Research Article

Feasibility of Neurorehabilitation Using a Hybrid Assistive Limb for Patients Who Underwent Spine Surgery

Table 2

Review of reports of several postoperative spinal diseases.

DiagnosisAuthor, yearSample size, (sex)Age (years) (mean)Follow-up (mean)Outcome measuresPresenting symptomsRehabilitation programLong-term results after surgical treatment

Arachnoid cystBond et al., 2012 [31]31 (M 14; F 17)1–17 (8.1)13 days to 12.6 years (4.4 years)Categorized as complete remission, improvement, stable, or worsePain: 13 cases
Lower extremity weakness: 12 cases
Gait instability: 10 cases
Spasticity: 6 cases
Sensory loss: 3 cases
Bladder dysfunction: 2 cases
N/A21 patients had complete remission of symptoms
6 patients had symptom improvement
3 patients were stable
1 patient had worsened symptoms

Dural AVFBehrens and Thron, 1999 [30]21 (M 18; F 3)33–75 (57.0)5 months to 11 years (50 months)Muscle strengthFlaccid: 9 patients
Spastic: 12 patients
N/AImproved: 67%; unchanged: 19%; deteriorated: 14%
Walking distanceWheelchair: 7 patientsN/AImproved: 57%; unchanged: 29%; deteriorated: 14%
Sensory lossSensory disturbance: 18 patientsN/AImproved: 38%; unchanged: 62%
PainNo patientN/AImproved: 5%; unchanged: 71%; deteriorated: 24%
BI (score)70.5 ± 20.43 (range 20–95)N/A85.75 ± 13.81 (range 50–100)
Van Dijk et al., 2002 [32]49 (M 39; F 10)28–78 (63)12 days to 9.9 years (32.9 months)Aminoff score of disabilityThe median gait score was 3
The median bladder score was 3
N/AThe median gait score was 2
The median gait score was 2

Cervical OPLLOnari et al., 2001 [33]30 (M 22; F 8)34–61 (51.3)10–23 years (14.7 years)Okamoto’s classification for the degree of walking disabilityGrade a: no patient
Grade b: 9 patients
Grade c: 18 patients
Grade d: 3 patients
N/AImprovement: 2 grades in 16 patients
Improvement: 1 grade in 8 patients
Ambulatory deterioration in 6 patients
Iwasaki et al., 2002 [34]64 (M 43; F 21)42–78 (56)10–16 years (12.2 years)JOA scoring system for cervical myelopathyThe mean preoperative total JOA score was 8.9
UE motor score: 2.5 ± 1.0
LE motor score: 2.2 ± 0.9
Sensory score: 2.2 ± 1.7
Bladder score: 2.2 ± 0.8
N/AThe mean last follow-up total JOA score was 13.8
UE motor score: 3.5 ± 0.8
LE motor score: 2.9 ± 1.1
Sensory score: 4.6 ± 1.4
Bladder score: 2.7 ± 0.5

Spinal lipomaLee et al., 1995 [35]6 (M 3; F 3)8–45 (27)12–96 months (53.8 months)Clinical and functional classification schemeGrade I: no patient
Grade II: 3 patients
Grade III: 3 patients
Grade IV: no patient
N/AGrade І: 1 patient
Grade II: 2 patients
Grade III: 2 patients
Grade IV: 1 patient

Cervical spondylosisWang et al., 2004 [36]204 (M 145; F 59)36–92 (63)16 monthsNurick score for myelopathyScore 0: 6 patients
Score 1: 56 patients
Score 2: 71 patients
Score 3: 28 patients
Score 4: 24 patients
Score 5: 19 patients
N/AScore 0: 64 patients
Score 1: 72 patients
Score 2: 31 patients
Score 3: 10 patients
Score 4: 19 patients
Score 5: 8 patients
Singh et al., 2009 [37]50 (M 36; F 14)56.7 ± 13.73 years30-m walking test (sec)53.6 ± 10.3N/A38.6 ± 6.9
Kadaňka et al., 2011 [38]64 (M, 46; F, 18)12 years10-m walking test (sec)N/A
Without surgery: Without surgery: 47–65 (54.5)12 years10-m walking test (sec)7.0 (5.3; 10.7)N/A7.1 (5.1; 12.5)
With surgery: With surgery: 41–65 (51.0)12 years10-m walking test (sec)8.0 (5.0; 29.8)N/A7.3 (5.1; 25.7)

Spinal ependymomaLi et al., 2013 [39]38 (M 19; F 19)11–60 (35.3)1 yearModified McCormick classificationGrade I: 18 patients
Grade II: 11 patients
Grade III: 9 patients
Grade IV: 0 patient
N/AGrade I: 15 patients
Grade II: 14 patients
Grade III: 7 patients
Grade IV: 2 patients
Kaner et al., 2010 [40]21 (M, 13; F, 8)17–57 (34)12–168 months (54 months)Modified McCormick classificationGrade I: 11 patients
Grade II: 5 patients
Grade III: 3 patients
Grade IV: 2 patients
They performed rehabilitation from an early postoperative day, but the content and method were not described at allGrade I: 20 patients
Grade II: 1 patient
Grade III: 0 patient
Grade IV: 0 patient


M = male; F = female; N/A = not available; AVF = arteriovenous fistula; BI = Barthel Index; OPLL = ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; UE = upper extremity; LE = lower extremity; the mean ± the standard deviation. Aminoff score of disability (classification of gait disturbance: grade 1: leg weakness or abnormal gait and no restricted activity; grade 2: grade 1 with restricted activity; grade 3: requiring 1 stick or similar support for walking; grade 4: requiring 2 sticks or crutches for walking; and grade 5: unable to stand and confined to bed or wheelchair. Classification of micturition: grade 1: hesitance, urgency, or frequency; grade 2: occasional urinary incontinence or retention; and grade 3: total urinary incontinence or retention). Okamoto’s classification for the degree of walking disability (a: impossible to walk; b: walk with aids; c: independent walk with spasm; d: walk with difficulty, with or without spasm; e: walk easily but difficult to walk continuously; and f: normal or almost normal walking). JOA scoring system for cervical myelopathy (motor function of fingers, shoulder and elbow, and lower extremity; sensory function of upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity; and bladder function. Total score for a healthy patient = 17. Normal score of UE motor: 4, LE motor: 4, sensory: 6, and bladder: 3). Clinical and functional classification scheme (grade I: neurologically normal, grade II: sensorimotor deficit affecting the function of the involved limb, grade III: more severe neurological deficit, and grade IV: severe deficit). Nurick score for myelopathy (0: root involvement but no evidence of spinal cord disease; 1: spinal cord disease but no difficulty in walking; 2: slight difficulty in walking, but still employable; 3: difficulty in walking preventing full-time work or housework but independent ambulation; 4: able to walk with assistance or a walker; and 5: chair-bound or bedridden). Median (5th–95th percentile range). Modified McCormick classification (grade I: neurologically normal, normal ambulation and professional activity, and minimal dysesthesia; grade II: mild motor and sensory deficit, independent function, and ambulation maintained; grade III: moderate sensorimotor deficit, restriction of function, and independent with an external aid; grade IV: severe sensorimotor deficit, restricted function, and dependent; and grade V: paraplegia and quadriplegia and even/flickering movement).