Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Volume 2017, Article ID 8315972, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8315972
Research Article

Bionic Design for Reducing Adhesive Resistance of the Ridger Inspired by a Boar’s Head

1Key Laboratory for Bionics Engineering of Education Ministry, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
2University of Mpumalanga, Private Bag X11283, Mbombela 1200, South Africa

Correspondence should be addressed to Meng Zou; nc.ude.ulj@gnemuoz

Received 18 July 2016; Revised 3 April 2017; Accepted 30 April 2017; Published 3 July 2017

Academic Editor: Andrea Cereatti

Copyright © 2017 Jianqiao Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Gebregziabher, A. M. Mouazen, H. V. Brussel, H. Ramon, J. Nyssen, and H. Verplancke, “Animal drawn tillage, the Ethiopian ard plough, maresha: a review,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 89, pp. 129–143, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. P. Mitchell, L. M. Carter, D. C. Reicosky, A. Shrestha, and G. S. Pettygrove, “A history of tillage in California’s Central Valley,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 157, pp. 52–64, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Q. Ren, J. Tong, and J. Q. Li, “Soil adhesion and biomimetics of soil-engaging components: a review,” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 239–263, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  4. L. Q. Ren, Z. W. Han, J. Q. Li, and J. Tong, “Experimental investigation of bionic rough curved soil cutting blade surface to reduce soil adhesion and friction,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 85, pp. 1–12, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Q. Ren, “Bionic research on anti-adhesion and anti-resistance of terrain machine,” Journal of Science China: Technological Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 1353–1364, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Soni, V. M. Salokhe, and H. Nakashima, “Modification of a mouldboard plough surface using arrays of polyethylene protuberances,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 44, pp. 411–422, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. M. Salokhe and P. Soni, “Physics of soil-tool adhesion: a review of principles involved in reducing adhesive forces,” Book Review of Current Problems in Agrophysics, Institute of Agrophysics PAS, Lublin, Poland, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Ibrahmi, H. Bentaher, E. Hamza, A. Maalej, and A. M. Mouazen, “Study the effect of tool geometry and operational conditions on mouldboard plough forces and energy requirement: part 2. Experimental validation with soil bin test,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 117, pp. 268–275, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Mckyes and J. Maswaure, “Effect of design parameters of flat tillage tools on loosening of a clay soil,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 43, pp. 195–204, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. You, D. Wang, and J. Liu, “A device for mechanical remediation of degraded grasslands,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 118, pp. 1–10, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Gebresenbet, E. Zerbini, A. Astatke, and P. Kaumbutho, “Optimization of animal drawn tillage implements systems: part 2, development of a reversible plough and a ridger,” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 299–310, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. L. Q. Ren, Y. P. Wang, and J. Q. Li, “Flexible unsmoothed cuticles of soil animals and their characteristics of reducing adhesion and resistance,” Chinese Science Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 166–169, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. Q. Cong, L. Q. Ren, and B. C. Chen, “Using characteristics of burrowing animals to reduce soil-tool adhesion,” Transactions-American Society of Agricultural Engineers, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1549–1556, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Xu, M. X. Lin, J. Q. Li, Z. L. Wang, and B. Chirende, “Three-dimensional geometrical modelling of wild boar head by reverse engineering technology,” Journal of Bionic Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 85–90, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. N. Postolache, M. M. Ciobanu, and P. C. Boișteanu, “Selected biometric characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa Ferus) in North-East Romania,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 137-138, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  16. S. B. Erika, J. András, and B. Károly, “Measurement on the body size of the wild boar in game farms,” Scientific Papers-Animal Science Series: Lucrări Ştiinţifice - Seria Zootehnie, vol. 63, pp. 3–8, 2015. View at Google Scholar