Inclusive Technology Performance Evaluation in the Production of Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter)

Table 3

Tukey (HSD) test following one-way ANOVA to identify significantly consistent treatment across districts.

Parameters	Pair of treatments	Sekota			Dehana			Lasta
		MD	SDE	THSD	MD	SDE	THSD	MD	SDE	THSD
Grain yield	IKIM - IBIM	2.7500	0.9895	0.069	4.000^∗∗∗	0.5303	0.000	2.250^∗∗	0.6208	0.016
	IKIM - LBIM	7.2500^∗∗∗	0.9895	0.000	6.000^∗∗∗	0.5303	0.000	5.500^∗∗∗	0.6208	0.000
	IKIM - LBFM	10.500^∗∗∗	0.9895	0.000	8.750^∗∗∗	0.5303	0.000	10.00^∗∗∗	0.6208	0.000
	IBIM - LBIM	4.5000^∗∗∗	0.9895	0.003	2.000^∗∗	0.5303	0.012	3.250^∗∗∗	0.6208	0.001
	IBIM - LBFM	7.750^∗∗∗	0.9895	0.000	4.750^∗∗∗	0.5303	0.000	7.750^∗∗∗	0.6208	0.000
	LBIM - LBFM	3.2500^∗∗	0.9895	0.029	2.750^∗∗∗	0.5303	0.001	4.500^∗∗∗	0.6208	0.000
Biomass yield	IKIM - IBIM	3.3750	3.0982	0.702	0.000	0.6455	1.000	1.625	2.1814	0.877
	IKIM - LBIM	8.000	3.0982	0.096	−3.500^∗∗∗	0.6455	0.001	9.375^∗∗∗	2.1812	0.005
	IKIM -LBFM	21.875^∗∗∗	3.0982	0.000	−3.500^∗∗∗	0.6455	0.001	16.63^∗∗∗	2.1812	0.000
	IBIM - LBM	4.6250	3.0982	0.471	7.375^∗∗	2.0220	0.015	7.750^∗∗	2.1812	0.018
	IBIM - LBFM	18.500^∗∗∗	3.0982	0.000	14.125^∗∗∗	2.0220	0.000	15.00^∗∗∗	2.1812	0.000
	LBIM -LBFM	13.875^∗∗∗	3.0982	0.004	6.750^∗∗	2.0220	0.026	7.2500^∗∗	2.1812	0.027
Days to maturity	IKIM - IBIM	0.000	0.4082	1.000	0.000	0.6455	1.000	0.000	0.4082	1.000
	IKIM - LBIM	−2.000^∗∗∗	0.4082	0.002	−3.500^∗∗∗	0.6455	0.001	−4.000^∗∗∗	0.4083	0.000
	IKIM - LBFM	−2.000^∗∗∗	0.4082	0.002	−3.500^∗∗∗	0.6455	0.001	−4.000^∗∗∗	0.4083	0.000
	IBIM - LBIM	−2.000^∗∗∗	0.4082	0.002	−3.500^∗∗∗	0.6455	0.001	−4.000^∗∗∗	0.4085	0.000
	IBIM - LBFM	−2.000^∗∗∗	0.4082	0.002	−3.500^∗∗∗	0.6455	0.001	−4.000^∗∗∗	0.4082	0.000
	LBIM -LBFM	0.000	0.4082	1.000	0.0000	0.6455	1.000	0.000	0.4082	1.000

Note. MD (mean difference), SDE (Standard error), THSD (Tukey’s honestly significant difference), IKIM (Improved “Korra” teff variety + improved management practices), IBIM (Improved “Bosset” teff variety + improved management practices), LBIM (Local “Burssa” teff variety + improved management practices), LBFM (Local “Burssa” teff variety + farmers’ existing management practices); ^∗∗, ^∗∗∗ are statistically significant levels at 1% and 0.1%, respectively.