Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Volume 2015, Article ID 837585, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/837585
Research Article

A QCT-Based Nonsegmentation Finite Element Head Model for Studying Traumatic Brain Injury

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6

Received 30 September 2014; Revised 17 January 2015; Accepted 17 January 2015

Academic Editor: Laurence Cheze

Copyright © 2015 Zhaoyang Liang and Yunhua Luo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Goldsmith, “The state of head injury biomechanics: past, present, and future. Part 1,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 29, no. 5-6, pp. 441–600, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Kleiven, “Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure,” International Journal of Crashworthiness, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65–79, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Luo, Q. Zhang, and M. R. Del Bigio, “Recent progress in application of FEM in study of non-penetrating brain injuries,” Advances in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, vol. 1, pp. 225–240, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. S. Ruan, T. Khalil, and A. I. King, “Human head dynamic response to side impact by finite element modeling,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 276–283, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Voo, S. Kumaresan, F. A. Pintar, N. Yoganandan, and A. Sances Jr., “Finite-element models of the human head,” Medical & Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 375–381, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Willinger, H.-S. Kang, and B. Diaw, “Three-dimensional human head finite-element model validation against two experimental impacts,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 403–410, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. El Sayed, A. Mota, F. Fraternali, and M. Ortiz, “Biomechanics of traumatic brain injury,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 197, no. 51-52, pp. 4692–4701, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Luo, Z. Li, and H. Chen, “Finite-element study of cerebrospinal fluid in mitigating closed head injuries,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 226, no. 7, pp. 499–509, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Helgason, E. Perilli, E. Schileo, F. Taddei, S. Brynjólfsson, and M. Viceconti, “Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review,” Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. E. Adams, “Quantitative computed tomography,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 415–424, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Materialise, “Biomedical solutions for engineering on anatomy,” 2012, http://biomedical.materialise.com/mimics.
  12. Simpleware, “The fast, easy and robust way to convert 3d images into models,” 2012, http://www.simpleware.com/.
  13. W. Goldsmith and K. L. Monson, “The state of head injury biomechanics: past, present, and future. Part 2: physical experimentation,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 105–207, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Schileo, E. Dall'Ara, F. Taddei et al., “An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 2483–2491, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. C. P. Du Plessis, C. A. Willemse, M. G. Lötter, and L. Goedhals, “The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients,” Medical Physics, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1195–1201, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. Schneider, T. Bortfeld, and W. Schlegel, “Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 459–478, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. M. Nahum, R. W. Smith, and C. C. Ward, “Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact,” in Proceedings of the 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 770922, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1977.
  18. Y. Chen and M. Ostoja-Starzewski, “MRI-based finite element modeling of head trauma: spherically focusing shear waves,” Acta Mechanica, vol. 213, no. 1-2, pp. 155–167, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus