- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 413965, 12 pages
Coefficient Conditions for Harmonic Close-to-Convex Functions
Department of Mathematics, Kinki University, Higashi-Osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
Received 25 January 2012; Accepted 13 April 2012
Academic Editor: Roman Simon Hilscher
Copyright © 2012 Toshio Hayami. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
New sufficient conditions, concerned with the coefficients of harmonic functions in the open unit disk normalized by , for to be harmonic close-to-convex functions are discussed. Furthermore, several illustrative examples and the image domains of harmonic close-to-convex functions satisfying the obtained conditions are enumerated.
For a continuous complex-valued function , we say that is harmonic in the open unit disk if both and are real harmonic in , that is, and satisfy the Laplace equations A complex-valued harmonic function in is given by where and are analytic in . We call and the analytic part and the coanalytic part of , respectively. A necessary and sufficient condition for to be locally univalent and sense preserving in is in (see  or ). Let denote the class of harmonic functions in with and . Thus, every normalized harmonic function can be written by where and , for convenience.
We next denote by the class of functions that are univalent and sense preserving in . Due to the sense-preserving property of , we see that . If , then reduces to the class consisting of normalized analytic univalent functions. Furthermore, for every function , the function is also a member of . Therefore, we consider the subclass of defined as Conversely, if , then for any .
We say that a domain is a close-to-convex domain if the complement of can be written as a union of nonintersecting half-lines (except that the origin of one half-line may lie on one of the other half-lines). Let , , and be the respective subclasses of , , and consisting of all functions , which map onto a certain close-to-convex domain.
Bshouty and Lyzzaik  have stated the following result.
Theorem 1.1. If satisfies for all , then .
A simple and interesting example is below.
Example 1.2. The function satisfies the conditions of Theorem 1.1, and therefore belongs to the class . We now show that is actually a close-to-convex domain. It follows that Setting for any , we see that Since we obtain that Also, noting that we know that which implies that Thus, maps onto the following close-to-convex domain as shown in Figure 1.
Remark 1.3. Let be the class of all functions satisfying the conditions of Theorem 1.1. Then, it was earlier conjectured by Mocanu [4, 5] that . Furthermore, we can immediately see that the function in Example 1.2 is a member of the class and it shows that is not necessarily starlike with respect to the origin in ( is starlike with respect to the origin in if and only if for all and ).
Remark 1.4. For the function given by
letting , we know that
which means that maps the unit circle onto a union of several concave curves (see [6, Theorem 2.1]).
Jahangiri and Silverman  have given the following coefficient inequality for to be in the class .
Theorem 1.5. If satisfies then .
Example 1.6. The function
belongs to the class and satisfies the condition of Theorem 1.5. Indeed, maps onto the following hypocycloid of six cusps (cf.  or ) as shown in Figure 2.
The object of this paper is to find some sufficient conditions for functions to be in the class . In order to establish our results, we have to recall here the following lemmas due to Clunie and Sheil-Small .
Lemma 1.7. If and are analytic in with and is close-to-convex for each , then is harmonic close-to-convex.
Lemma 1.8. If is locally univalent in and is convex for some , then is univalent close-to-convex.
We also need the following result due to Hayami et al. .
Lemma 1.9. If a function is analytic in and satisfies for some real numbers and , then is convex in .
2. Main Results
Our first result is contained in the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1. If satisfies the following condition for some real number , then .
Proof. Let be analytic in . If satisfies then it follows that This gives us that that is, . Then, it is sufficient to prove that for each by Lemma 1.7. From the assumption of the theorem, we obtain that This completes the proof of the theorem.
Example 2.2. The function
satisfies the condition of Theorem 2.1 with and belongs to the class . In particular, putting , we obtain Figure 3.
By making use of Lemma 1.8 with and applying Lemma 1.9, we readily obtain the next theorem.
Theorem 2.3. If is locally univalent in and satisfies for some real numbers and , then .
Putting in the above theorem, we arrive at the following result due to Jahangiri and Silverman .
Theorem 2.4. If is locally univalent in with then .
Furthermore, taking and in the theorem, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 2.5. If is locally univalent in and satisfies then .
A sequence of nonnegative real numbers is called a convex null sequence if as and for all .
The next lemma was obtained by Fejér .
Lemma 3.1. Let be a convex null sequence. Then, the function is analytic and satisfies in .
Applying the above lemma, we deduce the following theorem.
Theorem 3.2. For some and some convex null sequence with , the function belongs to the class .
In the same manner, we also have the following theorem.
Theorem 3.3. For some and some convex null sequence with , the function belongs to the class .
Remark 3.4. The sequence
is a convex null sequence because
Setting in Theorem 3.2 with the above sequence , we derive the following example.
Example 3.5. The function is in the class as shown in Figure 5.
Moreover, we know the following remark.
Remark 3.6. The sequence
is a convex null sequence because
Hence, letting in Theorem 3.3 with the sequence , we have the following example.
Example 3.7. The function is in the class as shown in Figure 6.
This paper is dedicated to Professor Owa on the occasion of his retirement from Kinki University.
The author expresses his sincere thanks to the referees for their valuable suggestions and comments for improving this paper.
- J. Clunie and T. Sheil-Small, “Harmonic univalent functions,” Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae. Series A, vol. 9, pp. 3–25, 1984.
- H. Lewy, “On the non-vanishing of the Jacobian in certain one-to-one mappings,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 689–692, 1936.
- D. Bshouty and A. Lyzzaik, “Close-to-convexity criteria for planar harmonic mappings,” Complex Analysis and Operator Theory, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 767–774, 2011.
- P. T. Mocanu, “Three-cornered hat harmonic functions,” Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1079–1084, 2009.
- P. T. Mocanu, “Injectivity conditions in the complex plane,” Complex Analysis and Operator Theory, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 759–766, 2011.
- T. Hayami and S. Owa, “Hypocycloid of n + 1 cusps harmonic function,” Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 3, pp. 239–246, 2011.
- J. M. Jahangiri and H. Silverman, “Harmonic close-to-convex mappings,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2002.
- P. Duren, Harmonic Mappings in the Plane, vol. 156 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
- T. Hayami, S. Owa, and H. M. Srivastava, “Coefficient inequalities for certain classes of analytic and univalent functions,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 4, article 95, pp. 1–10, 2007.
- L. Fejér, “Über die positivität von summen, die nach trigonometrischen oder Legendreschen, funktionen fortschreiten. I,” Acta Szeged, vol. 2, pp. 75–86, 1925.