Review Article

A Review of Traffic Congestion Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence

Table 1

Traffic congestion prediction studies in probabilistic reasoning.

MethodologyRoad typeData sourceInput parametersTarget domainNo. of congestion state levelsReference

Hierarchical fuzzy rule-based systemHighway corridorSensorOccupancySpeed2Zhang et al. [30]
SpeedSpeed4Lopez-garcia et al. [37]
Evolutionary fuzzy rule learningTraffic flowTraffic densityOnieva et al. [28]
Mamdani-type fuzzy logic inferenceHighway, trunk road, branch roadSpeedCongestion IndexCao and Wang [3]
DensityWang et al. [58]
Fuzzy inferenceHighway corridorCameraTravel time
Traffic flow
Speed

Fuzzy comprehensive evaluationHighway corridorProbeTraffic volumeSaturation5Kong et al. [4]
SpeedDensity speedYang et al. [5]
Hidden Markov modelHighway networkSensorEmission matrixTraffic pattern selectionZaki et al. [32]
Emission matrixTraffic pattern determinationZaki et al. [25]
Transition matrix
Main roadProbeObservation probabilityMapping GPS dataSun et al. [45]
Transition probability

Gaussian distributionHighway corridorSensorTraffic volumeOptimal feature selectionYang [29]

Bayesian networkBuild-up areaSimulationRoad and bus incrementCongestion probabilityYi Liu et al. [59]
BridgeSensorIntensityAsencio-Cortés et al. [54]
Occupation
Average speed
Average distance
Highway networkSensorNetwork directionCongestion probabilityKim and Wang [34]
Day and time weather
Incidents
Traffic flow
Occupancy
Speed
Level of service
Congestion state

Extended Kalman filterHighwayCameraTravel timeData fusionAdetiloye and Awasthi [7]

The table accumulates the data source, scope of the study area, input and resulting parameters, and how many cognitive traffic states were considered in the studies.2 = free/congested, 4 = free/light/medium/severe, 5 = very free/free/light/medium/severe