Advances in Agriculture

Advances in Agriculture / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 2658983 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2658983

Influence of Cultivar on the Postharvest Hardening of Trifoliate Yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) Tubers

Academic Editor: Claus A. Soerensen
Received31 Mar 2016
Revised20 May 2016
Accepted31 May 2016
Published16 Jun 2016

Abstract

The influence of cultivar on the postharvest hardening of Dioscorea dumetorum tubers was assessed. 32 cultivars of D. dumetorum tubers were planted in April 2014, harvested at physiological maturity, and stored under prevailing tropical ambient conditions (19–28°C, 60–85% RH) for 0, 5, 14, 21, and 28 days. Samples were evaluated for cooked hardness. Results showed that one cultivar, Ibo sweet 3, was not affected by the hardening phenomenon. The remaining 31 were all subject to the hardening phenomenon at different degree. Cooked hardness increased more rapidly in cultivars with many roots on the tuber surface compared to cultivars with few roots on the tuber surface. When both the characteristics flesh colour and number of roots on tuber surface were associated, cooked hardness in cultivars with yellow flesh and many roots increased more rapidly than in cultivars with white flesh and many roots, whereas cooked hardness in cultivars with yellow flesh and few roots increased more slowly than in cultivars with white flesh and few roots. Accessions collected in high altitude increased more rapidly compared to accessions collected in low altitude. The cultivar Ibo sweet 3 identified in this study could provide important information for breeding program of D. dumetorum against postharvest hardening phenomenon.

1. Introduction

Trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) is the most nutritious species of the eight yam species commonly grown and consumed in West and Central Africa [1]. Its tubers are rich in protein (9.6%), fairly balanced in essential amino acids (chemical score of 0.94), and its starch is easily digestible [2, 3]. This yam species is high-yielding (40 t/ha) and may not require staking, thus saving on labour [4]. Unlike other yam species, the storage of D. dumetorum is restricted by a severe postharvest hardening phenomenon characterized by loss of the ability to soften during cooking [5]. Tuber hardening begins within 24 h after harvest and it is manifested by the loss of culinary quality due to a combination of factors resulting from the normal but inadvertently deleterious reactions leading to textural changes [6, 7]. Microstructural studies showed that lignification and thickening of cell walls are one of the characteristic features of the hardening process [8].

Several studies were focused on the biochemical modifications related to postharvest hardening and the understanding of hardening mechanism [1, 3, 69]. In contrast, only few studies [8, 10] reported the variation in the postharvest hardening phenomenon among D. dumetorum cultivars. Trèche [10] noted that 3% of D. dumetorum tubers are not subject to the hardening phenomenon after one month of storage, and Sefa-Dedeh and Afoakwa [1] observed that the hardening phenomenon of D. dumetorum varies between yellow and white cultivars. This suggests that some cultivars of D. dumetorum may not suffer from the hardening phenomenon and could therefore be used in breeding programs of this species. To the best of our knowledge, few or no studies have been performed so far to evaluate the influence of cultivar on the postharvest hardening phenomenon of D. dumetorum tubers. The present study was therefore carried out to close this gap.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials

Thirty-two cultivars of trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) tubers were collected from the main yam growing regions in Cameroon and Nigeria (Table 1) and then planted in April 2014 at the “Ferme Ecole de Boukué” (FEBO) in the West region of Cameroon. Tubers were randomly harvested at physiological maturity, 9 months after planting (December 2014), from 3 different plants of each cultivar. These were immediately transported to the laboratory and stored under prevailing tropical ambient conditions (19–28°C, 60–85% RH) for a period of 28 days. During storage, yam samples were collected at fixed time intervals (days 0, 5, 14, 21, and 28). They were thoroughly washed with water, peeled, and chopped into chips of 1 cm thickness. No growth of mould was observed during the storage period. The sprouting of most tubers was observed after 28 days of storage.


Accessions codeArea of collectionRoots on the tuber surfaceTuber flesh colourAltitude (m)Latitude (N)Longitude (E)

1BabadjouWestFewYellow139505°37.488010°15.668
2BabungoNorthwestFewYellow118206°03.984010°26.823
3BaigonWestFewYellow112005°34.183010°40.489
4BambalangNorthwestFewYellow118505°53.644010°30.814
5BambuiNorthwestFewYellow126206°00.797010°13.635
6Bamendjou 1WestFewYellow164705°20.063010°22.118
7Bamendjou 2WestManyYellow164705°20.063010°22.118
8BamokonbouWestManyYellow141405°28.781010°25.197
9BanaWestFewYellow116705°09.365010°10.147
10Banga bakundu sweetSouthwestFewWhite6204°17.314009°24.451
11Bangang 1WestFewYellow177605°34.303010°09.133
12Bangang 2WestManyYellow177605°34.303010°09.133
13BangouWestManyYellow135005°08.379010°31.406
14BatiboNorthwestFewYellow112705°50.144009°53.467
15Bayangam 1WestFewYellow156005°17.930010°26.446
16Bayangam 2WestManyYellow156005°17.930010°26.446
17Country yamSouthwestFewWhite6204°17.314009°24.451
18DschangWestFewYellow133705°26.637010°03.404
19Fenkam-FotoWestFewYellow141405°28.781010°25.197
20Fongo-TongoWestManyYellow146005°30.118009°59.976
21FonkouankemWestManyYellow116705°09.365010°10.147
22FundongNorthwestFewYellow155406°16.790010°17.075
23GuzangNorthwestManyYellow123305°49.983009°55.278
24Ibo sweet 1SouthwestFewWhite5604°24.103009°26.522
25Ibo sweet 2SouthwestManyWhite5604°24.103009°26.522
26Ibo sweet 3SouthwestFewYellow5604°24.103009°26.522
27KumboNorthwestFewYellow172206°12.386010°40.478
28Lysoka sweetSouthwestManyYellow6004°11.306009°18.745
29Mabondji sweet whiteSouthwestFewWhite8004°33.745009°11.806
30MankonNorthwestFewYellow125305°58.172010°08.541
31MuyukaSouthwestFewWhite6204°17.314009°24.451
32NkwenNorthwestFewYellow125105°57.717010°10.078

These accessions cultivated in southwest of Cameroon are originated from Nigeria.
2.2. Hardness of Cooked Tubers and Edibility

Tuber samples of 1 cm thickness and about 5 cm diameter were cooked in boiling water for 60 min (this time was selected during preliminary studies as it allowed the yam tuber to soften completely) on a hot plate and made to cool completely at room temperature. Hardness was assessed with a PCE-PTR 200 digital penetrometer (PCE Instruments, France EURL) using an 8.83 mm probe. Six measurements were made for each cultivar and the data were expressed in Newton.

Coarseness feeling in the mouth during eating of cooked tubers was used to evaluate the edibility of yam. This parameter was used to assess hardness value above which the tuber is not consumable. For this purpose, a sensory evaluation of cooked yam tubers was conducted with nine trained panellists. Panellists were trained to evaluate edibility using fresh tubers as reference. Samples (D. dumetorum tubers stored during 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days) were cooked as described above and then evaluated for edibility on a 9-point hedonic scale quality analysis with 9 being liked extremely, 8 being liked very much, 7 being liked, 6 being liked mildly, 5 being neither liked nor disliked, 4 being disliked mildly, 3 being disliked, 2 being disliked very much, and 1 being disliked extremely.

2.3. Microstructural Studies

Yam tubers were cut into 0.04 mm thickness using a laboratory scale sledge microtome (Shibuya Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Cut tissues were then fixed by soaking them in carmine green iodine for 5 min, after soaking in diluted sodium hypochlorite for 15 min. Clearing was done by a series of washing processes in distilled water with acetic acid added in the last step.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

All measurements were carried out at least in triplicate. Statistical analyses of data were performed using SPSS IBM statistics 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) and STATISTICA 6 (Data Analysis Software System, StatSoft, Inc., USA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Duncan multiple range test, Pearson’s correlations, principal component analysis (PCA), and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were performed. Statistical significance was defined at .

3. Results and Discussion

Hardening during storage of D. dumetorum is characterized by a rough and fluffy surface of peeled tubers as opposed to the smooth and moist surface of freshly harvested ones. This could be explained by microstructural changes linked with tuber’s structure. As mentioned in previous studies [8], microstructural observation of tubers parenchyma showed very thin and flexible cell membranes in fresh tuber (Figure 1(a)) and thick membranes in hardened tuber (Figure 1(b)). The hardening phenomenon of D. dumetorum tubers is manifested by the coarseness in the mouth of cooked tubers, making them unsuitable for human consumption. Table 2 displays the results of hardness and sensory evaluation scores of D. dumetorum cooked tubers. Cooked hardness varied from  N for fresh tubers to  N for tubers stored during 28 days, and these fresh and 28-day-stored tubers were, respectively, extremely liked and very much disliked by panellists. Significant correlation (, ) was found between cooked hardness and sensory evaluation. Similar results were reported in previous studies [11, 12]. From the results of sensory evaluation, D. dumetorum tubers were not eatable at cooked hardness values above 8.83 N.


Tuber, storage periodCooked hardness (N)Sensory evaluation scores

03.98 ± 0.308.56 ± 0.53
16.73 ± 0.787.56 ± 0.73
28.83 ± 0.437.00 ± 0.71
311.32 ± 0.533.44 ± 1.24
413.23 ± 0.852.67 ± 1.22
514.92 ± 1.532.56 ± 1.13
717.75 ± 0.772.33 ± 1.22
1423.63 ± 1.312.11 ± 1.05
2126.15 ± 1.621.67 ± 0.71
2827.23 ± 1.661.56 ± 0.53

Mean ± SD.
.
9 (liked extremely) to 1 (disliked extremely), .
Means with the same letter in each column are not significantly different (), according to Duncan’s multiple rage test.

Among the 32 accessions evaluated, one, Ibo sweet 3, was not affected by the hardening phenomenon. The remaining 31 were all subject to the hardening phenomenon at different degree. In general, and as already noted in previous studies [7], cooked hardness significantly increased with the storage time following a first-rate-order kinetic according to empirical relation of the type , where is the rate constant, t is the storage time, and a is an empirical parameter (Figure 2). The magnitude of this effect was significantly affected () by the area of collection, the altitude, the tuber’s flesh colour, and the number of roots on the tuber’s surface. In this regard, varimax rotated loading factors representing correlations between principal components (PC) and original data (Table 3) showed that PC1 and PC2 representing 77.83% of total variance in the data can be enough to restitute the maximum information contained in the original data; PC1 describing 57.24% of the total variance in D. dumetorum cooked hardness had as main contributor the area of collection, the altitude, and the tuber’s flesh colour, while PC2 described 20.59% of the total variance with the number of roots on the surface of the tuber as main contributor. Nonsignificant correlation was noted between the tuber’s weight and cooked hardness, suggesting that cooked hardness was independent of the weight of tuber as previously reported by Trèche [10].


VariablePC1PC2PC3PC4PC5

Tuber weight0.550.48−0.67−0.11−0.02
Area of collection0.90−0.100.28−0.25−0.20
Tuber flesh colour0.900.020.030.43−0.06
Roots on the tuber surface−0.250.890.390.02−0.02
Altitude−0.94−0.02−0.200.10−0.25

Eigenvalue2.861.030.730.280.11
% total variance57.2420.5914.535.512.14
Cumulated eigenvalue2.863.894.624.895.00
Cumulated variance (%)57.2477.8392.3597.86100.00

Loading with absolute values higher than 0.67 represents a significant contribution.

The effect of some environmental and tuber’s characteristics on the development of hard-to-cook defect during storage is displayed in Table 4 and Figure 3. Cooked hardness increased more rapidly (a) in cultivars with white flesh colour compared to cultivars with yellow flesh colour, (b) in cultivars with many roots on the tuber surface compared to cultivars with few roots on the tuber surface, and (c) in cultivars collected in low altitude compared to cultivars collected in high altitude. When flesh colour and number of roots on tuber surface were associated, it was noted that cooked hardness increased more rapidly in cultivars with yellow flesh and many roots compared to other cultivars; the development of cooked hardness was more rapid in cultivars with white flesh and many roots than in accession with white flesh and few roots, whereas cooked hardness in cultivars with yellow flesh and few roots increased more slowly than in other cultivars.


VariablesFlesh colourNumber of roots on the tuberCombined factorsAltitude
YellowWhiteFewManyYellow-fewYellow-manyWhite-fewWhite-manyLowHigh

(day−1)0.11 ± 0.050.16 ± 0.050.09 ± 0.040.19 ± 0.070.07 ± 0.040.19 ± 0.070.15 ± 0.050.17 ± 0.070.17 ± 0.060.11 ± 0.05
23.99 ± 3.5625.02 ± 2.1324.01 ± 4.4626.25 ± 2.1724.99 ± 8.0926.39 ± 2.2325.08 ± 2.0824.77 ± 2.5824.61 ± 1.9923.83 ± 3.52
0.910.940.920.930.910.920.950.910.940.91
75018060033045030015030210720
0.01270.00570.00990.00840.01290.00910.00500.01280.00600.0123

: constant rate; : semiempirical parameter; : number of samples; mean ± standard error.

These variations of cooked hardness with morphological characteristics of tubers or the area of collection could be explained by genotype and environmental factors, as it is known that phenotype results from the expression of an organism’s genes as well as the influence of environmental factors and the interactions between the two. In this regard, it was reported that the hardness of wheat endosperm is controlled by genes and varied between accessions [13].

Results of HCA were displayed in Figure 4. In this dendrogram, there were three main groups for the similarity 0.7 (similarity index = ). The first group was composed of 15 cultivars (Babadjou, Fundong, Mankon, Bamendjou 1, Fenkam-Foto, Fonkouankem, Nkwen, Banga bakundu sweet, Kumbo, Bambui, Batibo, Dschang, Baigon, Bayamgan 1, and Bangang 1), the second group comprised 16 cultivars (Babungo, Ibo sweet 2, Bambalang, Bamokonbou, Bayamgan 2, Country yam, Fongo-Tongo, Mabondji sweet white, Lysoka sweet, Muyuka, Bana, Bamendjou 2, Bangou, Bangang 2, Ibo sweet 1, and Guzang), and the third group was formed with only Ibo sweet 3. Besides, this last cultivar showed a net separation from the other D. dumetorum cultivars at all the levels of the similarity index. In fact, Ibo sweet 3 was the only cultivar showing no significant variations in cooked hardness during storage. It was characterized by yellow flesh and few roots on the tuber surface.

4. Conclusion

In general, cooked hardness of D. dumetorum was affected by some environmental and tuber’s characteristics. The number of roots on the tubers surface, the flesh colour, and the altitude of the area of collection all affected the development of cooked hardness during the tuber’s storage. One cultivar, Ibo sweet 3, was not subject to the postharvest hardening phenomenon and could therefore be used to provide information for the breeding of D. dumetorum against posthardening.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Paul Kammogne Fokam and Dr. Justin Bomda, for practical and financial support through ADAF (Appropriate Development for Africa Foundation).

References

  1. S. Sefa-Dedeh and E. O. Afoakwa, “Biochemical and textural changes in trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum tubers after harvest,” Food Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 27–40, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. M. Lape and S. Trèche, “Nutritional quality of yam (Dioscorea dumetorum and D rotundata) flours for growing rats,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 447–455, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. O. Afoakwa and S. Sefa-Dedeh, “Chemical composition and quality changes occurring in Dioscorea dumetorum pax tubers after harvest,” Food Chemistry, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. N. Lyonga and J. A. Ayuk-Takem, “Investigation on selection and production of edible yam (Dioscorea spp.) in the Western Highlands of United Republic of Cameroon,” in Yams—Ignames, J. Miege and S. N. Lyonga, Eds., pp. 161–172, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. Trèche and F. Delpeuch, “Le durcissement de Dioscorea dumetorum au Cameroun,” in Yams—Ignames, J. Miege and S. N. Lyonga, Eds., pp. 294–311, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  6. G. N. Medoua, I. L. Mbome, T. Agbor-Egbe, and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Study of the hard-to-cook property of stored yam tubers (Dioscorea dumetorum) and some determining biochemical factors,” Food Research International, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. N. Medoua and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Hard-to-cook defect in trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum tubers after harvest,” Food Research International, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 513–518, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. O. Afoakwa and S. Sefa-Dedeh, “Textural and microstructural changes associated with post-harvest hardening of trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) pax tubers,” Food Chemistry, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 279–284, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. N. Medoua, I. L. Mbome, T. Agbor-Egbe, and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Physicochemical changes occurring during post-harvest hardening of trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) tubers,” Food Chemistry, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 597–601, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Trèche, Potentialités nutritionnelles des ignames (Dioscorea spp.) cultivées au Cameroun [Ph.D. thesis], Collection Etudes et Thèses, Paris, France, Vol I: texte, Vol. II: annexes, Thèse, Editions de l'ORSTOM, 1989.
  11. J. G. Montejano, D. D. Hamann, and T. C. Lanier, “Comparison of two instrumental methods with sensory texture of protein gels,” Journal of Texture Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 403–424, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J.-F. Meullenet, B. G. Lyon, J. A. Carpenter, and C. E. Lyon, “Relationship between sensory and instrumental texture profile attributes,” Journal of Sensory Studies, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 77–93, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Z. U. Qamar, U. K. Bansal, C. M. Dong, R. L. Alfred, M. Bhave, and H. S. Bariana, “Detection of puroindoline (Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1) allelic variation in wheat landraces,” Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 610–616, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Christian Siadjeu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1060 Views | 478 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.