Table 3: Comparison among ABFO0, ABFO1, BFO, PSO, and GA on 2-D problems.

2-DBFOABFO0ABFO1PSOGA

Best5.6423e–0074.0368e–13305.0576e–1242.8638e–048
Worst3.3404e–0053.8546e–11102.4892e–1141.0587e–045
f 1Mean1.4291e–0051.3068e–11208.5226e–1162.3105e–046
Std9.6035e–0067.0343e–11204.5408e–1152.7237e–046
Rank53124

Best1.5294e–00607.8886e–03106.8564e–010
Worst9.2935e–0041.3078e–0292.1905e–0145.3075e–0253.8578e–005
f 2Mean1.7353e–0048.1803e–0317.3528e–0163.9893e–0261.9021e–006
Std2.1344e–0042.6648e–0303.9983e–0151.1947e–0257.0743e–006
Rank51324

Best9.0825e–00404.6509e–01100
Worst0.125602.7349e–00900
f 3Mean0.025901.2655e–00900
Std0.030607.4950e–01000
Rank51411

Best0.02961.5306e–01200.03110
Worst2.99741.4551e–0097.7411e–0053.87910.0271
f 4Mean0.99755.2282e–0105.1542e–0061.11780.0063
Std0.81424.4791e–0101.5892e–0051.05210.0061
Rank41253

Average rank4.751.52.52.53
Final rank51223