Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2015, Article ID 712584, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/712584
Research Article

Power Series Solution for Solving Nonlinear Burgers-Type Equations

1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
2Departamento de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Km 16, Bairro Salobrinho, 45662-900 Ilhéus, BA, Brazil
3Departamento de Física, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Apartado Postal 14-740, 07000 México, DF, Mexico

Received 20 October 2014; Revised 9 March 2015; Accepted 10 March 2015

Academic Editor: Fazal M. Mahomed

Copyright © 2015 E. López-Sandoval et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Power series solution method has been traditionally used to solve ordinary and partial linear differential equations. However, despite their usefulness the application of this method has been limited to this particular kind of equations. In this work we use the method of power series to solve nonlinear partial differential equations. The method is applied to solve three versions of nonlinear time-dependent Burgers-type differential equations in order to demonstrate its scope and applicability.

1. Introduction

Power series solution (PSS) method is an old method that has been limited to solve linear differential equations, both ordinary differential equations (ODE) [1, 2] and partial differential equations (PDE) [3, 4]. Linear PDE have traditionally been solved using the separation of variables method because it permits obtaining a coupled system of ODE easier to solve with the PSS method. Some examples of these are the Legendre polynomials and the spherical harmonics used in Laplace’s equations in spherical coordinates or in Bessel’s equations in cylindrical coordinates [3, 4]. It is known that in nonlinear PDE (NLPDE) this procedure is not possible.

In this work we compare the spectral method (SM) with the PSS method solving three versions of nonlinear time-dependent Burgers-type equations [5] because we know that the SM is the more accurate numerical method. The SM with collocation points (SMCP) is a numerical technique applied to solve linear and nonlinear differential equations with high accurate approximations to the solution [6]. This has been used to solve PDE using polynomial interpolation function with an orthogonal basis such as Fourier, Chebyshev, or Legendre functions [7]. The SM has also been very successful to solve any kind of DE problems, including integro-differential problems [8], with Newman boundary values [9], and nonlinear PDE [10].

We use the symbolic computation package Matlab to obtain the algebraic operations for the truncated series approximation. This program helps to do easier the tedious algebraic operations.

2. Power Series Solution Method

We know that almost the totality of the NLPDE does not have a solution with an analytic expression, that is, a solution in a closed form of known functions. Our goal is to construct a solution using a power series, taking advantage of the capacity of power series to represent any function with algebraic series developing the idea to construct an approximate solution [1117]. It also has the possibility to approximate a solution, inclusive if an analytic form does not exist, in a similar way like the Taylor’s series approximate the functions. The existence of the PSS does not guarantee per se that the represented function has an exact approximation in distant points relative to the central value. However, considering that the PSS needs to satisfy the NLPDE, with initial values condition (IVC) or with boundary values conditions (BVC), therefore we can construct a well posed problem to obtain an accurate solution, constrained with all these limiting conditions [18]. Furthermore, the polynomial of the PSS is a smoothed function and this can guarantee the existence of a solution [18].

The PSS method represents a general solution with a series of unknown coefficients. When the PSS polynomial is substituted in the PDE we obtain a recurrence relation for the expansion coefficients. These coefficients should be expressed in function of the coefficients result from IVC or BVC. In this way, we obtain a system of equations depending on these initial value based coefficients. In order to obtain and solve a consistent algebraic system of equations, we also need the same number of coefficients and equations [11]. All these conditions, in the beginning, provide a guarantee that the PDE is a well posed problem; that is, existence, uniqueness, and smoothness of the solution are well defined [18].

Finally, the PSS method is a proposal to find a semianalytic solution as an asymptotic approximation (in space and time) of a finite series with minimal error in the expansion of terms of the series. From numerical analysis when a power series converges on an interval to a function , the radius of convergence is . In our work, the radius of convergence is defined by each interval where our error was estimated as we see below.

3. Numerical Results

First, we consider the nonlinear time-dependent one-dimensional generalized Burgers-Huxley equation [5]:with the initial condition where , , , and are real parameters. With , this equation admits a travelling wave solution. Then readswith , where and represent the wave number and frequency of the travelling wave, respectively, working as unknown variables. Introducing (3) in (1) we obtain The ansatz for (4) will be a PSS asThe respective derivatives and nonlinear terms in (4) result in Substituting the series of (6) in (4), we obtain the recurrence relationSolving with Matlab until degree of PSS from (4), we obtain the following values for the coefficients: We will use the initial conditions to obtain the unknown coefficients (8). From the initial condition (2), we express as a polynomial series applying Taylor’s theorem. ThenMatching the coefficients of this polynomial with the coefficients (8) of our ansatz, we obtain the next values: , , , , , , , , and so forth.

With and values matched to their respective coefficients in (8), we obtain an algebraic system of 2 equations with two variables. Solving this one, we obtain the value of the unknown variables and :Then, the complete solution as PSS for the NLDE (1) readsAs it usually does when an approximate solution with PSS is obtained, a test of accuracy of the approximation must be performed. In this way, we calculate the absolute difference between exact and approximated solution defined as , where is the exact solution obtained from [5], and is the calculated solution (11), at the point , until the power degree , respectively. We compute the error, with the parameters values , , and , within the intervals and . This result is shown in Figure 1. This parameter set was selected because it is the same one used in [5] to do a comparison. The convergence of the power series, , depends on and also the coefficient , and then it is possible to adjust these ones to solve the NLDE and to find a solution that approximates its behavior to any distance and time, at less in the interval where we calculate the solution.

Figure 1: Absolute error of Burgers-Huxley equation, (1), with , , , and .

We also compare the approximated solution with the spatial part fixed in , with different power degree polynomial (), relative to the exact result. This comparison is shown in Figure 2. From this figure we note that the improvement is better when the power degree increases. In a similar way, we solved (1) with and . For and in the intervals and we calculate the error shown in Figure 3. Finally, in Figure 4 we showed the absolute error of (1) for with in the intervals and .

Figure 2: Trajectories of the approximate solution of the Burgers-Huxley equation, (1), with , , , and , for .
Figure 3: Absolute error of Burgers-Huxley equation, (1), with and .
Figure 4: Absolute error of Burgers-Huxley equation, (1), with and .

For our second example, let us consider the nonlinear time-dependent one-dimensional Burgers-type equation [5]:where , , and are real parameters, with the initial condition . As in the first case, (12) admits a travelling wave solution. Performing the transformation where and and are unknown parameters, and replacing (13) in (12) then We use the following PSS ansatz for (14):thenor moving conveniently the sum index to , thenSubstituting the above series into (14), we haveThis recurrence relation is used in the PSS until the degree . Using Matlab to solve the recurrence algebraic system, we obtainExpanding the initial condition of (12) as a polynomial through the Taylor series,Matching the coefficients of (20) with the coefficients of solution (19), we arrive to The and matched values are used to get a system of 2 equations with 2 variables, and . Solving this one, we obtain the value of the unknown variables and :and the complete solution in (15) readsAs in the previous example, we calculate the error with the parameters values , , and within the intervals and until the power degree . This result is shown in Figure 5. In Figure 6 we make the comparison for a fixed in the time interval with several power degree polynomials ().

Figure 5: Absolute error of Burgers-type equation, (12), with , , and .
Figure 6: Trajectories of the approximate solution of the Burgers-type equation, (12), with , , and , for .

For the third example, we consider the nonlinear time-dependent one-dimensional generalized Burgers-Fisher-type equation [5]:with the initial condition where , , and are real numbers. When , this equation admits a travelling wave solutionwith . This one is replaced in (24)and we attempt a PSS and so the terms of (27) can be written asSubstituting (29) into (27), we obtain the recurrence relationThis recurrence relation is solved with Matlab until the degree and the coefficients result The initial condition (25) is expressed like a polynomial series applying Taylor’s formulaMatching the coefficients of this polynomial with those of polynomial from solution (31), we obtain the value of the coefficients: , , , , , , , , and so forth. With and values matched to their respective coefficients of (31), we obtain a system of 2 equations with 2 variables to solve and to obtain the values of the unknown parameters and :Therefore from the solution (28) readsWe computed the error with (34) and the exact solution presented in [5] with the parameters values and within the intervals and until the power degree . This error is shown in Figure 7. Figure 8 shows the trajectories of the approximate solution of problem (24) where , for , and and , in the time interval , with the power degree polynomial (). In Figure 9, the error is shown with , and and , in the intervals and . In Figure 10, the computed error is shown for , with and , in the intervals and .

Figure 7: Absolute error of generalized Burgers-Fisher-type equation, (24), with , , and .
Figure 8: Trajectories of the approximate solution of generalized Burgers-Fisher-type equation, (24), with , , and , for .
Figure 9: Absolute error of generalized Burgers-Fisher-type equation, (24), with , , and .
Figure 10: Absolute error of generalized Burgers-Fisher-type equation, (24), with , , and .

We remark that Figures 2, 6, and 8 are shown simple trajectories of the approximate solution due to the fact that they are the solution of this NLDE in the time interval with the axis fixed (to compare with [5]) where the behavior is smoother. These are nonlinear equations where the error grows in an exponential way, at difference of the behavior of linear equations. We show that by adding more terms to the ansatz series, the error is reduced and the solution is extended to long times and an increased space in comparison with other methods such as the spectral method that is one of the most accurate numerical methods. The PSS method is employed to more complex trajectories as shown in [13], where the method is used to solve chaotic NLDE.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

In this work we have shown that it is possible to solve nonlinear differential equations with the power series solution method. This method is implemented as a general approximate solution for each nonlinear PDE or ODE, in a similar way to the solution of a Linear DE. We transform a nonlinear DE problem into an algebraic system of equations. Therefore, with this method, it is possible to obtain a well posed problem when the system of DE is consistent. It means that the system has the same number of variables as equations, and consequently the number of algebraic variables (coefficients of expansion series) obtained with this method is the same as the number of equations.

We had shown that the PSS method is a semianalytic technique that leads, in an easier and exact way, to the solution of difficult differential equations with an approximated closed form expression. This is especially useful to solve nonlinear equations and leaves open the possibility to describe in an exact and convergent way the behavior of chaotic dynamical systems [13, 15]. Then, the solution can be approximated until the necessary degree into the power series. The convergence of the PSS method depends on the number of terms used in the power series. Once we know it, we can determine the domain of the space and time where the solution is valid. Three examples of the nonlinear time-dependent one-dimensional Burgers-Huxley, Burgers-type, and Burgers-Fisher-type equations were solved within this capable method. The errors between the exact analytic solution from [5] and our PSS are compared in each case. We obtained a better approximation in larger space and time intervals (~10−3–10−7) with PSS of order but not with the accuracy of [5] in a small space and time interval of the solution.

The advantages of the PSS method over the traditional methods are the same ones that are presented in the work with respect to the spectral method that solves any kind of NLDE. It means that it can solve NLDE with higher accuracy in an interval of time and space than the other traditional methods, adding more terms to the series.

In summary, we have shown that the PSS method is a technique which can be used to solve this kind of nonlinear differential equations [11]. In this work, the main goal was to solve the differential partial equation nonlinear Burgers type with dimension 1 (spatial) + 1 (time), doing a transformation of this one to a single nonlinear equation. We compared the PPS solution with that coming from the spectral method. We believe that it is possible to extend the solution to 2 or 3 spatial dimensions plus the time dimension. This possibility will be considered in future works. The procedure provides a much greater accuracy adding more terms into the series. The PSS method opens the possibility to analyze other characteristics of the NLPDE, obtaining better semianalytic approximations that involve less computational efforts.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are extremely grateful to Roman López Sandoval and Rogelio Ospina for their careful reading and helpful discussion of the paper. E. López-Sandoval would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Brazilian Agency CNPq Grant PCI D-B/2012 and the PNPD-CAPES in UESC-BA.

References

  1. D. G. Zill, A First Course in Differential Equations—The Classic, Brooks/Cole, 5th edition, 2001.
  2. L. Yilmaz, “Some considerations on the series solution of differential equations and its engineering applications,” RMZ Materials and Geo-Environment, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 247–259, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. Lin, C.-W. Wang, and X.-L. Zhang, “Series solution for the Schrodinger equation with a long-range spherically symmetric potential,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, vol. 458, no. 2022, pp. 1285–1290, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. C. Lin and M.-M. Lin, “Series solution of the differential equation determining the nth-shell one-electron density of a bare Coulomb problem in quantum physics,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 13, pp. 677–681, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. E. H. Doha, D. Baleanu, A. H. Bhrawy, and M. A. Abdelkawy, “A jacobi collocation method for solving nonlinear burgers-type equations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 760542, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. P. Boyd, Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, Dover, 2nd edition, 2001, http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jpboyd/BOOK_Spectral2000.html.
  7. J. P. Boyd and F. Yu, “Comparing seven spectral methods for interpolation and for solving the Poisson equation in a disk: Zernike polynomials, Logan-Sheppridge polynomials, Chebyshev-Fourier Series, cylindrical Robert functions, Bessel-Fourier expansions, square-to-disk conformal mapping and radial basis functions,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 230, no. 4, pp. 1408–1438, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. C. H. Kim and U. J. Choi, “Spectral collocation methods for a partial integro-differential equation with a weakly singular kernel,” Australian Mathematical Society Journal Series B: Applied Mathematics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 408–430, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. M. Javidi and A. Golbabai, “Spectral collocation method for parabolic partial differential equations with Neumann boundary conditions,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 1, no. 5-8, pp. 211–218, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. A. H. Khater, R. S. Temsah, and M. M. Hassan, “A Chebyshev spectral collocation method for solving Burgers'-type equations,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 333–350, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. E. López-Sandoval, A. Mello, and J. J. Godina-Nava, “Power series solution to non-linear partial differential equations of mathematical physics,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2346.
  12. C. P. Filipich, L. T. Villa, and R. O. Grossi, “The power series method in the effectiveness factor calculations,” Latin American Applied Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 207–212, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. P. Filipich, M. B. Rosales, and F. Buezas, “Some nonlinear mechanical problems solved with analytical solutions,” Latin American Applied Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. P. Banerjee, “A simplified approach to solving nonlinear dispersive equations using a power series method,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 1288–1290, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. V. Fairen, V. Lopez, and L. Conde, “Power series approximation to solutions of nonlinear systems of differential equations,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 56, pp. 57–61, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. S. Nuseir and A. Al-Hasson, “Power series solution for nonlinear system of partial differential equations,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 104, pp. 5147–5159, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Quevedo, “General static axisymmetric solution of Einstein's vacuum field equations in prolate spheroidal coordinates,” Physical Review D: Particles and Fields, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 2904–2911, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. J. Hadamard, “Sur les problèmes aux dérivées partielles et leur signification physique,” Princeton University Bulletin, vol. 13, pp. 49–52, 1902. View at Google Scholar