/ / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 694394 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/694394

# Optimal Inequalities among Various Means of Two Arguments

Accepted19 Oct 2009
Published10 Nov 2009

#### Abstract

We establish two optimal inequalities among power mean , arithmetic mean , logarithmic mean , and geometric mean .

#### 1. Introduction

For , the power mean of order of two positive numbers and is defined by

In the recent past, the power mean has been the subject of intensive research. In particular, many remarkable inequalities for the mean can be found in literature . It is well-known that is continuous and strictly increasing with respect to for fixed and .

If we denote by

, and the identric mean, logarithmic mean, arithmetic mean, geometric mean and the harmonic mean, of two positive real numbers and , respectively, then

with equality if and only if in each inequality.

In , Alzer and Janous established the following sharp double inequality (see also [13, page 350]):

for all real numbers .

In , Mao proved

for all real numbers , and the constant in the left side inequality cannot be improved.

In , the authors presented the bounds for and in terms of and as follows:

for all with .

Alzer  proved

In , Alzer and Qiu established

for , and with .

The main purpose of this paper is to present the optimal bounds for and for all in terms of the power mean . Moreover, two optimal inequalities among , , and are proved.

#### 2. Lemmas

In order to establish our main results we need two inequalities, which we present in this section.

Lemma 2.1. If , then for .

Proof. Let , , , , , , , , and , then simple computation yields
From (2.10) we clearly see that is strictly increasing in . Therefore, Lemma 2.1 follows from (2.2)–(2.9) and (2.11) together with the monotonicity of .

Lemma 2.2. If , then for .

Proof. Let , , , , , and , then simple computation leads to
From (2.18) we clearly see that is strictly increasing in . Therefore, Lemma 2.2 follows from (2.13)–(2.17) and (2.19) together with the monotonicity of .

#### 3. Main Results

Theorem 3.1. If , then with equality if and only if , and the parameter cannot be improved.

Proof. If , then we clearly see that
If , then without loss of generality we assume that and let ; hence elementary calculation yields

Let
then where
From Lemma 2.1 and (3.6) we know that
for .
Therefore, we get
for that follows from (3.3)–(3.5) and (3.8).
Next, we prove that the parameter cannot be improved.
For any , let , then (1.1) leads to
where
Making use of the Taylor expansion we get

Equations (3.10) and (3.12) imply that for any and , there exists , such that
for .

Remark 3.2. For any we have for all , with equality if and only if , and the parameter in the lower bound cannot be improved.
In fact, if , then we clearly see that . If , then follows from .
Next, we prove that the parameter in the lower bound cannot be improved.
For any , we have

Equation (3.15) implies that for any , there exists , such that
for .

Theorem 3.3. If , then for all , with equality if and only if , and the parameter cannot be improved.

Proof. If , then we clearly see that
If , then without loss of generality, we assume that , let ; hence simple computation leads to
Let then where
From Lemma 2.2 and (3.22) we know that
for .
Therefore, we get
for that follows from (3.19)–(3.21) and (3.24).
Next, we prove that the constants cannot be improved.
For any , let , then (1.1) leads to
where
Making use of the Taylor expansion we get

Equations (3.26) and (3.28) imply that for any and , there exists , such that
for .

Remark 3.4. For any , we have Therefore, (3.30) implies that inequality holds for all and , with equality if and only if and the parameter in the lower bound cannot be improved.

#### Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 60850005) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant no. D7080080 and no. Y607128).

1. J. J. Wen and W.-L. Wang, “The optimization for the inequalities of power means,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2006, Article ID 46782, 25 pages, 2006.
2. S. H. Wu, “Generalization and sharpness of the power means inequality and their applications,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 637–652, 2005.
3. K. C. Richards, “Sharp power mean bounds for the Gaussian hypergeometric function,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 308, no. 1, pp. 303–313, 2005.
4. P. A. Hästö, “Optimal inequalities between Seiffert's mean and power means,” Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2004.
5. H. Alzer and S.-L. Qiu, “Inequalities for means in two variables,” Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 201–215, 2003.
6. H. Alzer, “A power mean inequality for the gamma function,” Monatshefte für Mathematik, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 179–188, 2000.
7. C. D. Tarnavas and D. D. Tarnavas, “An inequality for mixed power means,” Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 175–181, 1999.
8. J. Bukor, J. Tóth, and L. Zsilinszky, “The logarithmic mean and the power mean of positive numbers,” Octogon Mathematical Magazine, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 1994. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
9. J. E. Pečarić, “Generalization of the power means and their inequalities,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 395–404, 1991.
10. C. O. Imoru, “The power mean and the logarithmic mean,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 337–343, 1982.
11. T. P. Lin, “The power mean and the logarithmic mean,” The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 879–883, 1974.
12. H. Alzer and W. Janous, “Solution of problem ${8}^{\ast }$,” Crux Mathematicorum, vol. 13, pp. 173–178, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
13. P. S. Bullen, D. S. Mitrinović, and P. M. Vasić, Means and Their Inequalities, vol. 31, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988. View at: MathSciNet
14. Q. J. Mao, “Power mean, logarthimic mean and Heronian dual mean of two positive number,” Journal of Suzhou College of Education, vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 82–85, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
15. B. C. Carlson, “The logarithmic mean,” The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 79, pp. 615–618, 1972.
16. E. B. Leach and M. C. Sholander, “Extended mean values II,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 207–223, 1983.
17. J. Sándor, “A note on some inequalities for means,” Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 471–473, 1991.
18. H. Alzer, “Ungleichungen für Mittelwerte,” Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 422–426, 1986.

#### More related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.