Research Article
Revisiting Blasius Flow by Fixed Point Method
Table 3
Comparison of
between FPM (
) and Howarth.
| | | FPM | Howarth [21] | | | |
| 0 | 0. | 0. | 0. | 0 | 0.2 | 0.06644347995228 | 0.06640775477474 | 0.06640779209625 | 0.06641 | 0.4 | 0.1328378289536 | 0.1327640864649 | 0.1327641607610 | 0.13277 | 0.6 | 0.1990509318305 | 0.1989371417431 | 0.1989372524222 | 0.19894 | 0.8 | 0.2648643497350 | 0.2647089925007 | 0.2647091387231 | 0.26471 | 1.0 | 0.3299775414929 | 0.3297798506391 | 0.3297800312497 | 0.32979 | 1.2 | 0.3940157297864 | 0.3937758909492 | 0.3937761044339 | 0.39378 | 1.4 | 0.4565422496657 | 0.4562615202332 | 0.4562617647051 | 0.45627 | 1.6 | 0.5170757864638 | 0.5167565112060 | 0.5167567844226 | 0.51676 | 1.8 | 0.5751123265865 | 0.5747578444754 | 0.5747581438894 | 0.57477 | 2 | 0.6301509546266 | 0.6297654136655 | 0.6297657365024 | 0.62977 | 3 | 0.8465117311855 | 0.8460440464746 | 0.8460444436580 | 0.84605 | 4 | 0.9559675373580 | 0.9555178143322 | 0.9555182298107 | 0.95552 | 5 | 0.9919283302451 | 0.9915414951870 | 0.9915419001644 | 0.99155 | 6 | 0.9993091537696 | 0.9989724827440 | 0.9989728724358 | 0.99898 | 7 | 1.000215077512 | 0.9999212208137 | 0.9999216041479 | 0.99992 | 8 | 1.000195058002 | 0.9999958903313 | 0.9999962745353 | 1.00000 | 10 | 1.000231913519 | 0.9999996129000 | 0.9999999980154 | / | 15 | 1.000224523350 | 0.9999996133026 | 1.000000000000 | / | 20 | 0.9997789079310 | 0.9999996166005 | 1.000000000000 | / |
|
|