Review Article

Challenges of Future VANET and Cloud-Based Approaches

Table 1

Comparative study of edge clouds (i.e., fog computing, MEC, and cloudlets) and the conventional cloud.

Key features Edge cloud computing Conventional cloud
FogMobile edge computing (MEC)Cloudlets

Proposed/introduced byCisco in Aug. 2012ETSI in Sep. 2014CMU team in Oct. 2013Amazon

Promoted byCisco, Princeton,
Microsoft, Intel, Dell
ETSI ISG MEC:
Nokia, Huawei, IBM, Intel, NTT DoCoMo, Vodafone
Prof. Mahadev at
CMU, later supported by Intel, Huawei, Vodafone, Deutsche Telekom, Nokia and NTT
Microsoft,
Google, Amazon

Industry organizationsOpenFog ConsortiumETSI MEC ISGOpen Edge Computing initiativeOpen Cloud Consortium

InspirationIoT, WSN, VANETsMEC as stepping
stone towards 5G mobile networks
Distributed cloud,
cognitive and tactical network
Remote storage, computing, and applications

Architecture frameworkYesYesNot necessary, it can be an enabler for fog and MECYes

Geo-distributedYesYesYesNo

Network ArchitectureDecentralizedDecentralizedDecentralizedCentralized

Low latency/jitterYesYesYesNo

Geo-mobility support for applications
on device
YesYesNot inherent, but
can be added
No

Near real-time interactionYesPartialPartialNo

Emphasis on online data
analytics & interaction with cloud
YesYesN/AYes

Edge server locationFlexible b/w end device and cloudCollocated with BSNetwork EdgeN/A

Dynamic broadcasting range depending on the message typeYesPartial, not dynamicYesN/A

Location awarenessYesYesYesNo

Mobility supportYesYesN/ALimited

Channel Bandwidth75 MHz for 802.11p20 MHz for LTE20 MHz for 802.11n---

Capacity6 Mbps for 802.11p150 Mbps downlink & 50 Mbps uplink for LTE50 Mbps for 802.11n---

ScalabilityHighHighHighAverage

Run experimental testbedYes, at PrincetonNoYes, at CMUYes