`Abstract and Applied AnalysisVolume 2011, Article ID 647368, 15 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/647368`
Research Article

## Wave Breaking and Propagation Speed for a Class of One-Dimensional Shallow Water Equations

1Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
2Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Shumen University, 9712 Shumen, Bulgaria

Received 24 June 2011; Revised 1 September 2011; Accepted 13 September 2011

Academic Editor: P. J. Y. Wong

Copyright © 2011 Zaihong Jiang and Sevdzhan Hakkaev. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We investigate a more general family of one-dimensional shallow water equations. Analogous to the Camassa-Holm equation, these new equations admit blow-up phenomenon and infinite propagation speed. First, we establish blow-up results for this family of equations under various classes of initial data. It turns out that it is the shape instead of the size and smoothness of the initial data which influences breakdown in finite time. Then, infinite propagation speed for the shallow water equations is proved in the following sense: the corresponding solution with compactly supported initial datum does not have compact -support any longer in its lifespan.

#### 1. Introduction

In this paper we consider the equation where and are real constants.

Set , then we can rewrite (1.1) as Let , then (1.1) can be reformulated in terms of :

By comparison with the Camassa-Holm equation [1], the Degasperis-Procesi equation, [2] and the Holm-Staley -family of equations [3], it is easy to find that (1.1) is more general. The Camassa-Holm equation, the Degasperis-Procesi equation, and the Holm-Staley b-family of equations are the special cases with ; , and , respectively. The equation of type (1.1) arises in the modeling of shallow water waves; compare with the discussion in the papers [4, 5].

When , use the scaling , then (1.1) can be reformulated into which is the well-known Camassa-Holm equation. The Camassa-Holm equation was first written explicitly and derived physically as a water wave equation by Camassa and Holm [1], who also studied its solutions. It has infinitely many conserved integrals including the -norm, but wave breaking also happens in finite time, which coincides with physical phenomenon. Some satisfactory results have been obtained recently [68] for strong solutions. Moreover, wave breaking for a large class of initial data has been established in [911], and recently, a new and direct proof for McKean's theorem is given in [12]. In [13] some new criterion on blowup is established for the Camassa-Holm equation with weakly dissipative term. In [14] (see also [15]), Xin and Zhang showed global existence and uniqueness for weak solutions with . The solitary waves of the Camassa-Holm equation are peaked solitons and are orbitally stable [16] (see also [17, 18]). It is worthwhile to point out that the peakons replicate a feature that is characteristic for the waves of great height waves of largest amplitude that are exact solutions of the governing equations for water waves; compare with the papers [1921]. Similarly, if , use the some scaling, then (1.1) can be reformulated into the Degasperis-Procesi equation, the existence of global solutions, persistence properties and propagation speed of Degasperis-Procesi equation is given in [22] and the references therein. For the the weakly dissipative Degasperis-Procesi equation, [23] is concerned with some aspects of existence of global solutions, persistence properties, and propagation speed. So, in our following discussion, we will always exclude these two cases.

In general, the family of equations are not always completely integrable systems. However, one can find the following conservation laws:

which are quite different from the invariants of the Camassa-Holm equation

Due to the similarity of (1.2) and the Camassa-Holm equation, just by following the argument for the Camassa-Holm equation, it is easy to establish the following well-posedness theorem for (1.2).

Theorem 1.1. Given , , then there exist a and a unique solution to (1.1) such that

To make the paper concise we would like to omit the detailed proof, since one can find similar ones for these types of equations in [7, 24].

When we study the Camassa-Holm equation, the most frequently (crucially) used conservation law is that of the -norm of the solution. However, if is a strong solution (decays rapidly at infinity) to (1.1), direct computation yields Hence, the -norm of the solution is not conserved at all except for . However, we also have a clear blow-up scenario as follows: the solution blows up if and only if the first-order derivative blows up that is, wave breaking occurs. More precisely, assume that is the lifespan of the corresponding solution, then

Before giving our main results, we list some notations that will be used in our paper. denotes the inner product in the Hilbert space , ; use for the corresponding norm and to denote the corresponding norm.

The remainder of the paper will be organized as follows. In the next section, we establish blow-up results for this family of equations under various classes of initial data. In the last section, infinite propagation speed for the shallow water equations is proved.

#### 2. Blow-Up Phenomenon

After local well posedness of strong solutions is established, the next question is whether this local solution can exist globally. If the solution exists only for a finite time, how about the behavior of the solution when it blows up? What induces the blowup? On the other hand, to find sufficient conditions to guarantee the finite time blowup or global existence is of great interest, particularly for sufficient conditions added on the initial data.

Set as the characteristic evolved by the solution; that is, it satisfies Taking derivative with respect to in (2.1), we obtain

Hence

which is always positive before the blow-up time. Therefore, the function is an increasing diffeomorphism of the line before blowup. In addition, from (1.1), the following identity is proved:

The following theorem is proved in [25] it is one of sufficient conditions to guarantee the finite time blowup added on the initial data.

Theorem 2.1. Let , with being odd and . Then the corresponding solution of (1.1) blows up in finite time.

From the above blow-up result we can obtain the following.

Theorem 2.2. Let , . Suppose that is odd and . Then the corresponding solution of (1.1) blows up in finite time.

Proof. If is odd, then is also odd. In fact On the other hand So Theorem 2.2, follows from Theorem 2.1.

Before giving our main result, we first recall the following three lemmas that will be used in our proof.

Lemma 2.3. If , then is algebra. Moreover

Lemma 2.4. If , then Here denotes the commutator of the linear operators and .

Lemma 2.5 (see [26]). Suppose that is twice continuously differentiable satisfying Then blows up in finite time. Moreover the blow-up time can be estimated in terms of the initial datum as

Now, we are ready to give our main results. Firstly, we present the result which improves Theorem 2.1.

Theorem 2.6. Let with , and assume that is the existence time of the corresponding solution with the initial data . If there exists such that then the norm of does not blow up on .

Proof. Let be the solution to (1.1) with initial data and let be the maximal existence time of the solution . Applying the operator to (1.2), multiplying by , and integrating, we obtain where and . We have where we applied Lemma 2.4 with . Again applying Lemma 2.4 with , we obtain and, from Lemma 2.3, we have Combining the above estimates, we obtain From Gronwall inequality, we obtain This completes the proof of the theorem.

In order to help the readers to understand the following theorem, we would like to give an intuitive explanation for this result. Neglecting lower-order source terms, (1.2) reduces to the generalized Hunter-Saxton equation: Differentiating with respect to , one obtains By looking at the evolution of along characteristics, it is clear that one can have or depending on the sign of .

Theorem 2.7. Let with . If , then every solution will exist globally in time. If , then the solution blows up in finite time if and only if the slope of the solution becomes unbounded from below in finite time. If , then the solution blows up in finite time if and only if the slope of the solution becomes unbounded from above in finite time.

Proof. It suffices to consider the case . Let be the maximal time of existence of the solution of (1.1). From [25] we know that . Multiplying (1.2) by and integrating by parts, we get Note that From (2.20), for , we have From Theorem 2.6, for the solution exists globally in time. If and the slope of the solution is bounded from below or if and the slope of the solution is bounded from above on , then there exists such that By Gronwall inequality, we have

There is no doubt that it is the shape of the initial data but not their smoothness or size that influences the lifespan. However, we try to understand what induces wave breaking. Another sufficient condition is given in the following theorem. The approach used to prove the following theorem is rooted in the considerations made in the paper [27].

Theorem 2.8. Let , . Suppose that and there exists such that , and Then the corresponding solution of (1.1) blows up in finite time with the lifespan

Proof. Suppose that the solution exists globally. Due to (2.4) and the initial condition, we have , and for all .
Since , one can write and as
Consequently,
From the expression of in terms of ,
Rewrite (1.1) as Using this identity, we can obtain
By direct calculation, we have Using the inequality (see [26]), we obtain Similarly, we have Now using the inequality (see [26]) we obtain Similarly, we have Combining all the above terms together, we have Claim. is decreasing and for all .
Suppose not that there exists a such that on and . Now, let Firstly, by the same trick as above, we obtain This implies that can be extended to infinity.
Moreover, due to the above inequality, we have Now substituting (2.39) in (2.42), we get Now the theorem follows from Lemma 2.5 with and . Then, we complete our proof.

The final goal for us is to establish a necessary and sufficient condition for guaranteeing singularity formation in finite time, which is in the opposite direction to global existence. So if the necessary and sufficient condition can be found, then the problem can be solved completely.

Now, let us try to find a condition for global existence. Unfortunately, when like the Degasperis-Procesi equation [22] and the Holm-Staley -family of equations [26], only the following easy form can be proved at present.

Theorem 2.9. Suppose that , does not change sign. Then the corresponding solution to (1.1) exists globally.

Proof. Without loss of generality we assume . It is sufficient to prove that is bounded for all .
In fact, while we can also obtain Combining the above terms together, we have Then, we complete our proof.

#### 3. Propagation Speed

The purpose of this section is to give a detailed description of the corresponding strong solution in its lifespan with being compactly supported. The analogous results were obtained in [6] for the Camassa-Holm equation and in the papers [28, 29] for the Degasperis-Procesi equation. The main theorem reads as follows.

Theorem 3.1. Let and . Assume that the initial datum is compactly supported in . Then, the corresponding solution of (1.1) has the following property: for with and , respectively, where is defined by (2.1) and is its lifespan. Furthermore, and denote continuous nonvanishing functions, with and for . And is a strictly increasing function, while is a strictly decreasing function.

Proof. Since has a compact support, also does. From (2.4), it follows that is compactly supported in in its lifespan. Hence the following functions are well defined: with . For , we have and, for , we have Hence, as consequence of (3.3) and (3.4), we have On the other hand, Differentiating (1.1) twice, we get Combining (1.1) and (3.7), we obtain
Substituting the identity (3.8) into and using (3.5), we obtain Therefore, in the lifespan of the solution, we have By the same argument, one can check that the following identity for is true: In order to complete the proof, it is sufficient to let and , respectively.

#### Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by Zhejiang Innovation Project (Grant no. T200905) and NSFC (Grant no. 11101376). S. Hakkaev is also partially supported by Research Grant DVU_10_0338.

#### References

1. R. Camassa and D. D. Holm, “An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1661–1664, 1993.
2. A. Degasperis and M. Procesi, “Asymptotic integrability,” in Proceedings of the International Workship on Symmetry and Perturbation Theory, pp. 23–37, World Scientific Publishing, Rome, Italy, December 1998.
3. D. D. Holm and M. F. Staley, “Nonlinear balance and exchange of stability of dynamics of solitons, peakons, ramps/cliffs and leftons in a $1+1$ nonlinear evolutionary PDE,” Physics Letters A, vol. 308, no. 5-6, pp. 437–444, 2003.
4. A. Constantin and D. Lannes, “The hydrodynamical relevance of the Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 165–186, 2009.
5. R. S. Johnson, “Camassa-Holm, Korteweg-de Vries and related models for water waves,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 455, pp. 63–82, 2002.
6. A. Constantin, “Finite propagation speed for the Camassa-Holm equation,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 46, no. 2, Article ID 023506, 4 pages, 2005.
7. A. Constantin and J. Escher, “Well-posedness, global existence, and blowup phenomena for a periodic quasi-linear hyperbolic equation,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 475–504, 1998.
8. A. A. Himonas, G. Misiołek, G. Ponce, and Y. Zhou, “Persistence properties and unique continuation of solutions of the Camassa-Holm equation,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 511–522, 2007.
9. H. P. McKean, “Breakdown of a shallow water equation,” The Asian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 767–774, 1998.
10. Y. Zhou, “Wave breaking for a shallow water equation,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 137–152, 2004.
11. Y. Zhou, “Wave breaking for a periodic shallow water equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 591–604, 2004.
12. Z. Jiang, L. Ni, and Y. Zhou, “Wave breaking of the Camassa-Holm equation,” In press.
13. Z. Guo, “Blow up, global existence, and infinite propagation speed for the weakly dissipative Camassa-Holm equation,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 49, no. 3, Article ID 033516, 9 pages, 2008.
14. Z. Xin and P. Zhang, “On the weak solutions to a shallow water equation,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1411–1433, 2000.
15. A. Bressan and A. Constantin, “Global conservative solutions of the Camassa-Holm equation,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 215–239, 2007.
16. A. Constantin and W. A. Strauss, “Stability of peakons,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 603–610, 2000.
17. Z. Guo and Y. Zhou, “Wave breaking and persistence properties for the dispersive rod equation,” SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 2567–2580, 2009.
18. Y. Zhou, “Stability of solitary waves for a rod equation,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 977–981, 2004.
19. A. Constantin, “The trajectories of particles in Stokes waves,” Inventiones Mathematicae, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 523–535, 2006.
20. A. Constantin and J. Escher, “Analyticity of periodic traveling free surface water waves with vorticity,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 559–568, 2011.
21. J. F. Toland, “Stokes waves,” Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 1996.
22. Y. Zhou, “Blow-up phenomenon for the integrable Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 328, no. 2-3, pp. 157–162, 2004.
23. Z. Guo, “Some properties of solutions to the weakly dissipative Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 246, no. 11, pp. 4332–4344, 2009.
24. Y. Zhou, “Local well-posedness and blow-up criteria of solutions for a rod equation,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 278, no. 14, pp. 1726–1739, 2005.
25. S. Lai and Y. Wu, “Global solutions and blow-up phenomena to a shallow water equation,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 693–706, 2010.
26. Y. Zhou, “On solutions to the Holm-Staley b-family of equations,” Nonlinearity, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 369–381, 2010.
27. A. Constantin, “Existence of permanent and breaking waves for a shallow water equation: a geometric approach,” Annales de l'Institut Fourier, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 321–362, 2000.
28. D. Henry, “Infinite propagation speed for the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 311, no. 2, pp. 755–759, 2005.
29. O. G. Mustafa, “A note on the Degasperis-Procesi equation,” Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2005.