Research Article

The Impact of Cocreation on the Student Satisfaction: Analysis through Structural Equation Modeling

Table 3

Confirmatory factor analysis, CR, and AVE.

ConstructsFactor loadings-values

Participation (CR = 0.764, AVE = 0.519, Squared Root of AVE = 0.720)
par1 I put a lot of effort into expressing my personal needs to the staff during the service .0.753
par2 I always provide suggestions to the staff for improving the service outcome.0.69610.784
par3 I have a high level of participation in the service .
par4 I am very much involved in deciding how the services should be provided.0.71110.157

Communication (CR = 0.781, AVE = 0.642, Squared Root of AVE = 0.801)
com1 The information provided by the university can be .
com2 In case of any problem, the university provides me with enough .
com3 The university allows me to have an interactive communication with .0.844
com4 The university maintains a regular contact with me.0.75614.735

Cocreation (CR = 0.892, AVE = 0.676, Squared Root of AVE = 0.822)
cocre1 Overall, I would describe my relationship with this university as involving a high level of cocreation.0.86624.495
cocre2 The final purchase solution was arrived at mainly through the joint effort of the university and .0.901
cocre3 What I receive from this university is due to work jointly between the university and student. 0.79019.829
cocre4 I contribute actively to the final solution in the educational service I receive.0.72117.235

Satisfaction (CR = 0.839, AVE = 0.723, Squared Root of AVE = 0.850)
sat1 Overall, I am pleased with the services offered by this university.0.90417.844
sat2 The service offered by my university meets my .0.793
sat3 I think I did the right thing when I enrolled in this .

Notes. CR: composite reliability. AVE: average variance extracted.
loading is fixed to 1 to set the scale of the construct.
after AFE.