPK activation by diphosphorylation aggravates myocardial infarction and is prevented by the direct binding of SB203580,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 5, pp. 2968–2975, 2010.
- R. Pappu, S. R. Schwab, I. Cornelissen et al., “Promotion of lymphocyte egress into blood and lymph by distinct sources of sphingosine-1-phosphate,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5822, pp. 295–298, 2007.
- D. A. Vessey, M. Kelley, and J. S. Karliner, “A rapid radioassay for sphingosine kinase,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 136–142, 2005.