Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 364675, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/364675
Research Article

Comparison of SUPG with Bubble Stabilization Parameters and the Standard SUPG

1Department of Mathematics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2School of Mathematical Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China

Received 23 February 2014; Accepted 13 May 2014; Published 2 June 2014

Academic Editor: Gerassimos Barbatis

Copyright © 2014 Xiaowei Liu and Jin Zhang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Stynes, “Steady-state convection-diffusion problems,” Acta Numerica, vol. 14, pp. 445–508, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. H. G. Roos, M. Stynes, and L. Tobiska, Robust Numerical Methods for Singularly Perturbed Differential Equations: Convection-Diffusion-Reaction and Flow Problems, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008.
  3. T. J. R. Hughes and A. Brooks, “A multidimensional upwind scheme with no crosswind diffusion,” in Finite Element Methods for Convection Dominated Flows, T. J. R. Hughes, Ed., vol. 34 of AMD, pp. 19–35, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Applied Mechanics Division, New York, NY, USA, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. V. John and P. Knobloch, “On spurious oscillations at layers diminishing (SOLD) methods for convection-diffusion equations—I. A review,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 196, no. 17–20, pp. 2197–2215, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. E. Burman and A. Ern, “Nonlinear diffusion and discrete maximum principle for stabilized Galerkin approximations of the convection–diffusion-reaction equation,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 191, no. 35, pp. 3833–3855, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. R. Becker and M. Braack, “A finite element pressure gradient stabilization for the Stokes equations based on local projections,” Calcolo, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 173–199, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. L. P. Franca and A. Russo, “Recovering SUPG using Petrov-Galerkin formulations enriched with adjoint residual-free bubbles,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 182, no. 3-4, pp. 333–339, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. T. J. R. Hughes, “Multiscale phenomena: Green's functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles and the origins of stabilized methods,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 127, no. 1–4, pp. 387–401, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. P. G. Ciarlet, The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, vol. 40 of Classics in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2002.
  10. O. Schenk and K. N. Nävert, “Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations with PARDISO,” Journal of Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 20, pp. 475–487, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. O. Schenk and K. N. Nävert, “On fast factorization pivoting methods for symmetric indefinite systems,” Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, vol. 23, pp. 158–179, 2006. View at Google Scholar