Research Article
In Vivo Assessment of Elasticity of Child Rib Cortical Bone Using Quantitative Computed Tomography
Table 3
Estimated Young’s modulus of child ribs from quantitative computed tomography along the rib.
| Group | | Age (year) | E1 | Eposterior2 | Elateral3 | Eanterior4 |
| 1 | Mean | 0.9 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 8.0 | 6.5 | SD | 0.2 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 2.6 |
| 2 | Mean | 1.8 | 7.6 | 6.2 | 8.7 | 7.9 | SD | 0.4 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| 3 | Mean | 3.1 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 8.0 | 6.6 | SD | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| 4 | Mean | 6.9 | 10.0 | 8.2 | 11.2 | 9.6 | SD | 0.3 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 3.0 |
| 5 | Mean | 10.1 | 10.8 | 10.9 | 11.5 | 9.8 | SD | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.8 |
| 6 | Mean | 13.9 | 12.6 | 11.7 | 14.4 | 11.2 | SD | 0.7 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 2.1 |
| 7 | Mean | 17.8 | 11.6 | 9.3 | 13.0 | 11.3 | SD | 1.1 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 1.6 |
|
|
1Global: slices 5%–95%; 2posterior: slices 5%–25%; 3lateral: slices 35%–65%; 4anterior: slices 75%–95%.
|