Research Article
Identifying Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Water Environment Treatment Public-Private Partnership Projects
Table 8
Weight of the indicators.
| Dimension | Indicators | Indicators weights | Rank |
| Economic | Internal return ratio (IRR) | 0.203 | 3 | Land value-added benefit around the project | 0.182 | 5 | Life-cycle cost | 0.209 | 2 | Sustainable cash flow | 0.224 | 1 | Fiscal pressures of government | 0.183 | 4 |
| Social | Public satisfaction | 0.461 | 1 | Provision of employment opportunities | 0.336 | 2 | Potential impact on social development | 0.204 | 3 |
| Resource and environment | Effect on water quality | 0.162 | 1 | Reduction of pollutant discharge | 0.154 | 3 | Energy efficiency (e.g., reduction of energy consumption and use of renewable energy resources) | 0.159 | 2 | Protection for landscape and historical sites | 0.119 | 7 | Sewage treatment rate | 0.133 | 5 | Comprehensive utilization of water resources | 0.126 | 6 | Use of innovation materials | 0.148 | 4 |
| Engineering | Completeness of supporting facilities for the project | 0.126 | 2 | Renewal of project facilities | 0.129 | 1 | Construction quality | 0.115 | 3 | Control of pollution sources | 0.104 | 7 | Adoption of advanced engineering technology | 0.099 | 8 | Sustainability of the technology itself | 0.114 | 4 | Capabilities of operation and maintenance | 0.109 | 5 | Utilization of construction waste | 0.097 | 9 | Waste recycling and reuse | 0.107 | 6 |
| Project management | Organization structure | 0.368 | 1 | Continual improvement of the operation management system | 0.301 | 3 | Competence and skills of the project team | 0.331 | 2 |
|
|