Research Article
Rural-Urban Labor Migration, Remittances, and Its Effect on Migrant-Sending Farm Households: Northwest Ethiopia
Table 4
Parameter estimation of the three-stage least square regression model.
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. error | t-statistic | Prob. |
| Agri-prod | Rural-urban migration | 0.3634962 | 0.3109939 | 1.17 | 0.242 |
| Amt of remit | 0.0308621 | 0.0521634 | 2.59 | 0.014 | Age | 0.0001046 | 0.0011102 | 0.09 | 0.925 | Edu-level | 0.0045924 | 0.0019496 | 0.42 | 0.671 | Fam-size | 0.0196487 | 0.0175491 | 1.12 | 0.263 | Cult-land | 0.1635392 | 0.0312445 | 5.23 | 0.000 | Liv-stock | 0.0342955 | 0.0148529 | 2.31 | 0.021 |
| Cer-access | −0.007219 | 0.0560591 | −0.13 | 0.898 | Ext-service | 0.0896 | 0.232103 | 2.39 | 0.021 | Irrigation | 0.0188608 | 0.0869364 | 0.22 | 0.828 | Agri-pest | −0.1084733 | 0.2478107 | −2.44 | 0.017 | _Cons | 9.341321 | 0.984844 | 9.49 | 0.000 |
| Rural-urban migration | Agri-prod | 1.403328 | 0.6005912 | 2.34 | 0.019 | Sex | 0.0037719 | 0.045958 | 0.08 | 0.935 | Num-stu | 0.0497263 | 0.0433169 | 1.15 | 0.251 | Fam-size | −0.0347043 | 0.0367421 | −0.94 | 0.345 | Cult-land | −0.2318789 | 0.1082901 | −2.14 | 0.032 | Liv-stock | −0.0544232 | 0.0244454 | −2.23 | 0.026 | _Cons | −12.51024 | 6.259922 | −2.00 | 0.046 |
| Amt of remit | Rural-urban migration | 5.423236 | 1.241401 | 4.37 | 0.000 | Livestock | 0.0293703 | 0.0985551 | 0.30 | 0.766 | Farm size | 0.0754538 | 0.1640279 | 0.46 | 0.646 | Migrants’ education | −0.2286891 | 0.2728889 | −0.84 | 0.402 | Num-stu | 0.6959269 | 0.2099912 | 3.31 | 0.001 | _Cons | 0.0243562 | 3.598579 | 0.01 | 0.995 |
|
|
,1% and 5% level of significance, respectively. |