- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 949815, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/949815

## Sharp Geometric Mean Bounds for Neuman Means

^{1}School of Mathematics and Computation Science, Hunan City University, Yiyang 413000, China^{2}School of Information Engineering, Huzhou Teachers College, Huzhou 313000, China

Received 31 March 2014; Accepted 27 April 2014; Published 6 May 2014

Academic Editor: Alberto Fiorenza

Copyright © 2014 Yan Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We find the best possible constants and such that the double inequalities + + + + + + + + hold for all with , where , , and are, respectively, the geometric, arithmetic, and quadratic means and , , , and are the Neuman means.

#### 1. Introduction

For with , the Schwab-Borchardt mean [1, 2] of and is given by where and are the inverse cosine and inverse hyperbolic cosine functions, respectively. Recently, the Schwab-Borchardt mean has been the subject of intensive research. In particular, many remarkable inequalities for Schwab-Borchardt mean and its generated means can be found in the literature [1–6].

Very recently, Neuman [7] found a new bivariate mean derived from the Schwab-Borchardt mean as follows:

Let , , , and be the Neuman means, where , , and are the classical geometric, arithmetic, and quadratic means of and , respectively. Then the inequalities for all with , were established by Neuman [7].

Let and . Then the following explicit formulas for , , , and are presented in [7] where , , , and are the inverse hyperbolic tangent, inverse sine, inverse hyperbolic sine, and inverse tangent functions, respectively.

In [7], Neuman also proved that the double inequalities hold for all with if and only if , , , , , , , and .

Let with , , , Then, it is not difficult to verify that and are continuous and strictly increasing on and , respectively. Note that

Therefore, it is natural to ask what the best possible constants and are such that the double inequalities hold for all with . The main purpose of this paper is to answer this question.

#### 2. Lemmas

In order to prove our main results, we need several lemmas, which we present in this section.

Lemma 1 (see [8, Theorem 1.25]). *Let , be continuous on and differentiable on , and on . If is increasing (decreasing) on , then so are
**
If is strictly monotone, then the monotonicity in the conclusion is also strict.*

Lemma 2 (see [9, Lemma 1.1]). *Suppose that the power series and have the radius of convergence and , for all . If the sequence is (strictly) increasing (decreasing), for all , then the function is also (strictly) increasing (decreasing) on .*

Lemma 3. *The function
**
is strictly increasing from onto .*

*Proof. *Making use of the power series expansion, we have
Let
Then
for all . Note that

Therefore, Lemma 3 follows easily from Lemma 2 and (14)–(17).

Lemma 4. *The function
**
is strictly increasing from onto .*

* Proof. *It is not difficult to verify that
Let and . Then,
From Lemma 1 and (19)-(20), we know that we just need to prove that the function
is strictly increasing on .

Let , , , and . Then
Note that
is strictly increasing on . Therefore, the monotonicity of follows easily from (22) and (23) together with the monotonicity of .

Lemma 5. *The function
**
is strictly increasing from onto .*

*Proof. *Simple computations lead to
Let and . Then
Let
Then
for all .

It, from Lemma 2 and (28)–(31), that is strictly increasing on . Therefore, Lemma 5 follows easily from (26) and (27) together with Lemma 1 and the monotonicity of .

Lemma 6. *The function
**
is strictly increasing from on .*

*Proof. *Differentiating gives
Let
Then, simple computations lead to
for .

Therefore, Lemma 6 follows easily from (33)–(39) together with the fact that and .

#### 3. Main Results

Theorem 7. *Let . Then the double inequality
**
holds for all with if and only if and .*

*Proof. *Since both the geometric mean and arithmetic mean are symmetric and homogeneous of degree 1, without loss of generality, we assume that . Let and . Then, from (4), one has
Let . Then , and
where is defined as in Lemma 3.

Therefore, Theorem 7 follows easily from (41) and (42) together with Lemma 3.

Theorem 8. *Let . Then the double inequality
**
holds for all with if and only if and .*

*Proof. *We follow the same idea in the proof of Theorem 7. Without loss of generality, we assume that . Let and . Then, from (5), we get
Let . Then, and simple computation leads to
where is defined as in Lemma 4.

Therefore, Theorem 8 follows easily from (44) and (45) together with Lemma 4.

Theorem 9. *Let . Then the double inequality
**
holds for all with if and only if and .*

* Proof. *Since both the quadratic mean and arithmetic mean are symmetric and homogeneous of degree 1, without loss of generality, we assume that . Let and . Then, (6) gives
Let . Then, and elementary computations lead to
where is defined as in Lemma 5.

Therefore, Theorem 9 follows easily from (47) and (48) together with Lemma 5.

Theorem 10. *Let . Then the double inequality
**
holds for all with if and only if and .*

* Proof. *We follow the same idea in the proof of Theorem 9. Let , and . Then, from (7), we have
Let . Then and
where is defined as in Lemma 6.

Therefore, Theorem 10 follows easily from (50) and (51) together with Lemma 6.

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61370173 and 61374086, the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province under Grant LY13A010004, and the Applied Research Major Project of Public Welfare Technology of Huzhou City under Grant 2013GZ02.

#### References

- E. Neuman and J. Sándor, “On the Schwab-Borchardt mean,”
*Mathematica Pannonica*, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 253–266, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - E. Neuman and J. Sandor, “On the Schwab-Borchardt mean II,”
*Mathematica Pannonica*, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 2005. View at Google Scholar - Z.-Y. He, Y.-M. Chu, and M.-K. Wang, “Optimal bounds for Neuman means in terms of harmonic and contraharmonic means,”
*Journal of Applied Mathematics*, vol. 2013, Article ID 807623, 4 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - Y.-M. Chu and W.-M. Qian, “Refinements of bounds for Neuman means,”
*Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2014, Article ID 354132, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - E. Neuman, “On some means derived from the Schwab-Borchardt mean,”
*Journal of Mathematical Inequalities*, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 171–183, 2014. View at Google Scholar - E. Neuman, “On some means derived from the Schwab-Borchardt mean II,”
*Journal of Mathematical Inequalities*, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 361–370, 2014. View at Google Scholar - E. Neuman, “On a new bivariate mean,”
*Aequationes Mathematicae*. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - G. D. Anderson, S.-L. Qiu, M. K. Vamanamurthy, and M. Vuorinen, “Generalized elliptic integrals and modular equations,”
*Pacific Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - S. Simić and M. Vuorinen, “Landen inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions,”
*Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2012, Article ID 932061, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet