Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical vs. Percutaneous vs. Hybrid Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Residual Myocardial Ischemia and Clinical Outcomes at One Year—Hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Stenting or Surgery (HREVS)

<div>MACCE-free survival (a) and cumulative risk of MACCE (b) during 12-month follow-up according to the treatment arm. Panel A shows MACCE-free survival, whereas the cumulative risk of MACCE is depicted in Panel B. Numbers of patients at risk are shown above the horizontal axis in panel A. Pairwise comparisons of treatment arms with Cox proportional hazards model are shown at the bottom of panel B. MACCE—Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebral Event.</div>

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical vs. Percutaneous vs. Hybrid Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Residual Myocardial Ischemia and Clinical Outcomes at One Year—Hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Stenting or Surgery (HREVS) 

Figure 2 | Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical vs. Percutaneous vs. Hybrid Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Residual Myocardial Ischemia and Clinical Outcomes at One Year—Hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Stenting or Surgery (HREVS) 