Numerical Study on Energy Dissipation of Steel Moment Resisting Frames under Effect of Earthquake Vibrations

Table 2

Comparison of the average dissipated energy by damping and hysteresis behavior for the structural models in near and far field of fault.

Structural model	Far field of fault			Near field of fault
	Earthquake input energy (KJ)	Dissipated energy		Earthquake input energy (KJ)	Dissipated energy
		Damping (KJ)—(%)	Hysteresis (KJ)—(%)		Damping (KJ)—(%)	Hysteresis (KJ)—(%)
SMRF15	430	395.93—95.5%	33.79—4.5%	1079	615.53—60.68%	462.98—39.32%
SMRF10	399	315—87.35%	84.42—12.65%	643	353.27—61.1%	296.47—38.9%
SMRF7	376	289.97—84.61%	86.41—15.39%	419	243.46—69.61%	171.41—30.39%
SMRF5	263	187.49—81.67%	75.39—18.33%	294	175.2—65.84%	118.41—34.16%
SMRF3	132	86.84—79.87%	44.84—26.13%	168	89.71—59.71%	78.02—40.29%