Occupational Therapy Practice in Sleep Management: A Review of Conceptual Models and Research Evidence

Table 1

Quality assessment by Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2001 version.

Author, year	Research design	Type	Level of evidence (LoE)	Quality appraisal (MMAT)
Eakman et al., 2016	Single-arm feasibility pilot study	Quantitative descriptive	Level III	3/4
Farrehi et al., 2016 [21]	RCT	Quantitative randomization controlled (trials)	Level I	3/4
Gee et al., 2017 [22]	An ABA single-subject design	Qualitative	Level V	1/4
Gutman et al., 2016 [23]	RCT	Quantitative randomization controlled (trials)	Level I	3/4
Heidt et al., 2016 [24]	Experimental study design	Quantitative descriptive	Level III	4/4
Jarus et al., 2011 [25]	Waitlist control trials	Quantitative nonrandomization controlled	Level II	3/4
Leland et al., 2016 [26]	RCT	Quantitative randomization controlled (trials)	Level I	3/4
Schoen et al., 2017 [27]	A quasi-experimental, single-group, pretest/posttest design	Quantitative descriptive	Level III	2/4
Wen et al., 2017 [28]	Mixed-methods pilot study	Mixed methods	Level IV	1/4
Wolfhope et al., 2016	Mixed-methods pilot study	Mixed methods	Level IV	2/4
Wooster et al., 2015 [30]	A pretest-posttest, one group design	Quantitative descriptive	Level III	2/4