Research Article
Transportation Planning through GIS and Multicriteria Analysis: Case Study of Beijing and XiongAn
Table 4
Ratings for alternatives.
| Alternatives | Criteria | Weight | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | F10 |
| V1: | AVG | B-AVG | G | A-AVG | G | Good | Good | AA | Good | Good | 0,17 |
| V2: | AVG | ET | ET | ET | ET | ET | ET | ET | ET | ET | 0,27 |
| V3: | G | G | A-AVG | G | G | Good | AA | G | G | B- AVG | 0,21 |
| V4: | G | A-AVG | A-AVG | G | AVG | A-AVG | A-AVG | G | A- AVG | B- AVG | 0,18 |
| V5: | G | A-AVG | A-AVG | G | AVG | A- AVG | A- AVG | G | A-AVG | B- AVG | 0,18 |
|
|
Average (AVG), good (G), above average (A-AVG), below average (B-AVG), above Average (A-AVG), and excellent (ET). |