Research Article

Quantitative Evaluation and Path Optimization of College Students’ Employment Policy Based on Text Mining

Table 4

PMC index system and evaluation criteria of college students’ employment policy.

Primary indicatorSecondary indicatorsIndicator evaluation criteria

I1 nature of policyI1:1 forecastReflect predictability, some are 1, none are 0
I1:2 regulationReflect supervision, some are 1, no is 0
I1:3 bootReflect guidance, some are 1, none are 0

I2 policy effectivenessI2:1 long termFor content involving more than ten years, some are 1 and none are 0
I2:2 mediumInvolving five to ten years of content, some are 1, not 0
I2:3 short termInvolving one to five years of content, some are 1, not 0
I2:4 this yearInvolving the content of this year, some are 1 and none are 0

I3 policy areaI3:1 demand pullInvolving content driven by demand-side measures such as expanding the scale of employment and providing jobs, some are 1 and none are 0
I3:2 supply promotionInvolving content promoted through supply-side measures such as improving employability and strengthening employment training, some are 1 and none are 0
I3:3 environmental optimizationFor content related to optimizing the employment environment for job hunting, there are 1 and no 0
I3:4 supply and demand matchingInvolving content such as providing a supply and demand matching platform and strengthening employment services, some are 1 and none are 0

I4 policy orientationI4:1 coordinationContains overall coordination content, 1 if there is one, 0 if there is none
I4:2 encouragementContains encouragement and incentive content, 1 for some, 0 for none
I4:3 reform and innovationIncluding reform and innovation content, some are 1, not 0
I4:4 perfect systemContains the content of the perfect mechanism system, some are 1, no is 0

I5 policy focusI5:1 curriculum reformThe policy attaches importance to curriculum reform, some are 1, not 0
I5:2 skill improvementThe policy focuses on skills upgrading, some are 1, not 0
I5:3 entrepreneurship-drivenThe policy attaches importance to entrepreneurship to promote employment, some are 1, not 0
I5:4 protection of rightsThe policy attaches importance to the protection of rights and interests, some are 1, not 0
I5:5 employment at the grassroots levelThe policy attaches importance to grass-roots employment, with 1 for some and 0 for none.
I5:6 rural revitalizationThe policy attaches importance to the realization of employment under rural revitalization, with 1 for some and 0 for none.

I6 policy perspectiveI6:1 macroInvolving macro policies, some are 1, not 0
I6:2 microscopicInvolving micro policies, some are 1 and none are 0

I7 regulatory rangeI7:1 nationwideThe scope of regulation is nationwide, if it is 1, it is not 0
I7:2 provincial and municipal scopeThe scope of regulation is provinces and cities, if it is 1, it is not 0

I8 publishing agencyI8:1 State Council and General OfficeIssued by the State Council and its General Office, if it is 1; otherwise, it is 0
I8:2 ministries and commissions of the State CouncilIssued by ministries and commissions of the State Council, it is 1 if it is; otherwise, it is 0
I8:3 joint release by multiple departmentsMulti-department joint release, is 1, not 0

I9 objectI9:1 government entitiesPolicies affect government entities, 1 if yes, 0 if no
I9:2 grassroots ruralThe effect of the policy on the grass-roots rural areas is 1, not 0
I9:3 industryIf the policy acts on a certain type of industry, it is 1, but not 0
I9:4 enterpriseIf the policy acts on a certain type of enterprise, it is 1, but not 0
I9:5 schoolThe policy acts on the school, if it is 1, it is not 0
I9:6 college studentsThe effect of the policy on the college student group is 1, not 0