Table of Contents
Advances in Biology
Volume 2014, Article ID 904281, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904281
Review Article

The Application of Genomic Technologies to Investigate the Inheritance of Economically Important Traits in Goats

Department of Animal Genetics, Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB), Campus Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain

Received 13 February 2014; Revised 15 July 2014; Accepted 19 July 2014; Published 17 September 2014

Academic Editor: Guillermo Giovambattista

Copyright © 2014 Marcel Amills. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Goat genomics has evolved at a low pace because of a lack of molecular tools and sufficient investment. Whilst thousands and hundreds of quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been identified in cattle and sheep, respectively, about nine genome scans have been performed in goats dealing with traits as conformation, growth, fiber quality, resistance to nematodes, and milk yield and composition. In contrast, a great effort has been devoted to the characterization of candidate genes and their association with milk, meat, and reproduction phenotypes. In this regard, causal mutations have been identified in the -casein gene that has a strong effect on milk composition and the PIS locus that is linked to intersexuality and polledness. In recent times, the development of massive parallel sequencing technologies has allowed to build a reference genome for goats as well as to monitor the expression of mRNAs and microRNAs in a broad array of tissues and experimental conditions. Besides, the recent design of a 52K SNP chip is expected to have a broad impact in the analysis of the genetic architecture of traits of economic interest as well as in the study of the population structure of goats at a worldwide scale.

1. Introduction

The main purpose of this review is to provide a general perspective of the advances made in the field of goat genomics in the last three decades. Goats are a species with a lower economic value than other domesticates, as cattle and pigs. They are mainly raised in Asian (~500 million heads) and African (~290 million heads) countries, whilst their relevance in Europe (~21 million heads) and North America (~3 million heads) is relatively modest [1]. These circumstances may explain why the genetic study of goats has experienced, in general, a substantial lag behind those performed in bovines and even sheep, a closely related species. Whilst the genomic analysis of quantitative traits has undergone substantial advances in the two species mentioned before, leading in quite a few successful cases to the identification of causal mutations, a small number of studies have identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) in goats. Fortunately, there are compelling signs that this situation is about to change, mainly because of the development of high throughput genotyping and sequencing tools that are allowing to generate huge amounts of data with a moderate investment of time and money. In the following pages, an outline of the major findings in the genetic analysis of quantitative and Mendelian traits of economic interest will be provided. Next, the impact of massive genotyping and sequencing platforms on the characterization of the caprine genome and transcriptome will be discussed. The review will conclude with some comments about future trends and developments in the field of goat genomics.

2. Analysing the Genetic Architecture of Production and Disease-Related Traits in Goats

The genetic analysis of production and disease-related traits in goats has been rarely done at a genome-wide scale. In this regard, the lack of well-established microsatellite panels covering the whole genome hindered, to a significant extent, the implementation of genome scans aimed at detecting QTL. Whilst 8,305 and 789 QTL have been reported in the Animal QTL Database (http://www.animalgenome.org/QTLdb/release.php) for cattle and sheep, respectively, goats are not even included. A bibliographic search at NCBI Pubmed Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) revealed few publications where caprine QTL are described (a representative list can be found at Table 1). For instance, De la Chevrotière et al. [2] identified 13 QTL for resistance to gastrointestinal nematode infections in Creole goats by analysing 101 microsatellites. Quantitative trait loci affecting mohair [3, 4] and conformation traits [5] as well as preweaning growth [6] have also been reported in Angora goats. On the other hand, partial genome scans have been carried out by Bolormaa et al. [7], who described QTL for worm egg and blood eosinophil counts in Australian Angora and Cashmere goats through the analysis of three microsatellites mapping to the caprine major histocompatibility complex on chromosome 23, and by Roldán et al. [8] who genotyped 37 microsatellites mapping to four chromosomes and found several QTL influencing the variation of milk yield and quality traits across lactation. Mohammad Abadi et al. [9] have also identified QTL for growth and Cashmere fiber.

tab1
Table 1: Identification of quantitative trait loci for economically important traits in goats.

In the absence of positional information, the investigation of the genetic factors that determine phenotypic variation of economically important traits has been based on physiological candidate gene approaches. This strategy has important limitations. The involvement [10] of one gene in a metabolic pathway does not necessarily imply that it contains variation affecting the trait under study. A common pitfall of association studies is to report significance as raw values, instead of correcting for multiple testing. Other extended flaws are to report associations without proposing any biological mechanism to support them or to infer that a trait is associated with a given genotype on the basis of divergent allelic frequencies among populations with extreme phenotypes. Flawed experimental practices can lead to the publication of spurious associations that do not have any biological basis. The recent opportunity to carry out genome-wide association studies in goats is expected to alleviate this problem by making possible to generate positional information at an affordable cost and relatively high resolution.

2.1. Candidate Genes for Dairy Traits

Candidate genes related with milk traits have been widely studied in goats [1113]. A detailed description of the polymorphism of casein, β-lactoglobulin, and α-lactalbumin genes can be found at Moioli et al. [11] and Amills et al. [13] and will not be reviewed here. Obviously, genes encoding caseins are strong candidates to explain the variation of traits such as milk protein content, rheological parameters, and cheese yield. The casein cluster maps to a 250–300 kb region on chromosome 6 and consists of four loci, namely, -casein (CSN1S1), β-casein (CSN2), -casein (CSN1S2), and κ-casein (CSN3). Three decades ago, Boulanger et al. [14] identified, by starch gel protein electrophoresis, CSN1S1 variants differing in intensity, an observation that suggested that the polymorphism of this gene might have differential effects on casein synthesis. Rocket immunoelectrophoresis studies provided evidence of the existence of CSN1S1 alleles with quantitative effects on CSN1S1 content [15]. So far, the catalog of CSN1S1 alleles has expanded to a total of 17 variants that can be classified, according to the CSN1S1 content they determine, as strong (A, B1, B2, B3, B4, C, H, L, and M), medium (E and I), low (F, D, and G), and null (01, 02, and N). Importantly, causal mutations explaining these quantitative effects have been identified, providing a valuable model to understand how genetic variation modulates milk composition. In this way, the most distinguishing feature of the E-allele is the presence of a retrotransposon insertion at exon 19 that might destabilize the transcript and shorten its half-life [16]. Similarly, the G-allele of the bovine CSN1S1 gene, which is also associated with a reduced milk CSN1S1 percentage, contains a retrotransposon insertion at exon 19 [17]. On the other hand, low CSN1S1 content alleles contain mutations that perturb the normal splicing of the mRNA, yielding transcripts that encode shorter CSN1S1 proteins because of exon skipping [1820]. Lastly, a large genomic deletion encompassing intron 12 to exon 19 of the caprine CSN1S1 gene explains the absence of this protein in individuals harbouring the 01 allele [21], while the N-allele is characterized by a premature stop codon at exon 12 [20].

The polymorphism of the goat CSN1S1 gene has broad effects on a wide array of dairy phenotypes. Pioneering studies performed by Mahé et al. [22] and Manfredi et al. [23] revealed that the CSN1S1 genotype influenced milk protein percentage and, more unexpectedly, also fat content. These findings were confirmed by Barbieri et al. [24], who showed a consistent association of the A-allele with higher milk and protein fat contents. Similarly, Zullo et al. [25] reported effects of the CSN1S1 genotype on milk composition in Cilentana goats. Chilliard et al. [26] and Balia et al. [27] have also proposed that milk fat composition is modulated by the CSN1S1 genotype. A global effect of CSN1S1 variation on protein content might be explained by the fact that CSN1S1 plays a pivotal role in casein transportation from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi complex in mammary epithelial cells [28]. Besides, CSN1S1 genotype seems to influence the structure and composition of milk fat globules [29] as well as the expression of lipogenic genes [30]. These data back up the notion that lipid and protein synthesis secretory pathways are tightly interconnected in the mammary gland [31].

Rheological properties of milk are also influenced by the CSN1S1 genotype; for example, milk from AA goats is associated with a firmer curd, a slower coagulation time, and increased cheese yield than that of FF goats in French [32, 33] and Italian breeds [25], whilst in Spanish goats less conclusive results have been obtained [34]. From an organoleptic point of view, the AA cheese has a less pronounced goat flavor intensity than that of the FF one, maybe because of differences in fatty acid composition and lipolysis rate [26, 33].

The variability of the other three casein genes and its association with milk traits have also been explored. Null alleles at the CSN1S2 [35] and CSN2 [36] genes have been described, but to the best of our knowledge association analyses with milk yield and protein and fat contents have not been performed yet. With regard to the CSN3 locus, a high number of missense mutations have been detected by Yahyaoui et al. [37], Jann et al. [38], and Prinzenberg et al. [39], and a nomenclature system for allelic variation at this locus has been proposed. According to Caravaca et al. [40] and Chiatti et al. [41], CSN3 polymorphism is associated with protein and casein contents, and in a recent work Caravaca et al. [34] have also suggested effects on milk rennet coagulation time.

A powerful approach to investigating the role of casein genes in determining milk composition consists in analysing haplotypes rather than specific genes or alleles. Hayes et al. [42] typed 39 SNPs mapping to the caprine casein loci in Norwegian goats and found associations between CSN1S1 haplotypes and protein percentage and fat yield and between CSN3 haplotypic variation and fat and protein percentages. Pazzola et al. [43] have also genotyped the four casein genes in Sarda goats and have described associations with diverse rheological parameters. It is important, however, to emphasize that casein concentrations are not exclusively influenced by polymorphisms within the casein cluster. In cattle, Schopen et al. [44] reported trans-QTL influencing the contents of CSN1S1 (bovine chromosome 9), CSN1S2 (chromosomes 1, 10, and 17), CSN2 (chromosome 3), and total caseins (chromosome 11). This means that genome-wide approaches will be needed to identify the genetic factors that regulate milk casein and protein contents.

There is a growing list of candidate genes whose polymorphism has been associated with milk fat content and composition traits (Table 2). These genes belong to different functional categories related with lipogenesis (ACACA, DGAT1, DGAT2, ME1, and SCD); lipolysis (LPL and LIPE); milk fat globule membrane proteins (BTN1A1 and MFGE); hormone signaling (GH and PRLR); and transcription factors regulating gene expression (PITX2, POUF1, and STAT5), amongst others [4559]. Although the main phenotype analysed in these reports is milk fat content, in some of them the genetic analysis of milk fatty acid composition has been undertaken (e.g., [53, 55, 58, 59]). However, and in strong contrast with the CSN1S1 model (see above), there is a complete lack of functional studies supporting the associations revealed in each one of these scientific reports. This important limitation hinders the application of this knowledge to improve milk fat composition through marker assisted selection schemes. In the future, high throughput genotyping tools are expected to provide a more comprehensive view about the genetic architecture of milk lipid traits.

tab2
Table 2: List of candidate genes associated milk fat content and composition traits.
2.2. Candidate Genes for Growth and Meat Quality Traits

The characterization of candidate genes influencing growth and meat-related traits has not reached yet the level of knowledge achieved for milk traits (see previous section), where mutations with causal effects have been identified. Probably, the loci that have been analysed most intensively are those related with the growth hormone (GH) axis. Growth hormone is secreted by the anterior pituitary and its main effects are to stimulate bone and skeletal muscle growth, through the action of IGF1, as well as to increase milk yield and diminish adiposity [60]. A missense SNP at the bovine GH gene has been associated with GH concentrations [61]. Besides, three haplotypes differing by amino acid substitutions at positions 127 and 172 have been associated with carcass weight and beef marbling score in Japanese cattle [62]. In goats, association studies have revealed the existence of relationships between GH genotype and a wide array of growth parameters such as body length and height [63, 64], and birth chest and weaning weight and height [65]. Similarly, the variability of the GH receptor has been associated with body length and height [65], while the growth hormone secretagogue receptor genotype displays significant associations with body length and body length index [66].

Myostatin (MSTN) belongs to the transforming growth factor- (TGF-) β superfamily and it has been shown to repress muscular growth [67]. In cattle, mutations inactivating MSTN expression lead to a muscular hypertrophy phenotype known as double muscling [68]. In goats, variation at the MSTN gene has been associated with body weight, length, and height [69]. In the case of GH and MSTN, genetic variability may affect growth rate because both molecules are known to play a key role in this physiological process (although causal mutations have not been identified yet). For other loci, this relationship is less obvious; for example, the polymorphism of the diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2) gene that regulates triacylglycerol synthesis has been associated with withers height in Chinese breeds without providing any mechanistic explanation [70].

2.3. Candidate Genes for Reproduction Traits

In Chinese goat breeds, the association between litter size and a wide array of polymorphisms mapping to the BMP4 [71], CART [72], GDF9 [73, 74], GNRH1 [74], INHA and INHBA [75], KISS1 [7678], KITLG [79], POUF1 [80], and TSHB [81] genes, amongst others, has been screened. However, the most significant finding in the field of caprine reproduction genetics has been the elucidation of the molecular basis of the goat polled intersex syndrome (PIS). This syndrome was reported for the first time by Bourdelle [82], and it is associated with the absence of horns, in males and females, and sex reversal (i.e., masculinization) of females [83]. While the inheritance of polledness is dominant, intersexuality segregates as a recessive trait [84]. The PIS locus was mapped to a 100 kb region on the goat 1q43 chromosome [85]. In humans, this genomic location contains the blepharophimosis ptosis epicanthus inversus syndrome locus, related with eyelid malformation and the loss of ovarian function. Bacterial artificial chromosome sequencing revealed that the causal mutation of caprine PIS is a 11.7 kb deletion affecting the expression of PISRT1, a long noncoding RNA, and FOXL2, a forkhead transcription factor involved in ovarian development and the maintenance of granulosa cell function [86]. The deleted region may contain a long range regulatory element affecting the expression of these two loci that lie 20 kb (PISRT1) and 200–300 kb (FOXL2) apart from it. Expression analyses have shown that, in XX PIS−/− sex-reversed gonads, FOXL2 mRNA levels are greatly diminished as early as 36 days after conception, whilst PISRT1 RNA declines a little bit later [86]. At 56 days after conception and afterwards, the transcript levels of these two loci in the gonads are undetectable. In contrast, in the horn buds of PIS−/− and PIS+/− 70-day-old fetuses FOXL2 and PISRT1 mRNA levels are strongly increased [86]. These molecular findings agree well with the dominant and recessive inheritance patterns observed for intersexuality (loss of function) and polledness (gain of function). Abolished expression of FOXL2 results in the activation of the testis differentiation program and in the reduced transcription of the CYP19 gene, which converts androgens into estrogens, while PISRT1 RNA has been hypothesized to act as an inhibitor of male differentiation genes as SOX9 [87].

2.4. Candidate Genes for Coat Color

Goats display a wide array of pigmentation patterns, even at the within-breed level (Figure 1), that contrast strongly with the monochromous brown color of the bezoar. The development of multiple coat colors has been probably the result of human artificial selection choosing certain pigmentation phenotypes because of cultural, religious, or breeding practices. Our understanding of the genetic basis of coat color in goats is more limited than that of other species, such as cattle and sheep, where causal mutations with well-established effects have been identified [88]. Pigmentation is a polygenic trait influenced by the combined action of many genes that often interact in an epistatic mode [89].

fig1
Figure 1: (a) Malagueña goats with dark chestnut (left) and blonde (right) coats, (b) Murciano-Granadina goats with black (left) and dark mahogany (right) coats that cosegregate with a C267W polymorphism [95] at the melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R), and (c) Palmera goats with black (left) and red (right) coats that are associated with a G255D polymorphism at MC1R (our unpublished data).

Although the list of candidate genes for pigmentation patterns can be very large, there are certain loci that seem to have a prominent and consistent role across species. An example of this would be the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) that encodes a G protein-coupled receptor with 7 transmembrane-spanning domains. The activity of this protein determines if either eumelanin (black) or pheomelanin (red/yellow) will be synthesized within the melanocyte [90]. In cattle, dominant black (L99P) and recessive red (premature stop codon) coat colors are produced by alleles at the MC1R gene ([91, 92], reviewed by [93]), and in sheep a M73K mutation is associated with dominant black [94]. In goats, Fontanesi et al. [95] characterized the diversity of the MC1R gene and found one nonsense mutation (p.Q225X), three missense mutations (p.A81V, p.F250V, and p.C267W), and one silent mutation. The Q225X polymorphism is expected to abolish MC1R function but, surprisingly, it did not show a complete association with a pheomelanic pigmentation, maybe because epistatic/modifier genes influence its effects. In Murciano-Granadina goats, the p.267W allele was present in black individuals but not in the brown ones suggesting a causal effect [95].

The involvement of the Agouti (ASIP) locus, which encodes a paracrine hormone that upon binding MC1R reduces its basal activity and stimulates the synthesis of pheomelanin [90], was highlighted by Adalsteinsson et al. [96], who reported the existence of 11 alleles, that is, white or tan (Awt), black mask (Ablm), bezoar (Abz), badger face (Ab), grey (Ag), light belly (Alb), Swiss markings (Asm), lateral stripes (Als), mahogany (Amh), red cheek (Arc), and nonagouti (Aa). Fontanesi et al. [97] analysed the variation of ASIP and identified three missense polymorphisms mapping to conserved positions of the cysteine-rich carboxy-terminal domain of the protein (p.A96G, p.C126G, and p.V128G), but they were not completely associated with pigmentation patterns. Besides, Badaoui et al. [98, 99] have characterized the polymorphism of the caprine ASIP and TYRP1 genes in Spanish and Italian breeds, whilst Adefenwa et al. [100] reported ASIP variability in Nigerian goats. Interestingly, Fontanesi et al. [97] also found evidence of a copy number variation affecting the ASIP gene that may correspond to the white/tan dominant Awt allele. This observation agrees well with data obtained in sheep demonstrating that the white dominant coat is caused by a 190 kb tandem duplication, encompassing the ovine ASIP and AHCY coding regions and the ITCH promoter region [101].

2.5. Genetic Determinants of Disease Susceptibility

Susceptibility to monogenic and complex diseases has a strong impact on the economic output of goat farms. Disentangling the genetic factors that modulate disease progression might be useful to implement selection schemes aimed at eradicating or decreasing the incidence of pathological conditions (for a review see [102]). One of the main determinants of the immune response elicited against pathogens is the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), which encodes class I and II molecules that present antigens to CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively.

In goats, the MHC maps to chromosome 23, encompasses around 2.4 Mb, and contains 160 protein-coding genes [103]. At least two MHC class I loci have been identified by Zidi et al. [104], whilst Dong et al. [103] sequenced the whole MHC region and found four class I genes. Besides, the class II region contains DR [105107] and DQ genes [108, 109]. As in other domestic species, the DRB gene is extraordinarily polymorphic in goats [106, 107, 110]. One particularity of ruminants, when compared to humans, is that DQ genes are duplicated (reviewed in [111]). The variability of goat MHC class I proteins has been linked to resistance to the caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus infection, a disease that causes joint inflammation and lameness in adults and encephalitis in kids [112]. Other diseases where MHC polymorphisms may play an important role in the development of an appropriate immune response are cowdriosis [113, 114], trichostrongyliasis [115], and Johne’s disease [116]. It should be emphasized, however, that the immunological basis of these associations has not been elucidated yet.

With regard to genetic disorders, a screening of the Online Mendelian Inheritance Database in Animals (http://omia.angis.org.au/home/) reveals the existence of 74 phenotypes which may have genetic causes in goats, including achondroplasia, anophthalmia, cryptorchidism, epidermolysis bullosa, hemimelia, diaphragmatic hernia, hypospadia, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, congenital myopathy, lipofuscinosis, peromelia, and many other pathological conditions. Unfortunately, causal mutations have been identified only for a few Mendelian genetic disorders (Table 3, [117121]).

tab3
Table 3: Hereditary diseases in goats where causal mutations have been identified (Online Mendelian Inheritance Database in Animals, http://omia.angis.org.au/home/).

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are a group of fatal neurological diseases including scrapie in sheep and goats and spongiform encephalopathy in cattle. The main pathogenic event is the conformational conversion of the normal prion into the amyloidogenic and misfolded isoform that tends to form aggregates with neurotoxic effects [122, 123]. In sheep, at least 10 mutations in the gene have been associated with resistance/susceptibility to classical scrapie while two others have been linked to atypical scrapie [124, 125]. The goat gene is very polymorphic with 28 missense substitutions described so far [126]. Recently, Goldmann et al. [127] have reported that the Met142 residue is associated with increased resistance to preclinical and clinical scrapie, whilst the Ser127 substitution is linked to a lower risk of showing clinical signs of scrapie in goats in which has accumulated in brain or periphery.

Analysis of gene expression with bovine microarrays has been useful in identifying the genes that are upregulated or downregulated in response to a challenge with Staphylococcus aureus in the mammary gland [128]. Among the genes with an increased expression, it is worthy to mention those related to the establishment of an immune and inflammatory response as well as with the regulation of innate resistance to pathogens and cell metabolism. These loci might constitute the initial line of defense against udder pathogens. Interestingly, a downregulation of lipid metabolism genes was also observed, a feature that is consistent with the inhibition of this biochemical pathway as a consequence of intramammary infection [128].

3. New Tools for Analysing the Goat Genome and Transcriptome

Although the analysis of the goat genome and transcriptome at a large scale is still in its infancy, some important milestones have been already reached. Without a doubt, the most significant of these advances has been the sequencing of a ~2.66 Gb genome of a 3-year-old female Yunnan black goat by Dong et al. [103], in the framework of the International Goat Genome Consortium (http://www.goatgenome.org/). These authors used a double strategy, based on short-read sequencing and optical mapping that facilitated in a very significant way genome assembly. Through this approach, 191.5 Gb of high-quality 45–101 bp reads was generated, thus providing a 65.6-fold coverage of the caprine genome.

According to Dong et al. [103], about 42% of the goat genome contains repetitive elements, with many of them being ruminant-specific. Comparison with cattle revealed an expansion, in goats, of SINE-tRNA repeats as well as a contraction of SINE-BovA elements. A consensus gene set of 22,175 protein-coding genes, 262 rRNA, 829 tRNA, and 1,010 small nuclear RNA genes was built, and evidences of positive selection were found at several genes related with the immune response. Moreover, a total of 487 genes encoding microRNAs (miRNA) were detected, with six of them being goat-specific. A total of 157 miRNA genes were distributed in 44 clusters of variable size (2–46 miRNA genes), a similar proportion to that observed in humans. Structural variation of the goat genome has also been characterized with a comparative genomic hybridization array with ~385,000 bovine probes [129]. A total of 127 copy number variation regions (CNVR), with an average size of 90 kb, were identified in Saanen, Camosciata delle Alpi, Girgentana, and Murciano-Granadina goats. Importantly, many of these CNVR also segregate in cattle suggesting ancient CNVR formation events in regions of genomic instability present in the ancestor of these two species [129].

Next generation sequencing has also been applied to characterize the transcriptome of goats [103, 130] as well as to generate large collections of SNPs mapping to transcripts [131]. Cashmere fine hair fiber, mainly produced in India and Mongolia, is derived from the hair secondary follicles that form part of the undercoat of Cashmere goats. Gene expression profiles of primary and secondary hair follicles of Cashmere goats have been compared in order to gain new insights into the genetic architecture of fiber quality [103]. The majority of expressed mRNAs corresponded to keratin and keratin-associated protein genes. Moreover, 28 downregulated and 23 upregulated mRNAs were identified in secondary versus primary follicles [103]. Amongst the differentially expressed genes, there were two keratin genes, 10 keratin-associated protein genes, fibroblast growth factor 21, asparagine synthetase, phosphoserine aminotransferase, and desmoglein 1. In another study, Geng et al. [130] compared skin mRNA expression at different hair follicle developmental stages (i.e., anagen, catagen, and telogen), thus identifying hundreds of differentially expressed genes. There has also been a sudden burst of studies analysing the expression profiles of miRNAs in the mammary gland [132135], testis [136], and skin and hair follicles [137]. Interestingly, overexpression of caprine miR-103 in cultured mammary epithelial cells has been shown to have broad effects on lipid metabolism [135], stimulating the expression of genes related with lipogenesis, unsaturated fatty acid synthesis, triglyceride synthesis, cholesterol transport, fatty acid uptake, and fat droplet formation and downregulating those involved in lipid catabolism (lipolysis and fatty acid β-oxidation). In this context, it would be interesting to investigate if variability at miRNA genes and their binding sites could have important effects on milk composition and other traits of economic interest.

The design, by the International Goat Genome Consortium, of a 52K SNP chip for the high throughput genotyping of caprine DNA samples should be envisaged as a major scientific achievement in the field of goat genomics [138]. Polymorphism discovery was achieved by next-generation sequencing of dairy (16 individuals from the Alpine, Creole, and Saanen breeds sequenced in a Hiseq2000 platform with 13–26-fold coverage) and meat (pool 1: 20 Boer goats, pool 2: 20 Savanna goats and 24 Katjang goats, both sequenced in an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx machine with 35-fold coverage) goat DNAs. Besides, reduced representation libraries for 17 Dutch Saanen goats were also sequenced with a low coverage. Altogether, this approach led to the identification of 11,924,638 variants including 1,229,120 indels and 10,695,518 SNPs. A total of 60,000 SNPs were selected and Illumina optimized assays for a total of 53,347 SNPs that were subsequently tested in a sample of 288 goats with a high success. This SNP chip has been already used by Kijas et al. [139] to carry out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for polledness in Boer, Cashmere, and Rangeland goats. A highly significant GWAS signal was detected at chromosome 1, just at the genomic region reported by Pailhoux et al. [86] as containing the causal mutation for the goat polled intersex syndrome. Curiously, not all intersex goats were homozygous for the PIS deletion suggesting the existence of genetic heterogeneity for this reproductive pathology [139]. The 52K SNP chip has also been used to characterize the genetic diversity of Italian goat breeds [140], which showed a remarkable level of population structure, and it is the main tool employed in current international efforts to investigate goat genetic variation at a worldwide scale (Goat Adaptmap project, http://www.goatadaptmap.org/) as well as to develop genetic markers that can be used as selection criteria for phenotypes of economic interest (3SR project, http://www.3srbreeding.eu/ThenbspProject.aspx).

4. Final Remarks

In the last decades, the investigation of the genetic architecture of traits of economic interest in goats did not experience a substantial progress. Very few QTL studies were carried out and, consequently, there was a lack of positional information for genetic factors regulating phenotypic variation. A consequence of this state of things is that a very small number of causal mutations have been identified in goats. In contrast, many studies analysing physiological candidate genes and their association with meat and dairy traits have been carried out. However, in the absence of positional information and replication in diverse populations, the scientific and practical significance of these studies is quite limited and they cannot be used to establish gene-assisted selection schemes (with the exception of the CSN1S1 and PIS loci where consistent genetic models with causal relationships have been successfully established).

The recent construction of a 52K SNP chip [138] is expected to accelerate the speed at which discoveries are made, facilitating the performance of GWAS with an unprecedented resolution. Importantly, the 52K SNP chip produces data that can be easily standardized amongst labs at an affordable cost (at least if compared with microsatellites). In the near future, this should result in the detection, in a broad array of populations with diverse origins, of genomic regions with important effects on the phenotypic variance of quantitative and Mendelian traits and, eventually, in the identification of causal mutations that can be used as selection criteria. An additional benefit of the 52K SNP chip is that it can be also used to detect CNVR, although with limited resolution and some bias (SNP mapping to CNVR are underrepresented in chips because very often they are not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium). Copy number variation can have important phenotypic effects in domestic species [141], but so far there is only one report in goats and data were generated with a bovine 384K oligonucleotide array [129]. A future goal would be to increase the resolution of the caprine CNVR map and to investigate the association of structural variation with phenotypes. Finally, the invention of a 52K SNP chip also paves the way to apply genomic selection to goats, although the benefit-cost ratio of establishing such strategy should be carefully evaluated.

The high coverage sequencing of a goat genome [103] is another essential milestone that is expected to generate huge amounts of biological data and speed up research on themes of paramount importance, such as the physiological genomics of lactation, growth, and reproduction. The existence of a goat reference genome will also facilitate the monitoring of gene expression through RNA-seq in distinct goat tissues or experimental conditions, for example, goats differentially exposed to diets, thermal stress or pathogens, and so forth. The large-scale measurement of mRNA expression has been greatly facilitated by the development of next generation sequencing techniques, and it should play a crucial role in understanding how genetic polymorphisms and environmental factors modulate gene expression through complex biological networks that evolve in time and space. In this regard, genome sequencing and RNA-seq experiments have allowed to establish an initial catalog of the miRNA genes residing in the goat genome [103, 132137], and in the next years we can anticipate that this list will be expanded to new miRNAs as well as to a plethora of regulatory RNAs, such as small interfering RNAs, Piwi-associated RNAs, and long noncoding RNAs, with significant effects on gene expression.

Massive parallel sequencing could also be applied to detect selective sweeps in the goat genome produced by artificial or natural selection. It should be taken into account, however, that processes as polygenic adaptation that can be fairly common in domestic species do not leave the classical genomic signatures observed for hard selective sweeps [142]. From a population genetics perspective, much information about the identification of goat domestication centers and genetic relationships amongst caprine breeds has been obtained from classical markers, as mitochondrial and microsatellite loci. However, the implementation of the 52K SNP chip and next generation sequencing techniques means that, in the coming years, powerful genome-wide approaches will be used to assess goat population structure at a worldwide scale as well as to investigate the influence of evolutionary forces on it (e.g., Nextgen project, http://nextgen.epfl.ch/). The participation of wild species other than the bezoar in the goat domestication process (either at primary or secondary domestication sites) could be also analysed by next generation sequencing. Another fundamental area of research would be to identify the genes that drove the behavioral and physiological changes leading to domestication. In this regard, the analysis of ancient DNA should provide new perspectives into this unresolved question. Finally, massive parallel sequencing could be also employed to characterize the diversity of highly endangered goat breeds and to devise strategies that ensure the conservation of such irreplaceable genetic resources.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Drs. Juan Capote, Juan Manuel Serradilla, Baltasar Urrutia, and Juan Manuel Carrizosa for providing the goat pictures shown at Figure 1.

References

  1. M. A. Aziz, “Present status of the world goat populations and their productivity,” Lohmann Information, vol. 45, no. 2, p. 42, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. De La Chevrotière, S. C. Bishop, R. Arquet et al., “Detection of quantitative trait loci for resistance to gastrointestinal nematode infections in Creole goats,” Animal Genetics, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 768–775, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. M. Cano, G. Marrube, D. L. Roldan et al., “QTL affecting fleece traits in Angora goats,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 71, no. 1–3, pp. 158–164, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Visser, E. van Marle-Köster, H. Bovenhuis, and R. P. M. A. Crooijmans, “QTL for mohair traits in South African Angora goats,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Marrube, E. M. Cano, D. L. Roldán et al., “QTL affecting conformation traits in Angora goats,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 71, no. 1–3, pp. 255–263, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Visser, E. van Marle-Köster, M. A. Snyman, H. Bovenhuis, and R. P. M. A. Crooijmans, “Quantitative trait loci associated with pre-weaning growth in South African Angora goats,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 112, no. 1–3, pp. 15–20, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Bolormaa, J. H. J. van der Werf, S. W. Walkden-Brown, K. Marshall, and A. Ruvinsky, “A quantitative trait locus for faecal worm egg and blood eosinophil counts on chromosome 23 in Australian goats,” Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 207–214, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. L. Roldán, A. E. Rabasa, S. Saldaño, F. Holgado, M. A. Poli, and R. J. C. Cantet, “QTL detection for milk production traits in goats using a longitudinal model,” Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 187–193, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. R. Mohammad Abadi, N. Askari, A. Baghizadeh, and A. K. Esmailizadeh, “A directed search around caprine candidate loci provided evidence for microsatellites linkage to growth and cashmere yield in Rayini goats,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 81, no. 2-3, pp. 146–151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Georges, “Mapping, fine mapping, and molecular dissection of quantitative trait Loci in domestic animals,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, vol. 8, pp. 131–162, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Moioli, M. D'Andrea, and F. Pilla, “Candidate genes affecting sheep and goat milk quality,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 68, no. 1-2, pp. 179–192, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Martin, M. Szymanowska, L. Zwierzchowski, and C. Leroux, “The impact of genetic polymorphisms on the protein composition of ruminant milks,” Reproduction Nutrition Development, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 433–459, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Amills, J. Jordana, A. Zidi, and J. M. Serradilla, “Genetic factors that regulate milk protein and lipid composition in goats,” in Milk Production—Advanced Genetic Traits, Cellular Mechanism, Animal Management and Health, N. Chaiyabutr, Ed., InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Boulanger, F. Grosclaude, and MF. Mahé, “Polymorphisme des caséines αS1 et αS2 de la chèvre (Capra hircus),” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 157–176, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. F. Grosclaude, M. F. Mahé, G. Brignon, L. Di Stasio, and R. Jeunet, “A mendelian polymorphism underlying quantitative variations of goat αS1-casein,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 399–412, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. J. Pérez, C. Leroux, A. S. Bonastre, and P. Martin, “Occurrence of a LINE sequence in the 3′UTR of the goat αS1-casein E-encoding allele associated with reduced protein synthesis level,” Gene, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 179–187, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Rando, P. Di Gregorio, L. Ramunno et al., “Characterization of the CSN1AG allele of the bovine αS1-casein locus by the insertion of a relict of a long interspersed element,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1735–1742, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  18. P. Martin, M. Ollivier-Bousquet, and F. Grosclaude, “Genetic polymorphism of caseins: a tool to investigate casein micelle organization,” International Dairy Journal, vol. 9, no. 3–6, pp. 163–171, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Leroux, N. Mazure, and P. Martin, “Mutations away from splice site recognition sequences might cis-modulate alternative splicing of goat αS1-casein transcripts: structural organization of the relevant gene,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267, no. 9, pp. 6147–6157, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. Ramunno, G. Cosenza, A. Rando et al., “Comparative analysis of gene sequence of goat CSN1S1 F and N alleles and characterization of CSN1S1 transcript variants in mammary gland,” Gene, vol. 345, no. 2, pp. 289–299, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Cosenza, R. Illario, A. Rando, P. Di Gregorio, P. Masina, and L. Ramunno, “Molecular characterization of the goat CSN1S101 allele,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 237–240, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. MF. Mahé, E. Manfredi, G. Ricordeau, A. Piacère, and F. Grosclaude, “Effets du polymorphisme de la caséine αS1 caprine sur les performances laitières: analyse intradescendance de boucs de race Alpine,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 151–157, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Manfredi, G. Ricordeau, M. E. Barbieri, Y. Amigues, and B. Bibé, “Genotype caséine αS1 et sélection des boucs sur descendance dans les races Alpine et Saanen,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 451–458, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Barbieri, E. Manfredi, J. M. Elsen et al., “Influence du locus de la caséine αS1 sur les performances laitières et les paramètres génétiques des chèvres de race Alpine,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 437–450, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Zullo, C. M. A. Barone, L. Chianese, P. Colatruglio, M. Occidente, and D. Matassino, “Protein polymorphisms and coagulation properties of Cilentana goat milk,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 223–230, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Chilliard, J. Rouel, and C. Leroux, “Goat's alpha-s1 casein genotype influences its milk fatty acid composition and delta-9 desaturation ratios,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 131, no. 3-4, pp. 474–487, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. F. Balia, M. Pazzola, M. L. Dettori et al., “Effect of CSN1S1 gene polymorphism and stage of lactation on milk yield and composition of extensively reared goats,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 129–137, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. Chanat, P. Martin, and M. Ollivier-Bousquet, “αS1-casein is required for the efficient transport of β- and κ-casein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus of mammary epithelial cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 112, part 19, pp. 3399–3412, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Cebo, C. Lopez, C. Henry et al., “Goat αS1-casein genotype affects milk fat globule physicochemical properties and the composition of the milk fat globule membrane,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 6215–6229, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Ollier, S. Chauvet, P. Martin, Y. Chilliard, and C. Leroux, “Goat's αs1-casein polymorphism affects gene expression profile of lactating mammary gland,” Animal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 566–573, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Ollivier-Bousquet, “Milk lipid and protein traffic in mammary epithelial cells: joint and independent pathways,” Reproduction Nutrition Development, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. Ambrosoli, L. Di Stasio, and P. Mazzocco, “Content of αS1-casein and coagulation properties in goat milk,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Vassal, A. Delacroix-Buchet, and J. Bouillon, “Influence des variants AA, EE et FF de la caséine αS1 sur le rendement fromager et les caractéristiques sensorielles des fromages traditionnels: prèmieres observations,” Le Lait, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 89–103, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  34. F. Caravaca, J. L. Ares, J. Carrizosa et al., “Effects of αs1-casein (CSN1S1) and κ-casein (CSN3) genotypes on milk coagulation properties in Murciano-Granadina goats,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Ramunno, E. Longobardi, M. Pappalardo et al., “An allele associated with a non-detectable amount of αS2-casein in goat milk,” Animal Genetics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. F. Mahé and F. Grosclaude, “Polymorphism of β-casein in the Creole goat of Guadeloupe, evidence for a null allele,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 403–408, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  37. M. H. Yahyaoui, A. Angiolillo, F. Pilla, A. Sanchez, and J. M. Folch, “Characterization and genotyping of the caprine κ-casein variants,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 2715–2720, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. O. C. Jann, E. Prinzenberg, G. Luikart, A. Caroli, and G. Erhardt, “High polymorphism in the κ-casein (CSN3) gene from wild and domestic caprine species revealed by DNA sequencing,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 188–195, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E.-M. Prinzenberg, K. Gutscher, S. Chessa, A. Caroli, and G. Erhardt, “Caprine κ-casein (CSN3) polymorphism: new developments in molecular knowledge,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1490–1498, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. Caravaca, J. Carrizosa, B. Urrutia et al., “Short communication: Effect of αS1-casein (CSN1S1) and κ-casein (CSN3) genotypes on milk composition in Murciano-Granadina goats,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 2960–2964, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. F. Chiatti, S. Chessa, P. Bolla, G. Cigalino, A. Caroli, and G. Pagnacco, “Effect of k-casein polymorphism on milk composition in the Orobica goat,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1962–1966, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. B. Hayes, N. Hagesæther, T. Ådnøy, G. Pellerud, P. R. Berg, and S. Lien, “Effects on production traits of haplotypes among casein genes in Norwegian goats and evidence for a site of preferential recombination,” Genetics, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 455–464, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Pazzola, M. L. Dettori, E. Pira, A. Noce, P. Paschino, and G. M. Vacca, “Effect of polymorphisms at the casein gene cluster on milk renneting properties of the Sarda goat,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 117, no. 2-3, pp. 124–130, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  44. G. C. B. Schopen, P. D. Koks, J. A. M. van Arendonk, H. Bovenhuis, and M. H. P. W. Visker, “Whole genome scan to detect quantitative trait loci for bovine milk protein composition,” Animal Genetics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 524–537, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. Badaoui, J. M. Serradilla, A. Tomàs et al., “Goat acetyl-coenzyme a carboxylase a: molecular characterization, polymorphism, and association with milk traits,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 1039–1043, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. Federica, N. Francesco, D. M. Giovanna et al., “Identification of novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in promoter III of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase-α gene in goats affecting milk production traits,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 386–389, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. P. Crepaldi, L. Nicoloso, B. Coizet et al., “Associations of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase α, Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase, and lipoprotein lipase genes with dairy traits in Alpine goats,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1856–1864, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Y. Qu, Y. Liu, L. Ma et al., “Novel SNPs of butyrophilin (BTN1A1) and milk fat globule epidermal growth factor (EGF) 8 (MFG-E8) are associated with milk traits in dairy goat,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 371–377, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. X. An, J. Hou, H. Zhao et al., “Mutations in caprine DGAT1 and STAT5A genes were associated with milk production traits,” Engineering, vol. 4, no. 10B, pp. 30–34, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  50. X. P. An, S. G. Song, J. X. Hou et al., “Polymorphism identification in goat DGAT2 gene and association analysis with milk yield and fat percentage,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 100, no. 2-3, pp. 107–112, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. E. Malveiro, M. Pereira, P. X. Marques et al., “Polymorphisms at the five exons of the growth hormone gene in the algarvia goat: possible association with milk traits,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 163–170, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. L. Dettori, A. M. Rocchigiani, S. Luridiana et al., “Growth hormone gene variability and its effects on milk traits in primiparous Sarda goats,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 255–262, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Zidi, V. M. Fernández-Cabanás, J. Carrizosa et al., “Genetic variation at the goat hormone-sensitive lipase (LIPE) gene and its association with milk yield and composition,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 190–198, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. Badaoui, J. M. Serradilla, A. Tomàs et al., “Short communication: identification of two polymorphisms in the goat lipoprotein lipase gene and their association with milk production traits,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 3012–3017, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. Zidi, J. M. Serradilla, J. Jordana et al., “Association analysis between goat malic enzyme 1 (ME1) genotype and dairy traits,” Animal, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1953–1957, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. H. Zhao, X. Wu, H. Cai et al., “Genetic variants and effects on milk traits of the caprine paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene in dairy goats,” Gene, vol. 532, no. 2, pp. 203–210, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  57. C. Daga, M. Paludo, S. Luridiana et al., “Identification of novel SNPs in the Sarda breed goats POU1F1 gene and their association with milk productive performance,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 2829–2835, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Zidi, J. M. Serradilla, J. Jordana et al., “Pleiotropic effects of the goat prolactin receptor genotype on milk fatty acid composition,” Domestic Animal Endocrinology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 85–89, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. Zidi, V. M. Fernández-Cabanás, B. Urrutia et al., “Association between the polymorphism of the goat stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) gene and milk fatty acid composition in Murciano-Granadina goats,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 4332–4339, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. H. Jiang and X. Ge, “Meat science and muscle biology symposium-mechanism of growth hormone stimulation of skeletal muscle growth in cattle,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  61. P. Schlee, R. Graml, E. Schallenberger et al., “Growth hormone and insulin like growth factor I concentrations in bulls of various growth hormone genotypes,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 88, no. 3-4, pp. 497–500, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. K. Tatsuda, A. Oka, E. Iwamoto et al., “Relationship of the bovine growth hormone gene to carcass traits in Japanese black cattle,” Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. X. P. An, J. X. Hou, L. X. Wang et al., “Novel polymorphisms of the growth hormone gene and their effect on growth traits in Chinese goats,” Meat Science, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 758–763, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. Q. J. Jin, J. J. Sun, X. T. Fang et al., “Molecular characterization and polymorphisms of the caprine Somatostatin (SST) and SST Receptor 1 (SSTR1) genes that are linked with growth traits,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 3129–3135, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. G. H. Hua, S. L. Chen, J. N. Yu et al., “Polymorphism of the growth hormone gene and its association with growth traits in Boer goat bucks,” Meat Science, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 391–395, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. Q. Jin, X. T. Fang, L. Yang et al., “Novel SNPs of the caprine growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHDR) gene and their association with growth traits in goats,” Biochemical Genetics, vol. 48, no. 9-10, pp. 847–856, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. R. H. S. Bellinge, D. A. Liberles, S. P. A. Iaschi, P. A. O'Brien, and G. K. Tay, “Myostatin and its implications on animal breeding: a review,” Animal Genetics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. L. Grobet, L. J. R. Martin, D. Poncelet et al., “A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle,” Nature Genetics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. C. Zhang, Y. Liu, D. Xu et al., “Polymorphisms of myostatin gene (MSTN) in four goat breeds and their effects on Boer goat growth performance,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3081–3087, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. X. Fang, J. Zhang, H. Xu et al., “Polymorphisms of diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 gene and their relationship with growth traits in goats,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1801–1807, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. X. Chu, L. Lu, T. Feng et al., “Polymorphism of bone morphogenetic protein 4 gene and its relationship with litter size of Jining Grey goats,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 4315–4320, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. P. Q. Wang, L. M. Deng, B. Y. Zhang, M. X. Chu, and J. Z. Hou, “Polymorphisms of the cocaine-amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) gene and their association with reproductive traits in chinese goats,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 731–738, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. T. Feng, C. X. Geng, X. Z. Lang et al., “Polymorphisms of caprine GDF9 gene and their association with litter size in Jining Grey goats,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 5189–5197, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. X. P. An, J. X. Hou, H. B. Zhao et al., “Polymorphism identification in goat GNRH1 and GDF9 genes and their association analysis with litter size,” Animal Genetics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 234–238, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. J. Hou, X. An, G. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Song, and B. Cao, “Exploring polymorphisms and their effects on reproductive traits of the INHA and INHβA genes in three goat breeds,” Animal Science Journal, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 273–278, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. G. L. Cao, M. X. Chu, L. Fang, R. Di, T. Feng, and N. Li, “Analysis on DNA sequence of KiSS-1 gene and its association with litter size in goats,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 3921–3929, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. G. L. Cao, M. X. Chu, L. Fang, T. Feng, R. Di, and N. Li, “Analysis on DNA sequence of GPR54 gene and its association with litter size in goats,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 3839–3848, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. X. An, T. Ma, J. Hou et al., “Association analysis between variants in KISS1 gene and litter size in goats,” BMC Genetics, vol. 14, article 63, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. X. P. An, J. X. Hou, G. Li et al., “Polymorphism identification in the goat KITLG gene and association analysis with litter size,” Animal Genetics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 104–107, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. T. Feng, M. X. Chu, G. L. Cao et al., “Polymorphisms of caprine POU1F1 gene and their association with litter size in Jining Grey goats,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 4029–4038, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. D. W. Huang, J. X. Wang, Q. Y. Liu et al., “Analysis on DNA sequence of TSHB gene and its association with reproductive seasonality in goats,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1893–1904, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. E. Bourdelle, “Hermaphroditisme complexe des voies génitales et apparence masculine chez un bouc,” Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire, vol. 11, pp. 682–688, 1903. View at Google Scholar
  83. E. Pailhoux, B. Vigier, D. Vaiman et al., “Contribution of domestic animals to the identification of new genes involved in sex determination,” Journal of Experimental Zoology, vol. 290, no. 7, pp. 700–708, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. A. Abdell, “The genetic sex of intersexual goats and a probable linkage with the gene for hornlessness,” Science, vol. 99, no. 2563, p. 124, 1944. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. L. Schibler, E. P. Cribiu, A. Oustry-Vaiman, J. Furet, and D. Vaiman, “Fine mapping suggests that the goat Polled Intersex Syndrome and the human Blephorophimosis Ptosis Epicanthus Syndrome map to a 100-kb homologous region,” Genome Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–318, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. E. Pailhoux, B. Vigier, S. Chaffaux et al., “A 11.7-kb deletion triggers intersexuality and polledness in goats,” Nature Genetics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 453–458, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. E. Pailhoux, B. Vigier, L. Schibler, E. P. Cribiu, C. Cotinot, and D. Vaiman, “Positional cloning of the PIS mutation in goats and its impact on understanding mammalian sex-differentiation,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 37, supplement 1, pp. S55–S64, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. D. P. Sponenberg and C. LaMarsh, “Dominant and recessive brown in goats,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. R. A. Sturm, R. D. Teasdale, and N. F. Box, “Human pigmentation genes: identification, structure and consequences of polymorphic variation,” Gene, vol. 277, no. 1-2, pp. 49–62, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. J. V. Schaffer and J. L. Bolognia, “The melanocortin-1 receptor: red hair and beyond,” Archives of Dermatology, vol. 137, no. 11, pp. 1477–1485, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. H. Klungland, D. I. Vage, L. Gomez Raya, S. Adalsteinsson, and S. Lien, “The role of melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) receptor in bovine coat color determination,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 636–639, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. H. Joerg, H. R. Fries, E. Meijerink, and G. F. Stranzinger, “Red coat color in Holstein cattle is associated with a deletion in the MSHR gene,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 317–318, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. M. Switonski, M. Mankowska, and S. Salamon, “Family of melanocortin receptor (MCR) genes in mammals-mutations, polymorphisms and phenotypic effects,” Journal of Applied Genetics, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 461–472, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  94. D. I. Våge, H. Klungland, L. Dongsi, and R. D. Cone, “Molecular and pharmacological characterization of dominant black coat color in sheep,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. L. Fontanesi, F. Beretti, V. Riggio et al., “Missense and nonsense mutations in melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene of different goat breeds: association with red and black coat colour phenotypes but with unexpected evidences,” BMC Genetics, vol. 10, article 47, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. S. Adalsteinsson, D. P. Sponenberg, S. Alexieva, and A. J. F. Russel, “Inheritance of goat coat colors,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 267–272, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. L. Fontanesi, F. Beretti, V. Riggio et al., “Copy number variation and missense mutations of the agouti signaling protein (ASIP) gene in goat breeds with different coat colors,” Cytogenetic and Genome Research, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 333–347, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. B. Badaoui, M. D'Andrea, F. Pilla et al., “Polymorphism of the goat agouti signaling protein gene and its relationship with coat color in Italian and Spanish breeds,” Biochemical Genetics, vol. 49, no. 7-8, pp. 523–532, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. B. Badaoui, A. Manunza, M. D'Andrea et al., “Identification of c.483C > T polymorphism in the caprine tyrosinase-related protein 1(TYRP1) gene,” Italian Journal of Animal Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. M. A. Adefenwa, S. O. Peters, B. O. Agaviezor et al., “Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the agouti signaling protein (ASIP) gene in some goat breeds in tropical and temperate climates,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 4447–4457, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. B. J. Norris and V. A. Whan, “A gene duplication affecting expression of the ovine ASIP gene is responsible for white and black sheep,” Genome Research, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1282–1293, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. S. C. Bishop and C. A. Morris, “Genetics of disease resistance in sheep and goats,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 48–59, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. Y. Dong, M. Xie, Y. Jiang et al., “Sequencing and automated whole-genome optical mapping of the genome of a domestic goat (Capra hircus),” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 135–141, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. A. Zidi, A. Sànchez, G. Obexer-Ruff, and M. Amills, “Sequence analysis of goat major histocompatibility complex class I genes,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 814–817, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. F.-. Schwaiger, E. Weyers, C. Epplen et al., “The paradox of MHC-DRB exon/intron evolution: α-helix and β-sheet encoding regions diverge while hypervariable intronic simple repeats coevolve with β-sheet codons,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 260–272, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. F. W. Schwaiger, E. Weyers, J. Buitkamp, A. J. Ede, A. Crawford, and J. T. Epplen, “Interdependent MHC-DRB exon-plus-intron evolution in artiodactyls,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 239–249, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. T. Takada, Y. Kikkawa, H. Yonekawa, and T. Amano, “Analysis of goat MHC class II DRA and DRB genes: identification of the expressed gene and new DRB alleles,” Immunogenetics, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 408–412, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. M. Amills, C. Sulas, A. Sànchez, G. Bertoni, R. Zanoni, and G. Obexer-Ruff, “Structural characterization of the caprine major histocompatibility complex class II DQB1 (Cahi-DQB1) gene,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 843–846, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. M. Amills, C. Sulas, A. Sànchez, G. Bertoni, R. Zanoni, and G. Obexer-Ruff, “Nucleotide sequence and polymorphism of the caprine major histocompatibility complex class II DQA1 (Cahi-DQA1) gene,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 375–379, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. M. Amills, O. Francino, and A. Sánchez, “Nested PCR allows the characterization of TaqI and PstI RFLPs in the second exon of the caprine MHC class II DRB gene,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 48, no. 3-4, pp. 313–321, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. M. Amills, V. Ramiya, J. Norimine, and H. A. Lewin, “The major histocompatibility complex of ruminants,” Revue Scientifique et Technique, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108–120, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. G. Ruff, J. G. Regli, and S. Lazary, “Occurrence of caprine leucocyte class I and II antigens in Saanen goats affected by caprine arthritis (CAE),” European Journal of Immunogenetics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 285–288, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. G. Ruff, J. C. Maillard, E. Camus, E. Depres, and G. Matheron, “Occurrence of caprine leucocyte antigens (CLA) in Creole goats susceptible/resistant to heartwater.,” Revue d'Elevage et de Medecine Veterinaire des Pays Tropicaux, vol. 46, no. 1-2, pp. 205–207, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. E. Camus, J. C. Maillard, G. Ruff, L. Pepin, M. Naves, and G. Matheron, “Genetic resistance of Creole goats to cowdriosis in Guadeloupe. Status in 1995,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 791, pp. 46–53, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. G. Obexer-Ruff, U. Sattler, D. Martinez et al., “Association studies using random and “candidate” microsatellite loci in two infectious goat diseases,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 35, supplement 1, pp. S113–S119, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. P. K. Singh, S. V. Singh, M. K. Singh et al., “Effect of genetic variation in the MHC class II DRB region on resistance and susceptibility to Johne's disease in endangered Indian Jamunapari goats,” International Journal of Immunogenetics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 314–320, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. J. R. Leipprandt, S. A. Kraemer, B. E. Haithcock et al., “Caprine β-mannosidase: sequencing and characterization of the cDNA and identification of the molecular defect of caprine β-mannosidosis,” Genomics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. G. J. M. Veenboer and J. J. M. De Vijlder, “Molecular basis of the thyroglobulin synthesis defect in Dutch goats,” Endocrinology, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 377–381, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. K. T. Cavanagh, J. R. Leipprandt, M. Z. Jones, and K. Friderici, “Molecular defect of caprine N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulphatase deficiency. A single base substitution creates a stop codon in the 5'-region of the coding sequence,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 18, no. 1, article 96, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. C. L. Beck, C. Fahlke, and A. L. George Jr., “Molecular basis for decreased muscle chloride conductance in the myotonic goat,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 20, pp. 11248–11252, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. E. M. Ibeagha-Awemu, P. Kgwatalala, A. E. Ibeagha, and X. Zhao, “A critical analysis of disease-associated DNA polymorphisms in the genes of cattle, goat, sheep, and pig,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 226–245, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. A. Aguzzi, M. Nuvolone, and C. Zhu, “The immunobiology of prion diseases,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 888–902, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  123. I. Poggiolini, D. Saverioni, and P. Parchi, “Prion protein misfolding, strains, and neurotoxicity: an update from studies on mammalian prions,” International Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 2013, Article ID 910314, 24 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  124. J. N. Arsac, O. Andreoletti, J. M. Bilheude, C. Lacroux, S. L. Benestad, and T. Baron, “Similar biochemical signatures and prion protein genotypes in atypical scrapie and Nor98 cases, France and Norway,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 58–65, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. W. Goldmann, “PrP genetics in ruminant transmissible spongiform encephalopathies,” Veterinary Research, vol. 39, no. 4, article 30, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. G. Vaccari, C. H. Panagiotidis, C. Acin et al., “State-of-the-art review of goat TSE in the European Union, with special emphasis on PRNP genetics and epidemiology,” Veterinary Research, vol. 40, no. 5, p. 48, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. W. Goldmann, K. Ryan, P. Stewart et al., “Caprine prion gene polymorphisms are associated with decreased incidence of classical scrapie in goat herds in the United Kingdom,” Veterinary Research, vol. 42, no. 1, article 110, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. P. Cremonesi, R. Capoferri, G. Pisoni et al., “Response of the goat mammary gland to infection with Staphylococcus aureus revealed by gene expression profiling in milk somatic and white blood cells,” BMC Genomics, vol. 13, article 540, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. L. Fontanesi, P. L. Martelli, F. Beretti et al., “An initial comparative map of copy number variations in the goat (Capra hircus) genome,” BMC Genomics, vol. 11, no. 1, article 639, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. R. Geng, C. Yuan, and Y. Chen, “Exploring differentially expressed genes by RNA-Seq in Cashmere goat (Capra hircus) skin during hair follicle development and cycling,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e62704, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. U. Sharma, P. Banerjee, J. Joshi, and R. K. Vijh, “Identification of SNPs in goats (Capra hircus) using RNA-Seq analysis,” International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 272–283, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  132. Z. Ji, G. Wang, Z. Xie et al., “Identification of novel and differentially expressed microRNAs of dairy goat mammary gland tissues using Solexa sequencing and bioinformatics,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e49463, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. Z. Li, X. Lan, W. Guo et al., “Comparative transcriptome profiling of dairy goat microRNAs from dry period and peak lactation mammary gland tissues,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e52388, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. F. Dong, Z. B. Ji, C. X. Chen, G. Z. Wang, and J. M. Wang, “Target gene and function prediction of differentially expressed microRNAs in lactating mammary glands of dairy goats,” International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2013, Article ID 917342, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. X. Lin, J. Luo, L. Zhang, W. Wang, and D. Gou, “MiR-103 controls milk fat accumulation in goat (Capra hircus) mammary gland during lactation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79258, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. J. Wu, H. Zhu, W. Song et al., “Identification of conservative microRNAs in Saanen dairy goat testis through deep sequencing,” Reproduction in Domestic Animals, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. C. Yuan, X. Wang, R. Geng, X. He, L. Qu, and Y. Chen, “Discovery of cashmere goat (Capra hircus) microRNAs in skin and hair follicles by Solexa sequencing,” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 1, article 511, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. G. Tosser-Klopp, P. Bardou, O. Bouchez et al., “Design and characterization of a 52K SNP chip for goats,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e86227, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  139. J. W. Kijas, J. S. Ortiz, R. McCulloch et al., “Genetic diversity and investigation of polledness in divergent goat populations using 52 088 SNPs,” Animal Genetics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 325–335, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. R. Negrini, P. Crepaldi, and Italian Goat Consortium, “Progress in genomic analysis of Italian goat population,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Plant & Animal Genome, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2012.
  141. A. Clop, O. Vidal, and M. Amills, “Copy number variation in the genomes of domestic animals,” Animal Genetics, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 503–517, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. J. K. Pritchard and A. Di Rienzo, “Adaptation—not by sweeps alone,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 665–667, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus