Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Astronomy
Volume 2010, Article ID 349171, 6 pages
Research Article

Master Robotic Net

1Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University, 13 Univeristetskij pr-t, Moscow 119991, Russia
2Kislovodsk Solar Station, P.O. Box 145, 100 Gagarina street, Kislovods 357700, Russia
3Ural State University, 51 Lenina pr-t, Ekaterinburg 620083, Russia
4Irkutsk State University, 1 Karl Marks ul., Irkutsk 664003, Russia
5Blagoveschensk State Pedagogical University, 104 Lenina street, Blagoveschensk 675000, Amur region, Russia

Received 30 June 2009; Accepted 16 November 2009

Academic Editor: Taro Kotani

Copyright © 2010 Vladimir Lipunov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The main goal of the MASTER-Net project is to produce a unique fast sky survey with all sky observed over a single night down to a limiting magnitude of 19-20. Such a survey will make it possible to address a number of fundamental problems: search for dark energy via the discovery and photometry of supernovae (including SNIa), search for exoplanets, microlensing effects, discovery of minor bodies in the Solar System, and space-junk monitoring. All MASTER telescopes can be guided by alerts, and we plan to observe prompt optical emission from gamma-ray bursts synchronously in several filters and in several polarization planes.

1. Introduction

The MASTER project (Mobile Astronomical System of TElescope Robots) was launched in 2002, when the first Russian robotic telescope was installed near Moscow on an automated mounting with automatic roof, weather station, and alert system (Lipunov et al. [13]). By early 2008 we posted about 100 GCN circulars, recorded optical emission from three gamma-ray bursts, and discovered four supernovae (Lipunov et al. [4], Tyurina et al. [5]). Unfortunately, very poor astroclimatic conditions near Moscow made it impossible to demonstrate the potential of our telescope to its full extent. However, we obtained about 80 000 images, each with a size of six square degrees, and used them to successfully develop a software pipeline, which allows us not only to perform in real time the extraction of images and their astrometric and photometric reduction, but also to automatically classify the sources identified; that is, determine which type of astronomical objects (supernovae, minor planets, comets, man-made satellites, meteors, or optical transients) they belong to (Figures 1 and 2). Moreover, our facility can also be used for alert observations of optical emission of gamma-ray bursts (Tyurina et al. [5]).

Figure 1: Folow-up exoplanet transit observations by MASTER (Moscow).
Figure 2: The first supernova discovered in Russia (SN2005bv).

Our experience with the operation of robotic telescopes allowed us to develop the wide-field MASTER optical facility with optimum parameters, which can be used to address a wide range of astrophysical tasks. We actually developed a multipurpose optical facility, which is similar in composition to the one independently proposed by Bogdan Paczynski (Paczynski [6]). The first MASTER telescopes and their individual components are already installed at three sites in Russia—near Kislovodsk (Caucasian Mountain Observatory of the Sternberg Astronomical Institute of the Moscow State University), in Urals (Kourovka Observatory of Ural State University), and near Irkutsk (Irkutsk State University Observatory). In summer 2009 we also plan to deploy similar facilities near Irkutsk and Blagoveshchensk.

2. MASTER Wide-Field Robotic Facility

The MASTER wide-field robotic telescope that we developed is manufactured by OAO Optika Moscow Association. The facility consists of two instruments: MASTER II wide-field optical telescope “Santel 400” and MASTER very wide-field (VWF) cameras.

2.1. MASTER II Wide-Field Robotic Telescope

A single fast German equatorial mounting carries two 1 : 2.5 focal-ratio symmetrical high-aperture 400-mm catadioptric telescopes (Figure 3). The telescope has an extra degree of freedom, which allows their tubes to be aligned or misaligned, making it possible to double the size of the field of view and, when operating in the alert mode (with collinear tubes), to perform synchronous photometry of rapidly varying objects in standard broad-band filters (B,V,R,I) and their polarimetry at different polarizations (Figure 4).

Figure 3: MASTER II wide-field robotic telescope (manufactured by OAO Optika Moscow Association). Each tube is equipped with a photometer with a set of B, V, R, I filters and polarizers.
Figure 4: Photometer with 3 filters and 1 polarimeter based on an Apogee AltaU16M CCD camera.

Table 1 lists the technical parameters of MASTER II telescope. The telescope is equipped with a shell-type automatic shelter, which, when open, allows the entire sky to be observed. This facility is also equipped with a time synchronization system, a weather station, and a cloud cover sensor.

Table 1: Composition and specification of MASTER II telescope.
2.2. MASTER VWF Very Wide-Field Camera

V. G. Kornilov developed a robotic very wide-field MASTER VWF camera with a maximum field of view of 1000 square degrees (Figure 5) for synchronous observations of optical emission from gamma-ray bursts. The facility uses a parallactic fork capable of carrying 2 CCD cameras with up to 10-cm aperture lenses. The facility has an autonomous high-quality roof designed by N. I. Shatskii. Our experience of its operation under extreme conditions of Russian winter (with temperatures as low as degree Celsius) demonstrates good survival potential of all systems. Table 2 lists the specifications of the very wide-field camera. The cameras are adapted to all large-aperture Nikor and Nikor-Ziess lenses. Our facility uses two lenses with the focal distances of 50 and 85 mm. The cameras allow continuous sky imaging with a minimum exposure of 150 milliseconds.

Table 2: Composition and specification of MASTER VWF camera.
Figure 5: MASTER very wide-field camera.

3. Geographic Location of the Stations of the MASTER Network as of May 2009

The locations of the station sites were determined by two factors: (1) sites must be about 2 hours apart in longitude and (2) sites must provide minimum required infrastructure (power supply, Internet, warm room for servers). Such sites can usually be found at university observatories (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Russian robotic network MASTER. The flags indicate the Russian contribution into gamma-ray burst’s astrophysic. The yellow rectangles indicate planned sites of network stations and the indicators without rectangles introduce already equipped ones. From West to East: Moscow (MASTER I), Kislovodsk (MASTER II, MASTER VWF-4), Ekaterinburg (MASTER II), Novosibirsk (planed), Irkutsk (MASTER II in Tunka (made in November 2009) and VWF-2), Blagoveshchensk (MASTER-I, made in October 2009), and Ussuriysk (planned). The average annual number of clear nights is indicated near each site.

The participants to the project already include Moscow State University (Figure 7), Ural State University (Figure 8), Irkutsk State University, and Blagoveshchensk Pedagogical University. The network extends over seven hours in longitude, thereby ensuring virtually continuous 24-hour observations during winter seasons.

Figure 7: MASTER II (Kislovodsk, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University). Photo by A. Belinskiy.
Figure 8: MASTER II (Kourovka, near Ekaterinburg, Ural State University).

When deployed, the first step MASTER II telescope network will have the following parameters

(i)Total field of view— square degrees.(ii)Survey rate—2000 square degrees per hour down to a limiting magnitude of 19-20.(iii)Alert positioning speed-up to 30 degrees/s.

4. Expected Scientific Results

4.1. GRB Mystery

Observations of the prompt emission of gamma-ray bursts, which is determined by the physical processes in the central engine, are of fundamental importance for understanding the nature of these bursts (Lipunov and Gorbovskoy [7, 8]).

First and foremost, we expect that MASTER II telescopes will allow us to obtain multicolor photometric and polarimetric follow-up observations for alerts from gamma-ray space observatories. We also plan to continue synchronous observations with very wide-field cameras. Recall that we have performed five synchronous observations of gamma-ray error boxes since November 2008 (Gorbovskoy et al. [9]).

4.2. Dark Energy

The first mass observations of type Ia supernovae showed (Reiss et al.[10]; Perlmutter S. et al.[11]) that the Universe expands with acceleration, which may be due to the so-called dark energy. This result follows from observations of several dozen supernovae. On the other hand, present-day search surveys miss most of the supernovae. The first computations of the velocities of explosions of cosmological supernovae performed by Jorgensen et al., [12] showed that the number of supernovae exploding in our Universe with magnitudes brighter than m can be described by the following formula:

Note that without the correction for host-galaxy extinction corresponds to a redshift of , where the effect of cosmic energy of vacuum becomes quite appreciable.

This actually means that MASTER can discover several thousand supernovae annually and perform multicolor photometry of these objects.

5. Conclusion

A complete survey of the entire visible sky during a single night will allow to perform a number of tasks with no special observing plan (provided, naturally, proper coordination between the stations of the network):

(i)search for orphan flares,(ii)search for exoplanets,(iii)search for dangerous asteroids,(iv)search for microlensing effects,(v)search for and monitoring of space waste.


The authors thank the General Director of the “OPTIKA” Association S. M. Bodrov for providing the MASTER project with necessary expensive equipment.


  1. V. Lipunov, “Mobile astronomical systems of the telescope-robots (MASTER) near the Moscow,” Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 35, p. 766, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. M. Lipunov, A. V. Krylov, V. G. Kornilov et al., “MASTER: the mobile astronomical system of telescope-robots,” Astronomische Nachrichten, vol. 325, no. 6–8, pp. 580–582, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. M. Lipunov, V. G. Kornilov, A. V. Krylov et al., “The master mobile astronomical system. Optical observations of gamma-ray bursts,” Astrophysics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 389–399, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. M. Lipunov, V. G. Kornilov, A. V. Krylov et al., “Optical observations of gamma-ray bursts, the discovery of supernovae 2005bv, 2005ee, and 2006ak, and searches for transients using the “MASTER” robotic telescope,” Astronomy Reports, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1004–1025, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. Tyurina, V. Lipunov, V. Kornilov et al., “MASTER prompt and follow-up GRB observations,”
  6. B. Paczynski, “Astronomy with small telescopes,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 118, no. 850, pp. 1621–1625, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. Lipunov and E. Gorbovskoy, “An extra long X-ray plateau in a gamma-ray burst and the spinar paradigm,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 665, no. 2, part 2, pp. L97–L100, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. M. Lipunov and E. S. Gorbovskoy, “Spinar paradigm and the central engine of gamma-ray bursts,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 383, no. 4, pp. 1397–1412, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Gorbovskoy, K. Ivanov, V. Lipunov et al., “Transient detections and other real-time data processing from wide-field chambers MASTER VWF,”
  10. A. G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis et al., “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 1009–1038, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber et al., “Measurements of O and ? from 42 high-redshift Supernovae,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 517, no. 2, pp. 565–586, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. E. Jorgensen, V. M. Lipunov, I. E. Panchenko, K. A. Postnov, and M. E. Prokhorov, “Evolution of supernova explosion rates in the universe,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 486, no. 1, pp. 110–116, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus