Influence of Cultural and Pest Management Practices on Performance of Runner, Spanish, and Virginia Market Types in North Carolina

Table 2

Analysis of variance () for interactions of year, peanut market type, and management practices including aldicarb applied at planting, chlorpyrifos applied at pegging, disease management, and weed management program.

Source of variation	Management practice
	Aldicarb		Chlorpyrifos		⁢Disease management		Weed management
	Thrips damage	Pod yield	Pod scarring	Pod yield	Canopy defoliation	Pod yield	Eclipta control	Pod yield
Year	0.0047	<0.0001	0.4961	<0.0001	0.0003	0.0131	0.1874	<0.0001
Market type	0.0592	0.0059	0.6822	0.0009	<0.0001	<0.0001	0.0448	0.0078
Year × market type	0.0468	<0.0001	0.3180	0.0161	<0.0001	0.0007	0.4869	0.3820
Management practice	<0.0001	0.0153	0.5215	0.0030	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001	0.6629
Market type × management	0.0029	0.3196	0.8878	0.2836	<0.0001	0.2927	0.0224	0.3387
Year × management	<0.0001	0.2790	0.9044	0.6288	<0.0001	0.0468	0.6779	0.4279
Year × market type × management	0.2136	0.7767	0.6073	0.3588	<0.0001	0.3700	0.5155	0.5345
Coefficient of variation (%)	22.0	11.2	115.3	14.0	63.6	14.1	36.1	17.1
Number of trials	4	4	4	4	4	4	2	2