Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Acoustics and Vibration
Volume 2012, Article ID 214839, 28 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/214839
Review Article

Advanced Applications for Underwater Acoustic Modeling

Northrop Grumman Corporation, P.O. Box 1693, Baltimore, MD 21203, USA

Received 29 October 2011; Accepted 30 January 2012

Academic Editor: Jafar Saniie

Copyright © 2012 Paul C. Etter. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. D. LePage, P. Neumann, and C. W. Holland, “Broad-band time domain modeling of sonar clutter in range dependent waveguides,” in in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans 2006 Conference (OCEANS'06), Boston, Mass, USA, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks,” ACM SIGBED Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 3–8, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  3. I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257–279, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Frye, L. Freitag, R. Detrick et al., “An acoustically linked moored-buoy ocean observatory,” EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, vol. 87, no. 22, pp. 213–218, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  5. Z. Han, Y. L. Sun, and H. Shi, “Cooperative transmission for underwater acoustic communications,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, (ICC '08), pp. 2028–2032, Beijing, China, 2008.
  6. V. Chandrasekhar, W. K. G. Seah, Y. S. Choo, and H. V. Ee, “Localization in underwater sensor networks—survey and challenges,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNet'06), pp. 33–40, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Wang, P. Cai, and D. Yuan, “An underwater acoustic channel simulator for UUV communication performance testing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, pp. 2286–2290, Harbin, China, 2010.
  8. J. G. Graver, Underwater gliders: dynamics, control and design, PhD dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005.
  9. A. Jochens, D. Biggs, D. Engelhaupt et al., “Sperm whale seismic study in the Gulf of Mexico,” Summary Report, 2002–2004 OCS Study MMS 2006-034, US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, La, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Thode, D. K. Mellinger, S. Stienessen, A. Martinez, and K. Mullin, “Depth-dependent acoustic features of diving sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in the Gulf of Mexico,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 308–321, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. M. Carey and R. B. Evans, Ocean Ambient Noise: Measurement and Theory, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  12. R. K. Andrew, B. M. Howe, J. A. Mercer, and M. A. Dzieciuch, “Ocean ambient sound: comparing the 1960s with the 1990s for a receiver off the California coast,” Acoustic Research Letters Online, vol. 3, pp. 65–70, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. A. McDonald, J. A. Hildebrand, and S. M. Wiggins, “Increases in deep ocean ambient noise in the Northeast Pacific west of San Nicolas Island, California,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 711–718, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. A. McDonald, J. A. Hildebrand, S. M. Wiggins, and D. Ross, “A 50 year comparison of ambient ocean noise near San Clemente Island: a bathymetrically complex coastal region off Southern California,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 1985–1992, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Nedwell and D. Howell, “A review of offshore windfarm related underwater noise sources,” Report 544R0308, Subacoustech Ltd, commissioned by COWRIE (Collaborative Offshore Wind Research Into the Environment), Hampshire, UK, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. D. Rouseff and D. Tang, “Internal waves as a proposed mechanism for increasing ambient noise in an increasingly acidic ocean,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. EL235–EL239, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. McCarthy, International Regulation of Underwater Sound: Establishing Rules and Standards to Address Ocean Noise Pollution, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004.
  18. National Research Council, Ocean Noise and Marine Mammals, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  19. National Research Council, Marine Mammal Populations and Ocean Noise: Determining When Noise Causes Biologically Significant Effects, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  20. J. F. Grassle, “The ocean biogeographic information system (OBIS): an on-line, worldwide atlas for accessing, modeling and mapping marine biological data in a multidimensional geographic context,” Oceanography, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 5–7, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Finette, “Embedding uncertainty into ocean acoustic propagation models,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 117, no. 3 I, pp. 997–1000, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. W. Lawson, “The use of sound propagation models to determine safe distances from a seismic sound energy source,” Research Document 2009/060, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  23. P. C. Etter, Underwater Acoustic Modeling and Simulation, Spon Press, London, UK, 3rd edition, 2003.
  24. R.J. Howard, T. Foreman, and D. Clark, “Architectural and design considerations in propagation model selection and design, simulation interoperability standards organization,” in Proceedings of the Simulation Interoperability Workshop, no. 00S-SIW-054, 2000.
  25. F. C. Newman, A. C. Biondo, M. D. Mandelberg, C. C. Matthews, and J. R. Rottier, “Enhancing realism in computer simulations: environmental effects,” Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 443–453, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Collins, T. Foreman, and D. Speicher, “A new design for a sonar environmental effects server,” in Proceedings of the Simulation Interoperability Workshop, no. 02F-SIW-114, Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, 2002.
  27. T. Foreman and D. Speicher, “Expanded sonar environmental acoustic effects server capabilities for fleet battle experiments,” in Proceedings of the Simulation Interoperability Workshop, no. 03F-SIW-062, Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, 2003.
  28. J. B. Collins and C. G. Scannell, “Natural environment data services in distributed modeling and simulation,” in Net-Centric Approaches to Intelligence and National Security, R. Ladner and F. E. Petry, Eds., pp. 149–174, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  29. J. M. Hovem, “PlaneRay: an acoustic underwater propagation model based on ray tracing and plane-wave reflection coefficients,” FFI-rapport 2008/00610, Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt/Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI), 2008. View at Google Scholar
  30. J. M. Hovem, S. Yan, X. Bao, and H. Dong, “Modeling underwater communication links,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM '08), pp. 679–686, IEEE Computer Society, 2008.
  31. J. M. Hovem and H. Dong, “PlaneRay: an underwater acoustic propagation model using ray tracing and plane wave reflection coefficients,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 120, p. 3221, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. M. Hovem and D. P. Knobles, “A range-dependent propagation model based on a combination of ray theory and plane-wave reflection coefficients,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 112, p. 2393, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  33. J. M. Hovem and D. P. Knobles, “A range dependent propagation model based on a combination of ray theory and plane wave reflection coefficients,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, pp. 2593–2600, Stockholm, Sweden, July 2003. View at Scopus
  34. S. A. Stotts, D. P. Knobles, R. A. Koch, D. E. Grant, K. C. Focke, and A. J. Cook, “Geoacoustic inversion in range-dependent ocean environments using a plane wave reflection coefficient approach,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 1078–1102, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. U. Kristiansen, “Sound propagation in regions of variable oceanography—a summary of student work at NTNU,” FFI-rapport 2010/00812, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  36. H.S. Olsen, “Lydutbredelse i havområder med avstandsavhengig oseanografi,” Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Institutt for elektronikk og telekommunikasjon, Trondheim, Norway, 2008.
  37. T. S. Semantic, “RAYSON: underwater acoustic rays software,” Product description literature, Semantic TS , Sanary, France, 2002.
  38. C. Viala, C. Noël, and G. Lapierre, “RAYSON: a real time underwater communication simulator and performance estimator,” in Proceedings of the 7th French Workshop on Underwater Acoustics, Brest, France, 2004.
  39. C. Viala, C. Noël, Y. Stéphan, and M. Asch, “Real-time geoacoustic inversion of large band signals,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Oceans 2005 Europe Conference, pp. 1392–1395, Brest, France, 2005.
  40. C. Viala, C. Noël, Y. Stéphan, and M. Asch, “Real-time geoacoustic inversion of broad band signals in deep water,” in Proceedings of the Caractérisation du Milieu Marin (CMM'06), Brest, France, 2006.
  41. E. Svensson, I. Karasalo, and J.-P. Hermand, “Hybrid raytrace modelling of an underwater acoustics communication channel,” in Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, pp. 1211–1216, Delft, The Netherlands, 2004.
  42. D. D. Ellis, “A two-ended shooting technique for calculating normal modes in underwater acoustic propagation,” DREA Report 85/105, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Nova Scotia, Canada, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  43. S. A. Stotts, D. P. Knobles, and R.A. Koch, “Scattering in a Pekeris waveguide from a rough bottom using a two-way coupled mode approach,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. EL172–EL178, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. N. A. Sidorovskaia, “A new normal mode program SWAMP as a tool for modeling scattering effects in oceanic waveguides,” in Modelling and Experimental Measurements in Acoustics III, D. Almorza, C. A. Brebbia, and R. Hernandez, Eds., pp. 267–275, WIT Press, Southampton, UK, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  45. N. A. Sidorovskaia, “Systematic studies of pulse propagation in ducted oceanic waveguides in normal mode representation,” The European Physical Journal, Applied Physics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 113–131, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. I. M. Tamendarov and N. A. Sidorovskaia, “Unified acoustic model for simulating propagation and scattering effects in oceanic waveguides,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 116, p. 2527, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  47. C. A. Clark, “Acoustic wave propagation in horizontally variable media,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 188–197, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. H. Schmidt, A. Maguer, E. Bovio et al., “Generic oceanographic array technologies (GOATS) ’98 – Bistatic seabed scattering measurements using autonomous underwater vehicles,” Report SR-302, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  49. H. Schmidt, I. Veljkovic, and M. Zampolli, “Bistatic scattering from buried targets in shallow water—experiment and modelling,” in Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, Delft, The Netherlands, 2004.
  50. H. Schmidt, “Bistatic scattering from buried targets in shallow water,” in Proceedings of the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle and Ocean Modelling Networks (GOATS'00), E. Bovio, R. Tyce, and H. Schmidt, Eds., no. CP-46, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, 2001.
  51. H. Schmidt, “OASES Version 3.1 user guide and reference manual,” Department of Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2004.
  52. D. J. Thomson and N. R. Chapman, “WIDE-angle split-step algorithm for the parabolic equation,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1848–1854, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. T. F. Duda, “Initial results from a Cartesian three-dimensional parabolic equation acoustical propagation code,” Tech. Rep. WHOI-2006-14, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Mass, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  54. L. Y. S. Chiu, Y.-T. Lin, C.-F. Chen, T. F. Duda, and B. Calder, “Focused sound from three-dimensional sound propagation effects over a submarine canyon,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. EL260–EL266, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. M. E. Austin and N. R. Chapman, “The use of tessellation in three-dimensional parabolic equation modeling,” Journal of Computational Acoustics, vol. 19, pp. 221–239, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  56. D. Mikhin, “Exact discrete nonlocal boundary conditions for high-order Padé parabolic equations,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 2864–2875, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. O. A. Godin, “Reciprocity and energy conservation within the parabolic approximation,” Wave Motion, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 175–194, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. T. Fialkowski, J. F. Lingevitch, J. S. Perkins, D. K. Dacol, and M. D. Collins, “Geoacoustic inversion using a rotated coordinate system and simulated annealing,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 370–379, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. L. Zhang, L. Da, and Y. Zhou, “A new ocean acoustic model in computational oceanographic physics,” in in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, CiSE'09, Wuhan, China, December 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. F. Sturm and J. A. Fawcett, “On the use of higher-order azimuthal schemes in 3-D PE modeling,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 3134–3145, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. F. Sturm, “Examination of signal dispersion in a 3-D wedge-shaped waveguide using 3DWAPE,” Acta Acustica United with Acustica, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 714–717, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. F. Sturm, “Numerical study of broadband sound pulse propagation in three-dimensional oceanic waveguides,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 117, no. 3 I, pp. 1058–1079, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. W. Renner, “User's guide for the ANDES model,” Tech. Rep. version 4.2, Science Applications International Corp., 1995. View at Google Scholar
  64. M. Moll, R. M. Zeskind, and W. L. Scott, “An algorithm for beam noise prediction,” Report 3653, Bolt, Beranek and Newman, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  65. J. Arvelo, “Array response advanced modal integrated simulator (ARAMIS) user’s guide, STX-98-010,” Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Md, USA, 1998.
  66. J. R. Nedwell, J. Lovell, and A. W. H. Turnpenny, “Experimental validation of a species-specific behavioral impact metric for underwater noise,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 118, p. 2019, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  67. BMT Cordah EIA and Environmental Services, Offshore Renewables. Noise Assessment and Modelling, Product Description Literature, Aberdeen, UK, 2010.
  68. M. H. Laurinolli, C. D. S. Tollefsen, S. A. Carr, and S. P. Turner, “Assessment of the effects of underwater noise from the proposed Neptune LNG project. Part (3): noise sources of the Neptune project and propagation modeling of underwater noise,” LGL Report TA4200-3, JASCO Research Ltd for LGL Ltd, Ontario, Canada, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  69. S. W. Marshall and J. J. Cornyn, “Ambient-noise prediction. Vol. 1–Model of low-frequency ambient sea noise,” Report 7755, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  70. S. W. Marshall and J. J. Cornyn, “Ambient-noise prediction. Vol. 2–Model evaluation with IOMEDEX data,” Report 7756, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  71. Science Applications Inc., “Review of models of beam-noise statistics,” SAI-78-696-WA, McLean, Va, USA, 1977.
  72. D. Long, “FANM/SIAM noise plot program,” Ocean Data Systems Inc., Rockville, Md, USA, 1974.
  73. R. J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1983.
  74. J. W. Choi, K.-S. Yoon, J. Na, J.-S. Park, and Y.N. Na, “Shallow water high-frequency reverberation model,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea, vol. 21, pp. 671–678, 2002 (Korean). View at Google Scholar
  75. D.D. Ellis, Measurements and Analysis of Reverberation and Clutter Data, DRDC Atlantic ECR 2007-065, Defence Research and Development Canada, Atlantic, 2007.
  76. D. D. Ellis, “Normal-mode models OGOPOGO and NOGRP applied to the 2006 ONR reverberation modeling workshop problems,” DRDC Atlantic TM 2006-289, Defence Research and Development Canada, Atlantic, 2008.
  77. J. F. Lingevitch, “A parabolic equation method for modeling rough interface reverberation,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Underwater Reverberation and Clutter, P. L. Nielsen, C. H. Harrison, and J.-C. LeGac, Eds., Lerici, Italy, 2008.
  78. M. D. Collins and R. B. Evans, “A two-way parabolic equation for acoustic backscattering in the ocean,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 1357–1368, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. F. A. Milinazzo, C. A. Zala, and G. H. Brooke, “Rational square-root approximations for parabolic equation algorithms,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 760–766, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. G. Bouchage and K. D. LePage, “A shallow-water reverberation PE model,” Acta Acustica United with Acustica, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 638–641, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. K. LePage, “Monostatic reverberation in range dependent waveguides: the R-SNAP model,” Report SR-363, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  82. M. K. Prior, C. H. Harrison, and K. D. LePage, “Reverberation comparisons between RSNAP, SUPREMO and analytical solutions,” Report SR-361, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  83. C. Harrison, “ARTEMIS: a fast general environment reverberation model,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Underwater Reverberation and Clutter, P. L. Nielsen and C. H. Harrison and J.-C. LeGac, Eds., p. 2008, Lerici, Italy, 2008.
  84. K. LePage, “Bottom reverberation in shallow water: coherent properties as a function of bandwidth, waveguide characteristics, and scatterer distributions,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 3240–3254, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. K. D. LePage, “Bistatic reverberation modeling for range-dependent waveguides,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 112, pp. 2253–2254, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  86. K. D. LePage and C. H. Harrison, “Bistatic reverberation benchmarking exercise: BiStaR versus analytic formulas,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 113, pp. 2333–2334, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  87. K. D. LePage and C. Harrison, “Effects of refraction on the prediction of bistatic reverberation in range dependent shallow water waveguides,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 114, p. 2302, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  88. D. M. Fromm, “A computationally efficient multistatic reverberation algorithm,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 129, p. 2631, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  89. V. Marconi, P. L. Nielsen, and C. Holland, “S-SCARAB: SACLANTCEN-Scattering reverberation and backscatter user guide and reference manual, NURC/SM-418,” NATO Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2004.
  90. F.-P. A. Lam, N. J. Konijnendijk, J. Groen, and D. G. Simons, “Non-Rayleigh wideband sonar reverberation modeling including hybrid multi-paths,” in Proceedings of the The Oceans'06 MTS/IEEE-Boston Conference, Boston, Mass, USA, 2006.
  91. D. A. Abraham and A. P. Lyons, “Simulation of non-Rayleigh reverberation and clutter,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 362–374, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. E. Pouliquen, A. P. Lyons, and N. G. Pace, “The Helmholtz-Kirchhoff approach to modeling penetration of acoustic waves into rough seabeds,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 104, p. 1762, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  93. G. Canepa and C. Berron, “Characterization of seafloor geo-acoustic properties from multibeam data,” in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference, Boston, Mass, USA, 2006.
  94. R. J. Soukup, G. Canepa, H. J. Simpson, J. E. Summers, and R. F. Gragg, “Small-slope simulation of acoustic backscatter from a physical model of an elastic ocean bottom,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 2551–2559, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. P. Staelens, Defining and modeling the limits of high-resolution underwater acoustic imaging,, Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Gent, Belgium, 2009.
  96. P. Blondel and N. G. Pace, “Bistatic sonars: sea trials, laboratory experiments and future surveys,” Archives of Acoustics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 95–109, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. G. L. Davies, “Project 03F–1: phase I completion report,” Memo SM-399, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2002.
  98. M. Meyer and G. L. Davies, “A beam-based high-frequency reverberation model,” Report SR-365, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  99. G. L. Davies and E. P. Signell, “Espresso—scientific user guide,” Report NURC-SP-2006-003, NATO Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  100. G. L. Davies and E. P. Signell, “Espresso(m)—user guide,” Report NURC-SP-2006-002, NATO Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  101. S. Mjølsnes, LYBIN SGP-180(C)—Model Description, The Royal Norwegian Navy Materiel Command, Bergen, Norway, 2000.
  102. K.T. Hjelmervik and G.H. Sandsmark, “In ocean evaluation of low frequency active sonar systems,” in Proceedings of the Acoustics ’08 Conference, pp. 2839–2843, Paris, France, 2008.
  103. E. Dombestein, A. Gjersøe, and M. Bosseng, “LybinCom 6.0—description of the binary interface,” FFI-rapport 2009/02267, Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt/Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  104. C. M. Ferla, C. Isoppo, G. Martinelli, and F. B. Jensen, “Performance assessment of the LYBIN-2.0 propagation-loss model,” Memo SM-384, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  105. S. M. Ivansson, “Stochastic ray-trace computations of transmission loss and reverberation in 3-D range-dependent environments,” in Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, pp. 131–136, Carvoeiro, Portugal, 2006.
  106. H. G. Schneider, “MOCASSIN: sound propagation and sonar range prediction model for shallow water environments. User's guide,” Tech. Rep. 1990–9, Forschungsanstalt der Bundeswehr für Wasserschall- und Geophysik, Kiel, Germany, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  107. F. Sturm, S. Ivansson, Y.-M. Jiang, and N. R. Chapman, “Numerical investigation of out-of-plane sound propagation in a shallow water experiment,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. EL341–EL346, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. K. Frith, “MODRAY underwater sound simulator user manual, Version 5.0,” Australia Department of Defence, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Maritime Operations Division, Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory, Edinburgh, South Australia, 2003.
  109. Ebor Computing, “MODRAY, product description literature,” Mile End, South Australia, 2005.
  110. R. Alksne, “Rapidly deployable systems (RDS) underwater acoustic telemetry trials report,” Tech. Rep. DSTO-TN-0259, Australia Department of Defence, Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Maritime Operations Division, Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory, Victoria, Australia, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  111. D. McCammon, “Active sonar modelling with emphasis on sonar stimulators,” Report CR 2004-130 Defence Research and Development Canada—Atlantic, 2004.
  112. A. Baldacci and C. H. Harrison, “SUPREMO prototype version 01 user’s guide, M-141,” SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2002.
  113. C. H. Harrison, “Scattering strength uncertainty,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 112, p. 2253, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  114. C. H. Harrison, “SUPREMO: a multistatic sonar performance model, Memo SM-396,” SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2002.
  115. C. H. Harrison, “Closed-form expressions for ocean reverberation and signal excess with mode stripping and Lambert's law,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 2744–2756, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. M. K. Prior and A. Baldacci, “Comparison between predictions made by the SUPREMO sonar performance model and measured data,” Report SR-429, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  117. M. K. Prior, “SUPREMO v.2.0 user guide,” Report NURC-FR-2007-009, NATO Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  118. M. K. Prior, “SUPREMO v.2.0 program description,” Report NURC-FR-2007-011, NATO Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  119. J. A. Theriault and D. D. Ellis, “Shallow-water low-frequency active sonar modelling issues,” in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans ‘97 Conference, p. 678, 672, Halifax, Canada, 1997.
  120. J. A. Theriault, S. Pecknold, N. Collison, and C. Calnan, “Modelling multibeam reverberation with an N×2D model,” in Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, Carvoeiro, Portugal, 2006.
  121. C. Calnan, “DMOS—Bellhop Extension,” Tech. Rep. CR 2006-005, DRDC Atlantic, Defence Research and Development Canada—Atlantic, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  122. M. D. Wagstaff, R. W. Meredith, and H. A. Terrill-Stolper, “Multi-beam high frequency imaging in a range-dependent environment,” in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans ’97 Conference, pp. 927–931, Halifax, Canada, 1997.
  123. M. A. Kalogerakis, E. K. Skarsoulis, J. S. Papadakis et al., “An integrated computer system for underwater acoustic detection analysis,” in Proceedings of the Undersea Defence Technology Conference, (UDT'04), Nice, France, 2004.
  124. H. J. Shyu and R. Hillson, “A software workbench for estimating the effects of cumulative sound exposure in marine mammals,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 8–21, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. M. Siderius and M. B. Porter, “Modeling techniques for marine-mammal risk assessment,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. “Applied Radar & Sonar Technologies GmbH, Sonar performance prediction system (SPPS),” product description literature, Bremerhaven, Germany, 2002.
  127. Applied Hydro-Acoustics Research Inc., “ASPECT user’s guide,” Version 2.0.1 Build 664, Centreville, VA, USA, 2001.
  128. A. S. Frankel, W. T. Ellison, and J. Buchanan, “Application of the Acoustic Integration Model (AIM) to predict and minimize environmental impacts,” in in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans ‘02 Conference, pp. 1438–1443, Biloxi, Miss, USA, October 2002. View at Scopus
  129. D. S. Houser, “A method for modeling marine mammal movement and behavior for environmental impact assessment,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 76–81, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. G. Haralabus and A. Baldacci, “Impact of seafloor and water column parameter variations on signal-to-background ratio estimates—a sensitivity analysis based on sonar performance modeling,” in Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, 2006, Carvoeiro, Portugal.
  131. P. D. Ward, P. Varley, and T. Clarke, “Detecting marine mammals using active sonar—a theoretical consideration,” in Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, vol. 26, part 6, no. Symposium on Bio-Sonar Systems and Bioacoustics, 2004.
  132. D. E. Weston, “Acoustic flux formulas for range-dependent ocean ducts,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 269–281, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. X. Lurton, An Introduction to Underwater Acoustics: Principles and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  134. C. W. Holland, “Propagation in a waveguide with range-dependent seabed properties,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 2596–2609, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. M. G. Brown, F. J. Beron-Vera, I. Rypina, and I. A. Udovydchenkov, “Rays, modes, wavefield structure, and wavefield stability,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 1607–1610, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. K. L. Cockrell and H. Schmidt, “A relationship between the waveguide invariant and wavenumber integration,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. EL63–EL68, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. R. McHugh, D. McLaren, M. Wilson, and R. Dunbar, “The underwater environment—a fluctuating acoustic medium rich in marine life. Implications for active military sonar,” Acta Acustica United with Acustica, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. G. B. Deane and M. D. Stokes, “Model calculations of the underwater noise of breaking waves and comparison with experiment,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 3394–3410, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. W. E. Brown and M. L. Barlett, “Midfrequency 'through-the-sensor' scattering measurements: a new approach,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 733–747, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. E. Delory, M. André, J. L. Navarro Mesa, and M. Van Der Schaar, “On the possibility of detecting surfacing sperm whales at risk of collision using others' foraging clicks,” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. J.-P. Hermand, M. Meyer, M. Asch, and M. Berrada, “Adjoint-based acoustic inversion for the physical characterization of a shallow water environment,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 3860–3871, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. M. Meyer and J.-P. Hermand, “Backpropagation techniques in ocean acoustic inversion: time reversal, retrogation and adjoint modeling—a review,” in Acoustic Sensing Techniques for the Shallow Water Environment: Inversion methods and experiments, A. Caiti, N. R. Chapman, J.-P. Hermand, and S.M. Jesus, Eds., pp. 29–46, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  143. P. Hursky, M. B. Porter, B. D. Cornuelle, W. S. Hodgkiss, and W. A. Kuperman, “Adjoint modeling for acoustic inversion,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 607–619, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. L. Gammaitoni, P. Hänggi, P. Jung, and F. Marchesoni, “Stochastic resonance,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 223–287, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. H. Zhang, B. Xu, Z.-P. Jiang, and X. Wu, “Target detection in shallow-water reverberation based on parameter-induced stochastic resonance,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 41, no. 10, Article ID 105003, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. B. Xu, L. Zeng, and J. Li, “Application of stochastic resonance in target detection in shallow-water reverberation,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 303, no. 1-2, pp. 255–263, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. A. V. van Leijen, The sound of sediments: acoustic sensing in uncertain environments, PhD dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010.
  148. B. B. Thompson, R. J. Marks, M. A. El-Sharkawi, W. J. Fox, and R. T. Miyamoto, “Inversion of neural network underwater acoustic model for estimation of bottom parameters using modified particle swarm optimizers,” in in Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1301–1306, Portland, Ore, USA, July 2003. View at Scopus
  149. Z.-H. Michalopoulou and U. Ghosh-Dastidar, “Tabu for matched-field source localization and geoacoustic inversion,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 135–145, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. F. Glover and M. Laguna, Tabu Search, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997.
  151. A. L. Virovlyansky, “Signal travel times along chaotic rays in long-range sound propagation in the ocean,” Acoustical Physics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 271–281, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. D. V. Makarov, M. Y. Uleysky, and S. V. Prants, “Ray chaos and ray clustering in an ocean waveguide,” Chaos, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 79–95, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. D. Makarov, S. Prants, A. Virovlyansky, and G. Zaslavsky, Ray and Wave Chaos in Ocean Acoustics: Chaos in Waveguides, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2010.