Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2015, Article ID 708131, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/708131
Research Article

Comparative Study of Metaheuristics for the Curve-Fitting Problem: Modeling Neurotransmitter Diffusion and Synaptic Receptor Activation

DATSI, ETS de Ingenieros Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus de Montegancedo, 28660 Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain

Received 22 October 2014; Revised 10 April 2015; Accepted 15 April 2015

Academic Editor: Jinde Cao

Copyright © 2015 Jesús Montes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Fuxe, A. Dahlström, M. Höistad et al., “From the Golgi-Cajal mapping to the transmitter-based characterization of the neuronal networks leading to two modes of brain communication: wiring and volume transmission,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 17–54, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Syková and C. Nicholson, “Diffusion in brain extracellular space,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1277–1340, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. A. Rusakov, L. P. Savtchenko, K. Zheng, and J. M. Henley, “Shaping the synaptic signal: molecular mobility inside and outside the cleft,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 359–369, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Boucher, H. Kröger, and A. Sík, “Realistic modelling of receptor activation in hippocampal excitatory synapses: analysis of multivesicular release, release location, temperature and synaptic cross-talk,” Brain Structure & Function, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 49–65, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Renner, Y. Domanov, F. Sandrin, I. Izeddin, P. Bassereau, and A. Triller, “Lateral diffusion on tubular membranes: quantification of measurements bias,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e25731, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. R. Stiles and T. M. Bartol, “Monte carlo methods for simulating realistic synaptic microphysiology using MCell,” in Computational Neuroscience: Realistic Modeling for Experimentalists, pp. 87–127, CRC Press, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. A. Kerr, T. M. Bartol, B. Kaminsky et al., “Fast Monte Carlo simulation methods for biological reaction-diffusion systems in solution and on surfaces,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3126–3149, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. S. J. Plimpton and A. Slepoy, “Microbial cell modeling via reacting diffusive particles,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 305–309, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. S. Andrews and D. Bray, “Stochastic simulation of chemical reactions with spatial resolution and single molecule detail,” Physical Biology, vol. 1, no. 3-4, pp. 137–151, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. S. Andrews, N. J. Addy, R. Brent, and A. P. Arkin, “Detailed simulations of cell biology with smoldyn 2.1,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Montes, E. Gomez, A. Merchán-Pérez, J. DeFelipe, and J.-M. Peña, “A machine learning method for the prediction of receptor activation in the simulation of synapses,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID e68888, pp. 1–14, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. LaTorre, S. Muelas, and J. M. Peña, “A comprehensive comparison of large scale global optimizers,” Information Sciences, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. C. Sequeira, F. Sanchez-Quesada, M. Sancho, I. Hidalgo, and T. Ortiz, “A genetic algorithm approach for localization of deep sources in MEG,” Physica Scripta, vol. T118, pp. 140–142, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. E. Cuevas, D. Zaldivar, and M. Pérez-Cisneros, “A novel multi-threshold segmentation approach based on differential evolution optimization,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 5265–5271, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Ochoa, M. Tejera, and M. Soto, “A fitness function model for detecting ellipses with estimation of distribution algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '10), pp. 1–8, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. LaTorre, S. Muelas, J.-M. Peña, R. Santana, Á. Merchán-Pérez, and J.-R. Rodríguez, “A differential evolution algorithm for the detection of synaptic vesicles,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation (CEC '11), pp. 1687–1694, IEEE, New Orleans, La, USA, June 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Santana, S. Muelas, A. LaTorre, and J. M. Peña, “A direct optimization approach to the P300 speller,” in Proceedings of the 13th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO '11), pp. 1747–1754, Dublin, Ireland, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Muelas, J. M. Peña, V. Robles, K. Muzhetskaya, A. LaTorre, and P. de Miguel, “Optimizing the design of composite panels using an improved genetic algorithm,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Optimization (EngOpt '08), J. Herskovits, A. Canelas, H. Cortes, and M. Aroztegui, Eds., COPPE/UFRJ, June 2008.
  19. W. Wang, Z. Xiang, and X. Xu, “Self-adaptive differential evolution and its application to job-shop scheduling,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing—Asia Simulation Conference (ICSC '08), pp. 820–826, IEEE, Beijing, China, October 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. M. Elsayed, R. A. Sarker, and D. L. Essam, “GA with a new multi-parent crossover for solving IEEE-CEC2011 competition problems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation (CEC '11), pp. 1034–1040, June 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. LaTorre, S. Muelas, and J. M. Peña, “Benchmarking a hybrid DERHC algorithm on real world problems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '11), pp. 1027–1033, IEEE, New Orleans, La, USA, June 2011.
  22. S. N. Parragh, K. F. Doerner, and R. F. Hartl, “Variable neighborhood search for the dial-a-ride problem,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1129–1138, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Muelas, A. Latorre, and J.-M. Peña, “A variable neighborhood search algorithm for the optimization of a dial-a-ride problem in a large city,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 14, pp. 5516–5531, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. C. Dias, P. Machado, D. C. Silva, and P. H. Abreu, “An inverted ant colony optimization approach to traffic,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, pp. 122–133, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. S. Zhang, C. Lee, H. Chan, K. Choy, and Z. Wu, “Swarm intelligence applied in green logistics: a literature review,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 154–169, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Gálvez, A. Iglesias, and J. Puig-Pey, “Iterative two-step genetic-algorithm-based method for efficient polynomial B-spline surface reconstruction,” Information Sciences, vol. 182, pp. 56–76, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. J. Yang, F. Liu, X. Tao, and X. Wang, “The application of evolutionary algorithm in B-spline curve fitting,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD '12), pp. 2809–2812, Sichuan, China, May 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Gálvez and A. Iglesias, “A new iterative mutually coupled hybrid GA-PSO approach for curve fitting in manufacturing,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1491–1504, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Zhao, J. Jiang, C. Song, L. Bao, and J. Gao, “Parameter optimization for Bezier curve fitting based on genetic algorithm,” in Advances in Swarm Intelligence, vol. 7928 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 451–458, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. Centro de Supercomputación y Visualización de Madrid (CeSViMa), 2014, http://www.cesvima.upm.es/.
  31. P. Jonas, G. Major, and B. Sakmann, “Quantal components of unitary EPSCs at the mossy fibre synapse on CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampus,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 472, no. 1, pp. 615–663, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. M. Franks, T. M. Bartol Jr., and T. J. Sejnowski, “A monte carlo model reveals independent signaling at central glutamatergic synapses,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 2333–2348, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. A. Rusakov and D. M. Kullmann, “Extrasynaptic glutamate diffusion in the hippocampus: ultrastructural constraints, uptake, and receptor activation,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 3158–3170, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  34. K. Zheng, A. Scimemi, and D. A. Rusakov, “Receptor actions of synaptically released glutamate: the role of transporters on the scale from nanometers to microns,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 95, no. 10, pp. 4584–4596, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Momiyama, R. A. Silver, M. Häusser et al., “The density of AMPA receptors activated by a transmitter quantum at the climbing fibre—Purkinje cell synapse in immature rats,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 549, no. 1, pp. 75–92, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. M. Bates and D. G. Watts, Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Applied Probability and Statistics, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. D. M. Bates and J. M. Chambers, “Nonlinear models,” in Statistical Models, S. J. M. Chambers and T. J. Hastie, Eds., Wadsworth & Brooks/cole, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  38. MathWorks, MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2013a, MathWorks, 2014, http://www.mathworks.com/support/sysreq/sv-r2013a/.
  39. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011.
  40. J. H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1975. View at MathSciNet
  41. F. Herrera and M. Lozano, “Gradual distributed real-coded genetic algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–63, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. Storn and K. V. Price, “Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–359, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. J. Brest, S. Greiner, B. Bošković, M. Mernik, and V. Zumer, “Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: a comparative study on numerical benchmark problems,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 646–657, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. Wang, Z. Wu, S. Rahnamayan, and L. Kang, “A scalability test for accelerated de using generalized opposition-based learning,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA '09), pp. 1090–1095, Pisa, Italy, December 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. F. J. Solis and R. J. B. Wets, “Minimization by random search techniques,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  46. L.-Y. Tseng and C. Chen, “Multiple trajectory search for large scale global optimization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '08), pp. 3052–3059, IEEE, Hong Kong, June 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, “Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: the covariance matrix adaptation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC '96), pp. 312–317, May 1996. View at Scopus
  48. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, “Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 159–195, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Auger and N. Hansen, “A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '05), pp. 1769–1776, IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA, September 2005. View at Scopus
  50. H. Theil, Economic Forecasts and Policy, Contributions to Economic Analysis Series, North-Holland, New York, NY, USA, 1961, http://books.google.es/books?id=FPVdAAAAIAAJ.
  51. G. Taguchi, S. Chowdhury, and Y. Wu, Taguchi's Quality Engineering Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. J. H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis, Pearson New International Edition, Prentice-Hall, 2013.
  53. W. W. Daniel, Applied Nonparametric Statistics, Duxbury Thomson Learning, 1990.
  54. S. García, D. Molina, M. Lozano, and F. Herrera, “A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms' behaviour: a case study on the CEC'2005 Special Session on Real Parameter Optimization,” Journal of Heuristics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 617–644, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. F. Wilcoxon, “Individual comparisons by ranking methods,” Biometrics Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 80–83, 1945. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. A. LaTorre, S. Muelas, and J.-M. Peña, “Evaluating the multiple offspring sampling framework on complex continuous optimization functions,” Memetic Computing, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 295–309, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. Muelas, J. M. Peña, V. Robles, A. LaTorre, and P. de Miguel, “Machine learning methods to analyze migration parameters in parallel genetic algorithms,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems 2007, E. Corchado, J. M. Corchado, and A. Abraham, Eds., pp. 199–206, Springer, Salamanca, Spain, 2007. View at Google Scholar