[Retracted] Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 3

Diagnostic performance of MD and MK for the included studies.

Included studies	MD						MK
	TP	FP	FN	TN	Sensitivity	Specificity	TP	FP	FN	TN	Sensitivity	Specificity
Liu et al. 2017	25	2	3	7	0.89	0.79	26	1	2	8	0.93	0.89
Chen et al. 2016	14	5	3	25	0.83	0.85	15	5	2	25	0.92	0.84
Wang et al. 2017	19	4	3	27	0.86	0.87	21	11	1	20	0.95	0.65
Lin et al. 2017	31	1	7	14	0.82	0.93	34	1	4	14	0.89	0.93
Gao et al. 2017	36	6	7	26	0.84	0.81	36	2	7	30	0.84	0.94
Li et al. 2018	24	8	6	26	0.80	0.77	25	5	5	29	0.83	0.85
Li et al. 2016	108	6	7	32	0.94	0.84	110	7	5	31	0.96	0.82
Nogueira et al. 2014	29	2	2	11	0.93	0.85	28	2	3	11	0.91	0.89
Sun et al. 2015	55	5	2	36	0.97	0.88	54	3	3	38	0.95	0.93
Wu et al. 2014	65	7	17	35	0.79	0.84	75	4	7	38	0.92	0.92
Li et al. 2018	38	16	9	43	0.81	0.73	38	10	9	49	0.81	0.83
Christou et al. 2017	31	1	3	18	0.91	0.94	33	1	1	18	0.97	0.94
Liu et al. 2019	35	9	7	21	0.83	0.70	35	5	7	25	0.83	0.83
Li et al. 2019	37	6	25	52	0.60	0.90	44	8	18	50	0.71	0.86

MK: mean kurtosis; MD: mean diffusion; TP: true-positive; FP: false-positive; TN: true-negative; FN: false-negative.