Research Article
Wind Power Assessment Based on a WRF Wind Simulation with Developed Power Curve Modeling Methods
Table 3
Performance comparison between the WRF-SLFN and WRF-SLFN-OD methods.
| | | RE of wind power assessment | 0–10 MW | 10–20 MW | 20–30 MW | 30–40 MW | 40–50 MW | Total |
| Site 1 | WRF-SLFN | 0.40 | 0.99 | 0.56 | 0.05 | −0.86 | −0.09 | WRF-SLFN-OD | −0.48 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.01 | −0.01 | −0.07 |
| | | 0–20 MW | 20–40 MW | 40–60 MW | 60–80 MW | 80–100 MW | Total |
| Site 2 | WRF-SLFN | 0.44 | 1.07 | 0.46 | −0.03 | −0.85 | −0.10 | WRF-SLFN-OD | −1.00 | −0.83 | −0.21 | 0.31 | 0.11 | −0.07 |
| | | 0–10 MW | 10–20 MW | 20–30 MW | 30–40 MW | 40–50 MW | Total |
| Site 3 | WRF-SLFN | 0.76 | 1.02 | 0.60 | 0.57 | −0.85 | −0.20 | WRF-SLFN-OD | −0.61 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 0.12 | −0.15 | −0.06 |
|
|