Research Article

Cell Colonization Ability of a Commercialized Large Porous Alveolar Scaffold

Table 1

Various scaffolds and protocols used for the in vitro development of tissue-engineered bone scaffolds.

Ref.CellScaffoldProtocolObservation

[14]Rat MSC60% HAP, 40% β-TCP
Porosity 90%
Cylinders ( mm, mm)
Seeding: suction
Culture: static versus fluid flow
Poor mechanical properties
[11]Human MSCHAP
Porosity 80%
Cylinders ( mm, mm)
Seeding: static versus fluid flow
Culture: static
Homogeneity
(i) After 3 days ≤ 40%
(ii) After 14 days ≤ 70%
[16]Fluorescent particlesPCL
Porosity 90%
Parallelepipeds ( mm, mm)
Seeding: static with acoustic wavesHomogeneous repartition in the first 3 mm, then gradient of particle concentration
[12]Ovine MSCβ-TCP porosity not given
Tubes ( mm, Di = 3 mm, De = 14 mm)
Seeding: suction
Culture: fluid flow
Gradient of cell concentration from the center towards the outside of the tube
[13]MC3T31Polystyrene foam
Porosity 95%
Cylinders ( mm, mm)
Seeding: static versus fluid flowFew cells actually seeded on the scaffold
Homogeneity: 40% (static) to 80% (fluid flow)
[15]MG632PLA
Porosity 95.7%
Cylinders ( mm, mm)
Seeding: fluid flowHomogeneity ≤ 50%
Poor mechanical properties
[9]MC3T3HAP
Macroscopic canals
Cylinders ( mm, mm)
Culture: static versus fluid flowStatic: peripheral cellular colonization only
Fluid flow: volumic colonization
[10]Immortalized MSCPDLLA-dimethacrylate
Porosity 67%
Cylinders ( mm, mm)
Culture: static versus fluid flowComparison between alveolar and gyroïd structures: better cell homogeneity for the latter

A more detailed review can be found in [31]. h: height; D: diameter; Di: internal diameter; De: external diameter; S: section. 1MC3T3: immortalized mouse osteoblastic precursors; 2MG63: human osteoblastic cells from an osteosarcoma.