Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Astronomy
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 196852, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/196852
Research Article

Can the New Neutrino Telescopes Reveal the Gravitational Properties of Antimatter?

Physics Department, European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

Received 9 April 2011; Accepted 8 May 2011

Academic Editor: Zdzislaw E. Musielak

Copyright © 2011 Dragan Slavkov Hajdukovic. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Kellerbauer, S. Mariazzi, R. S. Brusa et al., “Proposed antimatter gravity measurement with an antihydrogen beam,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, vol. 266, no. 3, pp. 351–356, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
  3. G. Gabrielse, A. Khabbaz, W. Jhe, D. S. Hall, C. Heimann, and H. Kalinowsky, “Precision mass spectroscopy of the antiproton and proton using simultaneously trapped particles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 16, pp. 3198–3201, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. M. Nieto and T. Goldman, “The arguments against “antigravity” and the gravitational acceleration of antimatter,” Physics Report, vol. 205, no. 5, pp. 221–281, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,” Physical Review, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 664–679, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. Greiner, B. Müller, and B. J. Rafaelski, Quantum Electrodynamics of Strong Fields, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1985.
  7. R. Ruffini, G. Vereshchagin, and S. S. Xue, “Electron-positron pairs in physics and astrophysics,” Physics Reports, vol. 487, no. 1–4, pp. 1–140, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Halzen, “IceCube science,” Journal of Physics, vol. 171, Article ID 012014, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Halzen, “Astroparticle physics with high energy neutrinos: from AMANDA to IceCube,” European Physical Journal, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 669–687, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. A. Anchordoqui, F. Halzen, H. Goldberg, and T. J. Weiler, “Neutrinos as a diagnostic of high energy astrophysical processes,” Physics Letters, vol. 621, no. 1-2, pp. 18–21, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Preti and F. De Felice, “Light cones and repulsive gravity,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 671–676, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. O. Luongo and H. Quevedo, “Toward an invariant definition of repulsive gravity,” in proceedings of 12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Paris, France, Jul 2009.
  13. M. P. Hobson, G. Efstathiou, and A. N. Lasenby, General Relativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
  14. P. Morrison, “Approximate nature of physical symmetries,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 358–368, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  15. L. I. Schiff, “Sign of the gravitational mass of a positron,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 254–255, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. I. Schiff, “Gravitational properties of antimatter,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 1959. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. L. Good, “KL0 and the equivalence principle,” Physical Review, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 311–313, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Chardin and J. M. Rax, “CP violation, a matter of (anti)gravity?” Physics Letters, vol. 282, no. 1-2, pp. 256–262, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Chardin, “CP violation and antigravity,” Nuclear Physics, vol. 558, pp. 477–495, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Chardin, “Motivations for antigravity in general relativity,” Hyperfine Interactions, vol. 109, no. 1–4, pp. 83–94, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. D. Tasson, “Gravitational physics with antimatter,” Hyperfine Interactions, vol. 193, no. 1–3, pp. 291–296, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Kostelecký and J. Tasson, “Matter-gravity couplings and Lorentz violation,” Physical Review, vol. 83, no. 1, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Villata, “CPT symmetry and antimatter gravity in general relativity,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 94, no. 2, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Deser and F. Pirani, “The sign of the gravitational force,” Annals of Physics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 436–451, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Jagannathan and L. P. S. Singh, “Attraction/repulsion between like charges and the spin of the classical mediating field,” Physical Review, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 2475–2477, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Dehnen and D. Ebner, “Derivation of the principle of equivalence for antimatter,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 105–115, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. S. Hajdukovic, “What would be outcome of a big crunch,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1023–1028, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. S. Hajdukovic, “Dark energy, antimatter gravity and geometry of the Universe,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 330, no. 1-2, pp. 1–5, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. S. Hajdukovic, “On the vacuum fluctuations, pioneer anomaly and modified newtonian dynamics,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 330, no. 2, pp. 207–209, 2010. View at Google Scholar