Table of Contents
Advances in Botany
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 476917, 9 pages
Review Article

Function and Regulation of the Plant COPT Family of High-Affinity Copper Transport Proteins

Departamento de Biotecnología, Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Avenida Agustín Escardino 7, Paterna, 46980 Valencia, Spain

Received 1 April 2014; Accepted 29 May 2014; Published 21 July 2014

Academic Editor: Tomotsugu Koyama

Copyright © 2014 Sergi Puig. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Copper (Cu) is an essential micronutrient for all eukaryotes because it participates as a redox active cofactor in multiple biological processes, including mitochondrial respiration, photosynthesis, oxidative stress protection, and iron (Fe) transport. In eukaryotic cells, Cu transport toward the cytoplasm is mediated by the conserved CTR/COPT family of high-affinity Cu transport proteins. This outlook paper reviews the contribution of our research group to the characterization of the function played by the Arabidopsis thaliana COPT1–6 family of proteins in plant Cu homeostasis. Our studies indicate that the different tissue specificity, Cu-regulated expression, and subcellular localization dictate COPT-specialized contribution to plant Cu transport and distribution. By characterizing lack-of-function Arabidopsis mutant lines, we conclude that COPT1 mediates root Cu acquisition, COPT6 facilitates shoot Cu distribution, and COPT5 mobilizes Cu from storage organelles. Furthermore, our work with copt2 mutant and COPT-overexpressing plants has also uncovered Cu connections with Fe homeostasis and the circadian clock, respectively. Future studies on the interaction between COPT transporters and other components of the Cu homeostasis network will improve our knowledge of plant Cu acquisition, distribution, regulation, and utilization by Cu-proteins.

1. Introduction

Copper (Cu) functions as a redox active cofactor in a wide variety of plant proteins including plastocyanin, cytochrome c oxidase, Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD), ethylene receptors, laccases, ascorbate and amine oxidases, plantacyanin, and polyphenol oxidases. Consequently, Cu is essential for fundamental biological processes in plants including photosynthesis, mitochondrial respiration, oxidative stress protection, cell wall metabolism, ethylene perception, response to pathogens, and molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis [13]. The optimal endogenous Cu levels in plants can substantially range depending on the species and its environmental availability. Adequate Cu levels in vegetative tissues are around 6 μg/g dry weight, with levels below 5 μg/g leading to deficiency symptoms [4]. Cu deficiency defects in plants include a general reduced growth rate, chlorosis, especially in young leaves, curling of leaf margins, damage at the apical meristem, defects in cell wall formation, and lignification, which causes insufficient water transport, defective pollen development and viability, limited fruit formation, and diminished seed production and viability [4]. Plant Cu availability also depends on soil composition, with organic soils being more likely to be Cu-deficient due to higher Cu-binding capacity [4]. In addition to the variable availability of Cu in the environment, plant Cu requirements also change daily given its participation in photosynthesis, during the development of green and reproductive tissues, and in response to other environmental cues.

Higher plants have developed sophisticated mechanisms to efficiently acquire and utilize Cu, especially when it is scarce. Cells from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana respond to Cu deficiency through a dual mechanism that consists in increasing Cu acquisition and optimizing its utilization (reviewed by [1, 2, 57]). In response to Cu limitation, Arabidopsis master Cu homeostasis regulator SPL7 (SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein-like 7), similar to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Crr1 transcription factor [8], activates the expression of multiple genes that contain within their promoter repetitive Cu-responsive elements (CuREs) with a GTAC motif as the essential core sequence [911]. Upon Cu limitation, SPL7 activates the expression of Cu2+-reductases (FRO4 and FRO5) and high-affinity Cu transporters (COPT1, COPT2, and COPT6) at the plasma membrane that mediate Cu+ transport to the cytoplasm [9, 10, 12, 13](see below). In addition to Cu acquisition, SPL7 triggers the expression of various microRNAs, denoted Cu-microRNAs, which promote the degradation of the transcripts encoding for dispensable Cu-utilizing proteins, including cytosolic Cu/Zn-SOD (CSD1), chloroplast stroma Cu/Zn-SOD (CSD2), several laccases, and plantacyanin [9, 1416]. To compensate for reduced Cu/Zn-SOD activity in chloroplasts, the SPL7 transcription factor also enhances the expression of plastid-localized Fe-SOD (FSD1) [9, 17, 18]. After entering the cytoplasm, Cu is delivered to specific Cu-containing proteins by specialized Cu chaperones. The major pathway for Cu supply to Cu/Zn-SOD utilizes the CCS1 Cu chaperone [1922], whereas ATX-like metallochaperones mediate Cu delivery to the Cu-proteins located on the secretory pathway or in plastids by interacting and transferring the cofactor to Cu-transporting P-type ATPases [23, 24]. RAN1 P-type ATPase pumps cytosolic Cu toward the secretory pathway for incorporation into Cu-proteins such as the ethylene receptor [25, 26]. PAA1 ATPase, which is located in the inner chloroplast envelope, mediates Cu transport from the cytoplasm to plastid stroma, and the thylakoid-located PAA2 facilitates final Cu delivery to plastocyanin into the thylakoid lumen [17, 27, 28]. Therefore upon Cu scarcity, cofactor delivery to multiple nonessential or replaceable Cu-consuming enzymes is reduced to prioritize the utilization of Cu in essential Cu-dependent processes such as photosynthetic electron transport [28, 29].

Numerous studies on yeasts, mammals, insects, algae, and plants have revealed that eukaryotes utilize the conserved CTR/COPT family of proteins to facilitate high-affinity (μM) cellular Cu acquisition at the plasma membrane and Cu mobilization from intracellular storage organelles, when Cu bioavailability decreases [3035]. CTR/COPT proteins are highly specific for Cu+ transport (and the isoelectric Ag+), but not for Cu2+ [13, 36, 37]. Consequently, they function in coordination with membrane metalloreductases that catalyze Cu2+ reduction to Cu+ before transport [38, 39]. The conserved features in CTR/COPT proteins include three transmembrane domains (TMDs), an amino-terminal region rich in methionine and/or histidine residues and an essential Mx3Mx12Gx3G signature motif embedded within TMD2 and TMD3 (Figure 1(a)). Genetic, biochemical, and structural data suggest that, in the first steps of Cu transport, extracellular methionine/histidine-rich motifs recruit Cu+ to the entrance of the pore and facilitate its subsequent translocation to a set of stacked methionine triads that provide a central Cu+-driving path from the external domain of the complex (Figure 1(b)). After passing through the pore, Cu+ would bind to the carboxy-terminal cysteine/histidine motifs facing the cytoplasm, which modulate Cu+-transport activity and delivery to membrane-associated metallochaperones for targeted distribution [4045]. This outlook paper focuses on our contribution to characterizing the function and regulation of the different members of the conserved CTR/COPT family of high-affinity Cu transporters in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana.

Figure 1: Conserved features in CTR/COPT family proteins. (a) CTR/COPT topology and conserved domains and motifs. The three TMDs are shown in blue. Green boxes represent extracellular methionine/histidine-rich motifs and red boxes indicate cytoplasmic cysteine/histidine motifs. (b) Representation of the assembly of CTR/COPT trimers in the membrane. The model highlights the role of methionines in the mechanism of copper transport. Only TMDs 1 and 2 have been represented for simplicity.

2. Contribution of Studies in Yeast to the Identification and Initial Characterization of Plant COPT High-Affinity Copper Transporters

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ctr1Δctr3Δ mutants lack high-affinity Cu acquisition systems at the plasma membrane and, consequently, display defects in Cu delivery to Cu-proteins, including cytochrome oxidase at the mitochondrial respiratory chain and multicopper ferroxidase Fet3 in the plasma membrane high-affinity iron (Fe) uptake system. Thus, yeast ctr1Δctr3Δ mutants display growth defects under both nonfermentable carbon sources (respiratory conditions) and Fe limitation. By functionally complementing the respiratory and low Fe defects exhibited by yeast ctr1Δctr3Δ mutants, we completed the identification of the COPT1–6 family of high-affinity Cu transporters in A. thaliana [6, 12, 13, 4648]. We observed that, with the exception of COPT4, the ectopic expression of all the Arabidopsis COPT family members expressed in yeast Cu transport mutants stimulates Cu uptake and accumulation [12, 13, 49]. Regarding yeast growth complementation, COPT1, COPT2, and COPT6 fully rescued the ctr1Δctr3Δ defect under nonfermentable and low Fe conditions, whereas the COPT3 and COPT5 effect was only partial [6, 12, 13, 48]. We observed that COPT4 expression, which does not possess the key methionine residues essential for Cu transport, including the MX3M motif, proves toxic to yeast cells [13]. Thus, the COPT4 potential function, if any, in plant Cu homeostasis remains to be elucidated. All together, these data suggest that, similarly to the CTR/COPT proteins in other organisms, Arabidopsis COPT family members are CTR-type proteins that utilize conserved methionine motifs for Cu transport.

3. Subcellular Localization and Copper Regulation of COPT Transporters in Arabidopsis

Budding yeast cells possess two Cu transport proteins at the plasma membrane (Ctr1 and Ctr3), whose expression is highly induced upon Cu deficiency in order to facilitate high-affinity Cu acquisition, and an intracellular Cu transporter (Ctr2), which mobilizes Cu from the vacuolar storage compartment when Cu is extremely scarce [50]. Recent studies by our and other research groups have shown that a similar division of functions occurs in Arabidopsis COPT proteins. Whereas fusions of COPT1, COPT2, and COPT6 to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) localize at the plasma membrane in plant cells, COPT5 is intracellularly localized [12, 4749, 5153] (Figure 2(a)). As indicated above, the Cu-regulated transcription factor SPL7 specifically activates the expression of COPT1, COPT2, and COPT6 genes in response to Cu deficiency, whereas no Cu regulation has been observed for COPT3 and COPT5 genes [9, 12, 13, 47] (Figure 2(b)).

Figure 2: Characterization of Arabidopsis COPT family members. (a) Subcellular localization in Arabidopsis protoplasts. COPT-GFP protein localization is indicated in green. (b) Transcript regulation in response to copper deficiency. (c) Expression pattern in flowers. (d) Expression pattern in roots and shoots. (e) Parameters affected in copt mutant lines upon copper scarcity. COPT3 and COPT4 have not been included due to the small amount of data currently available.

4. COPT1 Protein Constitutes the Major Arabidopsis Root Copper Acquisition System

Arabidopsis COPT1 was the first plant COPT family member to be identified [13, 46, 51, 54]. By fusing the COPT1 promoter region to the uidA gene, which encodes β-glucuronidase (GUS), we determined that COPT1 is expressed mostly in the root apex, cotyledons, stomata, trichomes, pollen grains, and embryos [54] (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). Consistently with its tissue and Cu-regulated expression, we determined that seedlings with low COPT1 transcript levels display a 50% decrease in root Cu acquisition, and consequently COPT1-defective plants displayed growth and pollen development defects when Cu availability was limited [54] (Figure 2(e)). It is noteworthy that we reverted these defects by Cu feeding, indicating that the Cu-transporting capacity of the COPT1 protein is crucial for soil Cu acquisition and pollen development when environmental Cu is scarce. By 64Cu uptake and metal competition experiments in yeast cells, we established that COPT1 is highly specific for Cu+ since its transport is only inhibited considerably by addition of excess Ag+, whereas only a minor effect is observed for other divalent metals [13]. Our results implied that, as previously described in other eukaryotic organisms, Arabidopsis root Cu uptake would also require cell surface Cu2+-reductases to function under Cu-deficient conditions. A recent study by Kramer’s group has shown that the mRNA levels of FRO4 and FRO5 Fe3+-reductases strongly increase in an SPL7-dependent manner in response to Cu deficiency [10]. More importantly, under low Cu conditions, plants that are defective in SPL7, FRO4, or FRO5 expression display markedly diminished root Cu2+-reductase activity, which leads to a drastic drop in Cu uptake at the root tips [10]. All these results strongly suggest that Cu2+ is first reduced by Cu2+-reductases FRO4 and FRO5, and then Cu+ is imported into plant roots by the COPT1 Cu+ transporter. Little is known about the proteins responsible for the remaining Arabidopsis root Cu uptake activity. We postulate that Arabidopsis COPT2, which is also highly expressed in roots, may constitute a secondary pathway for root Cu incorporation [47] (see below). In fact, we have observed that COPT1-defective plants upregulate COPT2 transcript levels, which can potentially relieve its defects in root Cu transport partially [54]. Since the Cu accumulation defect of the copt2 mutant plants is not marked [47] (see below), we seek to combine the effect of both COPT1 and COPT2 defects by analyzing Cu uptake in copt1copt2 double mutants. The sharp drop in Cu uptake at the root tip that the FRO4- and FRO5-defective plants exhibit does not mean that we can rule out that plant Cu acquisition can eventually occur at other places in the root by different families of metal transporters. For instance, Arabidopsis ZIP2 and ZIP4 transporters improve the growth defect in nonfermentable carbon sources of yeast cells that are defective in the high-affinity Cu uptake system at the plasma membrane, and their mRNA levels increase upon Cu limitation [55]. Comparing root Cu uptake and other phenotypes of single mutants to plants that are simultaneously defective in various Cu-regulated transporters will help to decipher their relative contribution to plant Cu acquisition.

5. Arabidopsis COPT2 Lies at the Intersection between Copper and Iron Homeostases

Among the COPT genes, COPT2 mRNA displays the most marked SPL7-dependent increase in response to Cu deficiency [9, 13, 47, 56]. By using transgenic Arabidopsis lines that express a fusion between COPT2 promoter and GUS reporter, we have determined that, under low Cu conditions, COPT2 is expressed mainly in roots, the vasculature of cotyledons and young leaves, apical meristems, and trichomes [47, 49] (Figure 2(d)). In reproductive tissues, COPT2 concentrates mostly in stigma, anthers, and pollen [47, 49] (Figure 2(c)). Similar results were obtained by Vatamaniuk’s group [47, 49]. Interestingly, our results show that, whereas COPT1 and COPT2 transcript expression patterns in shoots are similar, a notable difference is shown in roots. We observe that COPT1 is present exclusively in primary and secondary root tips, whereas COPT2 is absent from elongation and meristemic zones but is highly expressed in the root differentiation zone, lateral roots, and hair roots [13, 47] (Figure 2(b)). Despite the COPT2 expression in roots, its contribution to soil Cu acquisition seems minimum as compared to COPT1 [13, 47].

COPT2 transcript levels also rise in response to Fe deficiency [57, 58], although our results point that its tissue expression pattern differs from that observed under Cu-deficient conditions, and concentrates mostly in cotyledons [47]. Consistently with this predominant aerial expression, root transcription factor FIT1 is only partially responsible for COPT2 induction by Fe limitation [57]. A potential explanation for COPT2 mRNA induction by low Fe could be increasing cofactor availability for Cu-dependent enzymes such as Cu/Zn-SOD, which replaces Fe-SOD when Fe is scarce [17]. In fact, we have observed that wild-type, but not copt2, mutant plants increase Cu content in response to Fe deprivation [47, 58, 59]. Furthermore, ccs1 plants, which are defective in Cu delivery to Cu/Zn-SOD, display increased oxidative damage under Fe deficiency, suggesting a role for Cu in oxidative stress protection [58]. These observations indicate that Arabidopsis plants optimize Fe utilization by decreasing its use in Cu-replaceable functions and by prioritizing essential Fe-dependent processes.

Interestingly, we observed that simultaneous Cu and Fe deprivation leads to a further increased COPT2 mRNA expression, especially in roots [47, 58]. We did not find phenotypic differences between wild-type and copt2-defective plants under normal or Cu scarce conditions, whereas copt2 mutants exhibit better maintenance of the photosynthetic apparatus than wild-type seedlings under simultaneous Cu and Fe deficiencies [47]. Specifically, Arabidopsis copt2 seedlings display reduced leaf chlorosis, increased chlorophyll, and higher plastocyanin content under simultaneous low Cu and Fe, which leads to improved plant growth and seed production [47]. Although we have not fully elucidated the molecular basis underlying the copt2 mutant phenotype with both Fe and Cu defects, global gene expression analyses indicate a general effect of COPT2-mediated Cu transport in phosphate starvation signaling, which is highly connected to Fe homeostasis [47, 60].

As previously mentioned, high-affinity Fe uptake at the plasma membrane depends in S. cerevisiae on Fet3 ferroxidase, which uses Cu as an indispensable cofactor for its activity. Therefore, Cu deficiency leads to impaired Fe transport in yeast, and consequently to multiple Fe-related symptoms [61]. Likewise in green alga C. reinhardtii, multicopper ferroxidase FOX1 participates in cellular Fe acquisition [62]. In humans, inorganic Fe acquisition in the intestine is mediated by divalent metal transport denoted DMT1, which is independent of Cu, but Fe distribution depends directly on multicopper ferroxidases ceruloplasmin and hephaestin (reviewed in [63]). Root Fe acquisition in Arabidopsis plants mostly depends on IRT1, a member of the ZIP divalent metal transporter family that does not require Cu for its transport activity [6467]. Notwithstanding, in addition to ours, various studies have also linked Cu and Fe homeostases in plants. Severe Cu deficiency, achieved by growing Arabidopsis seedlings defective in SPL7 transcription factor (spl7-2 mutants) under low Cu conditions, leads to reduced root-to-shoot Fe translocation that activates various Fe deficiency responses, including an increased root surface Fe3+-reductase activity and higher IRT1 expression levels, and diminished shoot Fe-dependent enzyme catalase and lower aerial ferritin levels [10]. Interestingly, spl7-2 mutant plants also display severely reduced root ferroxidase activity when cultivated under Cu deficiency, suggesting that a multicopper ferroxidase may participate in root-to-shoot Fe translocation [10]. Furthermore, the spl7-2 phenotypic defects under Cu-deficient conditions, including chlorosis, are partially rescued by Fe supplementation [10]. We postulate that COPT2 could also be responsible for Cu delivery to multicopper oxidases LPR1 and LPR2, which are involved in the root growth responses to low phosphate [68]. In agreement with this hypothesis, we observe that the copt2 mutants display larger roots than wild-type seedlings and phosphate starvation diminishes COPT2 expression levels [47, 69]. Determining the function of plant Cu-proteins, including multicopper oxidases like ascorbate oxidases and laccases, will help our understanding of the connections of Cu to Fe homeostasis and phosphate metabolism.

6. The COPT6 Protein Facilitates Cu Distribution in Aerial Tissues

Although it was not initially annotated in the Arabidopsis genome, our analyses uncovered that At2g26975, denoted COPT6, was a novel member of the COPT family of high-affinity Cu transporters [6]. Unlike COPT1 and COPT2, our studies and those by Vatamaniuk’s group indicate that COPT6 is expressed mostly in shoots, especially in the vasculature of stems and leaves [12, 47] (Figure 2(d)). COPT6 can also be found in cotyledons, meristems, trichomes, and stomata [12, 47]. In flowers, COPT6 is present in sepals, petals, pistil, filaments of stamens, pollen, transmitting tissues of siliques, embryos, and seed envelopment [12, 47] (Figure 2(c)). COPT6 can also be detected in lateral roots, even at low levels, but not in the primary root or at the tip of secondary roots [12] (Figure 2(d)). Whereas aerial COPT6 transcript upregulation by Cu deficiency is fully dependent on SPL7, its regulation in roots seems to be partially independent of the SPL7 transcription factor [12]. We observed that contrary to COPT1 and COPT2, COPT6 expression is also present under Cu-sufficient conditions [48]. Our analyses of endogenous Cu levels have shown that the copt6 knock-out lines do not exhibit a significant defect in total Cu accumulation under either Cu-sufficient or Cu-deficient conditions. However, we observe that copt6 lines display a Cu distribution defect under low Cu conditions that leads to increased Cu levels in rosette leaves and reduced Cu in seeds [48]. We did not detect Cu distribution differences when the wild-type COPT6 gene was reintroduced into the copt6 mutant line or under Cu-sufficient conditions [48]. Thus, we conclude that COPT6 protein functions in Cu redistribution in shoots when Cu becomes limited, facilitating the transit of Cu from green tissues to reproductive organs.

7. The COPT5 Protein Mediates Cu Mobilization from Storage Sites

In addition to the COPT proteins involved in cellular Cu uptake at the plasma membrane, Arabidopsis also possesses COPT family members that function in intracellular Cu transport. By using Arabidopsis protoplasts, we have localized a functional COPT5-GFP fusion protein to prevacuolar compartments [52, 53]. By using COPT5 promoter fusion to GUS reporter, we determined that COPT5 is expressed mostly in the root vasculature, although it is also present at much lower levels in the apical meristems, trichomes, and vascular tissues of hypocotyls, cotyledons, and leaves [53] (Figure 2(d)). In reproductive organs of adult plants, we found COPT5 in pistils, ovules, filament of stamens, silique conducts, and embryos [53] (Figure 2(c)). Unlike the plasma membrane COPT proteins, COPT5 was not present in pollen [53]. Trentmann’s group has localized COPT5 to the vacuolar membrane [52, 53], and consistently they showed that plant cells lacking a functional COPT5 gene accumulate Cu in the vacuole [52]. At the systemic level, their copt5 knock-out plants do not show any alteration in total Cu levels but are defective in interorgan Cu distribution [52]. Whereas the roots of copt5 mutant seedlings accumulate Cu, siliques and seeds contain less Cu than wild-type plants [52]. Under severe Cu deficiency, we observed that copt5 plants exhibit reduced vegetative growth, impaired root elongation, chlorosis, and serious defects in photosynthetic transfer due to reduced plastocyanin accumulation [53] (Figure 2(e)). Despite COPT5 mRNA levels not being altered by environmental Cu availability, copt5 knock-out plants display major defects upon severe Cu limitation, suggesting that Cu levels may somehow regulate the COPT5 function in vacuolar Cu export either at a posttranscriptional level or through accessory proteins such as vacuolar Cu-reductase [52, 53]. Therefore, when Cu is abundant, Arabidopsis plants accumulate excess Cu in vacuoles, especially in roots. When Cu is scarce, the COPT5 transporter facilitates Cu mobilization from storage sites in roots to photosynthetic and reproductive tissues in shoots.

8. Overexpression of the COPT Proteins Uncovers a Connection between Copper and the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock

To further characterize COPT function in plants, we obtained Arabidopsis lines that expressed COPT1 and COPT3 genes under the control of the CaMV35S promoter. In both cases, COPT1- and COPT3-overexpressing seedlings accumulated more Cu than wild-type plants and, as indicated by root length assays, they are more sensitive to high Cu concentrations in the growth medium [12, 51]. Although overexpression in both yeast and Arabidopsis indicate that the COPT3 protein facilitates Cu transport, we have not yet deciphered its function in plant Cu homeostasis [13, 51]. We observed that when COPT-overexpressing plants are grown in soil, their overall size is substantially stunted and they display hyponastic leaves [48, 51]. The root tips of COPT1-overexpressing seedlings display membrane damage, increased Ca2+ influx and K+ efflux, and a drop in the basal peroxide levels, probably due to the Cu-dependent generation of hydroxyl radicals [70]. Interestingly, we showed that the COPT1- and COPT3-overexpressing lines exhibit phenotypes, such as differential flowering time and hypocotyl length, which are not displayed by those plants grown in high Cu environments but are reminiscent of plants with altered circadian rhythms [51]. We found that the expression of CCA1 and LHY, two MYB transcription factors that participate in the core of the Arabidopsis circadian clock, significantly lowers in COPT1- and COPT3-overexpressing plants, whose survival is compromised in the absence of environmental cycles [51]. Furthermore, addition of Cu to wild-type plants delays the phase and reduces amplitude, but not the period, of CCA1 and LHY gene expression oscillations [51]. Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that Cu influences the Arabidopsis circadian clock [51, 71].

9. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In the last few years, several studies have contributed to our current understanding of the function played by different members of the Arabidopsis COPT family of transporters in plant Cu homeostasis. We have performed yeast complementation assays, subcellular localization in plant cells, tissue-specific expression patterns, Cu regulation, and phenotypes associated with copt mutant plants concluding that each COPT transporter has developed specialized functions in plant Cu homeostasis, especially when Cu availability is low (Figure 2). For instance, COPT1 mediates root Cu acquisition, COPT6 facilitates Cu redistribution in shoots, COPT5 allows Cu mobilization from storage organelles, and COPT2 functions at the intersection between Cu and Fe homeostases. We have observed complex expression patterns and phenotypes associated with various copt mutants indicating that Cu plays a critical role in reproductive organs. We think that analyses of Arabidopsis plants simultaneously lacking various COPT genes are required to decipher the connection between these transporters and their overall relevance in plant Cu physiology. Furthermore, identifying the Cu-proteins directly responsible for the phenotypes observed and their biological function will prove to be of enormous help to understand plant Cu distribution and utilization. Finally, COPT studies have uncovered fascinating connections between Cu and other processes, including root development, Fe homeostasis, phosphate metabolism, and the circadian clock to be further explored.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The author is grateful to all members of the “Cu and Fe homeostasis group” at the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of the University of Valencia for their contribution to the findings described here. The author specially thanks Drs. Lola Peñarrubia and Antoni Garcia-Molina for critically reading this paper. The author also apologizes to the colleagues whose relevant work was not cited. Research in our laboratory is currently supported by the AGL2011-29099 grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.


  1. J. L. Burkhead, K. A. Gogolin Reynolds, S. E. Abdel-Ghany, C. M. Cohu, and M. Pilon, “Copper homeostasis,” New Phytologist, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 799–816, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Puig, N. Andrés-Colás, A. García-Molina, and L. Peñarrubia, “Copper and iron homeostasis in Arabidopsis: responses to metal deficiencies, interactions and biotechnological applications,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 271–290, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Yuan, S. Wang, Z. Chu, X. Li, and C. Xu, “The bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae overcomes rice defenses by regulating host copper redistribution,” Plant Cell, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 3164–3176, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Märschner, Mineral Nutrition in Higher Plants, Academic Press, London , UK, 2002.
  5. M. Pilon, C. M. Cohu, K. Ravet, S. E. Abdel-Ghany, and F. Gaymard, “Essential transition metal homeostasis in plants,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 347–357, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Peñarrubia, N. Andrés-Colás, J. Moreno, and S. Puig, “egulation of copper transport in Arabidopsis thaliana: a biochemical oscillator?” Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. K. Ravet and M. Pilon, “Copper and iron homeostasis in plants: the challenges of oxidative stress,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 919–932, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Kropat, S. Tottey, R. P. Birkenbihl, N. Depège, P. Huijser, and S. Merchant, “A regulator of nutritional copper signaling in Chlamydomonas is an SBP domain protein that recognizes the GTAC core of copper response element,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 51, pp. 18730–18735, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Yamasaki, M. Hayashi, M. Fukazawa, Y. Kobayashi, and T. Shikanai, “SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like7 is a central regulator for copper homeostasis in Arabidopsis,” Plant Cell, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 347–361, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Bernal, D. Casero, V. Singh et al., “Transcriptome sequencing identifies SPL7-regulated copper acquisition genes FRO4/FRO5 and the copper dependence of iron homeostasis in Arabidopsis,” Plant Cell, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 738–761, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. P. Birkenbihl, G. Jach, H. Saedler, and P. Huijser, “Functional dissection of the plant-specific SBP-domain: overlap of the DNA-binding and nuclear localization domains,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 352, no. 3, pp. 585–596, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Jung, S. R. Gayomba, M. A. Rutzke, E. Craft, L. V. Kochian, and O. K. Vatamaniuk, “COPT6 is a plasma membrane transporter that functions in copper homeostasis in Arabidopsis and is a novel target of SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein-like 7,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 40, pp. 33252–33267, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. V. Sancenón, S. Puig, H. Mira, D. J. Thiele, and L. Peñarrubia, “Identification of a copper transporter family in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 577–587, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Yamasaki, S. E. Abdel-Ghany, C. M. Cohu, Y. Kobayashi, T. Shikanai, and M. Pilon, “Regulation of copper homeostasis by micro-RNA in Arabidopsis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 22, pp. 16369–16378, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Sunkar, A. Kapoor, and J. K. Zhu, “Posttranscriptional induction of two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase genes in Arabidopsis is mediated by downregulation of miR398 and important for oxidative stress tolerance,” Plant Cell, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 2051–2065, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. E. Abdel-Ghany and M. Pilon, “MicroRNA-mediated systemic down-regulation of copper protein expression in response to low copper availability in Arabidopsis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 23, pp. 15932–15945, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. E. Abdel-Ghany, P. Müller-Moulé, K. K. Niyogi, M. Pilon, and T. Shikanai, “Two P-type ATPases are required for copper delivery in Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts,” Plant Cell, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1233–1251, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. M. Cohu and M. Pilon, “Regulation of superoxide dismutase expression by copper availability,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 747–755, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. E. Abdel-Ghany, J. L. Burkhead, K. A. Gogolin et al., “AtCCS is a functional homolog of the yeast copper chaperone Ccs1/Lys7,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 11, pp. 2307–2312, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Chu, W. Lee, W. Guo et al., “A copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase that confers three types of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase activity in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 425–436, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. M. Cohu, S. E. Abdel-Ghany, K. A. Gogolin Reynolds et al., “Copper delivery by the copper chaperone for chloroplast and cytosolic copper/zinc-superoxide dismutases: regulation and unexpected phenotypes in an arabidopsis mutant,” Molecular Plant, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1336–1350, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Huang, W. Kuo, C. Weiss, and T. Jinn, “Copper chaperone-dependent and -independent activation of three copper-zinc superoxide dismutase homologs localized in different cellular compartments in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 737–746, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Puig, H. Mira, E. Dorcey et al., “Higher plants possess two different types of ATX1-like copper chaperones,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 354, no. 2, pp. 385–390, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Mira, F. Martínez-García, and L. Peñarrubia, “Evidence for the plant-specific intercellular transport of the Arabidopsis copper chaperone CCH,” Plant Journal, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 521–528, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Hirayama, J. J. Kieber, N. Hirayama et al., “RESPONSIVE-TO-ANTAGONIST1, a Menkes/Wilson disease-related copper transporter, is required for ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis,” Cell, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 383–393, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. E. Woeste and J. J. Kieber, “A strong loss-of-function mutation in RAN1 results in constitutive activation of the ethylene response pathway as well as a rosette-lethal phenotype,” Plant Cell, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 443–455, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Shikanai, P. Müller-Moulé, Y. Munekage, K. K. Niyogi, and M. Pilon, “PAA1, a P-type ATPase of arabidopsis, functions in copper transport in chloroplasts,” Plant Cell, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1333–1346, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. W. Tapken, K. Ravet, and M. Pilon, “Plastocyanin controls the stabilization of the thylakoid Cu-transporting P-type ATPase PAA2/HMA8 in response to low copper in Arabidopsis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 22, pp. 18544–18550, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. Ravet, F. L. Danford, A. Dihle, M. Pittarello, and M. Pilon, “Spatiotemporal analysis of copper homeostasis in Populus trichocarpa reveals an integrated molecular remodeling for a preferential allocation of copper to plastocyanin in the chloroplasts of developing leaves,” Plant Physiology, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 1300–1312, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Puig and D. J. Thiele, “Molecular mechanisms of copper uptake and distribution,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. D. Page, J. Kropat, P. P. Hamel, and S. S. Merchant, “Two Chlamydomonas CTR copper transporters with a novel cys-met motif are localized to the plasma membrane and function in copper assimilation,” Plant Cell, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 928–943, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. Balamurugan and W. Schaffner, “Copper homeostasis in eukaryotes: teetering on a tightrope,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1763, no. 7, pp. 737–746, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Nevitt, H. Öhrvik, and D. J. Thiele, “Charting the travels of copper in eukaryotes from yeast to mammals,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1823, no. 9, pp. 1580–1593, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. R. Pope, A. G. Flores, J. H. Kaplan, and V. M. Unger, “Structure and function of copper uptake transporters,” Current Topics in Membranes, vol. 69, pp. 97–112, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. E. Blaby-Haas and S. S. Merchant, “The ins and outs of algal metal transport,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1823, no. 9, pp. 1531–1552, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. Lee, M. M. O. Peña, Y. Nose, and D. J. Thiele, “Biochemical characterization of the human copper transporter Ctr1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 6, pp. 4380–4387, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Bertinato, L. Cheung, R. Hoque, and L. J. Plouffe, “Ctr1 transports silver into mammalian cells,” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 178–184, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Hassett and D. J. Kosman, “Evidence for Cu(II) reduction as a component of copper uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 1, pp. 128–134, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. Georgatsou, L. A. Mavrogiannis, G. S. Fragiadakis, and D. Alexandraki, “The yeast Fre1p/Fre2p cupric reductases facilitate copper uptake and are regulated by the copper-modulated Mac1p activator,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 21, pp. 13786–13792, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Puig, J. Lee, M. Lau, and D. J. Thiele, “Biochemical and genetic analyses of yeast and human high affinity copper transporters suggest a conserved mechanism for copper uptake,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 29, pp. 26021–26030, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. F. Eisses and J. H. Kaplan, “Molecular characterization of hCTR1, the human copper uptake protein.,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 32, pp. 29162–29171, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. E. M. Klomp, J. A. Juijn, L. T. M. Van Der Gun, I. E. T. Van Den Berg, R. Berger, and L. W. J. Klomp, “The N-terminus of the human copper transporter 1 (hCTR1) is localized extracellularly, and interacts with itself,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 370, part 3, pp. 881–889, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. J. de Feo, S. G. Aller, G. S. Siluvai, N. J. Blackburn, and V. M. Unger, “Three-dimensional structure of the human copper transporter hCTR1,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 4237–4242, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. G. Aller and V. M. Unger, “Projection structure of the human copper transporter CTR1 at 6-Å resolution reveals a compact trimer with a novel channel-like architecture,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 3627–3632, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. G. Aller, E. T. Eng, C. J. De Feo, and V. M. Unger, “Eukaryotic CTR copper uptake transporters require two faces of the third transmembrane domain for helix packing, oligomerization, and function,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 51, pp. 53435–53441, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. K. Kampfenkel, S. Kushnir, E. Babiychuk, D. Inze, and M. van Montagu, “Molecular characterization of a putative Arabidopsis thaliana copper transporter and its yeast homologue,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 47, pp. 28479–28486, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. Perea-Garcia, A. Garcia-Molina, N. Andrés-Colás et al., “Arabidopsis copper transport protein COPT2 participates in the cross talk between iron deficiency responses and low-phosphate signaling,” Plant Physiology, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 180–194, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. A. Garcia-Molina, N. Andrés-Colás, A. Perea-García et al., “The arabidopsis COPT6 transport protein functions in copper distribution under copper-deficient conditions,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1378–1390, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. R. Gayomba, H. Jung, J. Yan et al., “The CTR/COPT-dependent copper uptake and SPL7-dependent copper deficiency responses are required for basal cadmium tolerance in A. thaliana,” Metallomics, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1262–1275, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. E. M. Rees, J. Lee, and D. J. Thiele, “Mobilization of intracellular copper stores by the Ctr2 vacuolar copper transporter,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 52, pp. 54221–54229, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. N. Andrés-Colás, A. Perea-García, S. Puig, and L. Peñarrubia, “Deregulated copper transport affects Arabidopsis development especially in the absence of environmental cycles,” Plant Physiology, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 170–184, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. Klaumann, S. D. Nickolaus, S. H. Fürst et al., “The tonoplast copper transporter COPT5 acts as an exporter and is required for interorgan allocation of copper in Arabidopsis thaliana,” New Phytologist, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 393–404, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Garcia-Molina, N. Andrés-Colás, A. Perea-García, S. Del Valle-Tascõn, L. Peñarrubia, and S. Puig, “The intracellular arabidopsis COPT5 transport protein is required for photosynthetic electron transport under severe copper deficiency,” Plant Journal, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 848–860, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. V. Sancenón, S. Puig, I. Mateu-Andrés, E. Dorcey, D. J. Thiele, and L. Peñarrubia, “The Arabidopsis copper transporter COPT1 functions in root elongation and pollen development,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 15, pp. 15348–15355, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. H. Wintz, T. Fox, Y. Wu et al., “xpression profiles of Arabidopsis thaliana in mineral deficiencies reveal novel transporters involved in metal homeostasis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 48, pp. 47644–47653, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. T. del Pozo, V. Cambiazo, and M. González, “Gene expression profiling analysis of copper homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 393, no. 2, pp. 248–252, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. P. Colangelo and M. L. Guerinot, “The essential basic helix-loop-helix protein FIT1 is required for the iron deficiency response,” Plant Cell, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 3400–3412, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. B. M. Waters, S. A. McInturf, and R. J. Stein, “Rosette iron deficiency transcript and microRNA profiling reveals links between copper and iron homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 63, no. 16, pp. 5903–5918, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. B. M. Waters and L. C. Armbrust, “Optimal copper supply is required for normal plant iron deficiency responses,” Plant Signaling & Behavior, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e26611, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. J. T. Ward, B. Lahner, E. Yakubova, D. E. Salt, and K. G. Raghothama, “The effect of iron on the primary root elongation of Arabidopsis during phosphate deficiency,” Plant Physiology, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 1181–1191, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. Askwith, D. Eide, A. Van Ho et al., “The FET3 gene of S. cerevisiae encodes a multicopper oxidase required for ferrous iron uptake,” Cell, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 403–410, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. La Fontaine, J. M. Quinn, S. S. Nakamoto et al., “Copper-dependent iron assimilation pathway in the model photosynthetic eukaryote Chlamydomonas reinhardtii,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 736–757, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. N. E. Hellman and J. D. Gitlin, “Ceruloplasmin metabolism and function,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 22, pp. 439–458, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. E. L. Connolly, J. P. Fett, and M. L. Guerinot, “Expression of the IRT1 metal transporter is controlled by metals at the levels of transcript and protein accumulation,” Plant Cell, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1347–1357, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. R. Henriques, J. Jásik, M. Klein et al., “Knock-out of Arabidopsis metal transporter gene IRT1 results in iron deficiency accompanied by cell differentiation defects,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 50, no. 4-5, pp. 587–597, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. C. Varotto, D. Maiwald, P. Pesaresi, P. Jahns, F. Salamini, and D. Leister, “The metal ion transporter IRT1 is necessary for iron homeostasis and efficient photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Plant Journal, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 589–599, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. G. Vert, N. Grotz, F. Dédaldéchamp et al., “IRT1, an Arabidopsis transporter essential for iron uptake from the soil and for plant growth,” Plant Cell, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1223–1233, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. Svistoonoff, A. Creff, M. Reymond et al., “Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root architecture,” Nature Genetics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 792–796, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Thibaud, J. Arrighi, V. Bayle et al., “Dissection of local and systemic transcriptional responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis,” Plant Journal, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 775–789, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. A. Rodrigo-Moreno, N. Andrés-Colás, C. Poschenrieder, B. Gunsé, L. Peñarrubia, and S. Shabala, “Calcium- and potassium-permeable plasma membrane transporters are activated by copper in Arabidopsis root tips: linking copper transport with cytosolic hydroxyl radical production,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 844–855, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. Perea-Garcia, N. Andres-Colas, and L. Peñarrubia, “Copper homeostasis influences the circadian clock in Arabidopsis,” Plant Signaling & Behavior, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1237–1240, 2010. View at Google Scholar