Review Article  Open Access
Dwarf Galaxies in Voids: Dark Matter Halos and Gas Cooling
Abstract
Galaxy surveys have shown that luminous galaxies are mainly distributed in large filaments and galaxy clusters. The remaining large volumes are virtually devoid of luminous galaxies. This is in concordance with the formation of the largescale structure in the universe as derived from cosmological simulations. However, the numerical results indicate that cosmological voids are abundantly populated with dark matter haloes which may in principle host dwarf galaxies. Observational efforts have in contrast revealed that voids are apparently devoid of dwarf galaxies. We investigate the formation of dwarf galaxies in voids by hydrodynamical cosmological simulations. Due to the cosmic ultraviolet background radiation lowmass haloes show generally a reduced baryon fraction. We determine the characteristic mass below which dwarf galaxies are baryon deficient. We show that the circular velocity below which the accretion of baryons is suppressed is approximately 40 km. The suppressed baryon accretion is caused by the photoheating due to the UV background. We set up a spherical halo model and show that the effective equation of the state of the gas in the periphery of dwarf galaxies determines the characteristic mass. This implies that any process which heats the gas around dwarf galaxies increases the characteristic mass and thus reduces the number of observable dwarf galaxies.
1. Introduction: Formation of Structure in the Universe
During the last couple of decades new extensive observations of the universe were made using both groundbased telescopes and space instruments. These measurements have provided new insights into the structure of the universe on various scales. A wide range of the electromagnetic spectrum emitted by cosmic objects has been studied. The wavelengths extend from very long radio wavelengths to energetic gamma rays. This observational progress has been accompanied by considerable effort in our theoretical understanding of the formation of different components of the observed structure of the Universe from small scales (galaxies and their satellites) up to the largest scales (clusters of galaxies and superclusters).
The standard picture of structure formation was suggested by White and Rees [1] more than 30 years ago. It suggests that gravitational instability drives the dark matter (DM) to cluster hierarchically in a bottomup fashion. The gaseous baryons settle into the DM haloes (namely, bound virial DM structures) and via gasdynamical dissipative processes cool, fragment, and form stars. This simple picture prevails today although our knowledge of the details and of the actual processes has evolved dramatically since then. The nonlinear nature of the gravitational dynamics and the gasastrophysical processes makes the problem of structure formation virtually intractable analytically, and therefore the fiecp..ld relies on numerical simulations. A substantial part of the progress in understanding structure formation of the universe is due to the increasing possibilities to make numerical experiments using the largest massive parallel supercomputers. In the eighties the best simulations handled particles, whereas at present particles became a standard for numerical simulations, a increase of roughly in agreement with Moore's law.
The effort of observers and theorists brought about the so called standard cosmological model. This model is based on the idea that some kind of dark energy contributes about 70% of the total energy density of the spatially flat universe in which the total energy density equals the critical one. The dark energy is responsible for the observed accelerated expansion of the universe. The simplest form of the dark energy is the cosmological constant, which was introduced already in 1917 by Albert Einstein in his paper about the cosmological solutions of the field equations of general relativity. The remaining about 30% of energy density consists of matter. About 85% of this matter is made of unknown dark matter particles, the remaining 15% is the contribution of “normal” baryonic particles well known to particle physicists. This means that the nature of more than 95% of the matter in the universe is not yet understood.
According to this standard cosmological model, the main process responsible for the formation of the observed structures is gravitational instability. The initial seeds, which eventually became galaxies and superclusters and all other structures, came from the quantum fluctuations generated during the early inflationary phase: sec or so from the beginning of the Big Bang. The power spectrum of these primordial fluctuations has been confirmed by measuring the temperature fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background radiation. These temperature fluctuations tell us the magnitude of the small fluctuations in the universe about 300 000 years after the Big Bang.
One of the key features of the standard model is its simplicity. The expansion rate and the clustering properties are described by only few parameters which are measured at present with quite high accuracy. These parameters are the current rate of universal expansion, , the mass density parameter, , the value of the cosmological constant, , the primordial baryon abundance, , and the overall normalisation of the power spectrum of initial density fluctuations, typically characterised by , the presentday r.m.s. mass fluctuations on spheres of radius Mpc.
The initial power spectrum (created during the inflationary phase) does not contain preferred length scales. However, the horizon size at matterradiation equality is mapped on this scalefree spectrum. Since this scale (today around 100 Mpc) is well above the typical scales of observed objects, structure formation is predicted to be essentially scale invariant: in a statistical sense the structures on scales of galaxy clusters are repeated on scales of galaxies. Typically, small objects merge together and form more and more massive objects. However, the small objects do not disappear within those larger objects but rather form a complex hierarchy of substructures. This hierarchical scenario predicts that our Milky Way galaxy is expected to have as many satellites (many hundreds) as a cluster of galaxies has galaxies. However, only a few dozen satellite of the Milky Way have been observed yet: this is the wellknown missing satellite problem [2, 3]. Other manifestations of the scalefree power spectrum are the predicted large number of dwarfs in low density regions of the universe [4, 5] or the predicted spectrum of minivoids in the Local Universe [6].
A better understanding of the physics of structure formation on small scales, in particular of the correct modelling of baryonic physics, could solve these problems [7]. Based on semianalytical models recently Macciò et al. [8] (see also [9]) claimed that the long standing problem of missing satellites can be solved within the CDM scenario. The basic idea behind this solution of the problem is that the haloes which host a galaxy of a given measured rotational velocity are more massive than expected by the direct association of rotational velocity and the haloes maximum circular velocity. Since more massive haloes are less frequent, the problem of missing satellites is solved. However, any nonbaryonic physics that reduces power on small scales compared to the standard model will also improve the situation. It is well known that warm dark matter acts in this direction by erasing power at short scales due to free streaming [10, 11].
Altogether, we arrive at a picture in which dark matter particles form the backbone structure for all objects in the universe from clusters of galaxies to dwarf galaxies. Normal matter (baryons) falls into the potential wells formed by the dark matter particles and forms the luminous objects. The details of this formation process must be followed using hydrodynamical simulations. Galaxy formation depends on many physical processes, some of which are very poorly understood, and some of which take place on subgrid scales and therefore cannot be modelled fully and consistently and need to be fudged numerically by ad hoc recipes. For example, the formation of stars and the feedback of stars on the intergalactic medium take place on scales orders of magnitudes below the present day resolution. In cosmological simulations of galaxy formation typical masses of “stellar particles” are or more. Thus such a particle represents the formation and evolution of a large number of real stars.
The paper is organised as follows. In Section 2 we introduce briefly the method of cosmological simulations and discuss observational facts about voids and how they are defined in simulations. In Section 3 we present the baryon fraction in low mass dark matter haloes and introduce the characteristic mass. In Section 4 we introduce a spherical model for the halo gas and discuss the relation between photoheating of the halo gas and gas accretion. Our findings are summarised in Section 5.
2. Cosmological Simulations
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) originates from the recombination of the hydrogen in the universe at redshift about 1000. Primordial small density fluctuations are imprinted on the spectrum of the CMB temperature fluctuations which is closely related to the initial power spectrum of density fluctuations. The observed unique features of CMB temperature fluctuations constrain the cosmological parameters as well as the normalisation of the power spectrum of density fluctuations. The most recent results of the WMAP experiment combined with the measurements of the baryonic oscillations and supernova data [12] yield a Hubble parameter , the density of dark matter , the baryonic density , the cosmological constant , the normalisation of the power spectrum , and its slope . These parameters fix the cosmological model and also the power spectrum of the initial perturbations. Starting with the initial conditions the simulations follow the growth of the perturbation in a universe that expands according to the chosen cosmological parameters. In this expanding universe the gravitational interaction is Newtonian.
2.1. Initial Conditions
The first step of running cosmological simulations is to set up the initial conditions, namely, amplitudes and phases of small perturbations at a very high redshift. Having in mind that the largest structures in the universe—superclusters and voids—have sizes of 10 to 50 Mpc, the simulated volume should be significantly larger. However, we may be interested in the structure of a much smaller object such as our Milky Way galaxy or its satellites. In body simulations each mass element is represented by a pointlike particle. The mass resolution is limited by the total number of particles computers can handle at a given time. Thus, increasing the representative cosmological volume decreases the mass resolution. To overcome this problem mass refinement techniques have been developed. Here we follow the algorithm proposed in [13]. To construct suitable initial conditions, we first create a random realisation at the highest possible resolution. This depends on the available computers; at present we reach particles. The initial displacements and velocities of particles are calculated using all waves ranging from the fundamental mode to the Nyquist frequency . Then the resolution can be decreased by replacing () neighbouring particles by one particle with higher mass which results in a distribution of , , , , or particles. Using a smaller number of more massive particles we first run lowresolution simulations until the present epoch. In this simulation we select the regions of interest. Then we repeat the simulation but this time we preserve low mass particles inside the region of interest. Outside of this region we progressively replace small particles by massive ones creating shells of more and more massive particles until we reach the low resolution region of particles. This procedure ensures that our object evolves in the proper cosmological environment and with the right gravitational tidal fields.
Based on the power spectrum of density fluctuations we set up the initial conditions of our simulation at an early redshift which depends on the size of the box and the required resolution. To move the particles from the original Lagrangian point on a regular grid to their Eulerian position we use the Zeldovich approximation. The power spectrum of the generated Gaussian stochastic density field corresponds to the input power spectrum. The random nature of the realisation manifests itself on scales comparable to the box size where the spectrum is sampled only by a few modes. By this procedure the cosmological parameters and the normalisation of the density power spectrum fully determine the initial conditions of the cosmological simulations, except of a random number which characterises the starting point of the random number generator. Thus, on scales comparable to the box size cosmic variance enters through this number which characterises a given simulation. On smaller scales—typically a quarter of the box size—the realisation follows very closely the input power spectrum. Starting from the initial matter distribution we simulate the formation of cosmological structures. More precisely, we integrate the Poisson equation by the help of particle methods (Gadget and ART).
2.2. The Simulation Method
Our hydrodynamical simulations have been run with an updated version of the parallel TreeSPH code Gadget [14, 15]. The dark and baryonic matter distributions are represented by particles. The gravitational forces are computed by a new algorithm based on the TreePM method which speeds up the force computation significantly compared with a pure tree algorithm. The hydrodynamical equations are solved by a SmoothedParticle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method. The code uses an entropyconserving formulation of SPH [14] which alleviates problems due to numerical overcooling.
The code also includes photoionisation and radiative cooling processes for an optically thin primordial mix of helium and hydrogen. For computing the thermal evolution it uses ionisation, recombination and cooling rates as given in [16]. Since we will set up later in this paper an analytic model for the evolution of the intergalactic medium (IGM) we give here in detail the processes which affect the temperature, , of the IGM. It primarily changes due to photoheating, , and radiative cooling, . Moreover, it decreases due to the adiabatic Hubble expansion, , where is the timedependent Hubble constant. Cosmological structure formation changes the temperature adiabatically, . Finally, changes of the chemical composition also affect the temperature, , where denotes the abundance of the atomic species with respect to the cosmic baryon density, . In summary, the temperature evolution is given by where denotes the overdensity, . We take the atomic hydrogen and helium species, HI, HII, HeI, HeII, HeIII, into account. We assume a constant, primordial helium mass fraction of .
The physics of star formation is treated in the code by means of a subresolution model in which the gas of the interstellar medium (ISM) is described as a multiphase medium of hot and cold gas [17, 18]. Cold gas clouds are generated due to cooling and they are the material out of which stars can be formed in regions that are sufficiently dense. Supernova feedback heats the hot phase of the ISM and evaporates cold clouds, thereby establishing a selfregulation cycle for star formation. The heat input due to the supernovae also leads to a net pressurisation of the ISM, such that its effective equation of state becomes stiffer than isothermal. This stabilises the dense star forming gas in galaxies against further gravitational collapse, and allows converged numerical results for star formation even at moderate resolution. See [17] for a more detailed description of the star formation model implemented in the Gadget code.
2.3. Dark Matter Haloes
During the cosmological evolution dark matter haloes are formed which accrete more and more matter or merge with other ones. Within a simulation with one billion particles it is a challenge to find structures and substructures. To find structures at virial overdensity one can use a friendsoffriends algorithm with a certain linking length (0.17 of the mean interparticle distance for the CDM model at redshift zero). The resulting particle clusters are in general triaxial objects. Substructures can be identified as particle clusters at smaller linking lengths (higher overdensities). The more different linking lengths are used the better substructures will be resolved. Thus a whole hierarchy of friendsoffriends clusters have to be calculated. To this end we have developed a hierarchical friendsoffriends algorithm which is based on the calculation of the minimum spanning tree of the given particle distribution. We use also the bounddensitymaxima (BDM) algorithm [19] which determines spherical haloes and their subhaloes. The code removes unbound particles which is particularly important for subhaloes.
At all redshifts the sample of haloes is characterised by the mass function of the isolated haloes. This number density of haloes of a given mass depends on the power spectrum. A first very successful analytical ansatz to predict the mass function of haloes has been made by Press and Schechter [20]. Later on this has been improved by Bond et al. [21] and Sheth and Tormen [22]. The search for an accurate and universal function which describes the number density of haloes found in simulation at different redshifts led to a set of fitting functions proposed by different authors [23–25].
2.4. Voids
With the first available large galaxy surveys it became clear that there exist large regions in the Universe which are not occupied by bright galaxies [26–28]. Regions of all possible sizes devoid of galaxies can be seen in all redshift surveys. The observational discovery was soon followed by the theoretical understanding that voids constitute a natural outcome of structure formation via gravitational instability [29, 30]. Together with clusters, filaments, and superclusters, giant voids constitute the largescale structure of the Universe.
More than 20 years ago, for the first time the sizes of voids have been estimated in different samples of galaxies with measured redshifts [31]. Later on voids in the CfA redshift catalogues were studied by [32], in the Las Campanas redshift survey by [33], in the Optical Redshift Survey and in the IRAS 1.2Jy survey by [34, 35] and in the PSCz catalogue by Plionis and Basilakos [36] and Hoyle and Vogeley [37]. For a review of early observational efforts see Peebles [5]. More recently voids have been studied by many authors using the TwoDegree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey [38–41] and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey [42–45].
There were several attempts to find dwarf galaxies in few individual voids [46–49]. The overall conclusion is that faint galaxies do not show a strong tendency to fill up voids defined by bright galaxies. The strongest arguments that voids are not populated by dwarf galaxies were given by Peebles [5] who points out that the dwarf galaxies in the ORS catalogue follow remarkably close the distribution of bright galaxies: there are no indications that they fill voids in the distribution of bright galaxies. To summarise, observations indicate that large voids found in the distribution of bright () galaxies are empty of galaxies, which are two magnitudes below . Recently, Tikhonov and Klypin [6] studied the properties of minivoids in the nearby universe.
The void phenomenon was already the target of many theoretical studies [50–59]. Using a set of DM only simulations [4] have studied the inner structure of voids. The haloes in voids are arranged in a pattern, which looks like a miniature Universe with the same structural elements as the largescale structure of the galactic distribution of the Universe. There are filaments and voids; larger haloes are at the intersections of filaments. The mass function of haloes in voids is much steeper for high masses resulting in very few galaxies with circular velocities . Note, however, that in DM simulations it has been usually assumed that each dark matter halo hosts at least one galaxy. This may not be true. Physical processes of galaxy formation are not well known and there could be processes that strongly suppress the formation of stars inside small haloes, which collapse relatively late in voids. This issue will be discussed in detail in the following sections.
There is a lot of interest in the void phenomena. However, there is no clear definition of a void. Almost every study uses its own definition of a void and its own void finder. Recently, the different approaches have been compared within the AspenAmsterdam Void Finder Comparison Project [60]. Here we use a rather simple and direct definition. In order to identify voids, we start with a selection of point like objects in 3D. These objects can be haloes above a certain mass or a certain circular velocity or galaxies above a certain luminosity. Thus the voids are characterised by the threshold mass or luminosity. The void finding algorithm can be applied both to numerical and observational data. In numerical simulations it takes into account periodic boundary conditions. At first it searches the largest empty sphere which is completely inside the given volume. The radius of this empty region is . Then we extend this region to an empty region with irregular shape. We define this empty region as union of all spheres with radius (thus with a volume greater or equal half of the volume of the original void sphere) which can be moved to their place without crossing any object or the box boundary. To find the other voids we repeat this procedure however taking into account the previously found voids. We now search the largest empty sphere which is completely inside the volume and does not intersect with any already known void. The voids are characterised by volume, shape and orientation.
For the resimulation we selected a void region from a larger periodic computational box. To construct suitable initial conditions, at first we replaced in a box of sidelength Mpc with particles the low mass particles by massive ones. After running the simulation at this low mass resolution we determined a void region of interest and, finally, we were rerunning the simulation with the original set of particles inside the void () and replacing only outside the void the low mass particles by more massive ones.
3. The Baryon Content of Dwarf Galaxy Haloes
The number density of dwarf galaxies observed in the Universe is apparently smaller than the predicted number density of low mass dark matter haloes [61]. The missing galaxies are either not formed because the corresponding dark matter haloes do not exist, or no stars are formed in small haloes. As shown by Hoeft et al. [7] and Okamoto et al. [62], the optically thin UVbackground already causes baryon deficiency in small haloes. In this section we determine the mass scale below which photoheating causes baryon deficiency.
3.1. Mass Accretion History
The gravitationally bound structures, that is, galaxies and clusters of galaxies, grow in two ways: they accrete surrounding matter and they merge with other galaxies or clusters. Numerical simulations allow us to follow the merging history of the haloes. Every massive halo at the end of the simulation has a large number of progenitors which subsequently merge to the final structure.
We compute the mass accretion history for all haloes in our two simulations, see Table 1. To this end we determine the haloes in each simulation snapshot. Then we go backward from the final snapshot and search for the most massive progenitor in the previous snapshot. Since we have stored more than one hundred snapshots for each simulation we can simply search for the most massive progenitor in the vicinity of a given halo. However, during merger events the halo finder sometimes fails to identify the halo at all, since two approaching haloes appear spuriously gravitationally unbound. Figure 1 shows the mass accretion histories of ten sample haloes, where the jumps are caused by merger events.

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
3.2. Characteristic Mass
We determine for all distinct haloes in our simulations the baryon fraction within the virial radius, , where denotes the baryonic mass, the total mass, the dark matter mass, the gas mass and in stellar mass. We take those haloes into account which consist of more than 180 dark matter particles. The resulting lowest halo mass is and for the void and for the filament region, respectively. Moreover, we exclude all haloes which have been within the virial radius of a more massive halo in the past, because the dark matter and baryonic masses may be affected by stripping. Figure 2 shows the resulting baryon fraction for both the low density region simulation the filament region simulation. The low mass haloes evidently have a baryon fraction much smaller than the cosmic baryon fraction. Since the transition from “cosmic mean baryon fraction” to “baryon deficient” occurs within a rather small mass range this phenomenon can be characterised by a single parameter, namely the mass at which the baryon fraction amounts in average to half of the cosmic mean, . We determine the characteristic mass computing the average baryon fraction in mass bins and approximating the resulting curve by the following analytic expression We use a different expression than in [7] to make the fitting procedure more robust, in particular when a second free parameter is included, here the width . Moreover, we expect that the halo gas, which is present independently from the halo size, leads to a floor in the baryon fraction. As we have shown in [7] the characteristic mass depends very little on the mass resolution used in our simulations. This indicates that the physical processes causing the baryon deficiency are reasonably resolved even if there are only a few tens of gas particles in small mass haloes.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
In [7] we focussed on the baryon content of dwarf galaxies in cosmological voids. The result we obtained might be affected by restricting to void dwarf galaxies. To investigate also the effect of the cosmological environment we include here dwarf galaxies in a cosmological filament. These galaxies have a higher merger rate than void dwarf galaxies with a similar mass but they do accrete less diffuse gas, see [63] and references therein. We have excluded all galaxies which have passed through the halo of a more massive galaxy since their dark matter and baryonic mass could be affected by stripping. Despite the cosmologically quite different environments, the characteristic mass of both regions coincide well, see Figure 2(top row). In conclusion, the general mass accretion history of a dwarf galaxy has only little effect on their baryon content, that is, there is universal characteristic mass for all dwarf galaxies. Note, this result is obtained with a homogeneous UVbackground. We will argue later that the UVheating may have a crucial impact on the baryon accretion in dwarf galaxies.
Observationally, the total mass of a galaxy is difficult to determine. Galaxies are preferably characterised by the maximum circular velocity, . One should note that also is difficult to measure in dwarf galaxies since most rotation curves do not approach a maximum, that is, the maximum of the circular velocity lies outside the observable gas distribution. However, we will characterise haloes mainly by . Figure 2(middle row) shows the baryon fractions in distinct haloes as a function of the maximum circular velocity.
Our aim is to determine what makes haloes below the characteristic mass baryon deficient. The baryon content at a given time is accumulated over the history of the halo. To assess what prevents at a given time haloes from accreting baryonic mass we determine the baryon fraction of newly accreted matter where and denote the masses of a given halo at an earlier and at a later time, respectively. Figure 2(bottom row) shows that small haloes do not accrete baryonic mass. Since we consider the differential evolution of the dark matter and the baryonic masses we have a large scatter in the characteristic mass of newly accreted matter. However, similar to the baryon fraction in haloes there is a clear separation between low mass haloes which accrete virtually no baryonic matter and high mass haloes which accrete matter with the mean cosmic baryon fraction.
3.3. Evolution of the Characteristic Mass
Figure 2 shows that the characteristic mass decreases with redshift. For instance, at redshift the characteristic mass is about , while it amounts to at . Figure 3 shows the redshift evolution of the characteristic mass as obtained from combined halo lists from our two simulations. For comparison also a few mass accretion histories from Figure 1 are shown.
(a)
(b)
Plotted as a function of circular velocity the evolution of the characteristic mass of the newly accreted matter has a rather simple behaviour: after a steep increase it is almost constant at for . Note that in [7] we found a lower value since we used the circular velocity at the virial radius, , instead of . Moreover, we considered only the baryon fraction in haloes. Since semianalytic models of galaxy formation assume a lowmass cutoff for gas accretion, see, for example, [64, 65], we investigate here also the characteristic mass of newly accreted matter.
Because the circular velocity of most of the dwarf galaxy haloes is almost constant with time, except a major merger occurs, one can separate two types of evolutionary scenarios for dwarf galaxies: (i) small galaxies with accrete baryons only for and (ii) galaxies with are not affected at all. In Figure 1 we have also depicted for each halo the evolution of as shown in Figure 3(a). One can see nicely that haloes get baryon deficient when their halo mass is below .
3.4. Can the Characteristic Mass Explain the Void Phenomenon?
The void phenomenon comprises two observational findings [5]: first, the distribution of massive galaxies () shows large empty regions, the “voids”, see Section 2.4. Lowluminosity galaxies populate the voids but with a low volume density compared to the dense regions [43]. Secondly, the galaxies found in voids are not special at all. According to the concordance CDM cosmology voids are filled by dark matter haloes with the size of dwarf galaxies [4]. To judge if this is at odds with the void phenomenon in observations one has to assign a luminosity to the dark matter haloes. Recently, Tinker and Conroy [66] applied a Halo Occupations Distribution (HOD) to a large dark matter simulation and analysed void regions. They found that the haloes in void regions which host galaxies with an absolute magnitude are located close to the walls of the voids. Only even fainter galaxies, that is, galaxies which are significantly below the current detection limit of surveys covering large void regions [43], populate the entire void volume. According to Tinker and Conroy galaxies with reside in haloes with a mass . Hence, the photoheating discussed here would reduce the luminosity of the haloes filling the entire void volume rendering those galaxies even more difficult to detect.
The HOD used by Tinker and Conroy implies that the masstolight ratio increases by a factor of ten from haloes with a mass of to haloes with , independent of the environment. This is consistent with the compilation of the baryon content of galaxies by McGaugh [67]. Haloes with the mass of seem to host only 5% of the baryonic mass corresponding to the cosmic mean. In our simulations we do not find any indication that the UVbackground reduces the baryon fraction in galaxies significantly more massive than the characteristic mass. Therefore, we speculate that stellar feedback plays a key role in reducing the baryon fraction galaxies with . Note that the baryon fractions in [67] shows indeed a break at , consistent with our findings for the characteristic mass.
In summary, the surprising low number of lowluminosity galaxies in voids can be explained by a massdependent masstolight ratio, as obtained from a global Halo Occupation Distribution and from a proper mass modelling of galaxies. Haloes above the characteristic mass are expected to reside close to the walls of voids. The photoheating discussed here reduces the luminosity of the lowmass and lowluminosity galaxies which can populate the entire void volume. Current surveys are limited to detect galaxies close to the walls due to the sensitivity limits of the surveys.
4. Why Small Haloes Fail to Accrete Gas
In the previous section we have shown that dark matter haloes with do accrete dark matter for while they do not accrete baryons for smaller redshifts. Halos with are generally baryon deficient for . These results are obtained for highresolution hydrodynamical cosmological simulations including a homogeneous photoheating of an optically thin medium and including radiative cooling for a primordial chemical composition. In this section we investigate in detail the origin of the baryon deficiency which is evidently related to the photoheating by the UV background. To this end we set up an analytic model and investigate how baryons cool in dwarf galaxies.
4.1. Outline of the Analytic Model
Our simple model is constructed as follows: In the beginning the gas in the universe is homogeneously distributed. In the process of structure formation gas is accreted by galaxies, that is, its density increases.
Starting from a homogenous distribution the gas in the periphery of haloes and in the IGM follows the evolution of the dark matter. For our model here we assume that there is universal evolution of the overdensity, , which only depends on the time and on the final overdensity, see Figure 4. By the help of (1) we can determine the temperature as a function of the overdensity. For a given temperaturedensity relation we can determine the gas density profile of NFWtype haloes. Assuming that the gas density in the periphery of the halo is given by the mean cosmic baryon fraction we can determine the central gas density and temperature. If the resulting cooling time is short the halo would accrete baryonic matter, if the cooling time is long the halo would fail to accrete baryonic matter.
4.2. Effective Equation of State of the IGM
For a known overdensity evolution, , we can integrate the thermal evolution of the IGM, (1). To determine the heating and the cooling, and , respectively, we have to know the abundance of each species, that is, the ionisation state of hydrogen and helium. As in the cosmological simulations we adopt collisional equilibrium, hence, we can determine for a given time and a given temperature the relative abundances. We solve the rate equations for collisional ionisation, for recombination, and for photoionisation. Now we can compute the photoheating and cooling of the gas. Timedependent specific energy injection rates, , are tabulated according to the UVbackground model. As a result, the total photoheating can be written as . Cooling rates are used as given in [16]. Hence, for a given overdensity evolution, and UVbackground model we can compute the final gas temperature, .
We use our numerical simulations to estimate the overdensity evolution, . In Gadget the hydrodynamical equations are solved by the SPH method, hence, the fluid is represented by mass elements. The SPHparticles can be traced through the simulation. We group SPHparticles according to their overdensity at the end of the simulation, , regardless if they are located in a galaxy, in a cosmological filament or in the field. Then, we trace back the density of the particles and compute the average density of each group, see Figure 4. For the integration of the thermal evolution of the IGM we approximate the overdensity evolution by an analytic expression, namely, where we use the cosmic expansion factor, as time variable. We approximate the time evolution by , and determine for each final overdensity the exponent . We fit (4) to each curve in Figure 4, where we take only the data for into account. In the overdensity range the resulting exponents are reasonably reproduced by . This finally provides an analytic model for the overdensity evolution, .
In Figure 5 the temperaturedensity relation, , obtained by integrating (1) using the analytic formula for the overdensity evolution described above, is shown. For comparison the densitytemperature phasespace, as obtained from the numerical simulation, is also depicted. For high densities, , the analytic result, , and the distribution of the SPHparticle coincides very well, because the thermal state is determined by thermal equilibrium. For low densities, most of the SPHparticles also follow . Finally, a significant fraction of the SPHparticles has temperatures substantially above , since in the numerical simulation particles are also heated by dissipation at shock fronts.
Which impact has the overdensity evolution? To answer this question we investigate two extreme scenarios. First, gas stays at mean cosmic density until and is then instantaneously compressed or decompressed to the final overdensity. This clearly leads to an adiabatic temperaturedensity relation, see Figure 5 (dashdotted line). Secondly, gas is brought to the final overdensity before reionisation takes place and has then constant overdensity. The resulting temperaturedensity (dashed line) relation is only slightly different from the result for the average cosmic density evolution (solid line); the transition to thermal balance occurs at lower overdensities, since the compressed gas has more time to cool.
For the overdensity history introduced in (4) we find for low overdensities, , an effective equationofstate, that is, the temperaturedensity relation follows a powerlaw, with and .
By plotting the cooling times in the temperaturedensity phasespace we can clearly see at which overdensities the gas is in thermal balance, see Figure 6. For low overdensities, , cooling has only a negligible effect, that is, the thermal state of the gas is determined by the cumulative photoheating. In contrast, at high overdensities, , the temperature lies exactly at the boundary between heating and cooling, that is, it is in thermal balance. Therefore, in the range the transition from the pure photoheating to the equilibrium between heating and cooling takes place.
4.3. The Halo Density Profile
We now set up the second part of our toy model, namely, the spherical halo model, with the aim to estimate the innermost gas density as a function of halo mass.
For a spherically symmetric halo in hydrostatic equilibrium the pressure force and the gravitational force are in balance: where is the gravitational constant and is the total mass enclosed by the radius . Assuming an effective equationofstate, as given in (5), we can write the lefthand side of (6) in terms of the gas overdensity. To this end we expand the gas density, , where is the proton mass. The pressure can be written as , where we have used the molecular weight, , and (5). Now we rewrite the lefthand side of (6):
We simplify the righthand side of (6) by assuming that the distribution of the total mass is determined by the dark matter. For the density profile of the latter we follow [68] with . The scaling radius, , is related to the virial radius, , of a halo by , where is the concentration parameter. The mass enclosed by the scaled radius is Evidently, the virial radius encloses the virial mass, . Dividing (9) by the virial mass leads to Using and the expression (7) we can rewrite (6) We can further simplify the expression on the righthand side by introducing the maximum circular velocity. The circular velocity is given by The quotient is independent from the halo properties and has a maximum value of . Therefore, we can write for the maximum circular velocity Equation (11) is now independent from the concentration parameter of the halo, namely, To determine the innermost gas overdensity we integrate (14) starting from the periphery of the halo, , to the center, . Since the halo gas is highly ionised we adopt . The resulting central overdensity is where is the gas overdensity at . We estimate the outer overdensity by assuming that it is identical to the dark matter overdensity.
From (8) we get The virial radius is determined by the cumulative overdensity, , at which virialisation is expected. We use the approximation of [69] for . For the virial mass we write now where we have used (9) for the last equality. Substituting we can write for (16) that which allows us to estimate in (15).
We wish to give the central gas overdensity as a function of the maximum circular velocity. To utilise (18) we have to find a relation between and the concentration parameter. Macciò et al. [70] give an relation between and the virial mass of a halo for : From our simulations we find that and the maximum circular velocity are on average related by Moreover, the concentration parameter is expected to scale with redshift according to [71, 72]. Thus, we obtain an relation between concentration parameter and , namely, which allows us finally to evaluate (15).
Finally, we compute the central gas overdensity as follows: For a given circular velocity we determine the concentration parameter of the halo by (21). Then we estimate the outer gas density, here we assume that , see (18), at three times the virial radius, . Finally, we compute the central gas overdensity, (15), as a function of the circular velocity, see Figure 7.
To estimate the characteristic circular velocity by our analytic model we have to give a criterion at which central overdensity gas condenses in a halo centre. The transition from the effective equationofstate to the thermal balance takes place in the overdensity range of . For an overdensity of 900 our analytic model would match the characteristic circular velocity obtained from the numerical simulations. However, the resolution in the numerical simulation is not sufficient to reach the innermost gas density as assumed in our model. To mimic the numerical resolution we integrate (15) only up to the scaling radius, see thin line in Figure 7. In this case an overdensity of 300 corresponds to the characteristic circular velocity. This leads to two conclusions: First, the analytic model matches the numerical result very well. Secondly, better resolved simulations may result in a lower characteristic velocity. However, gas mixing in the halo centre may generally prohibit an ideal hydrostatic equilibrium.
4.4. Evolution of the Characteristic Mass
In the previous section we have shown that our model well reproduces the characteristic circular velocity at . We can easily extend the model to other redshifts by determining the effective e.o.s and the criterion for condensation as a function of redshift. We derive the timedependent e.o.s. by integrating (1), see Section 4.2. To obtain a timedependent condensation criterion we determine the position of the maximum in the densitytemperature relation, see the solid line in Figure 5. To compensate for the discrepancy between and the actual overdensity for condensation we introduce a correction factor. To match the characteristic circular velocity obtained from the simulations this factor also comprises the effect of the limited numerical resolution. Equation (15) can be now rewritten: where we have neglected the contribution of the outer halo boundary. To match the characteristic circular velocity at we choose . Equation (22) indicates that the characteristic circular velocity is essentially determined by the densitytemperature relation at any time. All parameters on the r.h.s., namely slope and normalisation of the e.o.s. and , are derived from . Figure 8(upper row) shows how the characteristic circular velocity is composed of three parameters of the temperaturedensity relation. The upper left panel shows for several redshifts. The next three panels show the evolution of the parameters of : The temperature , the overdensity at the maximal temperature, , and the slope at . The right panel shows the resulting , which nicely matches the characteristic circular velocity obtained from the numerical simulations. In the range the circular velocity is virtually constant. This is the result of the decreasing and the increasing .
(a)
(b)
(c)
The redshift evolution of the characteristic mass can be derived from characteristic circular and (13) and (17). Combining these equations and using we find This is in agreement with the results found earlier [7]. More precisely, the dominating terms in are introduced by the redshift dependence in the definition of the virial radius, (17).
4.5. Variations in the UV Background
As shown above the cumulative heating of the IGM by the UV background prevents the gas cooling in the centre of small mass haloes. It is therefore evident that the characteristic mass depends on the UV background and its evolution over cosmic times. We use our model worked out above to assess the impact of modifications of the UV background model on the characteristic circular velocity. We first consider changes of the UV flux density and secondly of the UV spectrum.
4.5.1. UV Flux Density
The flux density of the UV background has only a small effect on the temperature of the IGM. The reason is that a higher flux reduces the fraction of neutral hydrogen in the tenuous IGM, hence, the higher flux finds fewer neutral atoms to ionise. As a result the heating rate is essentially independent from the flux density, when photoionisation dominates over collisional ionisation and as long as the spectrum remains unchanged. In this case the fraction of neutral hydrogen, , can be derived from the balance between photoionisation and recombination The IGM is generally highly ionised, hence . In this case the electron density is proportional to the hydrogen density, . As a result the heating due to hydrogen ionisation becomes The heating therefore depends only on the ratio , that is, only on the average energy input per ionisation event. In the limits made above the heat input is independent from the actual flux density. In accordance with this result we have found in [7] that the characteristic mass depends only little on the UV background flux density. Even very strong variations of the flux causes only a small shift of the characteristic mass, showing that the latter is sensitive only to the thermal state of the IGM which is little affected by the actual flux density.
4.5.2. UV Spectrum
Significantly more important for the thermal evolution of the IGM is the spectrum of the UV background. As a first guess one may expect that the final temperature of the IGM is directly proportional to the energy per ionising photon. However, since the recombination rate, , decreases with increasing temperature the effect is not that strong. Figure 9 shows the results for increased energies per ionising photon compared to the [73] model. We have computed models with four times and with eight times increased energy per ionisation event. The higher average energy shifts the effective equationofstate to higher temperatures. Also the shape of the temperaturedensity relation changes. The maximum in the relation shifts to higher densities. In particular, the maximum changes significantly between the four times and eight times increased model. The effective equationofstate runs in the cooling regime virtually parallel to lines of constant cooling times. When these cooling times are above the Hubble time. In those cases the cases the transition to thermal balance appears at very high overdensities.
(a)
(b)
(c)
We use the models introduced above to estimate the impact of the UV spectrum on the characteristic circular velocity. To this end we compute the evolution of the characteristics of the temperaturedensity relation, see Figure 8. For the four times increased energy per ionising photon we find that the characteristic circular velocity amounts to for . For the eight times increased model the characteristic velocity get very high, since shifts to very high overdensities.
5. Summary
We discuss highresolution simulations including radiative cooling and photoheating. We focus on the baryon content of dwarf galaxysized dark matter haloes. To this end, we have simulated the structure formation in two distinct cosmological environments and we found that the characteristic mass below which haloes are baryon deficient does not depend on the environment. Moreover, we found that in haloes in the mass range of to in general gas condensation stops at some redshift between reionisation and today. In our simulation those haloes are able to retain the already condensed gas, allowing further star formation. We have derived the characteristic mass in newly accreted matter, which is somewhat higher than the characteristic mass of the baryon fraction in the haloes. The former is more appropriate for semianalytic modelling.
Tinker and Conroy [66] found by a Halo Occupation Distribution analysis that the magnitude of galaxies which reside in haloes with a mass about the characteristic mass is . Moreover, they found that more luminous void galaxies, that is, , are preferably located close to the walls of the voids. Therefore, photoheating would reduce the baryon content of the smallmass haloes populating the entire void volume, rendering these galaxies even more dark. Current surveys which cover large void volumes are not sensitive enough to detect the galaxies affected by photoheating.
The failure of condensing gas can be traced back to the cooling time in the halo centre, which may exceed the Hubble time. We have set up a spherical model for the haloes gas density profile. Crucial for this model is the effective equation of state which we have derived by integrating the thermal history of the IGM using an approximation for the overdensity evolution as a function of the final overdensity We have justified this model by considering the density contrast evolution in the simulation. This spherical model allows us to derive the characteristic mass for different heating histories of the IGM.
We find that the mass at which galaxy formation seems to fade can be explained by a heating model which incorporates 6–8 times more energy per ionising photon than given in the Haardt and Madau model [73]. For redshift it is known from analyses of the Lyman forest that the temperature of the IGM is higher than obtained by a naive application of the Haardt and Madau model. The derived temperature implies a 34 times increased energy per ionising photon, or a more efficient heating due to nonequilibrium effects or radiative transfer effects. We found that if the average temperature of the IGM is today as high as ≳ dwarf galaxy formation would be suppressed at a mass scale consistent with that derived, for example, by the conditional luminosity function. Therefore, the mass scale for suppression of dwarf galaxy formation may be considered as a measure for the temperature of gas in the surroundings of dwarf galaxies. The heat source could be the UV background or alternatively any feedback of the galaxy.
Acknowledgments
The simulations discussed here have been performed at the LRZ Munich and the NIC Jülich. The authors would like to thank Gustavo Yepes and Volker Springel for many comments and discussions during the last years. Finally, they would like to thank their referees, in particular Michael Vogeley, who read the paper very carefully and provided many comments which improved this text.
References
 S. D. M. White and M. J. Rees, “Core condensation in heavy halos—a twostage theory for galaxy formation and clustering,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 183, pp. 341–358, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Klypin, A. V. Kravtsov, O. Valenzuela, and F. Prada, “Where are the missing galactic satellites?” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 522, no. 1, pp. 82–92, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Moore, S. Ghigna, F. Governato et al., “Dark matter substructure within galactic halos,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 524, no. 1, pp. L19–L22, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Gottlöber, E. L. Łokas, A. Klypin, and Y. Hoffman, “The structure of voids,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 344, no. 3, pp. 715–724, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. J. E. Peebles, “The void phenomenon,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 557, no. 2, pp. 495–504, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. V. Tikhonov and A. Klypin, “The emptiness of voids: yet another overabundance problem for the $\mathrm{\Lambda}$ cold dark matter model,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 395, no. 4, pp. 1915–1924, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Hoeft, G. Yepes, S. Gottlöber, and V. Springel, “Dwarf galaxies in voids: suppressing star formation with photoheating,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 371, no. 1, pp. 401–414, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. V. Macciò, X. Kang, F. Fontanot, R. S. Somerville, S. E. Koposov, and P. Monaco, “Luminosity function and radial distribution of Milky Way satellites in a LCDM universe,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 402, no. 4, pp. 1995–2008, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 S. E. Koposov, J. Yoo, H.W. Rix, D. H. Weinberg, A. V. Macciò, and J. M. Escudé, “A quantitative explanation of the observed population of Milky Way satellite galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 696, no. 2, pp. 2179–2194, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 A. V. Tikhonov, S. Gottlöber, G. Yepes, and Y. Hoffman, “The sizes of minivoids in the local universe: an argument in favour of a warm dark matter model?” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 399, no. 3, pp. 1611–1621, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zavala, Y. P. Jing, A. Faltenbacher et al., “The velocity function in the local environment from $\mathrm{\Lambda}$CDM and $\mathrm{\Lambda}$WDM constrained simulations,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 700, no. 2, pp. 1779–1793, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Hinshaw, J. L. Weiland, R. S. Hill et al., “Fiveyear wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe observations: data processing, sky maps and basic results,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 225–245, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Klypin, A. V. Kravtsov, J. S. Bullock, and J. R. Primack, “Resolving the structure of cold dark matter halos,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 554, no. 2, pp. 903–915, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Springel and L. Hernquist, “Cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: the entropy equation,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 333, no. 3, pp. 649–664, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Springel, N. Yoshida, and S. D. M. White, “GADGET: a code for collisionless and gasdynamical cosmological simulations,” New Astronomy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 79–117, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 N. Katz, D. H. Weinberg, and L. Hernquist, “Cosmological simulations with TreeSPH,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 19–35, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Springel and L. Hernquist, “Cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: a hybrid multiphase model for star formation,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 339, no. 2, pp. 289–311, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Yepes, R. Kates, A. Khokhlov, and A. Klypin, “Hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy formation: effects of supernova feedback,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 284, no. 1, pp. 235–256, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Klypin, S. Gottlöber, A. V. Kravtsov, and A. M. Khokhlov, “Galaxies in Nbody simulations: overcoming the overmerging problem,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 516, no. 2, pp. 530–551, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 W. H. Press and P. Schechter, “Formation of galaxies and clusters of galaxies by selfsimilar gravitational condensation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 187, pp. 425–438, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
 J. R. Bond, S. Cole, G. Efstathiou, and N. Kaiser, “Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 379, no. 2, pp. 440–460, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
 R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, “Largescale bias and the peak background split,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 308, no. 1, pp. 119–126, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Jenkins, C. S. Frenk, S. D. M. White et al., “The mass function of dark matter haloes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 321, no. 2, pp. 372–384, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Tinker, A. V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin et al., “Toward a halo mass function for precision cosmology: the limits of universality,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 688, no. 2, pp. 709–728, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. Warren, K. Abazajian, D. E. Holz, and L. Teodoro, “Precision determination of the mass function of dark matter halos,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 646, no. 2, pp. 881–885, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. A. Gregory and L. A. Thompson, “The Coma/A1367 supercluster and its environs,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 222, pp. 784–799, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Joeveer, J. Einasto, and E. Tago, “Spatial distribution of galaxies and of clusters of galaxies in the southern galactic hemisphere,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 185, pp. 357–370, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
 R. P. Kirshner, A. Oemler, P. L. Schechter, and S. A. Shectman, “A million cubic megaparsec void in Bootes,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 248, no. 5, pp. L57–L60, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Hoffman and J. Shaham, “On the origin of the voids in the galaxy distribution,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 262, pp. L23–L26, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
 P. J. E. Peebles, “Largescale background temperature and mass fluctuations due to scaleinvariant primeval perturbations,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 263, pp. L1–L5, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Einasto, M. Einasto, and M. Gramann, “Structure and formation of superclusters. IX. Selfsimilarity of voids,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 238, pp. 155–177, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
 M. S. Vogeley, M. J. Geller, C. Park, and J. P. Huchra, “Voids and constraints on nonlinear clustering of galaxies,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 745–758, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 V. Müller, S. ArbabiBidgoli, J. Einasto, and D. Tucker, “Voids in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey versus cold dark matter models,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 318, no. 1, pp. 280–288, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 H. ElAd and T. Piran, “Voids in the largescale structure,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 491, no. 2, pp. 421–435, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 H. ElAd and T. Piran, “A case devoid of bias: optical redshift survey voids versus IRAS voids,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 313, no. 3, pp. 553–558, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Plionis and S. Basilakos, “The size and shape of local voids,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 330, no. 2, pp. 399–404, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Hoyle and M. S. Vogeley, “Voids in the point source catalogue survey and the updated zwicky catalog,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 566, no. 2, pp. 641–651, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Ceccarelli, N. D. Padilla, C. Valotto, and D. G. Lambas, “Voids in the 2dFGRS and ACDM simulations: spatial and dynamical properties,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 373, no. 4, pp. 1440–1450, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. J. Croton, E. Gaztañaga, C. M. Baugh et al., “The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: higherorder galaxy correlation functions,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 352, no. 4, pp. 1232–1244, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Hoyle and M. S. Vogeley, “Voids in the twodegree field galaxy redshift survey,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 607, no. 2, pp. 751–764, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. G. Patiri, J. E. BetancortRijo, F. Prada, A. Klypin, and S. Gottlöber, “Statistics of voids in the twodegree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 369, no. 1, pp. 335–348, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. M. Goldberg, T. D. Jones, F. Hoyle, R. R. Rojas, M. S. Vogeley, and M. R. Blanton, “The mass function of void galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey data release 2,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 621, no. 2, pp. 643–650, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Hoyle, R. R. Rojas, M. S. Vogeley, and J. Brinkmann, “The luminosity function of void galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 620, no. 2, pp. 618–628, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. R. Rojas, M. S. Vogeley, F. Hoyle, and J. Brinkmann, “Photometric properties of void galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 617, no. 1, pp. 50–63, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. Vogeley, F. Hoyle, R. R. Rojas, and D. Goldberg, “The void spectrum and properties of void galaxies in the SDSS,” Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 36, p. 1496, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 N. A. Grogin and M. J. Geller, “An imaging and spectroscopic survey of galaxies within prominent nearby voids. I. The sample and luminosity distribution,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 2561–2580, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Kuhn, U. Hopp, and H. Elsässer, “Results of a search for faint galaxies in voids,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 405–415, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 U. Lindner, M. Einasto, J. Einasto et al., “The distribution of galaxies in voids,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 314, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 C. C. Popescu, U. Hopp, and H. Elsässer, “Results of a search for emissionline galaxies towards nearby voids. The spatial distribution,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 325, no. 3, pp. 881–892, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 A. J. Benson, C. S. Frenk, C. G. Lacey, C. M. Baugh, and S. Cole, “The effects of photoionization on galaxy formation. II. Satellite galaxies in the Local Group,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 333, no. 1, pp. 177–190, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Einasto, M. Einasto, M. Gramann, and E. Saar, “Structure and formation of superclusters. XIII. The void probability function,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 248, pp. 593–605, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Friedmann and T. Piran, “A model of void formation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 548, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. R. Furlanetto and T. Piran, “The evidence of absence: galaxy voids in the excursion set formalism,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 366, no. 2, pp. 467–479, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Ghigna, S. A. Bonometto, J. Retzlaff, S. Gottlöber, and G. Murante, “Void analysis as a test for dark matter composition?” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 469, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Ghigna, S. Borgani, S. A. Bonometto et al., “Sizes of voids as a test for dark matter models,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 437, no. 2, pp. L71–L74, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Lee and D. Park, “Rotation of cosmic voids and void spin statistics,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 652, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Mathis and S. D. M. White, “Voids in the simulated local universe,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 337, no. 4, pp. 1193–1206, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Sahni, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and S. F. Shandarin, “The evolution of voids in the adhesion approximation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 431, no. 1, pp. 20–40, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Shandarin, H. A. Feldman, K. Heitmann, and S. Habib, “Shapes and sizes of voids in the Lambda cold dark matter universe: excursion set approach,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 367, no. 4, pp. 1629–1640, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Colberg, F. Pearce, C. Foster et al., “The AspenAmsterdam void finder comparison project,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 387, no. 2, pp. 933–944, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. C. van den Bosch, X. Yang, H. J. Mo et al., “Towards a concordant model of halo occupation statistics,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 376, no. 2, pp. 841–860, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Okamoto, L. Gao, and T. Theuns, “Mass loss of galaxies due to an ultraviolet background,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 390, no. 3, pp. 920–928, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Fakhouri and C.P. Ma, “Dark matter halo growth. II. Diffuse accretion and its environmental dependence,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 401, no. 4, pp. 2245–2256, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. S. Somerville, “Can photoionization squelching resolve the substructure crisis?” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 572, no. 1, pp. L23–L26, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y.S. Li, G. De Lucia, and A. Helmi, “On the nature of the Milky Way satellites,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 401, no. 3, pp. 2036–2052, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. L. Tinker and C. Conroy, “The void phenomenon explained,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 691, pp. 633–639, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 S. S. McGaugh, J. M. Schombert, W. J. G. de Blok, and M. J. Zagursky, “The baryon content of cosmic structures,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 708, no. 1, pp. L14–L17, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, “A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 490, no. 2, pp. 493–508, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 G. L. Bryan and M. L. Norman, “Statistical properties of Xray clusters: analytic and numerical comparisons,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 495, no. 1, pp. 80–99, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 A. V. Macciò, A. A. Dutton, F. C. van den Bosch, B. Moore, D. Potter, and J. Stadel, “Concentration, spin and shape of dark matter haloes: scatter and the dependence on mass and environment,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 378, no. 1, pp. 55–71, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. H. Wechsler, J. S. Bullock, J. R. Primack, A. V. Kravtsov, and A. Dekel, “Concentrations of dark halos from their assembly histories,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 568, no. 1, pp. 52–70, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. H. Zhao, Y. P. Jing, H. J. Mo, and G. Börner, “Mass and redshift dependence of dark halo structure,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 597, no. 1, pp. L9–L12, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Haardt and P. Madau, “Radiative transfer in a clumpy universe. II. The ultraviolet extragalactic background,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 461, no. 1, pp. 20–37, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Matthias Hoeft and Stefan Gottlöber. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.