Abstract and Applied Analysis / 2014 / Article / Tab 2

Research Article

Wind Power Assessment Based on a WRF Wind Simulation with Developed Power Curve Modeling Methods

Table 2

Performance comparison between the WRF-SLFN and the four pdf-SLFN methods.

RE of wind power assessment
0–10 MW10–20 MW20–30 MW30–40 MW40–50 MWTotal

Site 1Weibull-SLFN0.220.350.731.06−0.41−0.28
Rayleigh-SLFN0.380.710.750.61−0.66−0.23
Gamma-SLFN0.540.490.460.32−0.53−0.15
Lognormal-SLFN0.040.661.511.36−0.19−0.56
WRF-SLFN0.400.990.560.05−0.86−0.09

0–20 MW20–40 MW40–60 MW60–80 MW80–100 MWTotal

Site 2Weibull-SLFN0.400.500.321.27−1.00−0.19
Rayleigh-SLFN0.400.810.590.71−1.00−0.19
Gamma-SLFN0.710.650.230.41−0.70−0.14
Lognormal-SLFN0.130.700.861.30−0.81−0.37
WRF-SLFN0.441.070.46−0.03−0.85−0.10

0–10 MW10–20 MW20–30 MW30–40 MW40–50 MWTotal

Site 3Weibull-SLFN0.620.341.150.99−1.00−0.20
Rayleigh-SLFN0.720.631.400.42−1.00−0.18
Gamma-SLFN0.770.541.290.37−1.00−0.14
Lognormal-SLFN0.290.562.101.07−0.89−0.40
WRF-SLFN0.761.020.600.57−0.85−0.20