Review Article

A Review of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Element Bearings for Induction Motor

Table 3

AI algorithms used in CM and FDD of IM.

The methodHighlights

Random forest(i) The small number of training samples is required
(ii) There is low computational cost
(iii) There is good performance for high-dimensional data
Bayesian network(i) There is high classification speed
(ii) It is useful if the prior knowledge is reliable
(iii) There is low storage need
(iv) It is computationally expensive
(v) There is prior beliefs’ problem
KNN(i) There is low classification speed
(ii) It is simple and easy to apply
(iii) There is poor performance for high-dimensional data
(iii) It is memory-intensive
(iv) It is noise sensitive
(v) It is computationally expensive
SVM(i) There is good performance for high-dimensional data
(ii) There are low storage needs
(iii) There is high classification speed
(iv) It is not efficient for big data
(v) It is noise sensitive
(vi) It has good accuracy
ANN(i) There is fault tolerance
(ii) There is high classification speed
(iii) There is parallelism
(iv) There is hidden training problem
(v) It is efficient for big data
(vi) It is computationally expensive
(vii) There is black box behavior problem
Neuro-fuzzy(i) There is good performance for high-dimensional data
(ii) It has good diagnosis accuracy
(iii) There is robustness
(iv) There is parallelism
(v) It is efficient for big data
(vi) There is black box behavior problem
(vii) It has self-learning capability
DNN(i) There is good classification speed
(ii) There are automatic fault diagnosis and detection
(iii) There is good accuracy
(iv) There is parallelism
(v) It has complex and deep architecture
(vi) It is feature extraction free
(vii) It is computationally expensive
(viii) There are massive parallel computations
(ix) It is efficient for big data
(x) There is long time training problem
(xi) A large number of training samples are required