GRS Method for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation of Code Results and Applications

<table>Calculated one-sided <svg height="11.5" id="M22" style="vertical-align:-0.27588pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 59.075001 11.5" width="59.075001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,11.5)">
<g transform="translate(72,-62.8)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.12)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">9</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="6.2515001" y="0">5</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="12.503" y="0">%</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="21.842741" y="0">/</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="25.318575" y="0">9</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="31.570074" y="0">5</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="37.821575" y="0">%</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg> uncertainty limit and best estimate reference calculation compared with a “conservative” calculation of rod clad temperature for a reference reactor during a postulated double ended offset shear cold leg break.</table>

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: GRS Method for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation of Code Results and Applications 