Inclusive Technology Performance Evaluation in the Production of Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter)
Table 1
Statistical difference between treatments on agronomic traits across districts.
Parameters
SV
Sekota
Dehana
Lasta
SSQ
df
MS
F
Sig.
SSQ
df
MS
F
Sig.
SSQ
df
MS
F
Sig.
Grain yield
Treatments
261.25
3
87.08
44.49
∗∗∗
162.69
3
54.23
96.41
∗∗∗
226.19
3
75.39
97.81
∗∗∗
Errors
23.50
12
1.958
6.75
12
0.56
9.25
12
0.77
Total
284.75
15
169.44
15
235.44
15
Biomass yield
Treatments
1110.06
3
370.02
19.27
∗∗∗
740.63
3
246.88
30.19
∗∗∗
704.55
3
234.85
24.68
∗∗∗
Errors
230.36
12
19.19
98.13
12
8.18
114.19
12
9.52
Total
1340.44
15
838.75
15
818.74
15
Days to maturity
Treatments
16.00
3
5.333
16.00
∗∗∗
49.00
3
16.33
19.60
∗∗∗
64.00
3
21.33
64.00
∗∗∗
Errors
4.00
12
0.333
10.00
12
0.83
4.00
12
0.33
Total
20.00
15
59.00
15
68.00
15
Note. SV (source of variation), SSQ (sum of squares), MS (mean square), df (degree of freedom), F (statistical value of ANOVA), Sig. (significant difference); ∗∗∗ is the level of significance at 0.1%.
