#### Abstract

We establish some new generalizations and refinements of the local fractional integral Hölder’s inequality and some related results on fractal space. We also show that many existing inequalities related to the local fractional integral Hölder’s inequality are special cases of the main inequalities which are presented here.

#### 1. Introduction

Let be constrained by Suppose also that and are continuous real-valued functions on . Then each of the following assertions holds true.

(1) For , we have the following inequality known as the Hölder inequality (see [1]):

(2) For and , we have the following* reverse* Hölder inequality (see [2]):
In the special case when and , inequality (2) reduces to the celebrated Cauchy inequality (see [3]). Both the Cauchy inequality and the Hölder inequality play significant roles in many different branches of modern pure and applied mathematics. A great number of generalizations, refinements, variations, and applications of each of these inequalities have been studied in the literature (see [3–13] and the references cited therein). Recently, Yang [14] established the following local fractional integral Hölder’s inequality on fractal space.

Let , , and . Then

More recently, Chen [15] gave a generalization of inequality (4) and its corresponding reverse form as follows.

Let , , and Then each of the following assertions holds true. (1) For , we have (2) For and , we have

The study of local fractional calculus has been an interesting topic (see [14–25]). In fact, local fractional calculus [14, 16, 17] has turned out to be a very useful tool to deal with the continuously nondifferentiable functions and fractals. This formalism has had a great variety of applications in describing physical phenomena, for example, elasticity [17, 26, 27], continuum mechanics [26], quantum mechanics [28, 29], wave phenomena and heat-diffusion analysis [30–34], and other branches of pure and applied mathematics [15, 35–37] and nonlinear dynamics [38, 39]. For more details and other applications of local fractional calculus, the interested reader may refer to the recent works [14–42] (see also the monograph [43] dealing extensively with fractional differential equations).

The purpose of this paper is to give some new generalizations and refinements of inequalities (6) and (7). Some related inequalities are also considered. This paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we introduce some basic facts about local fractional calculus. In Section 3, we establish some new generalizations and refinements of the local fractional integral Hölder inequality and their corresponding reverse forms. Finally, we give our concluding remarks and observations in Section 4.

#### 2. Preliminaries

In this section, we recall some known results of local fractional calculus (see [14, 16, 17]). Throughout this section we will always assume that is a subset of the real line and is a fractal.

Lemma 1 (see [17]). *Assume that is a bi-Lipschitz mapping; then there are two positive constants , and ,
**
such that
**
holds true for all .*

Based on Lemma 1, it is easy to show that [14] such that the following inequality holds true [14]: where is fractal dimension of .

*Definition 2 (see [14, 17]). *Assume that , , and ; if
then is called local fractional continuous at , denoted by . If is local fractional continuous on the interval , then we write (see, e.g., [14])
where denotes the space of local fractional continuous functions on .

*Definition 3 (see [16, 17]). *Suppose that is a nondifferentiable function of exponent . If the following inequality holds true
then is a Hölder function of exponent for .

*Definition 4 (see [16, 17]). *If satisfies the following inequality
then is continuous of order or, briefly, -continuous.

*Definition 5 (see [14, 16–18]). *Suppose that is local fractional continuous on the interval ; then the local fractional derivative of of order at is given by
provided this limit exists.

From Definition 5, we have the following conclusion (see [14]): which is denoted by (see [14]) where denotes the space of local fractional derivable functions on .

*Definition 6 (see [14, 16–18]). *Suppose that is local fractional continuous on the interval ; then the local fractional integral of the function in the interval is defined by
where , , and ; are a partition of the interval .

Let denote the space of local fractional integrable functions on ; from Definition 6, we can obtain the following result (see, for details, [14]): if there exists (see [14])

*Remark 7 (see [14]). *If we suppose that or , then we have

#### 3. Main Results

In this section, we state and prove our main results.

Theorem 8. *Assume that ;,
**
If and , then each of the following assertions holds true.**
(1) For , one has
**(2) For and , one has
*

*Proof. *(1) Let
Applying the assumptions and , a direct computation shows that
that is,
It is easy to see that
It follows from the Hölder inequality (6) that
Substitution of into (30) leads us immediately to inequality (24). This proves inequality (24).

(2) The proof of inequality (25) is similar to the proof of inequality (24). Indeed, by using (26), (29), and (7), we have
Substitution of into (31) leads to inequality (25) immediately.

*Remark 9. *Upon setting , , for , and , inequalities (24) and (25) are reduced to inequalities (6) and (7), respectively.

As we remarked earlier, many existing inequalities related to the local fractional integral Hölder's inequality are special cases of inequalities (24) and (25). For example, we have the following corollary.

Corollary 10. *Under the assumptions of Theorem 8 with , for , and , each of the following assertions holds true.**
(1) For , one has
**
(2) For and , one has
*

Theorem 11. *Assume that ,
**
If and , then each of the following assertions holds true.**
(1) For , one has
**(2) For and (), one has
*

*Proof. *(1) Since and , we get . Then, by applying (24), we immediately obtain inequality (35).

(2) Since , , and , we have . Thus, by applying (25), we immediately have inequality (36). This completes the proof of Theorem 11.

From Theorem 11, we obtain Corollary 12, which is a generalization of Theorem 11.

Corollary 12. *Under the assumptions of Theorem 11, let , and . Then each of the following assertions holds true.**
(1) For , one has
**(2) For , one has
*

Next we present a refinement of each of inequalities (35) and (36).

Theorem 13. *Under the assumptions of Theorem 11, each of the following assertions holds true.**
(1) For , one has
**
where
**
is a nonincreasing function with .**
(2) For and , one has
**
where
**
is a nondecreasing function with .*

*Proof. *(1) Let
By rearrangement, it follows from the assumptions of Theorem 11 that
Then, by Hölder's inequality (6), we obtain
Hence, the desired result is obtained.

(2) The proof of inequality (41) is similar to the proof of inequality (39), so we omit the details involved.

#### 4. Concluding Remarks and Observations

Integral inequalities play a major role in the development of local fractional calculus. In this work, we considered some new generalizations and refinements of the local fractional integral Hölder's inequality and some related results on fractal space. Hölder's inequality was obtained by Yang [14] using local fractional integral. Moreover, the reverse local fractional integral Hölder's inequality was established by Chen [15]. In our present investigation, we have offered further generalizations and refinements of these inequalities by using the local fractional integral which was introduced and investigated by Yang [14, 16, 17]. Special cases of the various results derived in this paper are shown to be related to a number of known results.

For the relevant details about the mathematical, physical, and engineering applications and interpretations of the operators of fractional calculus and local fractional calculus in dealing with the intermediate processes and the intermediate phenomena, the interested reader may be referred to the monographs by Yang [17] and Kilbas et al. [43] (and indeed also to some of the other recent investigations which are cited in this paper).

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

#### Authors’ Contribution

This paper is the result of joint work of all authors who contributed equally to the final version of this paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.

#### Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Key Project of Guangxi Social Sciences (no. gxsk201424), the Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (no. 2013JK1139), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2013M542370), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (no. 20136118120010), NNSFC (no. 11326161), the Key Project of Science and Technology Research of the Henan Education Department (no. 14A110011), the Education Science fund of the Education Department of Guangxi (no. 2013JGB410), NSFC (no. 61362021), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (no. 2013GXNSFDA019030), and the Scientific Research Project of Guangxi Education Department (no. YB2014560 and no. LX2014627).