Revisiting Blasius Flow by Fixed Point Method

Table 2

Comparison of 𝑓 between FPM (𝜆=1/5) and Howarth.

𝜂	𝑓
	FPM			Howarth; [21]
	𝑛=50	𝑛=200	𝑛=800
0	0.	0.	0.	0
0.2	0.006644529362447	0.006640995986591	0.006640999714597	0.00664
0.4	0.02657431250127	0.02655986911996	0.02655988401799	0.02656
0.6	0.05976777037563	0.05973460409079	0.05973463749804	0.05974
0.8	0.1061682229933	0.1061081617252	0.1061082208390	0.10611
1.0	0.1656669946990	0.1655716339700	0.1655717257893	0.16557
1.2	0.2380877115384	0.2379485860317	0.2379487172889	0.23795
1.4	0.3231726092163	0.3229813967422	0.3229815738295	0.32298
1.6	0.4205717973682	0.4203205366053	0.4203207655016	0.42032
1.8	0.5298364510983	0.5295177515398	0.5295180377438	0.52952
2	0.6504167979655	0.6500240214585	0.6500243699353	0.65003
3	1.397637112752	1.396807516637	1.396808230870	1.39682
4	2.307039632340	2.305745294404	2.305746418462	2.30576
5	3.284986166454	3.283272129531	3.283273665156	3.28329
6	4.281691879364	4.279618989982	4.279620922514	4.27964
7	5.281627551984	5.279236492841	5.279238811029	5.27926
8	6.281851614090	6.279210729689	6.279213431346	6.27923
10	8.282182252512	8.279208870686	8.279212342934	/
15	13.284515240195	13.27920694573	13.279212342479	/
20	18.283646215099	18.27920502276	18.279212342479	/