Revisiting Blasius Flow by Fixed Point Method

Table 4

Comparison of 𝑓^′′ between FPM (𝜆=1/5) and Howarth.

𝜂	𝑓^′′
	FPM			Howarth [21]
	𝑛=50	𝑛=200	𝑛=800
0	0.3322299008614	0.3320572413724	0.33205733621526	0.33206
0.2	0.3321681255428	0.3319836510534	0.33198383711462	0.33199
0.4	0.3316651431123	0.3314696606323	0.33146984420144	0.33147
0.6	0.3302835149673	0.3300789475208	0.33007912757428	0.33008
0.8	0.3275995678839	0.3273890950354	0.32738927014924	0.32739
1.0	0.3232190113859	0.3230069482211	0.32300711668693	0.32301
1.2	0.3167975457228	0.3165890310990	0.31658919106110	0.31659
1.4	0.3080647180157	0.3078652421801	0.30786539179016	0.30787
1.6	0.2968484699253	0.2966633238744	0.29666346145571	0.29667
1.8	0.2830971363448	0.2829308930580	0.28293101725975	0.28293
2	0.2668953087923	0.2667514357803	0.26675154569727	0.26675
3	0.1613836232798	0.1613602778747	0.16136031954088	0.16136
4	0.06418469140538	0.06423412147661	0.064234121091696	0.06424
5	0.01584093436570	0.01590681516643	0.015906798685320	0.01591
6	2.367987742194𝑒−3	2.402051505611𝑒−3	2.4020398437568𝑒−3	0.00240
7	1.526040209602𝑒−4	2.201705391867𝑒−4	2.201689552708𝑒−4	0.00022
8	−9.161215077567𝑒−4	1.223887615942𝑒−5	1.224092624324𝑒−5	0.00001
10	1.667970449293𝑒−4	9.650715210973𝑒−9	8.442915877193𝑒−9	/
15	2.499528919705𝑒−4	−1.207941083287𝑒−10	1.426848065722𝑒−17	/
20	1.244076430614𝑒−4	1.815564827202𝑒−9	4.736242910970𝑒−18	/