Abstract and Applied Analysis

Abstract and Applied Analysis / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7405725 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7405725

Jorge A. Esquivel-Avila, "Blow-Up of Solutions with High Energies of a Coupled System of Hyperbolic Equations", Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2019, Article ID 7405725, 11 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7405725

Blow-Up of Solutions with High Energies of a Coupled System of Hyperbolic Equations

Academic Editor: Sining Zheng
Received02 Jan 2019
Accepted13 May 2019
Published04 Jun 2019


We consider an abstract coupled evolution system of second order in time. For any positive value of the initial energy, in particular for high energies, we give sufficient conditions on the initial data to conclude nonexistence of global solutions. We compare our results with those in the literature and show how we improve them.

1. Introduction

A coupled Klein-Gordon system, in electromagnetic theory, was first introduced in [1]. Posteriorly, further generalizations have been studied. In particular, the following system was analyzed in [2]on , where , and . The existence and uniqueness of weak solutions of , as well as characterizations for blow-up and globality, by means of the potential well method for values of the initial energy smaller than the mountain pass level, were proved in [2]. In the same paper, sufficient conditions were given to obtain blow-up for arbitrary positive values of the initial energy. The purpose of our work is to study an abstract hyperbolic coupled system and improve some results about nonexistence of global solutions presented in the literature for some concrete systems. In particular, we shall improve some blow-up results presented in [2], for the problem . Precisely, we consider the following abstract problem:on , where we assumed that the operators are linear, continuous, positive, and symmetric, where are linear subspaces of the Hilbert space with inner product and norm . Here, are the corresponding dual spaces and we identify . Then, By means of the operators , , , and , we define the following bilinear forms: We assume that there exists , such that The nonlinear source terms and , are such that , and is a potential operator with potential , that is, and , and they satisfy where is a constant.

2. Functional Framework

We shall analyze qualitative properties for a set of solutions of problem . To this end, we define the phase space We assume that the following local existence and uniqueness result is met.

Theorem 1. For every initial data , there exists , and a unique local solution , such that problem () is satisfied in the following sense a. e. in and for every . Furthermore, the following energy equation holds for ,

Remark 2. Problem (P) is invariant if we reverse the time direction: . Indeed, the solution backwards , with initial data is the solution forwards , with initial data .

An important set of solutions are the equilibria, that is, solutions independent of time: . In this case, satisfies for every . In particular, for , and then

By , is an equilibrium. The set of equilibria , with minimal energy is called ground state, and the corresponding value of the energy is the mountain pass level denoted by ; see [3]. For the problem , the sign of characterizes either blow-up in finite time or boundedness of solutions if . Indeed, blow-up and boundedness properties hold if, and , respectively; see [2]. Similar analysis have been done to prove similar characterizations for coupled systems of wave equations with linear and nonlinear damping terms; see [48] and references therein, just to cite some works of the abundant literature in the field. The qualitative analysis of the solutions with high energies is almost unknown. There are some works that prove blow-up if and some other conditions on and the initial data are satisfied; see for instance [2]. Similar theorems have been proved in [6, 911], for damped systems of semilinear wave equations. The purpose of this work is to improve considerably the existing results for blow-up for systems (P), with high energies. We shall generalize the technique used in a previous work for a single equation; see [12].

3. Nonexistence of Global Solutions

We consider the following orthogonal decomposition of the velocities where and . Then, we define the functionals Consequently, Also, we define where is the constant in . We also define the following functions If , we notice that is strictly increasing, is strictly decreasing, and is strictly decreasing. They have the following relations and .

For the (KG) system, a recent work [2] proved blow-up of solutions with initial energy: . We observe that . Here, we shall prove nonexistence of global solutions of the (P) system with initial energy , for some and . Furthermore, we shall prove that for any positive value of the initial energy there are initial data implying nonexistence of global solutions.

Theorem 3. Consider any solution of problem (P) in the sense of Theorem 1. Assume that hypotheses and are met and that are satisfied. Then, we construct the nonempty interval where for some and , and we have the following assertions.
(i) If the initial energy is such that , then the maximal time of existence of the solution is finite.
(ii) For fixed , is strictly increasing, and

Corollary 4. Assume that hypotheses of Theorem 3 are met. For every number , we can choose initial data with large enough, so that , and then the corresponding solution with exists only up to a finite time.

4. Proofs

Proof (of Theorem 3). First, we will assume that the solution is global and then, by means of a differential inequality in terms of , we shall get a contradiction. Then, assume that exists for any . We observe that . Now, we define , and due to (21), we have that for , close to zero, the following inequality holds By energy equation and hypotheses and , we obtain where we used the following Then, and since , we get where We shall prove that there exists a constant such that and then Hence, which is impossible for any Then, the solution only exits up to a finite time.
Next, we prove that (32) is satisfied. To this end, we consider the right-hand side of (30) and define, for , and we notice that with , and Also, We observe that (32) is satisfied if , which is characterized by and it is equivalent to where Now, in order to guarantee that (40) is satisfied, we define, for , We observe that as either or , and for . Moreover, by (21), there exist exactly two different roots of , denoted by and , such that And since is strictly monotone for and , it follows that, for fixed , the interval grows as grows. Precisely, Then, (32) holds if and only if the initial energy satisfies that is, if . This proves that the maximum time of existence must be finite if the initial energy is within this interval.
Next, we shall find the values of and . Remember that these are the roots of . To find , we consider the function defined for , and the equation which holds if and only if which is equivalent to We notice that as and . Also, . Moreover, Then, the equation for has two roots and only one is bigger than 1. Furthermore, at this root, , Next, we consider the function defined for , and the equation which is equivalent to and it is characterized by which holds if and only if Notice that are strictly monotone increasing, and Then, there exists one and only one where . Moreover,

Proof (of Corollary 4). Since then, for every , there exists , such that Hence, the corresponding solution with initial energy satisfying (21) exists only up to a finite time.

Remark 5. For small energies, , the potential well method characterizes the qualitative behavior of any solution in terms of the sign of ; see [48]. In particular, blow-up is characterized if . Let us examine the situation for any positive value of the initial energy.
Assume that hypotheses of Theorem 3 are met. From energy equation, , , (21), , and since , we obtain Let us assume that and then Hence, if the source term is large enough at the initial data, the inequality is a necessary condition for nonexistence of global solutions. However, it seems that the condition , alone, does not imply nonexistence of global solutions for high energies; see [2, 6, 911]. Moreover, we did not require the sign of in the proof of Theorem 3.
From Corollary 4, global nonexistence for small positive energies is obtained if is large enough and, consequently, since then must be also sufficiently big. Then, by the previous discussion, is implied. Apparently, only for energies , the condition characterizes the nonexistence of global solutions of problem .

Remark 6. We shall prove the following lower bound for This inequality is equivalent to In order to prove it, let us define, for any , the positive function and we remember that is a function of , defined implicitly by where On the other hand, from Theorem 3 we know that Then, from the definition of and , Also, Consequently, there is some , such that . After some calculations, we find that