Comparison of Two Mechanics-Based Methods for Simplified Structural Analysis in Vulnerability Assessment

<table>Comparison of pushover analyses for seismically
designed building, <svg height="10.9125" id="M67" style="vertical-align:-0.17555pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 33.8125 10.9125" width="33.8125" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,10.9125)">
<g transform="translate(72,-63.27)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑐</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="8.6520758" y="0">=</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="20.692465" y="0">0</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>%, (a) original period-height relationship in DBELA (b)
modified period-height relationship in DBELA. </table>

Advances in Civil Engineering

fig6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Comparison of Two Mechanics-Based Methods for Simplified Structural Analysis in Vulnerability Assessment 