Adaptive Bacterial Foraging Optimization

Table 3

Comparison among ABFO₀, ABFO₁, BFO, PSO, and GA on 2-D problems.

	2-D	BFO	ABFO0	ABFO1	PSO	GA
	Best	5.6423e–007	4.0368e–133	0	5.0576e–124	2.8638e–048
	Worst	3.3404e–005	3.8546e–111	0	2.4892e–114	1.0587e–045
f 1	Mean	1.4291e–005	1.3068e–112	0	8.5226e–116	2.3105e–046
	Std	9.6035e–006	7.0343e–112	0	4.5408e–115	2.7237e–046
	Rank	5	3	1	2	4
	Best	1.5294e–006	0	7.8886e–031	0	6.8564e–010
	Worst	9.2935e–004	1.3078e–029	2.1905e–014	5.3075e–025	3.8578e–005
f 2	Mean	1.7353e–004	8.1803e–031	7.3528e–016	3.9893e–026	1.9021e–006
	Std	2.1344e–004	2.6648e–030	3.9983e–015	1.1947e–025	7.0743e–006
	Rank	5	1	3	2	4
	Best	9.0825e–004	0	4.6509e–011	0	0
	Worst	0.1256	0	2.7349e–009	0	0
f 3	Mean	0.0259	0	1.2655e–009	0	0
	Std	0.0306	0	7.4950e–010	0	0
	Rank	5	1	4	1	1
	Best	0.0296	1.5306e–012	0	0.0311	0
	Worst	2.9974	1.4551e–009	7.7411e–005	3.8791	0.0271
f 4	Mean	0.9975	5.2282e–010	5.1542e–006	1.1178	0.0063
	Std	0.8142	4.4791e–010	1.5892e–005	1.0521	0.0061
	Rank	4	1	2	5	3
	Average rank	4.75	1.5	2.5	2.5	3
	Final rank	5	1	2	2	3