Numerical Study on Energy Dissipation of Steel Moment Resisting Frames under Effect of Earthquake Vibrations

Table 1

The records used for this study.

Earthquake name	Station	Com.-Azi.^a	𝑅^b (Km)	PGA^c (g)	PGV/PGA^d (s)	CAV^e (m/s)	Tp^f (s)	Tm^g (s)	P. Tp^h (s)
Date (yy-mm-dd)
Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 99-09-20	CHY065	N-0°	83.43	0.1	0.14	9.88	0.56	0.79	—*
Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 99-09-20	TAP095	E-90°	109.01	0.15	0.18	56.56	0.98	0.84	—*
Loma Prieta, 89-10-18	CDMG58224	290°	72.2	0.24	0.15	27.69	0.32	0.86	—*
Loma Prieta, 89-10-18	CDMG58472	270°	74.26	0.26	0.16	28.35	0.64	0.85	—*
Kobe, Japan, 95-01-16	HIK	0°	95.72	0.14	0.11	45.02	0.6	0.76	—*
Loma Prieta, 89-10-18	CDMG58223	0°	58.65	0.23	0.11	33.26	0.3	0.53	—*
Manjil, Iran, 90-06-20	Qazvin	336°	49.97	0.13	0.09	59.48	0.16	0.46	—*
Northridge, 94-01-17	CDMG13122	0°	82.32	0.10	0.07	31.22	0.38	0.44	—*
Tabas, Iran, 78-09-16	Ferdows	T1	91.14	0.10	0.08	48.38	0.24	0.29	—*
Kocaeli, Turkey, 99-08-17	Bursa Tofas	90°	60.43	0.10	0.21	100.90	0.68	0.93	—*
Denali, Alaska, 02-11-03	Pump st. 10	47°	2.74	0.32	0.43	47.83	0.94	1.52	12.38
Bam, Iran, 03-12-26	Bam	T3-8°	𝑅<15	0.59	0.43	118.26	0.78	0.91	7.24
Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 99-09-20	CHY101	N-0°	9.96	0.44	0.27	48.15	0.9	0.98	5.98
Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 99-09-20	TCU068	E-90°	0.32	0.56	0.32	30.52	0.42	1.51	12.19
Imperial Valley, 79-10-15	CDMG 5158	230°	1.35	0.43	0.26	23.33	0.24	1.31	3.86
Northridge, 94-01-17	DWP 75	288°	5.19	0.49	0.15	25.50	0.22	0.72	3.48
Silakhor, Iran, 06-03-31	Chalan Cho.	L-99°	𝑅<15	0.45	0.33	93.81	1.52	1.82	8.62
Kocaeli, Turkey, 99-08-17	Yarimca	60°	4.83	0.26	0.25	39.12	0.52	1.29	4.9
Zanjiran, Iran, 94-06-20	Meymand	L-0°	𝑅<15	0.42	0.28	123.41	1.36	1.73	2.34
Kobe, Japan, 95-01-16	Takatori	0°	1.47	0.61	0.21	42.52	1.22	1.10	1.68

 ^aComponent-Azimuth. ^bClosest distance from the recording site to the ruptured area. ^cPeak Ground Acceleration. ^dPeak Ground Velocity to Peak Ground Acceleration ratio. ^eCumulative Absolute Velocity. ^fPredominant Period. ^gMean Period. ^hPseudo pulse period.
*P. Tp is calculated for near fault pulse-like motions and calculation of it for non-pulse-like motions in far field of fault is not valid [14].